Naughty Natt x, Farringdon 8/10

[FBIAgent]

Link: External Link/Members Only

Quite a famous lady here based in Farringdon next to Gymbox. If the gym was open, would be an amazing post-workout punt ;-)

Finally visited and was not disappointed.

She is indeed a red head. Not 100% sure if natural, but she wears it well.

Would say she is a bigger girl both height and size wise but not a disappointment. Although one of the more bigger girls, appearance-wise she is quite sexy and bangable. If one isn't smaller in height, I would say this is a really nice girl to have.

She loves sex and is quite enthusiastic. Her blowjob technique is one of the best. I think appearance wise, she is not as attractive as some of the more photo shopped images posted in other reviews but she is quite attractive if you saw her out on the street nevertheless. The best part about her is the enthusiasm, being a redhead and from doggy

[smiths]

Link: External Link/Members Only

Quite a famous lady here based in Farringdon next to Gymbox. If the gym was open, would be an amazing post-workout punt ;-)

Finally visited and was not disappointed.

She is indeed a red head. Not 100% sure if natural, but she wears it well.

Would say she is a bigger girl both height and size wise but not a disappointment. Although one of the more bigger girls, appearance-wise she is quite sexy and bangable. If one isn't smaller in height, I would say this is a really nice girl to have.

She loves sex and is quite enthusiastic. Her blowjob technique is one of the best. I think appearance wise, she is not as attractive as some of the more photo shopped images posted in other reviews but she is quite attractive if you saw her out on the street nevertheless. The best part about her is the enthusiasm, being a redhead and from doggy

Natt has put timber on on her thighs since last year, that's the main body difference I noticed this year from last. Service was still tip top though.

[Randy0118]

Visited her just few days back after seeing so many positive reviews of her but found imo  probably average at most.

[Fully Sated]

Visited her just few days back after seeing so many positive reviews of her but found imo  probably average at most.

Randy 0118, Welcome to the forum. It would be great if you could post a review about your experience so that others could benefit. Thanks.

[Royd30]

Hi Randy planning to see her but your comment needs expanding would like to know more might save myself some time and money can be donated elsewhere....thanks

[Fuzzyduck]

Hi Randy planning to see her but your comment needs expanding would like to know more might save myself some time and money can be donated elsewhere....thanks

Why on earth would you want to do that? Something not quite right with your "relationship" with this SP.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=271432.msg2853734#msg2853734

[Fuzzyduck]

Randy 0118, Welcome to the forum. It would be great if you could post a review about your experience so that others could benefit. Thanks.

+1

[Royd30]

Why on earth would you want to do that? Something not quite right with your "relationship" with this SP.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=271432.msg2853734#msg2853734

Don’t quite understand or the need for your response Fuzzyduck, don’t have any “relationship” with this SP. Booked her once turned up and she wasted my time radio silence doesn’t stop the fact that I would still love to bang the living daylights out of her. I am entitled to ask the question I did.....regards

[Fuzzyduck]

Don’t quite understand or the need for your response Fuzzyduck, don’t have any “relationship” with this SP. Booked her once turned up and she wasted my time radio silence doesn’t stop the fact that I would still love to bang the living daylights out of her. I am entitled to ask the question I did.....regards

You've booked her twice. From recollection, she ghosted you first time. You rebooked using another phone and when you saw her, you asked why she wasted your time previously. You ended up picking a fight and walked. You slag off her looks and her attititude and say you were happy to waste her time the second time around. And now you want to see her again? You know she's got form for having a crappy attitude. Do you think she won't remember you and that it's going to end well? You know she's a member on her, don't you? You've either got a screw loose or you actually get off on the conflict.

[Kev40ish]

Don’t quite understand or the need for your response Fuzzyduck, don’t have any “relationship” with this SP. Booked her once turned up and she wasted my time radio silence doesn’t stop the fact that I would still love to bang the living daylights out of her. I am entitled to ask the question I did.....regards

Not sure why you’d want to see her? I doubt she would want to see you following your previous experiences.

All seems a bit strange to me 

Well all I can say is BEWARE.....I made a booking with this SP turned up and phone silence....no response no texts...SEEMS TO BE A TIMEWASTER

Absolute timewaster booked her again tonite using a different phone, turn up and met her, she denied wasting my time showed her texts on previous phone, acted surprised and said she couldn’t understand it, no apology just rude when got found out. Decided to walk, well was a joint decision. She seems to be a seasoned SP and knows her way about, sure she here for the money, really shows. BTW her face is rather rough and pasted with makeup to hide her true looks. Cannot comment further. Had it not been for wasting my time on last booking I might have stayed to sample, but alas not to be.

[Fu-Qin Boi-Ling]

Absolute timewaster booked her again tonite using a different phone, turn up and met her, she denied wasting my time showed her texts on previous phone, acted surprised and said she couldn’t understand it, no apology just rude when got found out. Decided to walk, well was a joint decision. She seems to be a seasoned SP and knows her way about, sure she here for the money, really shows. BTW her face is rather rough and pasted with makeup to hide her true looks. Cannot comment further. Had it not been for wasting my time on last booking I might have stayed to sample, but alas not to be.

booking a service provider to call her out regarding wasting ur time only to walk and now you want see her again??? this is a next level of dumbness

[Royd30]

Think I’ll be polite, thought this forum was for sharing experiences and giving feedback, not for slagging each other off. Guess each to his own, but thanks for your views chaps. Consider the matter closed as far as I am concerned so I won’t comment further on your responses to my feedback.

[Fuzzyduck]

Think I’ll be polite, thought this forum was for sharing experiences and giving feedback, not for slagging each other off. Guess each to his own, but thanks for your views chaps. Consider the matter closed as far as I am concerned so I won’t comment further on your responses to my feedback.

I look forward to your review.

[whoya.kiddin]

Personal view, I saw her once far too long ago to review. I thought she had a shitty attitude and doctored photographs - she is a big girl as research here will reveal.  Some of the positive commentary here seems - shall we say - vaciforous?

[Fuzzyduck]

Personal view, I saw her once far too long ago to review. I thought she had a shitty attitude and doctored photographs - she is a big girl as research here will reveal.  Some of the positive commentary here seems - shall we say - vaciforous?

Who are you calling out? I understand what you're saying but I don't see much positive commentary about the SP in this thread. Quite the opposite in fact. There are 3 themes from what I can see.

- OP says she's a big girl and Smiths commented on her putting some timber on.
- Someone reported an average experience and he was encouraged to post a review
- Any voracity is directed at a member who in the past has been encouraged to post reviews on his 2 negative experiences with this SP, but he refuses for whatever reason to do so. He now takes the piss by asking for help on her. Furthermore, in full knowledge that she's got form for a crappy attitude and that she will likely remember him from before, he still wants to try again. Something not quite right about that and it's been called out.

When did you see her BTW?

[smiths]

Personal view, I saw her once far too long ago to review. I thought she had a shitty attitude and doctored photographs - she is a big girl as research here will reveal.  Some of the positive commentary here seems - shall we say - vaciforous?

She is or was recently when I saw her in N15 a bigger size 12 than last year but not yet a size 14 and had put fat on since last year around her thigh area. She is also quite tall but she wasn't fat otherwise, but has feminine curves and her body isn't toned. She looks quite imposing with her height i always think, she is also a VERY experienced WG and doesnt fuck about wasting time with me, its wash hands/shower and then get down to punting which I like. There is a pic on her on UKP where she is wearing black and has her arms outstretched above her hands in sex type handcuffs, that is the best face pic of her in my view. Her profile is run by a Polish pimp/s hence why she appeared in N15 in a well known to me Polish brothel recently on a few weekends, and was in another 1 in Bounds Green when I first punted with her last year. Chancery Lane is this pimp/s blue riband brothel where Natt has been weekdays for a long time now. Last Feb I paid her £100 an hour 3 times in 3 days which is the usual rate for this pimps outer London brothels. However, due to her many positives on here in N15 recently I paid her £120 an hour, the pimp/s most certainly reads UKP as I have seen WGs profiles changed following criticism on here, but that doesn't always happen.

Her attitude whenever I have punted with her which is now 5 times since last February has always been excellent with me, if it hadn't been I would of said so of course. What she is like with other punters is for them to say obviously.

[pepsicolaboy]

Messed me around and had a bad attitude on the texts (it was her texting IMO), so punt was aborted:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=297913.0

Mentions of being chunkier than photos is concerning, as this is moving into false photos territory/ B&S with old photos etc.

IMO the Polish Sergei's are excellent at manipulating photo angles etc.

I dont think she warrants a £120 per hour mark, but the price creep appears to happening with many London SP.

[Fuzzyduck]

Messed me around and had a bad attitude on the texts (it was her texting IMO), so punt was aborted:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=297913.0

Mentions of being chunkier than photos is concerning, as this is moving into false photos territory/ B&S with old photos etc.

IMO the Polish Sergei's are excellent at manipulating photo angles etc.

I dont think she warrants a £120 per hour mark, but the price creep appears to happening with many London SP.

Sure. You've rightly called this out before and reviewed appropriately.

The thing that annoys me is that we have 3 (and counting) people on this thread so far with less than positive experiences and no reviews between them. How can we expect to have a balanced view if people don't report the shit punts and just drop in on positive review to have a whine?

[smiths]

Messed me around and had a bad attitude on the texts (it was her texting IMO), so punt was aborted:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=297913.0

Mentions of being chunkier than photos is concerning, as this is moving into false photos territory/ B&S with old photos etc.

IMO the Polish Sergei's are excellent at manipulating photo angles etc.

I dont think she warrants a £120 per hour mark, but the price creep appears to happening with many London SP.

When I punted with her 1 of the 3 times in Bounds Green last year she asked me about a phrase I had used in a text by showing me it on her phone so she certainly did her own comms then.

Her A/W profile states she is a size 10, she isn't and wasn't in Feb last year, she was a 12 then and is now a bigger 12 but not yet a 14 and this is from seeing her twice so far this year. Her free pics show a 10, they should be updated to show what she looks like now in my view, a big size 12 with bigger thighs. The thing is her body isn't toned, if it stays like that gravity will pull everything downwards over time. She has been £120 an hour for many months since the pimp/s promoted her to Chancery Lane, I have no doubt she has been swept off her pussy since then with punters so I very much doubt that price will go down. She is a conveyor belt WG as all this pimp/s WGs are, its cram as many in per day as possible. And for me I paid her £120 for the hour twice in N15 this year and she was worth it to me as she offered me an excellent service both times, of course it would be even better if she was still £100 an hour.

There are now countless nobody WGs with no reviews and/or little feedback on here creating A/W profiles in my area sadly starting off charging £120 an hour or more, some a lot more. For some reason Bulgarian WGs in my area are now at least £120 an hour, and in fact virtually all nationalities apart from some Poles, Hungarians and Romanians are that or more.

[smiths]

Sure. You've rightly called this out before and reviewed appropriately.

The thing that annoys me is that we have 3 (and counting) people on this thread so far with less than positive experiences and no reviews between them. How can we expect to have a balanced view if people don't report the shit punts and just drop in on positive review to have a whine?

Indeed, reviews are essential, they wont change my mind on Natt as I have seen her 5 times but they could help who knows how many punters decide whether to see her or not. And I know same as ANY WG that I could still get a bad service at a future punt, that happened with Amy Amazon who I had punted with a lot more than Natt and then 1 time her attitude was appalling, negative review done at the time.

Of course a punter can post what he likes within the rules on any review thread so I don't have a problem at all with that, but reviewing a neg experience of the WG or a pos is always the best thing to do in my book, if you have info you want to give on here.

[whoya.kiddin]

Sure. You've rightly called this out before and reviewed appropriately.

The thing that annoys me is that we have 3 (and counting) people on this thread so far with less than positive experiences and no reviews between them. How can we expect to have a balanced view if people don't report the shit punts and just drop in on positive review to have a whine?

To answer the earlier question I saw her opposite Saddlers Wells in 2019and should clarify that be here I meant on UKP, not specifically this thread.

4 Reviews
 Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)

[Fuzzyduck]

To answer the earlier question I saw her opposite Saddlers Wells in 2019and should clarify that be here I meant on UKP, not specifically this thread.

Then why didn't you review at the time? You had started posting reviews on UKP before she reappeared on the scene. You're the one calling out vociferous positivity but can't be bothered to share your own poor experience to give a balanced view of her for the benefit of others. You can't have it both ways.

I'd also appreciate an answer on my earlier question: who in this thread has been overly positive on this SP? Many of the people here who have had positive experiences are also calling out her deficiencies and aren't glossing over her attitude issues.

Maybe you're compensating for not having made a contribution via a review or maybe you have a reaction because others have clearly got on with her and had good times when you didn't. I see from an earlier thread you have an existing viewpoint on her. You may have some valid points generally but they are misplaced here IMO. Unless of course you think someone here is marketing on her behalf in which case you need to clarify yourself.

Maybe.  I have noticed that any criticism of this SP generally gets a reaction.  Given my experience, which was very ordinary, together with the large number of reprofiles this leads me to think she keeps the marketing cranked up.  There was some murkey stuff about the veracity of her photos a couple of years back.  I weigh her reviews accordingly.

[smiths]

Then why didn't you review at the time? You had started posting reviews on UKP before she reappeared on the scene. You're the one calling out vociferous positivity but can't be bothered to share your own poor experience to give a balanced view of her for the benefit of others. You can't have it both ways.

I'd also appreciate an answer on my earlier question: who in this thread has been overly positive on this SP? Many of the people here who have had positive experiences are also calling out her deficiencies and aren't glossing over her attitude issues.

Maybe you're compensating for not having made a contribution via a review or maybe you have a reaction because others have clearly got on with her and had good times when you didn't. I see from an earlier thread you have an existing viewpoint on her. You may have some valid points generally but they are misplaced here IMO. Unless of course you think someone here is marketing on her behalf in which case you need to clarify yourself.

I am very positive about Natt as she has been excellent 5 times out of 5 so far with me, if another poster thinks I am being overly positive I really couldn't give a shit. I post my own experiences, what others experience and post is up to them. What i don't do unless I think they are well dodgy is question their experience of the same WG. So if Natt gets a neg I don't post that reviewer is wrong, that was his experience of her.

[bst]

To answer the earlier question I saw her opposite Saddlers Wells in 2019and should clarify that be here I meant on UKP, not specifically this thread.

You saw Natt at Sadler's Wells spot?

Jesus. Didn't know Natt worked at that dump but wow I guess that's another one of this Sergei's spot. He really does seem to control most of the Polish prossies on the scene. He is like what Raiola is to football 

[bst]

The thing that annoys me is that we have 3 (and counting) people on this thread so far with less than positive experiences and no reviews between them. How can we expect to have a balanced view if people don't report the shit punts and just drop in on positive review to have a whine?

Then why didn't you review at the time? You had started posting reviews on UKP before she reappeared on the scene. You're the one calling out vociferous positivity but can't be bothered to share your own poor experience to give a balanced view of her for the benefit of others.

I understand your grievance and you make great points, but I'd much rather prefer our friend here and his review record, as oppossed to those who just review their negatives and keep their positive punts to themselves.
I just had a quick look and our friend here has a number of pros, neus, and negs, so that tells me that he just posts reviews as and when he feels he has the time, with no discrimination or agenda.

[pepsicolaboy]

I have no doubt she has been swept off her pussy since then with punters

 

[Fuzzyduck]

I understand your grievance and you make great points, but I'd much rather prefer our friend here and his review record, as oppossed to those who just review their negatives and keep their positive punts to themselves.
I just had a quick look and our friend here has a number of pros, neus, and negs, so that tells me that he just posts reviews as and when he feels he has the time, with no discrimination or agenda.

My grievance is general; my specific point is directed at a punter who called out overly positive punters that react when this SP gets criticism. He's linked this with pimp marketing effort. I would like to understand what connection he is making.

To your general point, all reviews are important, even positives of SPs who already have loads of positive reviews. However, credible negative reviews are the most important IMO to help punters not make a bad choice. Ironically a member indirectly criticised my punting recently by saying he didn't want a review list like mine littered with a fair share of neutrals and negs.

[smiths]

My grievance is general; my specific point is directed at a punter who called out overly positive punters that react when this SP gets criticism. He's linked this with pimp marketing effort. I would like to understand what connection he is making.

To your general point, all reviews are important, even positives of SPs who already have loads of positive reviews. However, credible negative reviews are the most important IMO to help punters not make a bad choice. Ironically a member indirectly criticised my punting recently by saying he didn't want a review list like mine littered with a fair share of neutrals and negs.

I have read that thinking off some punters before, it was mainly on pnet years ago, they basically wouldn't do a negative review as it looked bad as they saw it. Some of us don't care about such rubbish.

[pepsicolaboy]

I have read that thinking off some punters before, it was mainly on pnet years ago, they basically wouldn't do a negative review as it looked bad as they saw it. Some of us don't care about such rubbish.

Aw punters are so scared of leaving a negative review IMO, for fear of a reprisal negative review and I assume this effecting their ability to book escorts after that (through the aw system) who 'dont book anyone with negative feedback'

This is largely why I ignore aw reviews and concentrate on intel here.

[bst]

He's linked this with pimp marketing effort. I would like to understand what connection he is making.

Hmm,,,, I see now. I too would be interested in clarification but I am leaning towards you read too much in that. I certainly didn't take offence when I read his comments. Me being one of Natt's regulars and gave her an excelled review. I gave her an "A+" while giving the forum darling of 2020, Lucy Mayer, an "A".
I remember seeing recently one guy asking for advice on how to book Natt and then turned out from previous comments he had two bookings with her, booking A being she cancelled on him./wasted his time. And booking B being he turned up to have a row with her and walked away. Does seem that Nattt can rub some people up the wrong way. However that doesn't mean they should accuse others of ontoward activity.
I for one can assure that I am not Polish let alone a Polish pimp. She is simply YMMV, perhaps more than others (I think I stated this is my review). If she doesn't take a like to you or whatever, move on and don't have an axe to grind 
Although of course we are the paying customer and would in an ideal world we should be getting a homogenous product as all paying the same price. I argue that the reality is rarely so, though.
Your Lucy Mayers, Ellie Roses, Maggie21s etc who give their all for every punter are exceptions to the rule as opposed to the norm. On second thoughts, I even recall seeing some YMMV with Ellie of all. One punter claimed her gave her anal under the counter so to speak. I recall she never rebutted this (she is on here and often replies).

My 5 pence 

[Fuzzyduck]

Hmm,,,, I see now. I too would be interested in clarification but I am leaning towards you read too much in that. I certainly didn't take offence when I read his comments. Me being one of Natt's regulars and gave her an excelled review. I gave her an "A+" while giving the forum darling of 2020, Lucy Mayer, an "A".
I remember seeing recently one guy asking for advice on how to book Natt and then turned out from previous comments he had two bookings with her, booking A being she cancelled on him./wasted his time. And booking B being he turned up to have a row with her and walked away. Does seem that Nattt can rub some people up the wrong way. However that doesn't mean they should accuse others of ontoward activity.
I for one can assure that I am not Polish let alone a Polish pimp. She is simply YMMV, perhaps more than others (I think I stated this is my review). If she doesn't take a like to you or whatever, move on and don't have an axe to grind 
Although of course we are the paying customer and would in an ideal world we should be getting a homogenous product as all paying the same price. I argue that the reality is rarely so, though.
Your Lucy Mayers, Ellie Roses, Maggie21s etc who give their all for every punter are exceptions to the rule as opposed to the norm. On second thoughts, I even recall seeing some YMMV with Ellie of all. One punter claimed her gave her anal under the counter so to speak. I recall she never rebutted this (she is on here and often replies).

My 5 pence 

5p? Talk about inflation.

I agree with with what you're saying. I didn't take offence either. I'm probably a bit like Smiths - I like her a lot and get on well with her but will happily call out her failings and encourage punters with neg experiences to leave reviews. What I do take offence at though is people talking shit.

[Fuzzyduck]

I have read that thinking off some punters before, it was mainly on pnet years ago, they basically wouldn't do a negative review as it looked bad as they saw it. Some of us don't care about such rubbish.

I managed to find one of my very early reviews there and nearly puked on its fluffiness. However, that forum was really for the benefit of SPs not punters. As someone who tarnished English Harriet's 100% positive record here, I really don't see there's a problem. Although I would be interested to see what happens when/if someone who gives Ellie Rose a neg.

[bst]

5p? Talk about inflation.

 

What I do take offence at though is people talking shit.

Even more 

[smiths]

Aw punters are so scared of leaving a negative review IMO, for fear of a reprisal negative review and I assume this effecting their ability to book escorts after that (through the aw system) who 'dont book anyone with negative feedback'

This is largely why I ignore aw reviews and concentrate on intel here.

Yes that's another thing, and for me completely undermines A/W feedback unless I know and trust the punter who has left it.

[smiths]

I managed to find one of my very early reviews there and nearly puked on its fluffiness. However, that forum was really for the benefit of SPs not punters. As someone who tarnished English Harriet's 100% positive record here, I really don't see there's a problem. Although I would be interested to see what happens when/if someone who gives Ellie Rose a neg.

Indeed, from 2010 at the latest it wasn't pnet anymore, it was pimpnet, they ruled the forum because the owner made lots of advertising money off them and let them post as they wished. Which involved attacking honest punters for daring to criticise their WGs, I know as I was one who criticised some WGs and got attacked. And along with the pimps were the white knight fanboys many of whom tried that shit on here and got banned fortunately. But no doubt there are loads on here still but using different nicks and being careful what and how they post.

[Fuzzyduck]

Indeed, from 2010 at the latest it wasn't pnet anymore, it was pimpnet, they ruled the forum because the owner made lots of advertising money off them and let them post as they wished. Which involved attacking honest punters for daring to criticise their WGs, I know as I was one who criticised some WGs and got attacked. And along with the pimps were the white knight fanboys many of whom tried that shit on here and got banned fortunately. But no doubt there are loads on here still but using different nicks and being careful what and how they post.

I joined in 1999. It was a revelation at the time but looking back it was always a bit sanitised and ultra fluffy, it just deteriorated once 3rd party interests were clearly running the show.

[bst]

1999? Fuck me. You guys were ahead of the game and on top of this forum shit when we woz using dial up 
Back then I used to just get the numbers in shop windows, phone boxes.... read between the lines posts in newspapers.
Most were B&S and or didn't provide services they said on the tin.

[Fu-Qin Boi-Ling]

1999? Fuck me. You guys were ahead of the game and on top of this forum shit when we woz using dial up 
Back then I used to just get the numbers in shop windows, phone boxes.... read between the lines posts in newspapers.
Most were B&S and or didn't provide services they said on the tin.

dont forget numbers at the back of the sport newspaper lol

[bst]

good times 

[Fuzzyduck]

1999? Fuck me. You guys were ahead of the game and on top of this forum shit when we woz using dial up 
Back then I used to just get the numbers in shop windows, phone boxes.... read between the lines posts in newspapers.
Most were B&S and or didn't provide services they said on the tin.

Don't forget the back of the jazz rags: Escort, Club etc.. Shop windows and phone box ads were a total lottery. They were always babes on the phone but the reality was mostly a disappointment. Younger punters don't really appreciate just how fucking lucky they are with UKP and being able to see pics and a list of services online.

[Fuzzyduck]

dont forget numbers at the back of the sport newspaper lol

What a lottery that was. I clearly remember this one ad that was an ansafone message for some granny out Romford way. She took it bareback in all holes. I had to ring it again just to check I had really heard what I thought I heard.

[whoya.kiddin]

Unless of course you think someone here is marketing on her behalf in which case you need to clarify yourself.

I stand by the comment you quote.  If you or others think I am talking out my arse go see her.  It really is no skin of my nose.

[bst]

My understanding was not that you are alledgedly talking out of your asshole. But rather are you accusing some of being involved with the group/pimp (I personally didn't read it as such, but at least one other did).

[Fuzzyduck]

I stand by the comment you quote.  If you or others think I am talking out my arse go see her.  It really is no skin of my nose.

Dodging the question again I see. Let's put aside the issue that you've seen her, had a poor experience and failed to review.

I asked you a couple of times to call out what positive commentary was vociferous (your word) in this thread and you've failed to respond.

You have a notion that her pimp efforts are having an effect on the reaction of punters here when she gets criticism. There may some truth to this but you fail to clarify what you mean and whether this is effect is direct or indirect.

I've had a look at the negative reviews she's got (shame there aren't more eh?) and I don't see any white knighting. In fact, I see punters being supportive. There was one challenge to a review 3 years ago but that was clarified and resolved amicably. I also see a number of people say they had poor experiences who were encouraged to post reviews, but didn't. Go figure

Perhaps you want to point out my reaction as an example? At face value, it might look like that but I've not reacted to neg criticism of this SP. Please point out if I have. I reacted to punters who (a) talk about bad experiences but don't review (b) have some psychological issue wanting to see a girl knowing it won't turn out well and (c) aren't prepared to back up what they say.

[whoya.kiddin]

Dodging the question again I see.

This isn't a court of law.  I can voice an opinion based on a generally impression that tone of commentary does not line up with the girl I saw and the services I recieved.  I can also point out her photos look doctored. You are right I can't prove it - I don't need to.  Fuckers here can form their own view.

I reacted to punters who (a) talk about bad experiences but don't review

You are not helping yourself.  I have already pointed out that I saw her some time ago.  It was before I was a member here and you are absolutely correct I did not review her - or any of the other 300+ WG's I have seen over the years before I joined  You look like your trying rather hard to win an argument... 

But do carry on.

Actually if you look back there is at least one controversy about whether her photos are accurate, and another when she was writing to admin complaining about photos here that she had previously published in her public gallery and was trying to get taken down - presumably so she could charge for them on a PG.  It is difficult to find the threads as they appear to have been edited but they certainly were there. 

[Fuzzyduck]

This isn't a court of law.  I can voice an opinion based on a generally impression that tone of commentary does not line up with the girl I saw and the services I recieved. I can also point out her photos look doctored. You are right I can't prove it - I don't need to.  Fuckers here can form their own view.

You are not helping yourself.  I have already pointed out that I saw her some time ago.  It was before I was a member here and you are absolutely correct I did not review her - or any of the other 300+ WG's I have seen over the years before I joined  You look like your trying rather hard to win an argument... 

But do carry on.

Actually if you look back there is at least one controversy about whether her photos are accurate, and another when she was writing to admin complaining about photos here that she had previously published in her public gallery and was trying to get taken down - presumably so she could charge for them on a PG.  It is difficult to find the threads as they appear to have been edited but they certainly were there.

There no argument here. I was only trying to understand whether there was any material substance behind your comments about members' behaviour and you've confirmed there isn't. There are less clumsy ways to recalibrate the overall impression of SPs on here.

[Moneyd]

Natt has put timber on on her thighs since last year, that's the main body difference I noticed this year from last. Service was still tip top though.

When she came back in Nov 2019 she had lost some weight, and as a result I didn’t think she was as sexy. Her tits we’re not as full as before etc.

Can anyone confirm that this isn’t the case anymore?

She was way sexier when she was a bit bigger. Amazing full tits and great kissing and blue job.

[Fuzzyduck]

When she came back in Nov 2019 she had lost some weight, and as a result I didn’t think she was as sexy. Her tits we’re not as full as before etc.

Can anyone confirm that this isn’t the case anymore?

She was way sexier when she was a bit bigger. Amazing full tits and great kissing and blue job.

Yes she's put on weight again but she's not quite the same shape as she was 3-4 year years ago. Her tits don't seem as full compared to 2017/18 and her thighs have more timber. Age I guess. Personally I think the autumn 2019 vintage is the sexiest. She's still a big girl remember (am@zonian rather than a chubber). In terms of my own preference: 2019 > 2017 > 2021. Still a good punt, though.

[Moneyd]

Yes she's put on weight again but she's not quite the same shape as she was 3-4 year years ago. Her tits don't seem as full compared to 2017/18 and her thighs have more timber. Age I guess. Personally I think the autumn 2019 vintage is the sexiest. She's still a big girl remember (am@zonian rather than a chubber). In terms of my own preference: 2019 > 2017 > 2021. Still a good punt, though.

Ok thanks, if I'm ever in the area I may try a quick 15 min BJ to asses for myself.

[smiths]

Yes she's put on weight again but she's not quite the same shape as she was 3-4 year years ago. Her tits don't seem as full compared to 2017/18 and her thighs have more timber. Age I guess. Personally I think the autumn 2019 vintage is the sexiest. She's still a big girl remember (am@zonian rather than a chubber). In terms of my own preference: 2019 > 2017 > 2021. Still a good punt, though.

Her thighs are certainly where I saw the noticeable difference since just before lockdown last March, I saw her last last month so a longish period in between. Indeed she is tallish and quite imposing looking I always think. An excellent punt and WG on the 5 times I have so far punted with her.