Author Topic: Flirty Chloe - Maidstone TOFTT  (Read 978 times)


2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6192425) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline matthew1986

Three negatives on the trot for me. Start wondering if it is me. Anyway, the review:

External Link/Members Only

Length of booking: 30 minutes

Price paid: £80.00 with no extras offered or asked for

Date: A week ago, in April 2021

Comms: All by text message, with clear discussion on service, time and location. When I had parked, detailed instructions given.

The girl: Saw this profile appear a short while ago and thought no reviews so I'd side swipe my preference for the day (NaughtySexyMariana) and see what Chloe had to offer. I wish I hadn't.

Age shows on AW as 24 and think this is accurate. Facially attractive, would be happy to wake up next to her each morning on looks alone, slender but not waif-like and the limited pictures on AW are accurate.

Venue: A private flat in Maidstone town centre, next to the Fremlin Walk car park. Parked at Fremlin walk and a 5 minute or so walk. Was given block number and code to get in, and when inside given flat number.

The meet: Not great from start to lack of finishing.

Requested 30 minute session at £80 and was seen on time.

As I approached the door opened and she hid behind the door completely - not even a brief look until door closed. Petite creature with a little summer dress on. Profile says 5' 5", I would have said shorter.

She led me to the room while answering text messages on her phone.

Entered the room, was not offered a shower and looking at the lone dirty towel when I left was glad I didn't ask. She took the cash, stripped off completely and lay on the bed. At this point she had not uttered a single word. Nothing.

I got undressed and lay next to her. No kissing at all and she started playing with my cock. After a minute or 2 of less than mediocre hand job, she started on a less than mediocre uncovered BJ. I am sure if she had carried on I would have finished eventually - but I had only booked 30 minutes and it was so bad this would not have been enough time.

Thought I may as well just fuck her - asked the question and she put the condom on. Still not a word from her just a had nod to indicate this was ok.

She lay back down in missionary and I climbed aboard. Cock inside and started my moves but then got a whiff of dirty vagina, followed by another whiff of body odour. Cock instantly soft.

Climbed off, condom off and went for a piss. She was immediatley back on her phone.

Dressed and off I went, home for a wank. From entering car park to exiting the car park was 28 minutes. Including 5 minutes each way walking to the flat and back.

Summary: I'll not be returning. There was nothing from her. The absolute definition of perfunctory performance. And there is no excuse for poor hygiene. Flirty Chloe? Dirty Chloe more like.

Offline massageseeker1977

Not very good at living up to the flirty in her name then....

Offline tigerladd

I agree with the original post, I have met her and it was very difficult to strike up a convo, sex was ordinary, vanilla would be an over statement.

I thought maybe she was tired

She was clean when I met her, so not flirty or dirty, just "Chloe"

I'd rate as NEUTRAL

Offline uncle jessie

I agree with the original post, I have met her and it was very difficult to strike up a convo, sex was ordinary, vanilla would be an over statement.

I thought maybe she was tired

She was clean when I met her, so not flirty or dirty, just "Chloe"

I'd rate as NEUTRAL

Perhaps if you had posted a review it could have saved the OP  from wasting 80 quid .
« Last Edit: April 28, 2021, 03:22:42 pm by uncle jessie »

Offline matthew1986

I agree with the original post, I have met her and it was very difficult to strike up a convo, sex was ordinary, vanilla would be an over statement.

I thought maybe she was tired

She was clean when I met her, so not flirty or dirty, just "Chloe"

I'd rate as NEUTRAL

Clearly don’t agree with the original post as it was rated as negative and not NEUTRAL.

Offline Simon1977

Aye should have posted and helped a fellow punter out. I f i see a neutral/negative i tend to look elsewhere so the reviews are vital for that to forewarn others.