Site rules regarding repeat reviews
4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
This is only advice just as Gingernuts has already pointed out. But past 3 reviews in succesion have been of the same WG. You dont need to post a review of a WG every time you see her otherwise the forum would be filled of repeat punter reviews and just clog up the boards. Can you imagine if we all did what your doing? Yeah, we may all have hundreds of reviews to our names but the site would be a total mess. If you want to review her every time then i would say leave her AW reviews instead. Im sure she would love that.
And just to clarify i do feel 3 reviews on the trot of the same WG is touting. It can be seen as an atempt to increase the WGS review count on the site, as well as push business towards her.
I always understood it as a repeat review of a WG should contain new and useful info like a rating change, bad attitude or something of that nature. But also keeping in mind if that same info would be better mentioned in a new thread on the regional discussion board.
This is all friendly advice so take it or leave it, your call.