Author Topic: PlayboyModelAmber - Tower Hill - Several Meets  (Read 13209 times)


24 review(s) for Playboymodelamber (11 positive, 4 neutral, 9 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Momodan38

Note - I was in two minds wether to do another review for Amber. But I feel I have some important info as well as the sessions being different enough to justify a fresh review.

Link - External Link/Members Only

Agency Links - External Link/Members Only

UK Glamour Girls also had her on their website, but she’s now disappeared. I’ll add it on here if she returns

Price - I saw her several times for £500 for 2 hour incall on each occasions.

Location - States Tower Hill, but google maps took me via Aldgate East. About 10 mins walk from the station.

Comms - via text.

Residence - Clean ground floor modern flat. Clean shower shower facilities.

Comms - all via text.

The Girl - IMHO FAF girl, really my type, plastic look, fake tits, BJ lips, tanned body, amazing feet. Pics are extremely accurate, face is even prettier is real life.

I have reviewed this SP before. In fact it was my first review on here. My meets from that review dated back to November 2020. I have seen her several times since then.

Her location has now changed to East London, which is very convenient for me. I can get to her place in about 15 mins.

As for the details of the session. Not much has changed. I do my usual thing. Exchange paperwork, start with kissing, play with her boob, lick and kiss the rest of her body, play with feet, recieve an OWO and finish off in missionary.

What’s changed is -

a) DFK is a lot more intense and more passionate.

b) Her personality is a lot more pleasant. Honestly, she is totally different from the girl I first met in my first session with her. This is due to repetition of visits I guess. But my chemistry with her was just getting better with each visit. Even her responses on text were a little more personal than her usual one line replies.

c) I added requests before meets to change her toenail paints to certain colours which she was happy to oblige with.

d) BJ skills have slightly improved, though I would still class them as average, makes more eye contact now though.

e) Her foot fetish skills also improved. Even during breaks between rounds she would a make a point of stroking her feet against my body and cock whilst we were talking, which I found was a nice sexy touch.

Also want to add, one of my meets was on very short notice. Given her track record of her last review, I would not be surprised if she had bumped a shorter booking in favour of seeing me.

Would I see her again? Honestly I feel fully satiated with her. I can’t see myself seeing her for at least another year. Too many fishes in the sea. There was a huge lust factor for me personally, that’s why I saw so many times. But now I feel my time is done.

Would I recommend? - Honestly, if your doing 30 mins in advance than no. If you just want to try her but don’t want to spend the money for several hours, then at least try to book her on the day. Less chances of being disappointed.

If it’s your first time seeing her, chances are you won’t find the same pleasant girl I found towards the end of my meets with her. Even if you spend the money for a longer session, you will most likely find her a little cold and arrogant. Bear in mind my review is after several meets, so I developed a good rapport with her by my second meet. If her attitude will bother you then stay away.

PS: If this type of second review is completely benign then let me know and I will stop.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: May 06, 2021, 11:20:04 am by Momodan38 »

Offline 2020rossjones

Solid review - been trying to see her, but actually been down to my avail - always seems to message back in a timely way for me

Offline Momodan38

always seems to message back in a timely way for me
You mean untimely way :D

Offline Discoballs

Glad you had fun . You're welcome to her . Far too many various negative comments on her flakyness for me to interested which is a shame as shes just my type .

But it's not a good selling point .... spend thousands on her or shes cold and arrogant .
« Last Edit: May 06, 2021, 06:36:34 pm by Discoballs »

Offline Hansolo69

I'd like to see a non air-brushed photo of here.

Sadly she looks a typical gold-digger sort with too much plastic / fakeness.

Offline Momodan38

Glad you had fun . You're welcome to her . Far too many various negative comments on her flakyness for me to interested which is a shame as shes just my type .

But it's not a good selling point .... spend thousands on her or shes cold and arrogant .

It's the main reason why I decided to do another review so punters can be aware. Also, "cold and arrogant", reflecting on those words, it does seem a bit harsh, it wasn't that she was going out of her way to be rude. It's just a layer of her personality, I found anyway.

Offline undercoverpunter

Cheers for the reviews.  Banging body no doubt but looking at YouTube she's ruined her looks with that nose job.

Offline Momodan38

UK Glamour Girls profile page is now back up again.

External Link/Members Only

Offline Discoballs

UK Glamour Girls profile page is now back up again.

External Link/Members Only

£600 FUCKING QUID . !!!   delusional. 

Offline thundercrackerxx

I met her in July and found she looked considerably different from her pictures. Her face looks far more butchered by surgery and she's thiccer too. The pics are photoshopped to within an inch of their life. I still had a fun time as she was nice and took a good fucking. But I seem to be the only person who thinks she looks quite different in real life compared to her heavily air brushed pictures.

Offline Momodan38

I met her in July and found she looked considerably different from her pictures. Her face looks far more butchered by surgery and she's thiccer too. The pics are photoshopped to within an inch of their life. I still had a fun time as she was nice and took a good fucking. But I seem to be the only person who thinks she looks quite different in real life compared to her heavily air brushed pictures.
So sorry….

I saw her again at the same time period as you.

I found her to have gained noticeable weight, the magic was gone.

I had warned a few fellow punters via PM who had shown interest in her. I was waiting for some time to pass before stating so publicly in one of her reviews, mine or others, but just forgot to update it.

Again, I wish I had been more prompt and on the ball so others could have been warned.

Again my sincerest apologies.

Edit- I see you have done a review of you’re own, so at least that is there. You also commented on PP1920’s review. So good job at that. Hopefully people can go in with grounded expectations with her.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2021, 02:30:15 pm by Momodan38 »

Offline Hansolo69

No idea how this tart got into Playboy, actually I do the cnut photographer was taking liberties with 'models'.

Offline magnetico

No idea how this tart got into Playboy

It seems to be in New Zealand in Oct 2019 as "Amber Honey", I guess that Playboy got really low standards nowadays.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2021, 12:52:50 am by magnetico »

Offline Hansolo69

It seems to be in New Zealand in Oct 2019 as "Amber Honey", I guess that Playboy got really low standards nowadays.
Yes, sadly Playboy is/are not as selective as they used to be.  Quite sad.
Really shocking, some of the 'models' now are very average, just have a hell of a lot of airbrushing to make them look half decent.

I prefer the days when photographers knew what they were doing and only worked with top class models.

Offline tdh

 Very striking eyes. If the BJ skills improved, looking at her eyes during oral would be a treat.  Way over priced for quality of service offered.