Dubious posters.

[Tjkooker]

Have recently spotted something which concerns me.  We all know how devious and cunning that stinking prossie Magalie is. I've spotted a pattern. Look at the posts of these "guys"

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=13221


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=10123

Pretty much useless reviews in pidgin english . Then glowing repot for mags or posting stuff that's been posted a million times. With her track record I'm certain there will be more than these profiles active or held dormant.

[valdishere]

+1 Thought same myself there appears to be a few dubious posters as I've mentioned previously myself.

Guess a by-product of UKP success that some trolls & pro$$ies will now try to invade our punter space.

[hunnymuncher]

I don't think it is just the prossies.
I think there are a few touts/pimps floating around too.

[Happyjose]

Agreed. Look how quickly profiles are being amended or taken down after being mentioned on here

That French fruitbat and her fluffies do seem more determined and thick-skinned than most though

[smiths]

Have recently spotted something which concerns me.  We all know how devious and cunning that stinking prossie Magalie is. I've spotted a pattern. Look at the posts of these "guys"

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=13221


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=10123

Pretty much useless reviews in pidgin english . Then glowing repot for mags or posting stuff that's been posted a million times. With her track record I'm certain there will be more than these profiles active or held dormant.

Admin will no doubt look into this. It is most certainly the case the number of pimps, touts and other assorted low lifes has risen as the forum has got more popular and i would imagine that will only increase as it becomes ever more popular. Which is why genuine punters need to be ever vigilant in my view.

[hunnymuncher]

Myself and a few of my buddies received the exact same pm about a lass. Unfortunately for the person who pm'd myself and my buddies are definitely not into the services they were suggesting.
I don't like to name or shame but without a doubt,  it is a tout and pmp..
From a member/poster who reviews in minimal detail
But jumps on any post.
Its not right so it is. Supposed to be a place where can put the good bad and ugly. Write up the truth. To help out the real people who want to weed out the shit punts from the top notch ones..

[vorian]

Myself and a few of my buddies received the exact same pm about a lass. Unfortunately for the person who pm'd myself and my buddies are definitely not into the services they were suggesting.
I don't like to name or shame but without a doubt,  it is a tout and pmp..
From a member/poster who reviews in minimal detail
But jumps on any post.
Its not right so it is. Supposed to be a place where can put the good bad and ugly. Write up the truth. To help out the real people who want to weed out the shit punts from the top notch ones..

Report it to Admin they if they are touting.

[hunnymuncher]

 

[Marmalade]

I'm slightly amazed at the sheer volume of reviews from Glasgow. The sudden leap from when it was occasional reviews can partly be explained by a rise in genuine punter-members who are covering the flourishing fanny field. But when it's posters who, as pointed out, seem to have an ethereal, semi-real existence consisting mostly of generic 'reviews' that frankly look like they could have been generated for a fee.

Or

Imagine the bus load of Romanians - "So who's going to do the publicity then? the profiles are ready to go, so who's got a spare phone to join ukp from a different IP address and be a 'punter'? Let's take it in turns girls. Read ukp, it tells you how to get a cheap phone and simcard, pretend to be a bloke, don't say to much specific if you slag off a genuine scottish bitch who likes it silly fucker, and keep enough details to show it is 'genuine' when you you review one of us."

Actually, that's probably too amateurish. New immigration laws mean Romanian pimps can wander into Britain and cause trouble.

The easy answer is to challenge newbie reviews and try to work out if there is a human-being-punter behind the posts. Unfortunately when you do this you will also get howls of rage (and risk pissing off a genuine punter).

[valdishere]

Good to see some others also acknowledge the sudden rise in posts in Scotland, especially Glasgow region over past few months
- however many of these are undoubtedly dubious ones and usually from new registered UKP members.

They can often be spotted as their 'generic' postings invariably lead to other fellow ‘dubious posters’ entering into inane comment response posts to yet extend the thread and probably to assist increasing their own post count - no doubt hoping to avoid newbie suspicions.

Although I do think a few more subtle ‘dubious posters’ who had joined months ago and now have a sizeable post count and are either just trolling shit stirrers with the occasional punting tout tips!

Interestingly if you accept AW for what it is regardless of quality of service it does show as at TODAY the number of Woman offering services as
549 - Glasgow
335  - Edinburgh
186 – Aberdeen
100 - Dundee
361 - Rest of Scotland

Glasgow scene doesn't have too many good WG's and also includes regular ones who are regularly 'On Tour' with the rest being long known well established WG’s
- A very high increase in EE profiles, many of these would appear to be fake scam or B&S as reported here.

Edinburgh by comparison has relatively few posts / reviews on AW profiles but a lot on the Sauna scene which no longer exists in Glasgow for many years now.
Dundee & Aberdeen don’t appear to get much coverage in reporting post terms – relative to numbers of Glasgow ones.

I think it’s a known fact that pimp/pro$$ie gangs (the dubious posters) find it easier to operate in the more densely populated cities and Glasgow in probably the most suitable location for them to mingle amongst population.   

[Tjkooker]

It really is the pidgin English that gives the game away in the Scotland area. 

[vorian]

It really is the pidgin English that gives the game away in the Scotland area.

To be fair TJ isn't just the Scottish region that is having more problems with fake posters,  the more popular UKP gets the more vigilant people need to be. Perhaps the Jocks are just better at spotting them quickly. 

[J_H]

Nah, we're just a torn-faced bunch of fuckers!

Actually one thing I did notice when I read the reviews from all round the country (nosey bastard not a sad one!) is that Scotland always seem to have a much larger proportion of Negative Reviews than anywhere else. You can look at London and see almost 10 Positives in a row, something you'd rarely see here. In fact just about the time, I joined this forum I seem to remember a poster pointing out that on one particular day, Scotland had nearly ten Negatives/Neutrals in a row and made a bit of joke of it.

Not sure if the reason for theat is that we really ARE a torn-faced bunch of fuckers or, being a relative backwater, we attract all the B list WGs!

[vorian]

Nah, we're just a torn-faced bunch of fuckers!

Actually one thing I did notice when I read the reviews from all round the country (nosey bastard not a sad one!) is that Scotland always seem to have a much larger proportion of Negative Reviews than anywhere else. You can look at London and see almost 10 Positives in a row, something you'd rarely see here. In fact just about the time, I joined this forum I seem to remember a poster pointing out that on one particular day, Scotland had nearly ten Negatives/Neutrals in a row and made a bit of joke of it.

Not sure if the reason for theat is that we really ARE a torn-faced bunch of fuckers or, being a relative backwater, we attract all the B list WGs!

You do seem to have a far higher proportion of Agency punts and reviews than say my area in the SE where they are very, very rare.  The NE seems to be in the same situation as well, I have never been able to work out why that is.

[hunnymuncher]

Reported and mindful is banned but will reappear no doubt
Imagine promoting a lass who does BB.

[captaincrunch]

It really is the pidgin English that gives the game away in the Scotland area.

Like an numpty I'm still of two minds about this given the nature of her services and her high feedback count there has to be someone that enjoys fucking her.

I look for a sensual GFE when punting but my top punts have come from WG who pushed out the boat to make sure I had a memorable time. Later I read the reviews here and abouts and there is always a poster who is quick to judge or focuses on a detail that I completely ignored.

"Too old and looks malnourished." "Doesn't speak much English other girls in the flat,"  "NIMBY neighbour accosted me at flat exit."

....are in reviews left for the girls in my top three punts of all time. I love that here there is a freedom to write what we want without fear or being outcast by the biased AW system. But it means I take everything written here with a pinch of salt.

Those fake fluffy reviews are stupid but the hatred after any mention of her from the heavy posters is almost comical, kind of like how I feel about Chelsea Handler.
Got the potential means for a punt at the end of the month and the dirtey euro whore is still on the short list. (But I'll be honest there are some tough contenders)

[CooperD]

Reported and mindful is banned but will reappear no doubt
Imagine promoting a lass who does BB.

Wasn't he thehun in disguise anyway. Always what I thought anyway 

[Marmalade]

Hidden Image/Members Only

I think it's a game of playing the odds. Everyone to their own. Pidgin fluffie review from someone with no believable 3D punter life is worth hardly any chips. Like 2 or 3 10/10 lol AW worshipful feedbacks. The latter might be genuine but no way of knowing. Slight upgrade if an AW feedback is from name reconised cross-referenced to fanny I've fucked. Reviews from punters you feel you 'know' are better cos you have an idea of their criteria. (If their 'criteria' are soggy bits of milk-soaked fluff, well it only says she's alive).

I still use profile info as best resource. Consistency, style of writing, apparent sanity, nationality, frequent and accurate-seeming updates. But 'negs' are the quickest way of trimmig my doable list. Further than walking or short taxi distance, Romanian (I prioritise Scottish and English), more than size 12, more than stated age 21 unless justifying exception, hidden feedback, registered last century but only two feedbacks, porno language, bareback offer, ugly picture, too expensive, shopping list of prices for extras .... a few of those and she can go fuck herself.

If she stays on my hotlist I might add 'ok ukp feedback' or 'recommended by xyz' in the notes (notes show up by hovering the mouse so fast way to skim through hotlist). Enjoy.

[James999]

Scotland does seem to have more than it's fair share of pimps & touters, will be esily resolved if they vote for independence and they can then start ScotlandPunting and the sections on here can be closed down 

[Marmalade]

Scotland does seem to have more than it's fair share of pimps & touters, will be esily resolved if they vote for independence and they can then start ScotlandPunting and the sections on here can be closed down 

FuckOff James man, it'd be better if England got independence   

[Barry Shipton]

Nah, we're just a torn-faced bunch of fuckers!

Actually one thing I did notice when I read the reviews from all round the country (nosey bastard not a sad one!) is that Scotland always seem to have a much larger proportion of Negative Reviews than anywhere else. You can look at London and see almost 10 Positives in a row, something you'd rarely see here. In fact just about the time, I joined this forum I seem to remember a poster pointing out that on one particular day, Scotland had nearly ten Negatives/Neutrals in a row and made a bit of joke of it.

Not sure if the reason for theat is that we really ARE a torn-faced bunch of fuckers or, being a relative backwater, we attract all the B list WGs!

Just posted a thread on that very topic in the North East board - there are more than twice as many negatives in the Scottish reviews section compared to the NE.

[vorian]

Just posted a thread on that very topic in the North East board - there are more than twice as many negatives in the Scottish reviews section compared to the NE.

How does that work out as a percentage of overall reviews when comparing.

[Barry Shipton]

I can add up but that's too much like a maths exam. But I know it's 100 per cent more negatives.

[vorian]

I can add up but that's too much like a maths exam. But I know it's 100 per cent more negatives.

Are you looking at all the reviews or just the first page, if it is just the first page it may just be more bumps as the Scottish section may have more active posters commenting and helping each other.

Without a percentage comparison a snapshot view doesn't really prove anything.

[Barry Shipton]

Just the first page, but doesn't seem to be an difference in the number of bumps, if anything the NE ones seems to have a few more. But I'll leave that to the Statto's and punting trainspotters on here unless I get very bored at the weekend.

[vorian]

I would say the three most active boards seem to be Scotland, NE and London.

[Tjkooker]

Scotland has a small population and even fewer local escorts. Majority are foreign. Unfortunately these girls are here for the money and give fuck all service. Many of the locals are the same. For each city there are only a handful of escorts that would receive a positive.  Hundreds that would get negatives. I rarely post negative as I usually stick to the tried and tested.
We also have some seriously fucked up prossies n pimps . That's the whole reason for this post

[seeker]

There's about 6 independent w.g worth seeing in Glasgow ...
As far as I know ....
Seems like there are hundreds of romanians with 0 feedback and generic profiles ...usually b.s...a waste of time and effort 
Punting down to 2 or 3 a month tried and tested or recommended only these days ...

[seeker]

That fanny thehun was always p.m ing me recommending gea girls but at 150 to try "no chance "if they offered a half hour at say 80 I would take a chance.

[Marmalade]

That fanny thehun was always p.m ing me recommending gea girls but at 150 to try "no chance "if they offered a half hour at say 80 I would take a chance.

what did he get booted for?

[James999]

what did he get booted for

He got sussed out and awkward questions were asked of him, he realised he had fucked up and been sussed and spammed the forum with  some stupid message cut and pasted over and over (in an effort to get banned and try and save face), Admin banned him. he has since rejoined, and been banned again 

[seeker]

Banned again