Disagree. Its more so a case that they are being caught offguard.
Mmmm... Not sure that is a good defence as it happens far too often
Utter rubbish, as usual. Its you and your WG double booking punter fucking over ilk that means threads have to be dedicated to outing fake profiles.
Smiths reduces it to his usual rubbish rant (My pet Stalker)
Absolute unmitigated bollocks.
You seem to have a hangup about outing fake profiles
No I have absolutely NO problem with outing fake profiles and if you read one of my posts, it actually recommended a way of doing it properly rather than the hap hazard way it is being done at present. But once again that post got hijacked by Smiths with his crusade before anybody could actually discuss if it was a good idea or not.
If you also took your time to read my post above I actually agreed with what Lurtz said as well, in that, as a percentage, there were not that many that were that bright. But for me to say the same about punters becomes a mortal sin.
Whilst a few seem to wish to rubbish WG's on how absolutely stupid they al arel etc what you can't hack is that a large percentage of punters are as thick as *******. Seems like you can dish it out but can't take it, or is it the remarks are too close to home for some?
I don't think that the board ethics putting the punter first was about classing WG's as rubbish and putting them all down at every opportunity, or is it?
So Mr Keen Punter maybe you would like to take a few minutes to re read what I actually write.