Author Topic: Chelsea House of Divine South Ken  (Read 4630 times)

Offline NIK

Been to House of Divine just the once before three years ago when I saw an excellent English girl called Sally (report on UKP). Never got around to going again for a number of reasons, two being HOD Sth Kensington isn’t open weekends and I'm not keen on the revolving door parlour experience these days.
Another reason is if both my excellent regulars Amy and Nicoletta are available I'm not into taking chances these days. However Nic was away and I thought I'd save the ever reliable Amy until Saturday before I went home. Little was I to know that I wouldn't get to see her either!
As I was meeting a friend in Earl's Court at 8 pm I thought a 45 minute app in Sth Ken at either 6.30 or 7 would be just the ticket.
Despite phoning when they opened they could only do half an hour at 5.30 which wasn't what I hoped for a start (although I was later glad it was only 30 min). Like the equally busy London Retreat it's not always easy to make an appointment at HOD, another reason I hadn't bothered since Sally.

Chelsea, who has full face photos, looked stunning on the website and she has one positive report. I thought feedback at HOD doesn't matter that much as I thought most of the girls were supposed to be good. Another mistake.
Ten minutes before I was due to go in I checked UKP and a member had kindly sent me a pm with some photos of Chelsea without the photoshopping. Now I didn’t expect her to be as stunning as the pics on the website; despite what many say in my experience they NEVER are, however she did look considerably different. Another member subsequently said she looked so different it was like bait and switch - I wouldn’t go that far, it was the same girl, but it’s amazing what they can do with the photos these days.
Two of my very rare recent none Amy/Nic punts with Raisa of Anna’s Angels and a decent service but mad EE called Elena both last year didn’t look like their photos either. However although far from the stunner of the photos Chelsea was by no means a minger and I was right outside and just ten minutes away from the appointment. Thinking maybe she would provide a great service anyway I went ahead.

Within two minutes my unerring punting radar had detected it would not be a good service. On meeting she had presented her cheek ostentatiously for a kiss, this ALWAYS suggests there will be no proper kissing. And so it proved. There wasn’t even any body to body contact as she knelt on the bed keeping as far away from me as possible. At first I thought she was going to offer a massage, but no it was straight for my cock. Some hand manipulation and the lightest touches of OWO.
As I laid back and made the best of it, thinking that it’s still only £70 and could have been worse had I booked longer I was thinking it was 1994 all over again. I’d had this kind of service countless times in the 1990’s and after dozens of full on punts with the likes of Nicoletta it wasn’t what I expect these days.
Despite taking a tab of Viagra my old man was still resolutely resting. I asked her to sit on my face. She complied and let me give her pussy and arse some attention which always gets me harder. At least she seemed to respond genuinely with little sighs, etc which always turns me on more than obvious fake stuff, and when she began to grind her arse firmly down on me as usually happens I shot my load.
I was out however before the end of the appointment.

Now looking back on my report on Raisa of Anna’s Angels I gave her a positive report for pretty much the same service, and Elena who I did mention but didn’t formally report provided a similar service. I’m usually not up for full sex, even with Viagra, unless the girl really gets me going as Nicoletta always does, so 69 is usually the way I climax.
However Elena did kiss and also provide my favoured w/s whilst Raisa’s owo was much better than Chelsea’s.
I was initially going to give Chelsea a neutral report as she did what I requested and eventually ground her arse down on me in the way that always gets me going, however for the lack of kissing, cuddling, body to body contact and anything remotely resembling a gfe it will have to be negative.

Ironically in 1994 I would probably have thought it a positive punt.
However hundreds of punts down the line I am a totally different punter with very different expectations.

Offline Steve2

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,522
  • Likes: 40
  •  
  • Reviews: 97
It's always good to check exactly that what YOU want is on offer BEFORE you hand over the cash NIK , but you already knew that.

A shame because in the photos , she looks spot on

Offline Jimmyredcab



A shame because in the photos , she looks spot on

Photoshop does seem to be a problem at HOD, certainly something to bear in mind.     :thumbsdown:

Splosh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
 :thumbsdown:
Photoshop does seem to be a problem at HOD, certainly something to bear in mind.     :thumbsdown:

I think photoshopping is a problem everywhere as Nik said it really is amazing what they can do, I've only been to HOD a few times mainly to see one particular lady who I first met as an Indie so as she new me the service was great but I think the back to back appointments at HOD may effect the service you get.

Offline Straife

Seems the divines read this review and put on twitter "We do not use fake pics,we use pics of the ladies provided by them, the same they use on every site they work for"

Yes, because there's no possible way the girls themselves would purposefully use fake pics, nor would any other website. :wackogirl:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Seems the divines read this review and put on twitter "We do not use fake pics,we use pics of the ladies provided by them, the same they use on every site they work for"

Yes, because there's no possible way the girls themselves would purposefully use fake pics, nor would any other website. :wackogirl:

Yes the management do bear a responsibility to make sure the photos they display are representative of what punters will see when they visit.

Who has the upper hand in this equation?

Does the girl say I won't work for you unless I can use my glossy photoshopped pics taken 5 years ago and the establishment just has to lump it?

Or do the establishment say you can't work for us unless you provide some more recent pics which are a better likeness and aren't going to disappoint our loyal clientele??

HoD does have the twitpics which are always good to peruse for a bit more candour.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2014, 03:28:46 pm by vt »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Seems the divines read this review and put on twitter "We do not use fake pics,we use pics of the ladies provided by them, the same they use on every site they work for"

Yes, because there's no possible way the girls themselves would purposefully use fake pics, nor would any other website. :wackogirl:

They of course avidly read this forum as its the punting forum to follow nowadays. As to saying they use the pics supplied by the WGs i have debated this with Divine before on Pnet. Its HIS site punters are seeing these WGs on so he is equally as responsible for the pics as the WGs.

vorian

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Seems the divines read this review and put on twitter "We do not use fake pics,we use pics of the ladies provided by them, the same they use on every site they work for"

Yes, because there's no possible way the girls themselves would purposefully use fake pics, nor would any other website. :wackogirl:

What a piss poor excuse that is, so they just post any old photo supplied on their site.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Yes the management do bear a responsibility to make sure the photos they display are representative of what punters will see when they visit.

Who has the upper hand in this equation?

Does the girl say I won't work for you unless I can use my glossy photoshopped pics taken 5 years ago and the establishment just has to lump it?

Or do the establishment say you can't work for us unless you provide some more recent pics which are a better likeness and aren't going to disappoint our loyal clientele??

HoD does have the twitpics which are always good to peruse for a bit more candour.

When Divine admitted he lied about the WGs ages and sizes and then pledged to be honest from that point onwards at least some WGs ages were changed, i recall you mentioning Izabels (i think) had gone up a few years, well she didnt immediately leave, so that tells us he dictates and the WGs like it or lump it. I presume between posting he lied and posting he would be honest from then on he discussed this with the WGs so they were made aware, and any that didnt like it could go elsewhere.

So HE is in charge with his awful moaning wife, except for the Olga-Gate episode where Olga had free rein to post on here with Divine joining pretending to be someone else, sad prick.

HOD and his brothels in MK make decent money no doubt and WGs good money as well, WGs know this and want some of it, i doubt they have much trouble in getting WGs wanting to work at HOD. If he was so bothered he could easily say only accurate pics will be used on his sites, i told him he could use be honest as his USP, seems he justs wants to lie like many others do. And just because others lie doesnt make his lying any better as i see it.

andrei

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
the pictures they had on their annabellas site of hayley (now tia) were of ashley emma the elite tv girl on one of them 900 channels on sky

Offline Straife

the pictures they had on their annabellas site of hayley (now tia) were of ashley emma the elite tv girl on one of them 900 channels on sky

They had a similar incident last year with a spanish girl using pictures of a famous Brazilian girl  :wacko:

vorian

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Does anyone have a link the the OlgaGate thread please, before I joined but I would like to have a read. Cheers.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
What a piss poor excuse that is, so they just post any old photo supplied on their site.

This has been Divines response to criticism for years, its the WGs fault, they supply the pics and we merely post them up on our sites. As i say i have disagreed with him many times on this point among others. Those pics are on his sites, thats where the punter sees them, so its obvious Divine should make sure those pics look like the WGs punters are booking to see.

And he is right that many other places do the same which is why i advised him to be honest and use it as his USP. What others do doesnt mean he has to do the same of course, he makes a choice to join them in lying if it suits him.

In addition to all this according to HOTMAID, obviously really Divine himself as it cant be proved who is actually posting at brothel premises where the posts originate from, the Divines now work in floristry and are not in charge of their brothels. Complete bollocks of course. ;)

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
the pictures they had on their annabellas site of hayley (now tia) were of ashley emma the elite tv girl on one of them 900 channels on sky

And they can no longer say they are only linked to HOD as Annabellas rota was on the Hod site last time i looked a couple of days ago.

Seems they have recently got worse with their lying. ;)

Offline vandalsavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Does anyone have a link the the OlgaGate thread please, before I joined but I would like to have a read. Cheers.

Here you go...
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14336.0
...lots to read
Banned reason: Needs to review
Banned by: Iloveoral


vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Here you go...
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14336.0
...lots to read

Hey vs, you only seem to pop up when there's a Divine scandal in the offing...are you a punter who was wronged by them...a pimp whose toes they trod on??

Is it a principled or personal disagreement you have?

veyronbad

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is a sad review.

Sad in so much as the OP wasted his time and money - when the girl in reality was nothing as advertised.

It is definitely not the girls that are to blame for the over use of Photoshop, its the agent/manager (Kind + polite words) of the establishment.
They charge the girls a fortune for the photos, whether they want to have them done or not.

Trust me guys, I know what a magical tool Photoshop is  :sarcastic:


I think in many cases now, I just have to walk away.
Mind you, that can be tricky when establishments employ security.

Splosh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is a sad review.

Sad in so much as the OP wasted his time and money - when the girl in reality was nothing as advertised.

It is definitely not the girls that are to blame for the over use of Photoshop, its the agent/manager (Kind + polite words) of the establishment.
They charge the girls a fortune for the photos, whether they want to have them done or not.

Trust me guys, I know what a magical tool Photoshop is  :sarcastic:


I think in many cases now, I just have to walk away.
Mind you, that can be tricky when establishments employ security.

I wouldn't say the girls have no say about the pictures, your right to say they have to have them done I believe it's all the same photographer and the shoot costs the girls £600 but I doubt they complain to loudly if he makes them a little or a lot more attractive than they really are.

I say again photoshopping is not an isolated problem in fact I'm more shocked now when I go along and find the woman in question looks exactly like her pics but thankfully that does still happen.


Offline ladiesman020

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 597
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
I am sad to read this as she's on my LIST
Banned reason: Undesirable, covertly filming bookings
Banned by: daviemac