Paty4u - Bond St

[Bushmills]

Been lurking here for a while now, thought I'd better make a contribution.

I can't believe no-one on here has found this stunner, who I saw yesterday:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location: her flat, very near Bond Street station. Long climb up to the top, but what awaits is well worth it. Flat is immaculate and feels like an upmarket hotel room. Bedroom has a very big bed. Excellent.

Physical: she is simply stunning. I really couldn't believe my luck. Tall, slender, with a bum that has to be seen to be believed. Firm, well proportioned boobs with large, sensitive nipples, which she enjoyed me licking. Didn't see a scar but they felt like they had been slightly enhanced. This isn't usually my thing, but she is so well proportioned that it all worked.
All over tan with faint lines.
Strikingly beautiful face with beautiful soft eyes.
Only minor thing - she has braces so oral was performed carefully - though very skilfully I must say!

Booking: I booked via AW email system. This was done quickly and professionally. On the day I texted to confirm and got the full address back with no fuss.
Overall excellent with no messing around.

She is Brazilian but speaks excellent English. No communication problems at all.

The meeting: I arrived between work meetings and climbed the stairs to the top apartment. When she opened the door, my heart skipped a beat - she IS the girl in the photos. Some of them looked a bit airbrushed but I thought I'd take a chance and I was not disappointed. She is *absolutely* beautiful.

We got the paperwork out of the way, then I took a quick shower.

She was wearing a nice seethrough blouse and some tight pants which showed off her legs and bum. I cam out of the shower to find her lying on the bed with a naughty glint in her eye. She pulled off my towel with a flick of her toe and invited me to join her on the bed.

Her clothes soon came off, allowing me to run my hands over her feather-soft skin. This soon progressed to enjoying each others' bodies in a variety of different ways. Lots of sensual touching and kissing led on to RO, covered oral then on to the main event in cowgirl, doggy and mish. She seemed to enjoy the doggy most and does a good line in dirty talk which I really liked.

While riding and sucking me she was very attentive, keeping almost continuous eye contact with me. To have such a beautiful girl - with *such* beautiful eyes - looking adoringly at me in this way was deeply enchanting, almost heavenly.

It was a hot day outside, so Paty had put a large fan at the foot of the bed. The gentle breeze blew her hair around her face in a very attractive way which only added to the whole experience.

Finished by coming over her lovely boobs. Cleaned up then chatted for a while before I headed for the shower and on to my next meeting.

Paty has a very gentle, sensual touch - she says she is a tantric therapist, which I can believe (and must also try out on a future visit). I really enjoy this kind of sensual, tantalising touching and will be back for more!

In summary: an outstanding experience with a stunning young lady.
I will be back to try out her tantric experience, but also just to enjoy the company of the beautiful and attentive Miss Paty.

I've had my share of good and bad punts, but this is up there with the best of them!

[mothra]

I can't believe no-one on here has found this stunner, who I saw yesterday:

@ 200 per pop I'm sure most will agree it is rather pricey for the average salary punter. Great if you can afford it and long may you continue.

[Sedlmayer]

Oh dear -
"The tribute that you give to me is for my time and companionship" 

[Stav096]

The second profile picture is that of a girl that use to be (may still be) on the Anna's Angels site; not the same girl as in the other two profile pictures.

[kowalski]

Nice report  but I agree, well pricy.Me personally half that thank you very much or less or a nice bit of Poland at £40 ph. Check out Roksa.pl

[Bushmills]

The second profile picture is that of a girl that use to be (may still be) on the Anna's Angels site; not the same girl as in the other two profile pictures.

If you mean the one in the middle - with her facing a mirror - I can assure you that is definitely her. You can see her face reflected in the mirror. This is the girl I saw this week.

I'm not sure about the third one where she's wearing white lacy things - the facial profile does not match hers.

As for costs - she is on my upper limit. I have paid similar amounts to other WGs, expecting great things and had an average time.
The only other one who is as good for this kind of money (for me) is tippingthevelvet up in Manchester.
Paty is physically very close to ideal for me, and I had a wonderful time, so I'm not complaining.

[mrhappypants]

Ably, I think you are a tout or the girl herself and here is why.

The going rate on Adultwork is about £120 per hour.  This girl is newly double that and has a pretty limited service list.  There are plenty of other girls who are very attractive at a much lower rate so why would you pick out this one?

Your review is effusively one sided.

You have a very limited numer of pots and no previous reviews.  We would much prefer to hear a balanced review of a girl in the sub £140 ph category.

I hope you prove me wrong but I smell bullshit.

[Bushmills]

There are plenty of other girls who are very attractive at a much lower rate so why would you pick out this one?

No previous reviews and I had a good time.

Your review is effusively one sided.

I do not believe the review is one sided. I have had plenty of crap punts with unenthusiastic girls, mouldy apartments, bait & switch etc. for once I had a decent time so I thought I should share the experience.

We would much prefer to hear a balanced review of a girl in the sub £140 ph category.

Sorry, didn't realise there was a price limit for reviews. Will stick to cheaper girls in the future.

You have a very limited numer of pots and no previous reviews.

We all have to start somewhere. Nice to be made to feel welcome.

I hope you prove me wrong but I smell bullshit.

I am neither the girl nor a tout. I do appreciate that there are a lot of both on a forum like this, but on this occasion your nose is wrong.

[mrhappypants]

I have had plenty of crap punts with unenthusiastic girls, mouldy apartments, bait & switch etc.

Review them.

[The High Sparrow]

I do not believe the review is one sided. I have had plenty of crap punts with unenthusiastic girls, mouldy apartments, bait & switch etc. for

   

Yes please review them so  we can avoid. That's what this forumn is all about

[jbl]

Ably, I think you are a tout or the girl herself and here is why.

The going rate on Adultwork is about £120 per hour.  This girl is newly double that and has a pretty limited service list.  There are plenty of other girls who are very attractive at a much lower rate so why would you pick out this one?

Your review is effusively one sided.

You have a very limited numer of pots and no previous reviews.  We would much prefer to hear a balanced review of a girl in the sub £140 ph category.

I hope you prove me wrong but I smell bullshit.

and this is why there are so many lurkers on this forum who dont post reviews.....

[helmsdale]

and this is why there are so many lurkers on this forum who dont post reviews.....

To have such a beautiful girl - with *such* beautiful eyes - looking adoringly at me in this way was deeply enchanting, almost heavenly.

This is Mills & Boon stuff, no genuine punter writes like this.

[The happy one]

Hey

Well if the review is real or not I don't know nor care really

For 1 £200 and no oral without waste of my money

2. Fit looking bird

3. Have paid £80 an hour and had a great time. Have paid £ 500 an hour had a great time

So cost is up to what you want I have not read anywhere that reviews are only for cheap girls.

But this one is not for me

I want owo and the girl to enjoy me spunking over her face and open mouth and to take a couple of photos of it

That to me is worth £200

[flouch]

If she looks like those photos, quality of services are good, and she works from a nice/clean flat, I'd happily pay £200 an hour.

[mrhappypants]

and this is why there are so many lurkers on this forum who dont post reviews.....

Jbl,  let me offer you a few words of wisdom so you and anyone else who posts without reviewing can grow a pair and write your first review:

1 Use a review you think is well written and write yours to the same issue about the girl you saw. 
2 in your review answer the questions "what sort of punter would want to see this girl" (eg one who likes big boobs and a pretty face, wants CIM, not worried about PSE) and what sort punter should avoid (likes skinny, needs a very enthusiastic performance, wants two pops in the hour).
3 describe in reasonable detail the services you  enjoyed
4 lists any useful information related to booking (she cannot read English, she provides services not listed if you are clean and respectful) she only works office hours.
5 help other punters on this forum decide if they want to visit her rather than trying to pursuade.

There are others but this will be a start.
5

[Pastime]

If you don't like the review just move on, what is with the unnecessary critique?

For my part I found it useful, and I'm pretty sure others did.

[mrhappypants]

If you don't like the review just move on, what is with the unnecessary critique?

For my part I found it useful, and I'm pretty sure others did.

Mate, it so easy to spot the fake posts by touts trying to build up profiles on this site, 

[Stealthshagger]

several have signed up just to post their support here, it looks like.

[mrhappypants]

several have signed up just to post their support here, it looks like.

That is right, and if we don't call it out some unsuspecting punter is going to find his way along there only to find he is getting fleeced for a rediculous amount of money (£200 !!! ) by some old pig with fake pics, braces (!) and a shit attitude and service list who spends her days surfing the internet posting fake reviews rather than offering decent service at a reasonable price.

[Bushmills]

That is right, and if we don't call it out some unsuspecting punter is going to find his way along there only to find he is getting fleeced for a rediculous amount of money (£200 !!! ) by some old pig with fake pics, braces (!) and a shit attitude and service list who spends her days surfing the internet posting fake reviews rather than offering decent service at a reasonable price.

Now that's just rude.

You're not calling anything out. You're being deliberately offensive in order to try to prove your incorrect assumption.

Don't know how I'm supposed to prove that I'm a genuine punter but I really can't be bothered.

[Stealthshagger]

Now that's just rude.

You're not calling anything out. You're being deliberately offensive in order to try to prove your incorrect assumption.

Don't know how I'm supposed to prove that I'm a genuine punter but I really can't be bothered.

He is calling something out. This bullshit. you forget to tell us to treat her right or how she is the best escort on adultwork, and how you laughed, you cried, you fell in love...for only £200. Shes an angel right?

[always_a_winner]

sbly: without doubt the review is the either the tout or the girl herself. Your review is too wordy just like the overly wordy profile on adultwork. And just for the record, you charge £200 an hour and you don't even offer CIM or anal. For that cash an hour you should offer a lot more.

[Stav096]

The girl in the second picture is not Brazilian. She is not currently with Anna's Angels, but was previously with them.

[mrhappypants]

Now that's just rude.

You're not calling anything out. You're being deliberately offensive in order to try to prove your incorrect assumption.

Don't know how I'm supposed to prove that I'm a genuine punter but I really can't be bothered.

As I told you before; post reviews - would that you could.

[Jason]

For the record I believe that “sbly” is not touting. His Adultwork profile should be this one:
External Link/Members Only

Unless he just copied from him it is very easy to be identified as he submitted an even fluffier version of the above review for paty4u on AW (without any negatives – at least here he mentioned that the girl has braces in her mouth) : External Link/Members Only

Also I completely disagree about having an upper price limit on what reports we consider useful. While I support the view that the review section is very useful for our members in finding recommendations about low priced good service providers I believe the review section is most often used in reverse. A review will be read by those who come across an escort profile through their own internet searches, are already willing to spend x amount of money (here £200ph) and are checking across the internet to find a review to verify whether the girl is genuine and good provider or a bullet that should be dodged. If anything a genuine, non-fluffy report about an expensive girl is more important than those about cheaper girls as the amount of money you risk in a single punt is higher.

[mrhappypants]

Jason, I remain doubtful about the veracity of the original review but agree wholeheartedly about the usefulness of balanced reviews on more expensive girls. particularly the combination of looks, attitude and service list.

[Stealthshagger]

I agree with the price bit, but this review is bollocks I feel. The review even uses the same terms as her profile repeatedly. And the people joining just to agree with the review? Bitch, please. We know its you Paty/Paty's manager/pimp/boyfriend etc.

[nervyfooker]

... feather-soft skin.
...To have such a beautiful girl - with *such* beautiful eyes - looking adoringly at me in this way was deeply enchanting, almost heavenly...

genuine punter or not this sort of language
is just cringeworthy,nails on the blackboard stuff
and few on this board will take you seriously.

[Stealthshagger]

and the toe flick of the towel. And the fan blowing her hair. I almost expect Berlin to be singing in the background as they make love on an f-14. Me thinks Paty got her view on punts from the male perspective from watching pretty woman or the like.

[Jason]

As I said I believe he is a genuine punter but a fluffy one. His review is as useful as the other AW field reports (i.e. degree of usefulness 10-15%). At least he confirms pictures authenticity and good place. I would also reckon  (albeit the services offered were limited and cum once principle was applied and despite the fluffy report) that the delivery of what Paty offers should be OK. And to be fair to the reviewer he mentioned a couple of negatives:
-"they felt like they had been slightly enhanced." (Paty's profile says natural)
-"Only minor thing - she has braces so oral was performed carefully."

That said the following ultra-fluffy, Harlequin romance novel style, soft-porn descriptions are just plain ridiculous:
-"I came out of the shower to find her lying on the bed with a naughty glint in her eye."
-"She pulled off my towel with a flick of her toe and invited me to join her on the bed."
- "Allowing me to run my hands over her feather-soft skin."
-"To have such a beautiful girl - with *such* beautiful eyes - looking adoringly at me in this way was deeply enchanting, almost heavenly."
-"The gentle breeze blew her hair around her face in a very attractive way which only added to the whole experience."
-"I really enjoy this kind of sensual, tantalising touching and will be back for more!"

To the OP: If this is the kind of reviews you are writing please stick on submitting them on Adultwork only.

[Stealthshagger]

As I said I believe he is a genuine punter but a fluffy one. His review is as useful as the other AW field reports (i.e. degree of usefulness 10-15%). At least he confirms pictures authenticity and good place. I would also reckon  (albeit the services offered were limited and cum once principle was applied and despite the fluffy report) that the delivery of what Paty offers should be OK. And to be fair to the reviewer he mentioned a couple of negatives:
-"they felt like they had been slightly enhanced." (Paty's profile says natural)
-"Only minor thing - she has braces so oral was performed carefully."

That said the following ultra-fluffy, Harlequin romance novel style, soft-porn descriptions are just plain ridiculous:
-"I came out of the shower to find her lying on the bed with a naughty glint in her eye."
-"She pulled off my towel with a flick of her toe and invited me to join her on the bed."
- "Allowing me to run my hands over her feather-soft skin."
-"To have such a beautiful girl - with *such* beautiful eyes - looking adoringly at me in this way was deeply enchanting, almost heavenly."
-"The gentle breeze blew her hair around her face in a very attractive way which only added to the whole experience."
-"I really enjoy this kind of sensual, tantalising touching and will be back for more!"

To the OP: If this is the kind of reviews you are writing please stick on submitting them on Adultwork only.

the OP said they met the girl in the pics, so please see stav096's posts. pics from elsewhere and not correct nationality

[Jason]

the OP said they met the girl in the pics, so please see stav096's posts. pics from elsewhere and not correct nationality

Stav096's posts say that the girl was previously listed on a London agency. This doesn't prove that it is not her. She may retired from them and is now an indie (and she worked as a semi-independent for some time as well). As for the correct nationality agencies lie about nationalities all the time especially for Romanians saying they are Spanish, Italians etc and for Brazilians saying that they are from other South American Countries or Spanish/Portuguese etc. The AW nationality is correct as this is a verified profile and required a passport or ID in order to be confirmed. So unless Stav096 met the girl in the pics himself and can verify with certainly that she is not Brazilian (because for example of being Brazilian himself, he recognised the accent etc) I cannot consider his comments as any kind of proof against this girl’s second picture authenticity.

[mrhappypants]

Jason,  I think you are missing an important bit of evidence.  After my initial challenge to the honesty of the profile, notice how there are three very suspect contributions from jbl, flouch and pastime.  The use of "stooges" to create the impression of consensus is the oldest con trick in the book.  Milligram produced some amazing results looking at this 50 years ago.  The initial review was suspect, but the clustering of stooges in this way is a classic tell of a con in action.

[GreyDave]

Mr Happy pants is spot on 
The poster?young lady    has cut and pasted and worked up the reveiwer.
I`ve only reveiwed 2 and those have been rushed badly typed and in correct grammer
Have been punting 30 plus years and have never paid more than £150 and that was for a couple of hours
Soho walk ups change frequently as do many local "houses" so often I feel it pointless reveiwing as girls Ive read about often go
(like my last reveiwed big titted Hungarian working from a Travellodge)
The reveiw is like one written by a good PA whoops (pimp
 I try to follow Steve 2 picks to ensure VFFM

[jbl]

Jason,  I think you are missing an important bit of evidence.  After my initial challenge to the honesty of the profile, notice how there are three very suspect contributions from jbl, flouch and pastime.  The use of "stooges" to create the impression of consensus is the oldest con trick in the book.  Milligram produced some amazing results looking at this 50 years ago.  The initial review was suspect, but the clustering of stooges in this way is a classic tell of a con in action.

oh no! I thought by creating this account in December 2013 no one would pick me as a fraud!!

I am not associated with this post, I was simply pointing out that there must be lots of people like me who go to write a review but then cant be arsed as no doubt there will be a forum know it all who picks it apart....

carry on, i am done

[Jason]

Jason,  I think you are missing an important bit of evidence.  After my initial challenge to the honesty of the profile, notice how there are three very suspect contributions from jbl, flouch and pastime.  The use of "stooges" to create the impression of consensus is the oldest con trick in the book.  Milligram produced some amazing results looking at this 50 years ago.  The initial review was suspect, but the clustering of stooges in this way is a classic tell of a con in action.

Look Dave I don’t know what the true motives of these posters are but in my view they are just fluffy lurkers:
Pastime is a member since 07 August 2013
Slby is a member since 16 December 2013
Jbl is a member since 26 December 2013
Flouch is a member since 07 April 2014

Do you really think that Paty organised such an elaborate scam? Planting herself secretly and waiting months until she posts a review about herself and use the other profiles as stooges? And if these profiles belong to the same person or are otherwise related then Admin would have most probably recognised it from the IP addresses (and in case they access from anonymous proxy servers and TOR he can look it up to see if that is the case). But if all this is indeed organised then hat's off to her for being so methodical! I know that we all want to protect the forum against fake reports but in my opinion we should not get carried away with such theories.

[Stav096]

Stav096's posts say that the girl was previously listed on a London agency. This doesn't prove that it is not her. She may retired from them and is now an indie (and she worked as a semi-independent for some time as well). As for the correct nationality agencies lie about nationalities all the time especially for Romanians saying they are Spanish, Italians etc and for Brazilians saying that they are from other South American Countries or Spanish/Portuguese etc. The AW nationality is correct as this is a verified profile and required a passport or ID in order to be confirmed. So unless Stav096 met the girl in the pics himself and can verify with certainly that she is not Brazilian (because for example of being Brazilian himself, he recognised the accent etc) I cannot consider his comments as any kind of proof against this girl’s second picture authenticity.

The second picture is not only of a different nationality, but of a girl of different ethnicity. The girls in the first and third pictures are not the same girl as the one n the second picture. This is clearly a fake profile.

P.S.
The girl I am referring is extremely unlikely to turn-up on AW.

[Jason]

The second picture is not only of a different nationality, but of a girl of different ethnicity. The girls in the first and third pictures are not the same girl as the one n the second picture. This is clearly a fake profile.

P.S.
The girl I am referring is extremely unlikely to turn-up on AW.

Look Stav096. I am well aware that most agency girls don't turn on AW. In fact from the about 150-200 escorts working in type A London agencies only 5-6 are also on AW as independents (and from another 150 working in type B and C agencies only 10 WGs have AW profiles and these profiles were created by the agencies themselves). Also there are cases of girls that have retired from agencies and are now on AW. They are not many. But they exist.

Also may I ask you how you concluded that she is of different nationality or even ethnicity? And can you really tell about Brazilian girls? They come in all colours and shapes! Plus the girl that you are referring to (in case it is a different person as you believe) in her former agency’s ads she was saying that she is Brazilian or mixed Indian/Latin and that she speaks fluent Portuguese:
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Obviously if someone can look at her PG (where she has a lot of pics) it would sort out this “issue”. But even if she is not the girl in the pics I still believe that the above review was not written by Paty or by a pimp or by a tout and that it was a mistake done by a genuine but ultimately fluffy and with unreliable vision punter. I hope if sbly is genuine (as I believe he is) he can confirm that the girl he saw was the girl in the above agency profiles or recognise his mistake in case he made it in first place. Well that is getting surreal but anyway…

[Bushmills]

Also may I ask you how you concluded that she is of different nationality or even ethnicity? And can you really tell about Brazilian girls? They come in all colours and shapes! Plus the girl that you are referring to (in case it is a different person as you believe) in her former agency’s ads she was saying that she is Brazilian or mixed Indian/Latin and that she speaks fluent Portuguese:
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Obviously if someone can look at her PG (where she has a lot of pics) it would sort out this “issue”.

But even if she is not the girl in the pics I still believe that the above review was not written by Paty or by a pimp or by a tout and that it was a mistake done by a genuine but ultimately fluffy and with unreliable vision punter. I hope if sbly is genuine (as I believe he is) he can confirm that the girl he saw was the girl in the above agency profiles or recognise his mistake in case he made it in first place. Well that is getting surreal but anyway…

Thank you Jason - at least there is someone on here who checks out the facts rather then jumping to conclusions.

I have looked at her PG - which has a few pictures in common with the gallery for "Fiona" above. I can't get the other link to load the images - I am overseas on the slowest possible hotel internet connection.

This is definitely the same girl.

I did wonder if she was mixed race. Brazil is a huge cultural melting pot, so this is very common. Was wondering if Japanese-Brazilian but from her face, Indian-Brazilian makes sense.

Sorry for the fluffiness of the review - I did try to tone it down a bit from the review I put on AW - but clearly got carried away. Will stick to more mechanical and explicit details in future.
Having said that, I *did* have an outstandingly good time. Enough to make me be bothered to spend the time writing a review.
For me, the more expensive girls are about how beautiful the girl is and how enthusiastically the service is delivered. I prefer the girl to take the lead. Maybe others have different yardsticks. Paty looked after me very well, much better than most.

But as jbl says, if the prevailing opinion on the board is that anyone new posting a positive review must be a fake, and if other newbies join in to comment, it must be an elaborate scam, then why bother?

[mrhappypants]

Look Dave I don’t know what the true motives of these posters are but in my view they are just fluffy lurkers:
Pastime is a member since 07 August 2013
Slby is a member since 16 December 2013
Jbl is a member since 26 December 2013
Flouch is a member since 07 April 2014

Do you really think that Paty organised such an elaborate scam? Planting herself secretly and waiting months until she posts a review about herself and use the other profiles as stooges? And if these profiles belong to the same person or are otherwise related then Admin would have most probably recognised it from the IP addresses (and in case they access from anonymous proxy servers and TOR he can look it up to see if that is the case). But if all this is indeed organised then hat's off to her for being so methodical! I know that we all want to protect the forum against fake reports but in my opinion we should not get carried away with such theories.

Jason,  if you think the combination of the excessively one sided review, together with the cluster of supporting commentary from a bunch of respondents, all of whom have a low number of post, looks legitimate then we are just going to have to agree to disagree.

Nik's ability to track the login pattern of respondents is unknown to me.  But you will agree, won't you, that it isn't beyond the bounds of possibility that pimps routinely create new profiles on here and have accounts on the go that they can call on to manage an argument?

Dave

If you r

[kong]

this girl looks gorgeous but i wonder who the hell is paying 300 for a single hour!

[Bushmills]

She was £200 / hr when I saw her.

I have been back a few times and, yes, she is stunning and very good, but at £300 / hr I won't be rushing back.

[Bushmills]

For those of you who read my original fluffy review - I did have an outstanding first punt with her. Subsequent visits were also very good.

The braces I mentioned have now gone

Boobs *ARE* enhanced - but not overdone = B/C cup. Perky but not like rocks... i.e. a 'believable' end result.
Incisions and stitches very well hidden - took me two visits to see where they were, just under the areolas. Nicely done (I say that as a professional compliment - I did surgical training many moons ago and know nice work when I see it  )

Definitely not a clock watcher - we always over-ran by a good 15-20 mins.

Delightful girl overall, but £200/hr was pushing it.