sexy@Cata - Edinburgh B&S

[Tim_10]

External Link/Members Only 

Walked as B&S

Comms were straightforward, agreed on 1 hour for £150

Location, flat not far from Meadowbank, arrived at the postcode, called her to get instructions, everything was nice and easy, she speaks okay English

open the door for me in a robe, no makeup, glasses on. here, for a second I thought I went to the wrong address, what an awkward moment.
 
she let me in the room. I asked her to take off the rope, which she did, what the heck, she isn't the girl in the photos, yeah she got tattoos all over her body but she is not the same girl, tbh I wasn't bothered with tattoos at all, but, even her body doesn't match the girl in the photos, here I decided to leave.


Verdict: Wouldnt recommend at all ( Bait and switch)

[David1970]

Good on you Tim for walking, done it a few times myself.

[Matrix]

Probably the same tattooed bird I reviewed a couple of months back.

Tidy but hopeless anyway.

[Tim_10]

Probably the same tattooed bird I reviewed a couple of months back.

Tidy but hopeless anyway.

I just checked your review, I think she is the same WG you reviewed, as she matches the photos which been posted in your reviewd, but now she uses fake photos, therefore I walked and gave her a Neg

[Tim_10]

Good on you Tim for walking, done it a few times myself.

cheers mate, I always walk if the goods don't match the advertised photo

[nike]

Is this her?

Photo's of unknown origin removed as per rule #29

[Tim_10]

aye, she is, she had specs on when I met her

[Matrix]

Aye, that's her.  Very fit but you dodged a bullet.  She was friendly but hopeless.

[Matrix]

Is this her?

Photo's of unknown origin removed as per rule #29

Just noticed this new rule which contravenes rule #22 and all the verification threads. 

29 No Adultwork verification photos or private gallery photos to be posted this includes links to previously posted photos and to using the ‘quote’ feature to repost the photo

22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.To clarify, this means no personal photos at all from anywhere. Phone numbers may be posted in full if the number is online on a current advert. Personal numbers not allowed. Hotels may be named but not room numbers.
 General description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and/or street names. Modelling, porn, and media-related work are acceptable to be posted, even if it includes their real names as they actively sought publicity / higher-profile. Any news items may be posted. All aforementioned restrictions do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of reasons.

So we can link to an aw profile which brings up pictures uploaded by the girls, but we can't use the verification pictures uploaded onto a pay for sex site.  Such pictures have been incredibly handy in the past as they usually give a more realistic look at your potential punt and in some cases turn out to be from a completely different girl altogether.

Well rules are rules, but I must admit that I'm disappointed with this, as the picture which was removed was previously on the girls profile when I saw her and she was clearly using fake picture. 

In fact she now appears to have reuploaded the very same picture, the removed one, to her main profile page. 

[michaelteam]

Just noticed this new rule which contravenes rule #22 and all the verification threads. 

So we can link to an aw profile which brings up pictures uploaded by the girls, but we can't use the verification pictures uploaded onto a pay for sex site.  Such pictures have been incredibly handy in the past as they usually give a more realistic look at your potential punt and in some cases turn out to be from a completely different girl altogether.

Well rules are rules, but I must admit that I'm disappointed with this, as the picture which was removed was previously on the girls profile when I saw her and she was clearly using fake picture. 

In fact she now appears to have reuploaded the very same picture, the removed one, to her main profile page.

I actually saw this girl last year in Edinburgh and she was hot. The service was just alright and I remember staying for 15m and paying for 30m which kind of annoyed me. There was more that 1 girl in the flat so they might be sharing pics.

[Matrix]

She's tidy but useless at sex. Was sharing with a black girl.