Service Provider wants review to be taken down

[Hotdogboy88]

Where's the 'right to post' rule to be found? Beyond being a member. As for 'respected' spare me the
pomp.

Also I seem to have become the object of a few members spite and sport for the evening. Whilst all ganging up on me and accusing me of being the bully, all on my little own, bless.

You like to play the victim don’t you.
You Wade In Throwing insults and sulk because you been called out. Grow a pair, go use them, then write a review.

[Hotdogboy88]

I think the general consensus is FishFace is a waste of oxygen 

+1

[Fishface]

+1

Nasty boys.

[scutty brown]

FFS haven't you all twigged yet that Fishface is female?
How many more clues does she have to give you?

[Hotdogboy88]

Nasty boys.

Again playing the victim. If you gonna dish it out you need to learn to take it.

[The Owl]

FFS haven't you all twigged yet that Fishface is female?
How many more clues does she have to give you?

I was having a look through the posts made by Fishface. I agree with you. So now the question is, is Fishface an SP masquerading as an SS, a genuine female SS or a troll of some kind? I suspect SP masquerading as an SS.

[shed]

FFS haven't you all twigged yet that Fishface is female?
How many more clues does she have to give you?

Totally agree, she will be sat there laughing her tits off.

[Charlie Chalk]

Totally agree, she will be sat there laughing her tits off.

I’m starting to come to the same conclusion. Time to stop feeding the troll, maybe Davie M will be along shortly for another quiet word or maybe a swing of the banhammer.

[Hotdogboy88]

FFS haven't you all twigged yet that Fishface is female?
How many more clues does she have to give you?

We know as posted earlier on. 

[Hotdogboy88]

Its a woman. Obviously not a lesbo either. 😄

Just here.

[winkywanky]

Any more?! Thanks for demonstrating what a bunch of thick bullies some of you are. One after the other lol.

You, in this thread, get off on attacking other members here who don't conform to your bully boy ethical code. As if it matters.

You virtually called everyone on the site a heartless cunt, while at the same time asserting your moral own personal moral high ground as 'a MAN and a decent human being'.

You are a gormless, superior, simpering fucking twat, and if you think anyone here is going to think any different of you, simply delusional as well  .

[winkywanky]

I don't 'wish to be banned'

What part of slagging off virtually the whole membership of the site, and simultaneously wishing to be seen as some shining beacon of humility, do you not understand? Wanker.

[alabama1]

You virtually called everyone on the site a heartless cunt, while at the same time asserting your moral own personal moral high ground as 'a MAN and a decent human being'.

You are a gormless, superior, simpering fucking twat, and if you think anyone here is going to think any different of you, simply delusional as well  .

Oh come on WW don't hold back. Say what you think for fuck's sake 

[winkywanky]

Where's the 'right to post' rule to be found? Beyond being a member. As for 'respected' spare me the
pomp.

Also I seem to have become the object of a few members spite and sport for the evening. Whilst all ganging up on me and accusing me of being the bully, all on my little own, bless.

How about the right to slag off the membership while taking and contributing fuck all yourself? Is that because you're a MAN and a human being? You're happy to take intel off the site and give nothing back though. You remind me of Groucho Marx, he wouldn't want to join a club which was happy to have him as a member. He was funny though, you on the other hand are deeply unfunny.

[winkywanky]

Oh come on WW don't hold back. Say what you think for fuck's sake 

Just had a double espresso 

 

[winkywanky]

FFS haven't you all twigged yet that Fishface is female?
How many more clues does she have to give you?

Who gives a shit, in a spirit of true equality I see Fishface as a useless cunt, either way.

[Fishface]

Who gives a shit, in a spirit of true equality I see Fishface as a useless cunt, either way.

Rule 23 Abuse towards other members

[winkywanky]

Rule 23 Abuse towards other members

When it is thoroughly deserved, discretion may be applied 

[Steve2]

When it is thoroughly deserved, discretion may be applied 

Are you the Boss now Winky?

[winkywanky]

Are you the Boss now Winky?

Of course I'm not the boss. I wouldn't be so arrogant and I'm sure you wouldn't either  .But anyone who's been here for 5mins (even yourself) would know that members are allowed robust criticism of each other, and the allowed extent of that is at the Mods' discretion.

23 Abuse towards other members
Discord must be kept civil. Excessive abuse/swearing is not acceptable. "You're acting like a twat" is not excessive. However, "you're a fucking inbred cunt" is excessive and is not acceptable. Bullying will result in a ban. Abuse to the Mod or Admin Team will result in a ban.

That's the actual rule. Anyone can see (even yourself) that discretion will be applied. That discretion will be based on the wording used, whether it's persistent or trolling, whether there was severe provocation (ie both as bad as each other), even whether someone is a newbie, throwing their weight around against established members. Basically commonsense.

As an established member yourself I'd have thought you'd know?

[Steve2]

Of course I'm not the boss. I wouldn't be so arrogant and I'm sure you wouldn't either  .But anyone who's been here for 5mins (even yourself) would know that members are allowed robust criticism of each other, and the allowed extent of that is at the Mods' discretion.

23 Abuse towards other members
Discord must be kept civil. Excessive abuse/swearing is not acceptable. "You're acting like a twat" is not excessive. However, "you're a fucking inbred cunt" is excessive and is not acceptable. Bullying will result in a ban. Abuse to the Mod or Admin Team will result in a ban.

That's the actual rule. Anyone can see (even yourself) that discretion will be applied. That discretion will be based on the wording used, whether it's persistent or trolling, whether there was severe provocation (ie both as bad as each other), even whether someone is a newbie, throwing their weight around against established members. Basically commonsense.

As an established member yourself I'd have thought you'd know?

Who gives a shit, in a spirit of true equality I see Fishface as a useless cunt, either way.

Winky, that is not acceptable. I'd have thought you would know that 

[winkywanky]

Who gives a shit, in a spirit of true equality I see Fishface as a useless cunt, either way.

Winky, that is not acceptable. I'd have thought you would know that 

Agreed with your assessment highlighted in red.

However, what I do know is that the OP and then Fishface labelling themselves as some kind of caped crusaders and by implication, the membership of UKP as inhumane/misogynistic and not real men is worthy of a good degree of derision, which frankly, I am only too happy to supply. If you feel I have overstepped the mark then feel free to report my posts for the summary justice you feel is deserved  .

[Fuzzyduck]

Agreed with your assessment highlighted in red.

However, what I do know is that the OP and then Fishface labelling themselves as some kind of caped crusaders and by implication, the membership of UKP as inhumane/misogynistic and not real men is worthy of a good degree of derision, which frankly, I am only too happy to supply. If you feel I have overstepped the mark then feel free to report my posts for the summary justice you feel is deserved  .

And you weren't even the first to call him/her a cunt.

[winkywanky]

And you weren't even the first to call him/her a cunt.

I defer to your superior speed in that regard  .

[winkywanky]

I take that back, someone else must have called him a cunt first, you merely referred to him as a cock   

[Fuzzyduck]

I take that back, someone else must have called him a cunt first, you merely referred to him as a cock   

Finn made the early call I believe. I felt that, since since he/she wanted desperately to identify as a man then I should be respectful and use cock rather than cunt.

[winkywanky]

...sounds fair to me 

[Kev40ish]

I take that back, someone else must have called him a cunt first, you merely referred to him as a cock   

Behave...
Not worth getting a ban over it 

[winkywanky]

  

[90125]

 

Your Review : Post ratio isn’t the best here is it 

[winkywanky]

Your Review : Post ratio isn’t the best here is it 

No, it's shit to be frank. Punting hasn't been too clever lately because of the pandemic, perhaps I should just shut the fuck up and not mess up the ratio any more? Always an option I suppose.

[90125]

No, it's shit to be frank. Punting hasn't been too clever lately because of the pandemic, perhaps I should just shut the fuck up and not mess up the ratio any more? Always an option I suppose.

Agreed. A quality daily dump is more satisfying than having Diarrhea.

[Atlas1957]

I'm kind of interested on the lack of commentary on Fishface's 6 years and no reviews by mod/admin. I see the odd four/five/six year old account with no reviews floating around and I always wonder why they are allowed to stick around. Are they an SP? I know there is a forum bug that prevents some SPs having their accounts showing as Service Providers, but I thought you had found a workaround for that by adding '(Service Provider)' to their name?

[PunterP]

No, it's shit to be frank. Punting hasn't been too clever lately because of the pandemic, perhaps I should just shut the fuck up and not mess up the ratio any more? Always an option I suppose.

Except your last review was clearly during the pandemic as you and the sp were talking about the 'end of the world scenario'... Unless you were recently watching deep impact, clearly you've got no problem punting at the moment

[Fabaceous]

A good few years ago - I had two meets with a lovely young black girl in Manchester - a 1 on 1 and a threesome with a friend. I wrote a review of the first encounter but didn't review the threesome as it was so close to the first booking.
Anyway, some months later, some random dude contacted me on my punting phone demanding that the review be taken down. He started sending me threatening texts and saying he would take me to court - I told him to i bring it on. Sadly, he didn't know who I was - pillock. Clearly, the SP had kept my number and could tell the review was about her.

The review is still there as a record of my fun:-)