Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Can someone be that stupid, that you don't want to shag them?  (Read 6533 times)

Offline Angel.LBB

To be honest the same is true of punters,  I very rarely meet punters who post on forums and those that do are certainly not representative of the average punter.  Most punters are too busy with work, their families, hobbies and have full lives. 

I don't understand how some of you guys manage to spend to so much time posting on here, or why you would even want to in the first place.  Especially when the main motivation appears to be to slag prostitutes off all the time. Some of the behaviour on here seems very unhealthy to a point of being obsessed.

Recently I've spent a lot of time in parlours setting up the new SAFE NW project that we are running up here and I would categorically say that the above is very representative of how a number of non posters look at the internet.

I know that we get about 1200 members per day but we get 2000 individual "guests" who only use our site to look at the reports and the offers. You ask some of the non-posters about forums and they think that some of the people that use them are freaks  :scare: :scare:

I've made an effort to target the "normal" punters rather than the big "interesting" posters because thats what we thought would work best with what we wanted to do and they aren't interested in some of the "look at me" type posts anyway. The results of trying to make people be the same on the internet as they would be in real life persona wise has been that a huge number of people post who never had before or do anywhere else.

Offline Wayang

I don't understand how some of you guys manage to spend to so much time posting on here, or why you would even want to in the first place.  Especially when the main motivation appears to be to slag prostitutes off all the time. Some of the behaviour on here seems very unhealthy to a point of being obsessed.

Deserves to be read by many posters here.
The forum has losts its concept of 'sharing information' and been hijacked by a few who delight in identifying doubtful ads by WGs and slagging them off.
It is one thing to point out the foibles and failures of many AW posts (and it seems effective in having them removed) but it is totally different to the develop from the specific to the general and to slag WGs as a group.
Reading some posts makes me wonder why some who post on here do any punting - they have such a low opinion of WGs.

Online NIK

The problem is that the Pro$$ies that post on the internet are not representative of the Pro$$ies that guys book and see and enjoy, the majority of the Pro$$ies that post on forums are the older / out of condition / hard faced ones that have dusty phones and use the net to fill their endless hours waiting for a client to call.

The young / fit ones are either to busy or doing something else with their downtime, like shopping, partying etc.

Of course you will get the odd cute one post something but they tend not to be regular contributors to any forum (regardless of ethos) as they can't be bothered .
Spot on. :cool:
Many members might disagree with James, but so often he hits the nail on the head as here.

Offline Angel.LBB

Are you really saying that there aren't that many young fit WG's on any forums Nik ?

And equally do you think the big posters that dominate forums are reflective of your average punter ???

Offline Simple

Mind you, your average punter is not that clever, or there would not be a post dedicated to outing fake profiles on AW.

what you can't hack is that a large percentage of punters are as thick as *******.
Oh jeez, seriously why are you even here on a punters board if your opinion on punters is clearly so low and you think we're a bunch of big thicks, will no other punting related board have you or something so you hang around here continually making negative comments about punters (or even men in general). I don't wanna speak for others, but I think if you did actually leave you'd be missed about as much as a case of genital herpes by most...

Reading some posts makes me wonder why some who post on here do any punting - they have such a low opinion of WGs.
I also wonder why some people punt when they seem to have nothing, but negativity regarding punting and/or very low opinions of prossies. Even with fluffies that are delusional or pathetic enough to believe the sun shines out of the arse of any and every prossie and so on, are deriving some sort of enjoyment as opposed to those punters that appear quite jaded (happens to punters as well as prossies), IMO probably only enjoy moaning on and on about prossies and the like...

For those that seem to find almost nothing positive at all within punting I would suggest considering another less expensive hobby and for one particular so-called punter with only horrid things to say I would strongly suggest as a hobby cordless bungee jumping to try at less once...

Offline Mr XL

Obviously it isn't a rule, but generally you don't get to earn the kind of money you need (legally) to be able to spend £150 an hour on sex if you are thick.

I've known a lot of ordinary people on ordinary incomes spend extraordinary amounts on their chosen hobby.

Offline Angel.LBB

I've known a lot of ordinary people on ordinary incomes spend extraordinary amounts on their chosen hobby.

The amount spent by gamblers and drug addicts is pretty significant and I don't see anyone saying just how intelligent they must be  :diablo: :diablo:

Offline Wayang

Are you really saying that there aren't that many young fit WG's on any forums Nik ?

And equally do you think the big posters that dominate forums are reflective of your average punter ???

Cllearly there are fit and young WGs who post - it would be ridiculous to suggest that but equally the majority of WGs who do post are probably the more mature.
Certainly the majority of posters are not your average punters.
Just as young fit bimbos are too busy f*ck*ng to post so young fit men are to busy f*ck*ng to post.
All fora cater for the residue of WGs and punters.

Offline Keen Punter

Cllearly there are fit and young WGs who post
Who ?

TK is young, but I wouldn't say fit. Of the other girls that post, how many of them are under 25 ? Not many I suspect.

Offline Angel.LBB

Who ?

TK is young, but I wouldn't say fit. Of the other girls that post, how many of them are under 25 ? Not many I suspect.

On a quick search I'd guess that there are between 30 - 100 girls under 25 and more than that again under 30 on my place but you are right in one aspect though most of the younger ones don't post as much on the public boards even though they are on very frequently.

I think that part of it could be the reputation of forums or how "forum punters" are seen by the girls in the industry as either woman haters or the "train-spotters", its something that we have limited success in changing their views on and getting them to join in but in honesty I think thats mostly down to the socials and how they find people at them.

Offline Keen Punter

On a quick search I'd guess that there are between 30 - 100 girls under 25 and more than that again under 30 on my place but you are right in one aspect though most of the younger ones don't post as much on the public boards even though they are on very frequently.

I think that part of it could be the reputation of forums or how "forum punters" are seen by the girls in the industry as either woman haters or the "train-spotters", its something that we have limited success in changing their views on and getting them to join in but in honesty I think thats mostly down to the socials and how they find people at them.
What people are forgetting though is that we don't care if there are 1 or 1000 girls who post on here. Equally we don't care whether they are 18 or 88. This is a board for punters, not one with a commercial interest that cowers to the WG's.

We tell it how it is, some people just don't like that.

Offline Angel.LBB

What people are forgetting though is that we don't care if there are 1 or 1000 girls who post on here. Equally we don't care whether they are 18 or 88. This is a board for punters, not one with a commercial interest that cowers to the WG's.

We tell it how it is, some people just don't like that.

Again I don't disagree with that at all was just pointing out the inaccuracies of James comment with some facts, I think if you state things like you just have that should be enough without having to make an inaccurate statement like he did that can take away from it or look like you need to have an excuse for saying so.

I much prefer someone making a straight comment like you just have even if I don't agree with it (and I'm not saying I don't to some extent btw) than someone who invents shit to justify a POV.

I frequently tell people (Wg's , Providers and Punters) just how little I care if they stay or go it won't effect a decision in the slightest so well said that man  :drinks:

Offline Lurtz

Spot on. :cool:
Many members might disagree with James, but so often he hits the nail on the head as here.

NIK, I can't believe you fell for Troll999's trick of quoting Jimmy but removing the quotation marks! He's not beyond a bit of rimming to save his hide.

Online NIK

NIK, I can't believe you fell for Troll999's trick of quoting Jimmy but removing the quotation marks! He's not beyond a bit of rimming to save his hide.

I am already aware it is Jimmy's opinion. It has also been mine for a very long time.
The fact that James also holds this opinion demonstates his sound judgement.    :D
 

Offline Lurtz

I am already aware it is Jimmy's opinion. It has also been mine for a very long time.
The fact that James also holds this opinion demonstates his sound judgement.    :D

NIK, I'll surprise you and say that I sometimes agree with Troll999. Furthermore, I think he helps the momentum of the board by generating a lot of new threads. But his relentless repetition of the same old stale opinions is boring. How many of his posts this week will contain the words 'fat', 'tax', 'benefits', 'liars', 'cheats', etc ad nauseum?

Offline anon

"Can someone be that stupid, that you don't want to shag them?". Nah, stupidgirls turn me on. Rude (like your description OP, is a different matter altogether)

Offline Wayang

NIK, I'll surprise you and say that I sometimes agree with Troll999. Furthermore, I think he helps the momentum of the board by generating a lot of new threads. But his relentless repetition of the same old stale opinions is boring. How many of his posts this week will contain the words 'fat', 'tax', 'benefits', 'liars', 'cheats', etc ad nauseum?

I am also on record as agreeing with Troll999 on occasions but I find two things distasteful:
1.  Exactly the same words that Lurtz highlights which spatter all his posts.  I wonder why he punts if alll WGs fall into these categories.
2.  The apparent inability of people, Mods included, to see through the negative overall effect that he has on the development of UKP.
Others on other threads have expressed similar views; it is a pity that these are not acknowledged and the slavish support of senior members  tempered with better judgement of his foibles (particularly toeing the party line with no original thought).

Online Jimmyredcab

I am already aware it is Jimmy's opinion. It has also been mine for a very long time.
The fact that James also holds this opinion demonstates his sound judgement.    :D

Game, set and match.    :drinks:

ok take out all james posts and there would be some large gaping holes in the forum .
I dont agree with him all the time and he has a harsh tongue (or typing hand) but wtf if you dont like his posts dont reply .....

Online Jimmyredcab

ok take out all james posts and there would be some large gaping holes in the forum .
I dont agree with him all the time and he has a harsh tongue (or typing hand) but wtf if you dont like his posts dont reply .....

There is also the ignore facility, I can't really use it but there are one or two people I would dearly love to ignore. ;)


Offline Lurtz

ok take out all james posts and there would be some large gaping holes in the forum .
I dont agree with him all the time and he has a harsh tongue (or typing hand) but wtf if you dont like his posts dont reply .....

Sod that for a game of soldiers - it's too much fun.  :D  Shame he doesn't fight back - it would be nice to see if he had the stomach for an opponent that doesn't wear a skirt.

Offline smiths

There is also the ignore facility, I can't really use it but there are one or two people I would dearly love to ignore. ;)

A facility i was sorely tempted to use for the very first time anywhere but thanks to you guys at admin i now dont need to as Wife4Rent has been given her marching orders, many thanks. :D ;)

Sod that for a game of soldiers - it's too much fun.  :D  Shame he doesn't fight back - it would be nice to see if he had the stomach for an opponent that doesn't wear a skirt.


Bantrs what its all about  :drinks:

Offline jackdaw

To be honest I'd be happy to shag any good looking woman intelligent enough to give informed consent.  I raise my standards a wee bit, however, when I have to pay.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)