Author Topic: Palomaxx - Birmingham  (Read 3337 times)


60 review(s) for Palomaxx (47 positive, 7 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline samsung1

Seen her a few times at her JQ base, nice location but shabby/ messy room and layout.

I get shes busy but communications are terrible with her even with advance notice/ bookings.

The first time I seen her was good, got on and enjoyed my time with her, afterwards seems to mess about with timings and seems to have a rollercoaster mood never know what you could expext. Was saying she was tired and had bad experience with previous client, if you are tired please take a break and stop accepting bookings.

2nd and 3rd meet was machinical and she seemed moody on both occasions, when it came to the deed she kept huffing and puffing which put me off entireley.

Im not a model myself but, looks wise facially she is average next door type, slim body good ass with small boobs.

Was hoping she could be a regular but dont think I would see her again due to timewasting and being too busy.
External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 12, 2021, 12:54:45 am by samsung1 »

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
Did you ask if bontempo had been in touch?
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
Look. Working out in the gym.

Hidden Image/Members Only

"Dirty men always leering at me doing my pulls":

Hidden Image/Members Only

Would love to see her and chardonnay in a mma fight. Winner takes on lillith noir.

« Last Edit: September 12, 2021, 01:11:46 am by Straightsix »
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Joball87

Seen her a few times at her JQ base, nice location but shabby/ messy room and layout.

I get shes busy but communications are terrible with her even with advance notice/ bookings.

The first time I seen her was good, got on and enjoyed my time with her, afterwards seems to mess about with timings and seems to have a rollercoaster mood never know what you could expext. Was saying she was tired and had bad experience with previous client, if you are tired please take a break and stop accepting bookings.

2nd and 3rd meet was machinical and she seemed moody on both occasions, when it came to the deed she kept huffing and puffing which put me off entireley.

Im not a model myself but, looks wise facially she is average next door type, slim body good ass with small boobs.

Was hoping she could be a regular but dont think I would see her again due to timewasting and being too busy.
External Link/Members Only

Sorry to hear as I thought she was great at my first meet (review a bit later for discretion) - also had her as a new very regular candidate. I've noticed so many SPs just dont care anymore, are shit with comms and treat regs no different to new clients. As a reg i don't expect stuff like freebies or anything else but just a bit more honesty. If SP has had a bad day i would much rather they cancel me vs give crap service and grab the cash. Sadly it's a sellers market and they know it, but this is a short term strategy. Oddly they will probs have more bad clients if they keep putting off regs who they know warts or otherwise.Hopefully just a one off for Paloma.

Offline guymids-72

Need to leave my review, was just waiting a few weeks.
Mine will be a weak positive. FAF it just seems a bit mechanical and lacking any connection

Offline CrashingSea

Been planning to see her but not so sure now. I'm not paying those prices for huffing and puffing like the big bad wolf :dash:

Offline alabama1

I have only seen her the once, (almost a year ago now, reviewed). I enjoyed the meet, and vowed to return, but never have. Over the last 12 months i have since seen girls of similar price or cheaper, that i have enjoyed more. Thanks for the review.  :hi:

Offline Cryton123

I have only seen her the once, (almost a year ago now, reviewed). I enjoyed the meet, and vowed to return, but never have. Over the last 12 months i have since seen girls of similar price or cheaper, that i have enjoyed more. Thanks for the review.  :hi:

Exactly the same as me. Saw her, enjoyed it but never had the desire to return  :unknown:

Offline Diggingdeep

Exactly the same as me. Saw her, enjoyed it but never had the desire to return  :unknown:

Likewise - reviewed from my only visit earlier in year, haven’t been back and don’t feel any inclination to

Offline Steve1961

With that kind of attitude and lack of a quality gfe she isn't getting my hard earned.
Although huffing and puffing could be a free add on to the gym  :lol: :lol:

Offline Steve1961

*gym* = *gfe* damned autocorrect  :dash:

Offline Hothandle

I have only seen her the once, (almost a year ago now, reviewed). I enjoyed the meet, and vowed to return, but never have. Over the last 12 months i have since seen girls of similar price or cheaper, that i have enjoyed more. Thanks for the review.  :hi:
I think this post (in a way) pretty much sums up Punting…
The ladies are ticking (or not) so many subliminal boxes. It’s such a personal/horses for courses experience, reading between the lines on reviews is the best approach..


Offline Cheltclient

Quite interesting to see guys who have seen her once, enjoyed it, but not been inclined to go back.

My one meet with her was an easy positive - I thought she was gorgeous - but I’ve also not been back. I’ve been really wanting a booking for at least a month but not found anyone suitable. On a few occasions I’ve been in Brum and Paloma has been ‘Available’ but not considered booking. Upon reflection, she’s not the friendliest. She wasn’t rude or tired with me but there was a vibe of going through the motions. As a one off I still enjoyed myself, like I say I think she’s gorgeous, but just not been inclined to go back either. Does sound like it’s a roll of the dice to see what mood she’s in.

Offline Dock

Have seen her twice myself as well and both times I’ve had a good time, she’s exactly the type of body I like (great ass), but as I’ve seen her a couple of times I’m happy to keep as a plan B.

Comms wise I’m finding a lot of SP’s are piss poor

Offline Joball87

It must be f hard for even the best SP to be 100% all the time, they aren't robots - i always cut them a bit of slack there, either indy (it's their biz entirely) or agency (maximise utilisation, usually). But the increasingly flakey comms thing is getting annoying ! Still reckon that Paloma is one of the much better ones overall in these times.

Offline Steve1961

Interesting point. However as a customer focused business, there is no excuse for being rude or obnoxious to your clients. Equally it goes both ways. Civility and good manners cost nothing.

Offline guymids-72

Interesting point. However as a customer focused business, there is no excuse for being rude or obnoxious to your clients. Equally it goes both ways. Civility and good manners cost nothing.

Well said and sensible if you are trying to build up a stable client base


Offline Joball87

Interesting point. However as a customer focused business, there is no excuse for being rude or obnoxious to your clients. Equally it goes both ways. Civility and good manners cost nothing.

I couldn't agree more. My observation of late is that many SPs can only see sky high demand and are not focused on client retention - a dangerous approach but i can't see any end to it at the moment.

Offline Cheltclient

I couldn't agree more. My observation of late is that many SPs can only see sky high demand and are not focused on client retention - a dangerous approach but i can't see any end to it at the moment.

I do wonder whether the lack of girls impacts this. Perhaps people are finding it easier than me but I’m really struggling to find options these days. Once upon a time I’d get the horn, search on AW and have 4 or 5 English options to choose from. Nowadays - there may be one or two but often I research on here and they’re no-go’s. If the competition is diminishing, I think a half decent English girl will get business regardless of how friendly they are. And if you’re a hottie like this SP, I doubt the phone will go dusty. If you’re going to get the service regardless, it’s bound to show in the level of your enthusiasm .

Should point out I enjoyed Paloma. I just suspect that as she’s not overly friendly, that’s why i prob haven’t gone back. And with some of the observations on here (a lot from the SP herself before the banning) I do think if you caught her in a mood, it would show in the service.

Offline Dock

I think SP quality isn’t great at the moment and the choices for real top quality is few and far between, add to that the fact when you are fortune enough to find a SP you like the comms is the worst

Offline Cheltclient

I think SP quality isn’t great at the moment and the choices for real top quality is few and far between, add to that the fact when you are fortune enough to find a SP you like the comms is the worst

I depressingly agree. Arranging a meet is so hard at the moment. And comms have def got a lot worse. Maybe punters are far outnumbering escorts, to the extent SP’s don’t have to try so hard.

Anyhow, apologies for going a bit off topic. Might have a threesome lined up for next week (not sure as yes, comms are slow and crap). So hopefully will have a new review to submit soon :)

Offline samsung1

It must be f hard for even the best SP to be 100% all the time, they aren't robots - i always cut them a bit of slack there, either indy (it's their biz entirely) or agency (maximise utilisation, usually). But the increasingly flakey comms thing is getting annoying ! Still reckon that Paloma is one of the much better ones overall in these times.

Yes I agree, 2nd time i gave her the benefit of doubt however on the 3rd time she was still the same. I suspect shes just trying to see as many customers a day.

Offline Cryton123

Arranging a meet is so hard at the moment. And comms have def got a lot worse. Maybe punters are far outnumbering escorts, to the extent SP’s don’t have to try so hard.

One of my regulars (who doesn’t work all the time) often shows me her work phone when I see her. Trust me, some girls are absolutely bombarded with txs from the moment they switch it on. The amount of messages she can get in an hour is ridiculous, it would be a full time job just answering them. Then she has to weed out the time wasters and idiots. She also lets me read some of them, and my God the shit she sometimes receives is comical!

Anyway my point is, I think the punters do outnumber the girls by some margin from what I’ve seen. And as frustrating as it is I don’t take it too personally anymore if a WG doesn’t answer my txs. Seeing it from the other side gives you a new perspective of things  :hi:

Offline Joball87

One of my regulars (who doesn’t work all the time) often shows me her work phone when I see her. Trust me, some girls are absolutely bombarded with txs from the moment they switch it on. The amount of messages she can get in an hour is ridiculous, it would be a full time job just answering them. Then she has to weed out the time wasters and idiots. She also lets me read some of them, and my God the shit she sometimes receives is comical!

Anyway my point is, I think the punters do outnumber the girls by some margin from what I’ve seen. And as frustrating as it is I don’t take it too personally anymore if a WG doesn’t answer my txs. Seeing it from the other side gives you a new perspective of things  :hi:

Agree with this, frustrating but just the way it is. I still think if WGs have genuine regs, and i mean once a month or more rather than once a year, and the comms to these are better it should help them manage some of the text dross as they should have a decent enough baseline of reliable bookings. I am probably mad but have even suggested offering a modest "membership retainer" to some SPs to try and get bumped up the priority queue but no takers yet!

Offline alabama1

Agree with this, frustrating but just the way it is. I still think if WGs have genuine regs, and i mean once a month or more rather than once a year, and the comms to these are better it should help them manage some of the text dross as they should have a decent enough baseline of reliable bookings. I am probably mad but have even suggested offering a modest "membership retainer" to some SPs to try and get bumped up the priority queue but no takers yet!

Oh FFS !  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Offline Joball87

I was at least half joking on the retainer idea lol - not quite that desparate!!

Offline alabama1

I was at least half joking on the retainer idea lol - not quite that desparate!!

No you fucking wasn't !

Offline PunterNumber69

Oh FFS !  :dash: :dash: :dash:
Maybe we could have membership cards Fuckbuster instead of Blockbuster?

Offline Joball87

The fact the one i asked as a "joke" didn't even take up the idea was telling - they just can't be arsed with any more admin as demand is so high

Offline alabama1

The fact the one i asked as a "joke" didn't even take up the idea was telling - they just can't be arsed with any more admin as demand is so high
Stop backpedalling  :thumbsdown:

Offline Joball87

Lol - my spade is now back in the shed and the hole is deep enough.

Offline Punterperson1971

Stop backpedalling  :thumbsdown:
Think you better get it back out and keep digging your self that hole :dash: :dash:


Offline Joball87

It's all cool. Alabama introduced a welcome reality check in these mad times!

Offline Brumish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,776
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 11
The fact the one i asked as a "joke" didn't even take up the idea was telling - they just can't be arsed with any more admin as demand is so high

Years ago, there were a few agency that did a regulars card. I'm not entirely sure how they managed it but I never produced the card. As I was such a regular the madam eventually decided to always charge me 80 Instead of 100 for the hour. Think it was collect so many and you get a freebie. Didn't fancy carrying a card around in my wallet
« Last Edit: September 14, 2021, 08:54:41 am by Brumish »
Banned reason: Last review 2020 lucky not banned for arranging social meets / telegraph group
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline thecretin

Oh FFS !  :dash: :dash: :dash:

If i found the ideal girl and the only way to secure an appointment was to pay a retainer / membership / higher fee then i would have no hesitation in doing it. I have barfined some of the hottest girls in Pattaya Walking St gogos purely by paying over the odds. I would have no issue doing the same thing here.

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
If i found the ideal girl and the only way to secure an appointment was to pay a retainer / membership / higher fee then i would have no hesitation in doing it. I have barfined some of the hottest girls in Pattaya Walking St gogos purely by paying over the odds. I would have no issue doing the same thing here.

Checks username...

Offline alabama1

Checks username...
:lol: Seriously though, it's soul destroying when you get fellow members coming up with these insane suggestions. It comes to something when some punters will pay money to a wg, to get himself elevated up the pecking order. Talk about shooting ourselves in the foot.  :dash:

Offline thecretin

:lol: Seriously though, it's soul destroying when you get fellow members coming up with these insane suggestions. It comes to something when some punters will pay money to a wg, to get himself elevated up the pecking order. Talk about shooting ourselves in the foot.  :dash:

 There seems to be no shortage of guys wanting to see the likes of Lillith or Gorgeous Vicky at £100 for 30 minutes, prices are getting out of hand but guys are continuing to pay them so it seems that we have already shot ourselves in the foot.

Offline alabama1

There seems to be no shortage of guys wanting to see the likes of Lillith or Gorgeous Vicky at £100 for 30 minutes, prices are getting out of hand but guys are continuing to pay them so it seems that we have already shot ourselves in the foot.
The difference with you mate is that you want to pay money and not see them

Offline thecretin

The difference with you mate is that you want to pay money and not see them

The membership fee or whatever you call it would give me priority so of course i would see them, why else would you pay the extra fee?

Offline Steve1961

Some people have more money than sense. The membership approach depends on take up. I don't believe that the sensible ones would bother with this (and I assume that is the majority) and it will fizzle out. Ffs how many SPs are there, how many would promote this ide :dash: :dash: :dash:a, and how much would it cost a punter? A stupid idea if ever there was one.
Next thing that Cretin will be advocating is paying deposits in advance.

Offline PunterNumber69


Offline Joball87

Should close down this thread as it was supposed to be for Paloma!

Anyway hands-up apologies for starting the topic diversion - was more out of frustration. I have a manic schedule and just don't have the time to hustle and wait for responses all the time - for me personally, as much as it grates against all logic, if paying a small fee for some select SpS/agencies only meant i had a more stress free diary then i would do it. My time is precious and valuable too. Sorry again guys.