Barbarossa -- Diva Escorts, Knightsbridge

[User176]

External Link/Members Only

One-hour incall for £300

Fast and efficient comms with Diva as usual.

Location: Studio flat next to Harrods that shares its bathroom with another studio, occupied by another WG. Somewhat of an inconvenience having to move clothes from the bathroom to the bedroom.

The WG: Short, blonde Swedish girl. She has quite a number of tattoos, but nothing too distasteful IMO. Pictures are accurate. Medium-sized natural rack. Lip fillers. Fluent English. Friendly attitude. Age is around 20; she is new to escorting.

Services: Started with DFK (good), then a fair amount of OWO, which started off rather mechanical but slowly improved over time. Varied tongue action, some ball play. Then CG, which was average.

Mid positive.

[Momodan38]

Cheers for the review 

Had my eye on her.

[JackSaint]

Cheers for the review 

Had my eye on her.

Me too, but this review hasn't got me rushing to book, thanks OP.

[mbyrnes]

Agreed - sounds a bit rubbish

[flamingice]

Me too, but this review hasn't got me rushing to book, thanks OP.

+1

[Steely Dan]

Thanks for the review.

Would you go back at £300/hr? It seems you could have a MFF for the same price.  Don't see what in this review makes her worth 2 escorts.

[User176]

Thanks for the review.

Would you go back at £300/hr? It seems you could have a MFF for the same price.  Don't see what in this review makes her worth 2 escorts.

Honestly, probably not. Maybe at 200/250

[Steely Dan]

Honestly, probably not. Maybe at 200/250

So a pretty weak positive.  Note the consensus on the puntingwiki.  Not a rule, just what many members here think:
External Link/Members Only

Give a positive rating if you want to unequivocally recommend the provider to other punters. If you would repeat the punt as it was, or plan to revisit, you should probably give a positive rating. Note B&S bookings should not be recorded as a positive rating against original profile, even if you had a good experience. (If you would not repeat based on the girl/experience - not because you just never repeat - then rate neutral or negative.)

Not hearing an unequivocal reco.  Not hearing you would repeat at this price ('probably not').  Sounds like a neutral.  Why are punters afraid of using this score?  It is the least popular score.  Poor misunderstood neutral ..... 

[Alexmck]

So a pretty weak positive.  Note the consensus on the puntingwiki.  Not a rule, just what many members here think:
External Link/Members Only
Not hearing an unequivocal reco.  Not hearing you would repeat at this price ('probably not').  Sounds like a neutral.  Why are punters afraid of using this score?  It is the least popular score.  Poor misunderstood neutral .....

Am guilty of this. Will probably be more neutrals in the future - didn't see the 'unequivocal'