Author Topic: Kim_KK - Birmingham  (Read 2565 times)


27 review(s) for Kim_KK (14 positive, 8 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
27 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 8472941) (14 positive, 8 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline mudsucker

External Link/Members Only

4th visit to the cute little Rom who is fast becoming my fave. £60 for h/h including OWO and anal. If you’re after a brilliant conversation, you’ll be disappointed. She does what she says on the tin with no frills but I’m good with that. Comms by text, buzzed in at agreed time. Made it through the 2nd tricky inner door. She was dressed to please, chubbier than photos but attractive enough. My main reason I like Kim so much is her BJ skills. Love the head and hand technique! Anal was agreed and delivered with enthusiasm. She took it well and never had any hygiene issues. Finished with a BJ and CIM. As I was ‘completing’ she continued to gently wank me off into her mouth until I was well and truly done. And I love this little technique. She spits into a set of wipes and off I trot.

Don’t expect PSE, dirty talk etc. Expect to get what you ask for with no complaints. Could hear someone else rattling around in the flat and having a shower at one point. Didn’t bother me. Never been disturbed by anyone before during previous visits. The layout of the block is a bit weird and I’ve ended up in front of the wrong flat EVERY time I’ve visited. Same again on the way back to the lift! Damn you 1960s high rise architecture.

I’ll be back at some point no doubt.



Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Reviews are appreciated but this is your third of the same girl in eight months. You might want to have a little think before pressing the review button again.

Quote
4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months (for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months) after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

Offline mudsucker


Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
My God, are you for real?!

I've offered you some advice about repeat reviews, take it or not.

Offline alibirmingham

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,655
  • Likes: 31
  •  
  • Reviews: 179
Site rules regarding repeat reviews

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

This is only advice just as Gingernuts has already pointed out. But past 3 reviews in succesion have been of the same WG. You dont need to post a review of a WG every time you see her otherwise the forum would be filled of repeat punter reviews and just clog up the boards. Can you imagine if we all did what your doing? Yeah, we may all have hundreds of reviews to our names but the site would be a total mess. If you want to review her every time then i would say leave her AW reviews instead. Im sure she would love that.

And just to clarify i do feel 3 reviews on the trot of the same WG is touting. It can be seen as an atempt to increase the WGS review count on the site, as well as push business towards her.

I always understood it as a repeat review of a WG should contain new and useful info like a rating change, bad attitude or something of that nature. But also keeping in mind if that same info would be better mentioned in a new thread on the regional discussion board.

This is all friendly advice so take it or leave it, your call.

Offline shed

My God, are you for real?!

Just accept the rules and move on. Its so easy :unknown:

Offline Colston36

Just accept the rules and move on. Its so easy :unknown:

I must say that at £100 she seems amazing value.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 11:24:58 pm by Colston36 »

Offline Kerosene

I will add that when I saw her, despite there being no conversation, there was also nothing on in the background. Given that her flat is on a main road running through the centre of Birmingham, the background was the noise of traffic. Now that there's the CAZ in place there's an even greater chance of punting in absolute silence.