Author Topic: Palomaxx - Birmingham: Jewellery Quarter (A Double Negative)  (Read 55467 times)


61 review(s) for Palomaxx (47 positive, 7 neutral, 7 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline bonatempora

My punt with Paloma took place on 05/04/21.

Here is the link for her AdultWork page: External Link/Members Only

Comms:

Punt was arranged 2 days prior via text. On the day radio silence from Paloma and I text 30 minutes before the meet to confirm if we were still on. Got a typical Paloma response of "yes" then I started to make my way. As I'd seen her many times prior I knew where I was going, so no need for a post code, etc.

Got there and was buzzed in accordingly.

Location:

Her usual incall spot at the Jewellery Quarter, I won't go into too much detail as it's been documented many times on here already.

Only real update about her place is she's gotten comforters (over time), etc for her bed to make it more decent but, really needs to invest in a new bed as it's not fit for punting rather than leaving it to her landlord.

Looks:

Paloma opened the door wearing the blue/turquoise lingerie set I had requested. No makeup as it was only a 1 hour booking. Hair was left open and free-flowing.

-On her AW page she states she's 22. This is accurate (confirmed after getting to know her over time).

-Facially without makeup she's never done it for me personally. Majority of the time(s) I've seen her has been with as opposed to without. 6.5 in this department. Also, without makeup her fake lips steal the show.

-Body wise 5'6, dress size 6 - 8, B cup perky boobs and she isn't what I would define as a proper gym bunny. Truth is she's gained some weight over Lockdown(s), the flabbiness on her arse can easily be pulled to a side and when I saw her she hadn't been on a tanning bed/applied her tanning cream. Now a 7.5 in this department.

-Pics on AW have been done professionally. Only ones that bear any accuracy are the natural ones taken.

Fee:

£150 for the hour.

Service:

As I got outside her door there was a delivery man waiting for the neighbour to pick up his parcels. I gently knocked Paloma opened the door and immediately started talking loudly. I had to put my finger on my lips to usher her to remain quiet until the door was closed. She knew someone was out there and asked me what they were doing once the door was closed. So much for discretion at that point anyhow. Whilst I was withdrawing her cash I had picked up a £1 Dairy Milk bar for her as she has a sweet tooth. Before I could even take my shoes off she eagerly eyed up the bag and asked "what's in the bag?" I handed it to her she took a sneak peak then went into the bedroom. Clearly she thought I had gone out of my way and bought her an expensive gift lol. As I had taken my shoes off she came out: with what I can only describe as the most ungrateful look on someone's face ever! She tried to mask it with a fake smile and was like "awww thank you!" I just thought be grateful I'm paying you £150 as it is and it's the thought that counts!

Thereafter, we go into the bedroom and she puts the chocolate to a side. I count out the cash give it to her and she goes to stash it alongside, getting me my water. Shower wasn't offered however, not needed as I had come fresh from home. Once back in the room she asks me what I think of the lingerie and without paying too much attention I just said it was "alright." She gave me a slight awkward stare and I think was expecting me to say "it's amazing Paloma! Wow!" I had thanked her for it and was more focused on getting undressed. She sat on the bed and watched me undress then started talking about random stuff, I requested she bring one of her living room chairs in the bedroom for standing-Doggy, as I've always found her bed rather uncomfortable and really not fit for purpose. Hence why I mentioned it earlier on in the review.

Paloma then went to get the chair alongside going to do something in the bathroom. As I had stripped down I waited for a few minutes or so. When she got back in the bedroom we started talking again... what you'll find is she'll burn a lot of your time through conversation if she can. I then sat on the bed and wanted to discuss role-play/dirty talk, guided her to sit on my lap, took her a minute just to do that as she kept spinning whilst standing. Before talking to her about the direction of the punt she had a face that can only be described like a "slapped-arse!" It was kind of difficult to even talk to her as she sat there staring at me like it was a chore. Once I set the precedent of what I wanted out the meet she giddily jumped up and said "I want to show you something!"

She went to her chest of drawers and showed me a BDSM-type toy set one of her clients had gotten her. Then she pointed out it cost somewhere in the hundreds... go figure after I got her that £1 Dairy Milk. I think most will see where I'm going with this. She showed me a few of the materials and wanted to wear the Dog Collar, didn't really ask just took it out and started to put it on. Then as we were going to the bed she started talking about how another client sent her a £500 gift! At this point I'm just thinking "wtf!" Anyhow we get to the bed and as she lay on her back we start to kiss: for me the collar was awkward as I couldn't add my sensual element to the booking. It wasn't what I wanted anyway. Instructed her to take it off and she threw it to the floor and reminded me of the time I made her bark like a dog. So, naturally assumed I'd enjoy it despite me outlining what I wanted from the offset!

Earlier on when talking she had said she woke up earlier than usual. As we started to kiss she didn't smell "fresh-fresh" for the punt... I think she probably showered a few hours beforehand. The kissing was mostly tongue (DFK) her fake lips make it difficult to engage in full-on lip kissing. Then I make my way down her neck and kiss it/nibble on her ear as I'm pulling back I see her either texting/checking the time on her phone (which was close by)... very cheeky! She has a coy smile on her face and then we re-engage in DFK and I have to literally instruct her to come close for mutual touching, hugs, etc. None of which would've been done on her own accord... a tad bit lazy in fairness. Then I posture myself onto my knees and she positions herself to give me some OWO.

Got the usual dead-eye stare from Paloma, even had to ask her to look up. Her blowjob skills are good but, on this occasion it really did just feel like she was going through the motions. More wanking my cock off then sucking it and I had to prompt her to go deeper and gag, etc. As it was only an hours booking decided to get the condom on and proceed with sex. Started with standing Doggy on the chair and for some reason her pussy was insanely tight. I literally had to hold/push my erect cock in and I'm very surprised she didn't feel discomfort either. Once I was in I couldn't penetrate comfortably at all her pussy was as tight as a vice and drier than the Sahara Desert. It opened up a little/got a little moist but not nearly enough as it needed to be. After some painful penetration (for me) we switched onto the bed (Doggy) as I thought this would enable her to arch up more. When she spread herself it wasn't a pretty site as I could see her Chocolate Starfish and the very pink line to her ass crack! Fake tan/sunbeds sure do make a difference. Off-putting in its own right.

The Doggy on the bed was very much the same. Pulled her flabby-arse apart as much as I could but still no respite for my dick. I don't understand why she didn't just put some lube on! After I pulled my dick out my cock was slightly mangled (condom still in place) and she said "ooh that looks painful!" I don't know if this was intentional to reduce penetration or if she just couldn't be asked to put lube on. Then she made a cheeky comment about it "still being very hard" and I said "yeah that's because I took Viagra." Only reason I throw this into the mix is as she lay on her back, she showed me a box of Viagra one of her clients had given her for free. She sells it on the side to make a bit of pocket money as she puts it. I had enquired with her a week prior but chose to buy my own off a respected retailer. I think she was suspicious and purposely wanted to make a point.

Now onto missionary and before I go inside her, her pussy looked good I gave it slight kiss/lick but, the thought of her arse crack/chocolate starfish put me off. I think she expected me to go down on her. Again once inside still very restrictive penetration and she starts talking again, only to again mention another one of her clients buying her a £500 gift! Wtf! During sex! I had to at that point say "the only thing you're gonna get off me is that bar of chocolate." Entitled or what I thought at this point and so many fucking hints! So tried missionary for a bit (just lay there with her legs open) then we switch to Cowgirl... Beforehand I suggested we change condoms (I had bought 2 of my own). As I don't like the Pasante condoms Paloma gets free from her local clinic. She kept saying no and I'll get to "why" later.

The Cowgirl sex was a washout and still very restrictive due to her tightness/dryness. Took a breather kissed for a bit and worked her pert boobs which she seemed to enjoy. But, I couldn't proceed with the sex anymore and she took the condom off, started sucking my balls/wanking my cock really quick, I then took over the wanking as she sucked my balls. She catered to my foot fetish to get me to orgasm so placed her foot/toes on my lips, her foot tasted salty and manky, not wanting to be in that position too long I eventually came. Had a clean up and with her thumb on my condom and a greedy smile on her face she asked "what about this then?" Basically whether or not I was gonna leave it with her. Of course I said I'm gonna take it back I mean ffs... you make £150 an hour... go buy your own fucking condoms! So she then marched off a little and started taking a shower in what was still classed as my time.

I found that rude as she started getting ready for her next booking in my time and just left me to it kinda thing. During her shower she blamed the state of my cock on the shower products I use at home... really lol? As I was getting ready she was talking about her break that she was gonna take, being unsure of when she'd be working again. I was contemplating doing my Birthday booking with her: seeing as she was my regular go-to WG and thought in regards to the current booking "everyone has an off-day here and there." So, was a little gutted she was perhaps gonna be out the picture until June. As she came back in the room she had another lingerie set on (the green one on AW), then started asking if it looked good or not. Again I really didn't care and said it looked "alright" clearly: she wanted compliments and then started telling me about how she did her photo shoot in it.

Before I was ready to leave we were discussing our next booking/her break and she basically goaded me into making a comment. I won't go into too much detail as when you frequent a WG you do share certain personal aspects of your life (both-ways). She outlined my comment "wasn't very nice!" to which I did apologise straight away and then she "acted" like she was okay with it. Funnily enough after I made my comment she charged to her door and undid all the locks as I was putting my shoes on. Clearly she wanted me out and had gotten funny with me. She then sat next to me on the bed as I was putting my shoes on and was like "it's all good, it went over my head." After making me feel like shit.

Once I was leaving we casually discussed meeting again in 2 weeks time although, for me the it felt like you could cut the tension with a knife. She put her hands around her back leaned forward, I gave her a kiss on the lips and we said our goodbyes.

Why the Double Negative?

2 weeks after this meet on the 16/04/21 we met again for what was gonna be my Birthday booking alongside, seeing Paloma before her "big break." So we were gonna drink, chill and have fun: £450 was agreed for 3 hours. She was clearly still salty from the comment made a week prior. Additionally, it looked like she had just rolled out of bed: makeup was caked on, hair was tied up as a topknot (didn't look brushed) and aesthetically she just didn't look nice. Not to mention having a serious attitude problem from the moment I walked in.

We sat in the living room I laid out the money and gave her the option of carrying on with the punt. Better that she handed me my money back rather than me saying "no" and aiming for a refund. Long-story-short I wanted to set the precedent out is all, and ensure we have a good time but just wanted to outline we refrain from talking about personal matters. She was defensive, shot down everything I said and made it out like I was "having a go" at her. She handed me my money back then started prompting me to change her mind. In truth, I was just trying to her calm her down... low and behold... she starts shouting at me from the top of her lungs! Swearing, accusing me of not being happy in previous punts, I can't believe how she just "switched." I made one comment about how she was still sour about what was said the week prior, after her 20 odd comments to me, she flipped and told me "to get the fuck out we are done!"                                     

After 40 minutes of hell she labeled it as "too much drama!" Then the cheeky-mare was even funny in handing me back the wine I had bought before I left. So it was established before I left she didn't want to see me again, at the point I just "okay" and as I left she held the door open and said "goodbye" quite vexed. Never did I think I'd see the day where a WG of her "so-called calibre" would switch like that and behave in such a disgusting manner.

In Summary:

I wasn't going to do this review as didn't want my fellow punters to think because me and Paloma fell-out, I'm just being bitter and posting this on purpose. Although, after ruminating on the matter and having time to think about things/events I think it's important that others should know how I was treated (abysmally). Most of you who know my posts know I only ever contribute to the forum whenever I feel necessary (feel I add something of value). Also, my reviews are always honest since I've been a member on here and those who follow my work can vouch for that. I know after posting this: WK's, fanboys and Paloma being a member on here will have something to say also.

On 05/04/21 my review speaks for itself and I simply didn't get the service I wanted so, to me it was a waste of £150. Something to make my fellow-punters laugh: after having that painful penetration my dick was hurting for 3 days thereafter, nothing a little ibuprofen couldn't fix but still lol! 16/04/21 was atrocious and I would wish it on no punter... it felt like I was being told off by a glorified Troll Doll (just how she looked on the day)... it wasn't the Paloma I knew basically.

The Verdict: Now that I'll never be seeing her again I have nothing to lose in posting this. She clearly becomes jaded over time so once you've seen her once or twice don't bank on consistency. Clearly has a sense of entitlement and I think as many have noticed on here "a sense of double-standards." Right now she's just riding her age/looks and making money by doing the bare-minimum if she can.

On A Final Note:

Foolishly after we parted ways I did make contact with her again as to try and end things as civil/decent human beings. She was having none of it and again gave me a "telling off/was just full of malice and anger." A man can only take so much and when I "told her where to go" shortly after received threats (messages) from one of her guy mates: who threatened to chop my hands off. Alongside if that wasn't enough an hour later her Rom/EE boyfriend left me a voicemail stating: he'll kill me, kill my family, fuck my life, etc... the typical Rom/EE threat from some guy who's served time in prison (she told me herself). Thought I'd add that in as it goes to show who she associates/affiliates herself with, and really is nothing but "smoke and mirrors herself."

Good luck to anyone who chooses to see her. :wackogirl: 
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline teddyking

Really good review , just about to book her but now I think il pass.
Also, you were very generous with a £1 dairy milk. I have had SPs tell me that their clients buy them £200 lingerie sets and made me think why they would bother when that SP will wear that lingerie to impress other punters
« Last Edit: May 13, 2021, 07:37:36 pm by teddyking »
Banned reason: Sarcastic twat of a troll
Banned by: daviemac

Offline bonatempora

Really good review , just about to book her but now I think il pass.
Also, you were very generous with a £1 dairy milk. I have had SPs tell me that their clients buy them £200 lingerie sets and made me think why they would bother when that SP will wear that lingerie to impress other punters

Thank you teddyking :thumbsup:

Glad my review helped you make an informed decision.

I believe it's the small things in life that make you happy mate... clearly in this case it wasn't! :lol:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline JJwyatts

genuinely why after what you felt was a negative experience, and you making a comment which by your own admission pissed her off. Would you then book again for an even longer period of time for more money. just doesn't make sense. I get that anyone can have off days, it happens, but when your parting with that sums of cash and your really disappointed why continue? either way im staying out of all this, was just curious.

Offline bonatempora

genuinely why after what you felt was a negative experience, and you making a comment which by your own admission pissed her off. Would you then book again for an even longer period of time for more money. just doesn't make sense. I get that anyone can have off days, it happens, but when your parting with that sums of cash and your really disappointed why continue? either way im staying out of all this, was just curious.

Hi JJwyatts,

I had been seeing Paloma over a period of 8 months and in that time built a good rapport with her. Yes, my point exactly I just thought she had “an off day” there really isn’t much more to it. Remember as said in my review she did goad me into making the comment although, I didn’t think it was something which would linger.

The future booking was more a case of “giving her the benefit of the doubt.” Alongside, other factors such as WG availability, comfort & knowing my regular go-to SP. From when I walked into her place on the 16/04/21 it became apparent she “wasn’t over it.”

You can forgive certain situations although, I was more “really disappointed” after collectively going through what I’ve been through. And... please don’t take this sarcastically but... you have read I had a literal death threat right. :hi:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline alabama1

To be brutally honest, although you deny it in your review, you do actually come across as bitter and twisted. And you making contact with her again after her telling you that she doesn't want to see you again makes me think you also have a case of EAS. You seem to have gone into minute detail in the review to criticise her from every angle, be it her body, temperament, behaviour, hygiene, or attitude, or indeed her friends. Basically i have never read such contrasting reviews of a working girl by the same punter. I think you are in the same state of mind as the prophet999.

And yes, i have seen Paloma once, (reviewed here), had a good time. Maybe i will see her again sometime, maybe i wont. I am not trying to draw favour or defend her, but i surely can't be the only one who thinks that the OP has issues with her, and that this review does him, her, and more importantly us punters no favours when deciding where next to spend our hard earned.


Offline bonatempora

Alabama1,

You're entitled to your opinion and can express it in any way you wish. I knew the "EAS" card was gonna come at some-point so thank you for getting it out the way. If I had a true case of EAS I'd be "begging her to take me back right now, no?" Why would I come on here and outline what's, what. To my recollection Prophet999 never wrote positives and then negatives of the girls he saw. Well all the things you've said: looks, hygiene, behaviour, etc: aren't these all reviewed on here for WG's as a normal standard anyway? We do review WG's on here don't we... I thought that was the site ethos. Right her friends who made violent threats... then her boyfriend who made a death threat... others shouldn't know about this why?

You WK her on every review there is of her Alabama1... let's be honest. So thanks for doing it on this one too. When Lilith Noir got banned you were still defending her also. If there were no issues in general for anyone posting a negative: nobody would post a negative. For all I care go see her: maybe take a cake while you're at it too! ;) 

Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline alabama1

Alabama1,

You're entitled to your opinion and can express it in any way you wish. I knew the "EAS" card was gonna come at some-point so thank you for getting it out the way. If I had a true case of EAS I'd be "begging her to take me back right now, no?" Why would I come on here and outline what's, what. To my recollection Prophet999 never wrote positives and then negatives of the girls he saw. Well all the things you've said: looks, hygiene, behaviour, etc: aren't these all reviewed on here for WG's as a normal standard anyway? We do review WG's on here don't we... I thought that was the site ethos. Right her friends who made violent threats... then her boyfriend who made a death threat... others shouldn't know about this why?

You WK her on every review there is of her Alabama1... let's be honest. So thanks for doing it on this one too. When Lilith Noir got banned you were still defending her also. If there were no issues in general for anyone posting a negative: nobody would post a negative. For all I care go see her: maybe take a cake while you're at it too! ;)

It sounds to me you did want her to take you back, getting back in touch with her after she told you to fuck off ? And why would i come on here and outline whats what ? You already said in your review that it was because you couldn't go back, so you had nothing to loose.
And don't confuse white knighting with someone telling you a few home truths.  :hi:
« Last Edit: May 13, 2021, 09:08:16 pm by alabama1 »

Offline bonatempora

That would be the natural assumption... yes. People can still be civil and part ways decently, there's no need to end things with such animosity. Nowhere did I say "take me back as a client." This isn't a teen drama lol.

Yes, nothing to lose: as I won't be going back. Do I need to be more clear lol? Outlining what's, what means I've got my head/shit together (when contributing): allowing others to make an informed choice as to what they wanna do.

Okay, so you didn't WK... you told me a few home truths... thank you much appreciated. :rolleyes:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline JJwyatts

Hi JJwyatts,

I had been seeing Paloma over a period of 8 months and in that time built a good rapport with her. Yes, my point exactly I just thought she had “an off day” there really isn’t much more to it. Remember as said in my review she did goad me into making the comment although, I didn’t think it was something which would linger.

The future booking was more a case of “giving her the benefit of the doubt.” Alongside, other factors such as WG availability, comfort & knowing my regular go-to SP. From when I walked into her place on the 16/04/21 it became apparent she “wasn’t over it.”

You can forgive certain situations although, I was more “really disappointed” after collectively going through what I’ve been through. And... please don’t take this sarcastically but... you have read I had a literal death threat right. :hi:

fairenuff pal, as for her goading you into a comment, i struggle to believe that, i can't imagine any WG trying to goad someone into making an offensive comment, i could be wrong of course as i don't know the context, but hard to believe that. More likely you said something out of turn and realized you fucked up. As for threats etc, should that of occurred, not acceptable of course. No threats of violence or anything of that nature is acceptable.

Offline bonatempora

JJwyatts,

I know the nature of the girl and I'll leave it at that. I've refrained from getting too personal with my review. At the time she made me feel it was "on me and I fucked up" but, after I had time to think how things transpired: she definitely goaded me into making it.

Well the threats did occur and I still have them.

All I'm gonna say is certain people will use you when needed and when they have no use for you, disregard you as your purpose has been served.
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline BromsgroveFella

This site is great. I was going to have an hour with her as well. Cheers

Offline JJwyatts

JJwyatts,

I know the nature of the girl and I'll leave it at that. I've refrained from getting too personal with my review. At the time she made me feel it was "on me and I fucked up" but, after I had time to think how things transpired: she definitely goaded me into making it.

Well the threats did occur and I still have them.

All I'm gonna say is certain people will use you when needed and when they have no use for you, disregard you as your purpose has been served.

of course, i understand leaving out personal matters, i'm just doing what i'd do with any review, read it, analyse it, read between the lines and use it to make an educated decision on everything to help inform my decisions going forward. Not denying your experiences as without being there i can't truly know! likewise im not assuming everything as ghospal truth as i don't know Paloma's version of events. Two sides to every story. No disrespect intended to either you or Paloma

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
Hi, have you tried a £20 Smethwick Romanian?
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bonatempora

BromsgroveFella,

You’re welcome. :thumbsup:

JJwyatts,

And I do appreciate that. It’s what the forum is here for at the end of the day. As far as any one of my negative experiences go... it’s for you to decide. There are other elements to the client/WG rapport I had with Paloma but, if those things are mentioned it’ll just get messy. I’m sure she doesn’t need that can of worms opened either.

Straightsix,

I was waiting as to when you’d comment and as always... :lol:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Freddybigstuff1983

bonatempora , thank you for your review, probably knowing full well you would get stick for it.
To be honest, the attitude you describe, is exactly how she came across replying to my negative review.

If she has sense, she wont reply to this thread, will let the dust settle and regain her previously, very good reputation.

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
Straightsix,

I was waiting as to when you’d comment and as always... :lol:

No, seriously. When you mentioned 'looking at the phone' and 'ungrateful' I just thought you could get that at a fraction of the cost!
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bonatempora

bonatempora , thank you for your review, probably knowing full well you would get stick for it.
To be honest, the attitude you describe, is exactly how she came across replying to my negative review.

If she has sense, she wont reply to this thread, will let the dust settle and regain her previously, very good reputation.

Freddybigstuff1983,

Anytime buddy. :hi:

It’s sad but I knew that certain readers would focus on “what went wrong” rather than looking at the context of what I posted (my review). It’s what happened and not a fabrication of my experience(s).

I did follow your negative review and my guess is pal: she probably woke up, saw your text and couldn’t be asked. So parred you off. She’s not a morning person and I’m surprised she wanted you to text her by “x” time.

Her attitude won’t help anything although, her behaviour is predictable and I’m guessing she’ll come on here and have something to say. But, as I said she’ll only be opening “another can of worms” for herself which she really doesn’t need.

If I once posted a positive, I did and I standby it. Things do change and now I standby my negative. ;)

Straightsix,

I know what you mean pal. I just had a good thing going with said WG... a shame things ended up this way.

I don’t mind punting at £150 PH... punting is the name of the game! :P
« Last Edit: May 13, 2021, 10:06:00 pm by bonatempora »
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
You know I'm only joking.
As with all relationships when they dwindle.
Onwards 👍

Hidden Image/Members Only

📵 📳 📴 🤳


« Last Edit: May 13, 2021, 10:23:26 pm by Straightsix »
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bonatempora

I know lol.

And upwards :thumbsup:

Thanks for pic & phone emojis... memories! :lol:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline teddyking

Hi, have you tried a £20 Smethwick Romanian?

I’ve always wanted to try those ads but I’m stuck in Birmingham in for work at home so punting in inner city local areas is a huge risk for me 😭😭
Banned reason: Sarcastic twat of a troll
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PunterP

thanks for the review, unfortunate that one WG already gone off my very small WM hotlist. Although its valid that the review could be extremely biased, I will wait for a while before booking her.

Bit annoyed now though, trying to find a higher end escort to book in WM apart from Neve, Lilith and now Paloma  :D Better than potentially wasting £150 i guess.
Banned reason: Abusive to other members & boundary pusher.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline pbrown355

I think it's important for context to White Knight the £20 Smethwick ladies. I can think of 2 who didn't go near their phones and had a perfect attitude throughout. Throughout wasn't very long but nevertheless.

Offline JontyR

Wow. Thank you for the review (s)

Get the feeling this one may run and run.

Just asking...not accusing...was there anything in the meetings prior to this that you may have soured relations? I know that both parties can start to overstep the mark inadvertently when they think they know the other better than they actually do.

I may be odd, but even when I've had a reg I've never messaged them unless it was to arrange a booking. I certainly wouldn't be messaging someone I had no intention of seeing again.

Offline bonatempora

PunterP,

As I say to anyone who reads my reviews, you can base your decision off them but, ultimately if you still wanna go see the WG... see her.

I can acknowledge/respect my review may come across as biased. Your hard-earned is yours so do with it as you wish.

JontyR,

No worries mate. :hi:

Well hopefully it doesn't need to run and run.

There was a meet in March that took place early hours of the morning where: Paloma basically thought I wasn't grateful for her effort(s). Naturally, I did explain I was grateful, etc and I just felt like it was something she held onto to be accusatory of. Alongside, in her mind if I ever fed-back anything it was always deemed as "taking the piss." However, I was just comfortable enough with the girl to talk to her about how our punts were going. It's well-known that SP's rarely take criticism well... even if it isn't criticism... it'll easily be labelled as.

From her side though there were plenty of things (during meets) that I can easily label as "she soured" relations. But I won't as I don't need to. Everyone has a different rapport with their regular I guess. Without going into too much detail I considered her more of a friend (cardinal fuck-up), than having the rapport as client/WG. But I do believe she played me to a certain extent too. We had a lot more contact than we should have really.

Yes, it was foolish to message her when I knew I wouldn't be seeing her again. Although, the state of how things were left were just horrible. She did me favours as did I her (in a sense). Naturally, her take (angle) on it would be "I loved her and had EAS" which isn't the case at all.

In truth, for things I don't really wanna go into I feel quite used/manipulated by her. Yet, that doesn't change being treated the way I was and about what I've documented above.       
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
I’ve always wanted to try those ads but I’m stuck in Birmingham in for work at home so punting in inner city local areas is a huge risk for me 😭😭
You gotta do it, it's like a right of passage. In, emptied and out in under 10 minutes.

I think it's important for context to White Knight the £20 Smethwick ladies. I can think of 2 who didn't go near their phones and had a perfect attitude throughout. Throughout wasn't very long but nevertheless.
Purely functional and detached, how it should be. Innate desire fulfilled I have better things to be getting on with. Id have checked my messages but my phone was too far to reach without withdrawal.
I think I got a kebab and went home happy. What a lovely evening it was.
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline JontyR


Offline legendinho

Sorry to hear about this OP

In future just pay,fuck and leave. Makes punting so much easier no feelings involved.

 :hi:

Offline bonatempora

Sorry to hear about this OP

In future just pay,fuck and leave. Makes punting so much easier no feelings involved.

 :hi:

Appreciate the kind words legendinho. :thumbsup:

That’s my normal mantra: pay, fuck & leave. Also, never to get feelings involved with a WG.

Unfortunately on this occasion things got far “too political.”
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline PunterP

PunterP,

As I say to anyone who reads my reviews, you can base your decision off them but, ultimately if you still wanna go see the WG... see her.

I can acknowledge/respect my review may come across as biased. Your hard-earned is yours so do with it as you wish.

For what it's worth as it does seem like I was accusing you of being extremely biased, I actually am taking this review at face value hence the not booking Paloma in anytime soon. At the end of the day 2 negative reviews in a row for a WG isn't a good look so i'm happy to wait and see how this progresses rather than take the plunge on a potential waste of a £150 punt
Banned reason: Abusive to other members & boundary pusher.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline bonatempora

For what it's worth as it does seem like I was accusing you of being extremely biased, I actually am taking this review at face value hence the not booking Paloma in anytime soon. At the end of the day 2 negative reviews in a row for a WG isn't a good look so i'm happy to wait and see how this progresses rather than take the plunge on a potential waste of a £150 punt

Either way good luck to you buddy! There are plenty of other options out there: if you fancy spending a little more The Deluxe Agency has a good range of girls too. ;)
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,055
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Either way good luck to you buddy! There are plenty of other options out there: if you fancy spending a little more The Deluxe Agency has a good range of girls too. ;)

To be honest I’ll probably still go and see her when I am in Birmingham next...
I tend not to get too involved with WGs, so doubt I’ll have the same issues as you.

Offline bonatempora


To be honest I’ll probably still go and see her when I am in Birmingham next...
I tend not to get too involved with WGs, so doubt I’ll have the same issues as you.

Kev40ish,

I hope it’s a good one for you.

Well I sincerely hope you don’t. :hi:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline DaveR

Possibly the most fascinating and in depth review on here. I think you’ve rendered someone speechless. The crown is slipping

Offline bonatempora

Possibly the most fascinating and in depth review on here. I think you’ve rendered someone speechless. The crown is slipping

lol not quite sure how to take that but, if you loved this one then be sure to check out my other ones too. ;)
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline heisenberg.

To be brutally honest, although you deny it in your review, you do actually come across as bitter and twisted. And you making contact with her again after her telling you that she doesn't want to see you again makes me think you also have a case of EAS. You seem to have gone into minute detail in the review to criticise her from every angle, be it her body, temperament, behaviour, hygiene, or attitude, or indeed her friends. Basically i have never read such contrasting reviews of a working girl by the same punter. I think you are in the same state of mind as the prophet999.

And yes, i have seen Paloma once, (reviewed here), had a good time. Maybe i will see her again sometime, maybe i wont. I am not trying to draw favour or defend her, but i surely can't be the only one who thinks that the OP has issues with her, and that this review does him, her, and more importantly us punters no favours when deciding where next to spend our hard earned.

I'd have to somewhat agree with this. The amount of detail to which you've scrutinised her is beyond normal. The review feels a bit petty - I can understand parts of where you're coming from and I would warrant it a negative. But it seems you've seen her many times before without much complaints. I get the impression feelings have been developed here which is dangerous in the punting world.

Please remember, this game is strictly business. Exchanging light pleasantries should really be as far as it should go.

Offline bonatempora

I'd have to somewhat agree with this. The amount of detail to which you've scrutinised her is beyond normal. The review feels a bit petty - I can understand parts of where you're coming from and I would warrant it a negative. But it seems you've seen her many times before without much complaints. I get the impression feelings have been developed here which is dangerous in the punting world.

Please remember, this game is strictly business. Exchanging light pleasantries should really be as far as it should go.

My reviews are always in-depth and quite honest. If you think the scrutiny in this one is bad then you should read my negative on Amber Rosé lol! You’re entitled to your opinion so that’s fine. I did mention over time her service became jaded, that counts for prior meets also. No feelings were developed I can assure you. You can class someone as your friend & care for them but, that’s that in this matter.

Thanks for your advice I’ll bear it in mind moving forward. :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Jays776

You gotta do it, it's like a right of passage. In, emptied and out in under 10 minutes.
Purely functional and detached, how it should be. Innate desire fulfilled I have better things to be getting on with. Id have checked my messages but my phone was too far to reach without withdrawal.
I think I got a kebab and went home happy. What a lovely evening it was.

Couldn’t agree more straightsix  :lol:

I never get personal with WG I don’t buy them gifts, I turn up fresh, with cash and a smile that’s all. The only true gift they'll get from me if I’m feeling really generous is my load on their chin. WG’s are not my friends, no matter how many times I see them or cash/gifts I give them, they wouldn’t give me the time of day in the real world or in their world if I was broke. You have an allotted time, you both do a bit of role play and pleasantries to get what you want and you go back to your life. As with any service you get good bad and awful.

Great review OP

Offline MrBamboo

Thanks for the review, if it was as you described it sounds to me like someone either on Charlie
Or coming down from it. Just my opinion.

Offline spiralnotebook

I gave up half way through thinking the review was going to be by Leo Tolstoy.
Sorry mate  :hi:

Offline Cheetah_321

Excellent review! Thanks for being honest and detailed.

Offline Hothandle

I think this review demonstrates the pitfalls of getting a little too close to an sp..

“All i’m  gonna say is certain people will use you when needed and when they have no use for you, disregard you as your purpose has been served”

Best not to ever think the ladies see you as anything other than a paying punter. Some are just too good at acting out the “gfe” experience..




Offline bonatempora

Thank you Jays776,

I've held my hands up on this one that I let my guard down a little but, it wasn't intentional if you get what I mean. What's done is done now and I can only own my side of it.

You're welcome Mr Bamboo,

lol no worries, you're entitled to your opinion although, I can assure you there were no drugs involved in this scenario.

spiralnotebook,

Haha don't worry about it!

Cheetah_321,

Anytime pal!

Hothandle,

Most certainly it does. I knew what I was doing back in Sep 20 when I first went to see her: as in strictly business.

Ironically, the reason I grew close to her on my side had nothing to do with our meets. All I'm going to say to anyone reading this is just trust me... the way events/things panned out... it just made it so that an "indirect/separate relationship" was built IMO. Paloma may have a different view on it.

As I've said earlier I don't want to get into the intricacies of it as it'll do her no favours, and I don't need the additional stress either. I'm sure she'd agree too. It won't benefit anyone and let's just leave it at: politics.     

Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline alabama1

Basically you posted this review for your own benefit not ours, in order to piss her off  :hi:

Offline Hotdogboy88

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,967
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 71
genuinely why after what you felt was a negative experience, and you making a comment which by your own admission pissed her off. Would you then book again for an even longer period of time for more money. just doesn't make sense. I get that anyone can have off days, it happens, but when your parting with that sums of cash and your really disappointed why continue? either way im staying out of all this, was just curious.

I’m with you jjwyatts. He mentions how uncomfortable and not built for doggy from earlier experiences with her how she scores low previously in some areas, yet still goes back has an other meet and buys her a present, gets upset with her response which is understandable (red flag here) and then after terrible meet books her for 3 hours then starts fucking around trying to get her to cancel the meet, which eventually happens then he’s pissed off that she gives him back the wine he bought as a present.

This reads like a civilian relationship where one doesn’t want to be with the other and the other can’t accept it. Sounds like the bitterness of a jilted lover who can’t accept the rejection and try to make they ex look like the unhinged one.

Grateful you took your time to write this review but hasn’t put me off one bit, infact  it good to see a wg who doesn’t want to get tangled up in emotional dramas, and rather miss out on a big pay day than go through the motions. Credit there.

Offline Hotdogboy88

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,967
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 71
Basically you posted this review for your own benefit not ours, in order to piss her off  :hi:

Agree.

Offline bonatempora

Alabama1 & Hotdogboy88,

I wrote my review to share my experience(s) (I was treated like shit) and you can make of it what you will. There was no personal gain from this, I could've just left it and I think from the way things went down I had pissed her off enough already right.

Hotdogboy88,

You don't know the ins and outs of what had gone on so, I can understand you can make assumptions on your part. Sometimes things aren't really that complicated and I did think with my dick for the longer booking alongside convenience/other factors. I didn't intentionally start fucking around I went in with a genuine intention although, if it was you who had handed £450 over to a WG, knew something was off: would you demand a refund and if she said "no" be happy after 40 minutes (without service) you were down £450? I don't think so. I wasn't pissed she handed me my wine back... If you read my review she was funny about giving me my wine back lol.

I knew many would point the finger at me and say "I had a thing for her" before I even posted it. I never intended to get with her in the first place. I'm a tad bit annoyed but not over rejection. As a collective experience no punter deserves to be treated this way and if anyone had a death threat the way I did: they'd be lying if they said they weren't ticked off in the slightest.

Well all I'm gonna say is from my experience(s) it was all about the emotional drama(s) for her. As I've said to others: you can go see her on your own merit and not base your decision(s) off this. Funnily enough she didn't have to accept my booking but she did, you really think she was happy in losing out on £450. She only handed me my money back based on the politics of the situation.   
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline pbrown355

At the beginning the review had some slightly worrying traits but didn't think too much of it. As the thread has gone on it reads more and more like prophet999's "time off to heal" debacle. When posting in such a negative manner you leave yourself open to criticism, or doubt, when you can't tell the whole story and ask "just trust me".
Ultimately don't quite know what to think, but it wouldn't put me off seeing her again.

Offline Hotdogboy88

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,967
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 71
Alabama1 & Hotdogboy88,

I wrote my review to share my experience(s) (I was treated like shit) and you can make of it what you will. There was no personal gain from this, I could've just left it and I think from the way things went down I had pissed her off enough already right.

Hotdogboy88,

You don't know the ins and outs of what had gone on so, I can understand you can make assumptions on your part. Sometimes things aren't really that complicated and I did think with my dick for the longer booking alongside convenience/other factors. I didn't intentionally start fucking around I went in with a genuine intention although, if it was you who had handed £450 over to a WG, knew something was off: would you demand a refund and if she said "no" be happy after 40 minutes (without service) you were down £450? I don't think so. I wasn't pissed she handed me my wine back... If you read my review she was funny about giving me my wine back lol.

I knew many would point the finger at me and say "I had a thing for her" before I even posted it. I never intended to get with her in the first place. I'm a tad bit annoyed but not over rejection. As a collective experience no punter deserves to be treated this way and if anyone had a death threat the way I did: they'd be lying if they said they weren't ticked off in the slightest.

Well all I'm gonna say is from my experience(s) it was all about the emotional drama(s) for her. As I've said to others: you can go see her on your own merit and not base your decision(s) off this. Funnily enough she didn't have to accept my booking but she did, you really think she was happy in losing out on £450. She only handed me my money back based on the politics of the situation.

As I said before thank you for taking the time to write the review. What I take from it is my opinion and no one else’s. My opinion is only formed by what you have written. When some has neg previous meets appearance and attitude yet keep returning to make a long booking just doesn’t seem right to me. For me personally this negative won’t make me think any different from booking her. Her other neg by Freddy would make be more aware though.  As his didn’t  come across as bitter.

Offline bonatempora

At the beginning the review had some slightly worrying traits but didn't think too much of it. As the thread has gone on it reads more and more like prophet999's "time off to heal" debacle. When posting in such a negative manner you leave yourself open to criticism, or doubt, when you can't tell the whole story and ask "just trust me".
Ultimately don't quite know what to think, but it wouldn't put me off seeing her again.

pbrown,

Prophet999 was a completely different kettle of fish, his post was merely for attention and he protected the WG. I've been very forward/forthcoming and have taken accountability on my part. Many wouldn't have been this honest even. You can have your own take on it, that's fine by me.

I take onboard leaving certain elements out can undermine what you've posted. Although, I feel there should be an element of respect there if you don't want to entirely divulge.

Fact of the matter is she's a popular girl and well liked by many. Now that she's got a negative of this nature it was gonna be prone to attack. I'm sure my review won't take away from her livelihood and stop her from eating. Rather than the typical derailing of a review and undermining it, it would be nice if there was a focus on the actual content itself. I'm sure many can sit here all day and try to draw their own conclusions. I posted a review and that's, that really.

Hotdogboy88,

Anytime. And that's fine you go with what you think/feel is best.   
Banned reason: Undesirable
Banned by: Kev40ish