Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Charlotte Glasgow City Escorts  (Read 4031 times)

This review has not been indexed yet.

Offline pilgrim

http://www.glasgowcityescorts.co.uk/profile/charlotte_.html

The only positive about this punt was that the shower worked and there were clean dry towels.
Doomed from the start, the blue agency site had her down as available from midday yet the brown site had her down for starting at 8pm. After a discussion on the phone I could get a booking at 13:15 once the flat became available.
Phoned through a clothing request but that was never passed on, she did have a maids costume but had left it in the car!!  Buzzer controlled entry wasn’t working so after phoning the agency she came to the door to let me in, the leering concierge was keeping an eye on us.
Tattoos YES, Kissing NO, CIM NO, Fat YES
She insisted on taking off her own clothes until she was stood in her bra and pants, no proper kissing, lips and eyes kept tightly closed.  Tried oral on her but there was a musky smell, I put it down to her saying she had been driving for a few hours to get there.  I had made use of the shower at the start of the punt, she had asked when I came out if it was working ok.  I got the impression she had never used it.  Gave up on oral and asked her if she had a toy, she produced one of those vibrating bullets, I had to take her word that she was using it as I couldn’t see past her gut.  She stated her pics are about 4 years old and she and her mate Toni are saving up to get new ones done.  She mentioned that the pimp who runs the agency sometimes takes the pics but he leers at her and wants a free punt.  I moved up the bed to get some oral from her, she was doing nothing for me so I started to have a wank, she shot up and said “you cant come in my mouth or my face!!”  I said its on your profile. She said the agency says she has to have it.  I should have left at this point as I hadn’t paid.
She was keen to state that she was degree educated and hadn’t been involved in the copper stealing drugs and cash investigation.  She said she was too well educated and well spoken for his liking as he liked “Rough girls” Her words.  We discussed reports and she asked if I had seen the comments about Robyn as she was aware of her getting negative comments.  She mentioned that business was really slow, her best mate Toni is apparently very similar in size and have/swap the same type of punters. She said I could have her personal number if I saw her again.  Obviously she was not aware how pissed off I was with such a shite punt.
With about ten minutes to go she mentions time is getting on and the agency will be checking up on her, I ask for another pop so she produces some sort of lube/liquid and covers my knob with it before starting oral then on with the condom and climbing on top of me.  Her technique was painful as she just bounced up and down, she holds her arms in an upright position over her tits to stop them flopping about.  I stopped her after 2 mins as I was in pain, I climbed on top and struggled to get hard as she just lay there with no interaction.  After I came I made my way to the shower, she just wiped herself with a wet wipe and started getting dressed again.

She has potential to be a “Courtesan” complete with degree education and a dusty phone.

Offline Tjkooker

That's a pity. I'm sure the agency are using photos that were of Jessica. Always hoped it maybe was her. .
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline xr888

Fortunately I removed Charlotte from my list back then when I was seeking a WG.

So sometimes the photo is taken by the pimp instead of professional and the pimp even want a free ride? Hmm...

Huh? Toni is her best mate. I definitely don't and won't want to see her again. Though I wrote "Neutral" in review, she was one of the worst experience. Guess this would be the phrase "Birds of a feather flock together". I only seen her once last year, and she was about size 8 back then. I don't know if her size has changed or not.

The reports mean here? Because I never saw any negative comments on neither GEA nor GCE site.

« Last Edit: May 13, 2014, 09:06:57 PM by xr888 »

Offline sammy222

I used to use this agency when i was based in Glasgow- now returned to Edinburgh and the sauna scene (and joined this board)
Charlotte was a terrible punt then and it seems nothing has changed in the last couple of years, in fact that review is very similar to my experience back then. And £150 as well- nothing good about it.

Offline pilgrim

Its just another example of this agency lying about services provided and then doing nothing when they become aware of it.

The phone handlers dont meet the girls so they have no idea what they look like.  The pimp meets them all during the week and collects his fee.

I was a bit dubious of her pics.  You can tell that they have something to hide when they use clothing or arms to obscure a clear shot of their belly.

I had phoned through the clothing request but the bloke on the phone forgot to pass it on (thats what he told her) He told me she was traveling/had set off already but had a maids costume, which she left in the car.

Ive told the agency about CIM never being provided, but as usual as other reports about various prossies from this agency failing to provide advertised services has shown, nothing has been done and she continues to advertise it on her profile.

XR888 mentions never seeing neg reviews on the agencies site.  They edit the reports.  They used to accept PN reviews but they pulled the lot when the negative ones appeared.  There was a thread on PN about not trusting the agency on site reviews as they were edited, even the girls were promised that the agency would never publish anything negative about them.

Offline the fitter

Pilgrim I agree with a lot you say especially Charlotte being a negative, but I have sampled a lot of GEA girls,as I am a one girl one punt person, and I find the majority do CIM.

Offline the fitter

I case someone pulls me up for it I should have said MOSTLY a one girl one punt person. :rolleyes:

Offline vorian

Pilgrim I agree with a lot you say especially Charlotte being a negative, but I have sampled a lot of GEA girls,as I am a one girl one punt person, and I find the majority do CIM.

Got a list of the girls that did CIM would help other punters out. :hi:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline the fitter

vorian that would not help the punters out, this is at discretion, its up to us to get the girl to do it. There can be several reasons why they would not want to do it, the main one being hygene.

Offline vorian

vorian that would not help the punters out, this is at discretion, its up to us to get the girl to do it. There can be several reasons why they would not want to do it, the main one being hygene.

I understand, the point being that CIM (At discretion) is listed on many profiles as standard by the agency as a way of enticing the punter in even if the girl has no intention of providing it, irrespective of the hygiene of the punter. I assume that your hygiene was excellent when you had CIM from these girls, so by providing a list of the escorts that did CIM with you it will be helping out punters as they know the girl does not refuse on principle and as long as their attitude and hygiene is up to scratch then they are in for a good chance of CIM as well.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline the fitter

It was stated on here in an earlier post that the agency make the escorts put CIM on their profile, well if you check the profiles this is not the case. The profiles CIM on must be voluntary, its the same with OWO. There are punters on here that find them self in a position where they do not want to do RO,for various reasons, well it must be the same for the escorts.

Offline vorian

It was stated on here in an earlier post that the agency make the escorts put CIM on their profile, well if you check the profiles this is not the case. The profiles CIM on must be voluntary, its the same with OWO. There are punters on here that find them self in a position where they do not want to do RO,for various reasons, well it must be the same for the escorts.

I see, so that will be a no then, you said the escorts will do CIM with you but you do not wish to name the ones that do. Thanks for setting out your position.  :hi:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline the fitter

What I am saying vorian,is that the majority of girls with CIM on their profiles are willing in the first instance, if the circumstances are right, of course there is a minority that have no intention, but we have got to live with that.

Offline pilgrim

What I am saying vorian,is that the majority of girls with CIM on their profiles are willing in the first instance, if the circumstances are right, of course there is a minority that have no intention, but we have got to live with that.

I totally disagree with your statement that we have "... to live with that."  My money, my rules.  I should have clarified that she was going to do CIM, if not I would have walked.  I notice that its not listed on their brown site but it is on the blue site.  The guy on the phone tends to work off the brown site, maybe he needs to get someone to correct the blue site.

There is often a lot of variation between a prossies profile on the 4 sites, as  I mentioned in another post Sammi has 4 different pages, 3 dont list CIM but the Edinburgh blue version does list CIM, very misleading.

Not all the girls have that option forced upon them by the agency as reasonably new profiles for Erin and Kayla do not have CIM on either blue or brown site versions.  Its up to the girls to check their profiles and make sure they are accurate.  What was the previous discussion about? Was it Ava or Mia showing A levels but failing to provide it??

Its hard work weeding out the chaff!!  Then when you find a decent one they go indie or the flats not available!!

Offline the fitter

What I am answering Pilgrim, is were you say on your second post, you told the agency that CIM is never provided.

Offline pilgrim

I dont have a clue as to what you are trying to say "fitter" ?  Structured sentences would be much better.

Well Charlottes profile has now been removed from both the Glasgow sites.  Maybe all the negative publicity has awakened the agency to sort their act out.  She is still shown as "Kirsty" on their Newcastle site where there is no availability for any girl. They have also now removed the profiles of Danielle and Shelly from the Gla and Edin sites who both left months ago and are doing well on AW.


This could be seen as a warning to the other girls, check your profiles and only list the services you are prepared to offer, otherwise it looks as if the agency will remove your profile.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2014, 10:53:16 AM by pilgrim »

Offline xr888

Well Charlottes profile has now been removed from both the Glasgow sites.  Maybe all the negative publicity has awakened the agency to sort their act out.  She is still shown as "Kirsty" on their Newcastle site where there is no availability for any girl. They have also now removed the profiles of Danielle and Shelly from the Gla and Edin sites who both left months ago and are doing well on AW.
This could be seen as a warning to the other girls, check your profiles and only list the services you are prepared to offer, otherwise it looks as if the agency will remove your profile.

Maybe or maybe not as they might just go indies, since there is at least still one who has been complained. Anyway, sometimes I am really happy to see negative WG leave the agency, like Toni and the other one, possibly EE, who just worked for a little while last year.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2014, 12:15:28 PM by xr888 »

Offline zag69

Does anyone have the AW profile for Danielle or Shelly?



4 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (4 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline James999

Sounds terrible what did the "Agency" say about this?

Or is it the usual bollocks where the pro$$ie blames the Pimp and the Pimp blames the pro$$ie and the paying client loses out  :thumbsdown:

Offline pilgrim

Sounds terrible what did the "Agency" say about this?

Or is it the usual bollocks where the pro$$ie blames the Pimp and the Pimp blames the pro$$ie and the paying client loses out  :thumbsdown:
The phone handler working for the agency came out with the line that I have previously heard "Well, I can only apologise, I will pass your comments onto the bosses"  They never raise the possibility of a refund or a reduction on your next punt.  You can of course repeatedly submit comments via their on site review system and these will hopefully get read by the pimp/bosses/owner.  Its well known that they dont publish any negative comments and reviews are carefully edited.  James999, if you read my posts in this thread you will see that there was a bit of blame passing between pro$$ie and the phone handler.

Her profile has now been removed from the site, this may be as she has taken a break and will come back with new pics and a different profile.  I notice her mate Toni now has her profile back up on the blue site but she is not on the brown version which is the one the phone handler uses.  Charlotte mentioned they offered the same services and saw the same punters. So another one to AVOID.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2014, 06:32:24 PM by pilgrim »

Offline James999

The phone handler working for the agency came out with the line that I have previously heard "Well, I can only apologise, I will pass your comments onto the bosses" 

But surely they made the booking and the arrangements and as such have a responsibility for the problems, as a minimum they should refund you their cut of the Pro$$ies fee  :hi:

Offline pilgrim

But surely they made the booking and the arrangements and as such have a responsibility for the problems, as a minimum they should refund you their cut of the Pro$$ies fee  :hi:

Yes, we all know that but it rarely happens across the country.  All we can do is write a constructive report and ensure that other punters are warned of this pro$$ie and agency offering a poor service.  Its been mentioned before about their lack of interest in ensuring profiles are accurate in regards to the provision of services, having the requested clothing, tattoos and the state of the flat in matters of no towels, no toilet seat, shower in bits, creaky bed, filthy bedding.

Thats one of the main uses of this forum, to exchange reviews and therefore help other punters have better punts and avoid the dross.

Offline James999

Yes, we all know that but it rarely happens .

Whilst I agree that doesn't mean it should be accepted, instead of calling unhappy customers liars they would get far better PR by saying "Sorry Pilgrim, here's a £70 refund" The easiest way they could turn a negative into a positive.

Offline xr888

Her profile has now been removed from the site, this may be as she has taken a break and will come back with new pics and a different profile.  I notice her mate Toni now has her profile back up on the blue site but she is not on the brown version which is the one the phone handler uses.  Charlotte mentioned they offered the same services and saw the same punters. So another one to AVOID.

Recently, if a WG has a leave, she usually comes back with the totally the same profile with same old pictures. I've only seen two or three have new photo.

Yeah, Toni is definitely one to avoid if you don't like poor, bad attitude, even she looks good, not to mention some service wasn't provided.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)