Author Topic: Eduarda - Chelmsford  (Read 2987 times)


24 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5565755) (20 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Gpunter1

Hello everybody! Not my first punt but my first review since joining the forum.

Review of “Eduarda - Chelmsford”

Comms with Eduarda was excellent with postcode and confirmed time of meet with plenty of notice. On arrival I called her and she directed me to her apartment and it was very easy to find with free parking close by! She answered the door in a black robe and was wearing gorgeous stockings underneath. I paid £100 for a 30 minute meet and once she put the money away she came back and we started DFK straight away and she’s a great kisser. We then started removing our clothes and she let me kiss her all over and go down on her pussy. She moaned loads and didn’t just lay there like some do! She then returned the favour and performed OWO and we did 69 together to. She tasted great! She then put a condom on and we did missionary, her on top, doggy and pro bone positions and she took a good pounding again with lots of moaning. The 30 mins was nearly up so she removed condom and performed OWO with handjob to finish me off which she was really good at. I’ve seen around 5-6 WGs in the last year and she is by far the best one. She spends her time in London sometimes she said and she’s back in Chelmsford in a few weeks as she’s leaving again for London tomorrow. She’s a stunning young 24 year old Brazilian beauty and I can’t wait to see her again.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2021, 10:47:30 pm by Gpunter1 »



Online norwichfunseeker

Welcome to the forum, and a review for your first post. :hi:

She sounds a good punt,  and is well reviewed on here. Good to see she is still delivering a good experience.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 25, 2021, 10:49:07 pm by norwichfunseeker »

Offline marion70


 Am I being a bit cynical but the review seems a bit fictional for a newbie  :unknown:. Posting of link and pictures a bit of desperation it seems. I might be wrong though but just a thought.

 Habe seen her and tried rebooking but no success. Seems we didn't click lol  :crazy: :wackogirl:

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,045
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Am I being a bit cynical but the review seems a bit fictional for a newbie  :unknown:. Posting of link and pictures a bit of desperation it seems. I might be wrong though but just a thought.

 Habe seen her and tried rebooking but no success. Seems we didn't click lol  :crazy: :wackogirl:

I am like you cynical, but happy to give the new members a chance.
They probably are aware of the site. Have had time to read reviews and keen to contribute. Yes they often don’t get it right, posting the wrong link etc, but it would be best if they were supported rather than automatically dismissed as either the WG or a tout.

Offline marion70

I am like you cynical, but happy to give the new members a chance.
They probably are aware of the site. Have had time to read reviews and keen to contribute. Yes they often don’t get it right, posting the wrong link etc, but it would be best if they were supported rather than automatically dismissed as either the WG or a tout.

 Agree, but review seems a bit of an advertisement as well if u read thru the lines and there certainly is no free parking nearby ! Unless location has moved.

 Anyways, time will tell I guess.

Offline Gpunter1

Wow the cynicism is strong on this forum! Parking was free as I went at 8pm in the evening and every word of that review is the truth. Isn’t putting a picture up part of the rules of reviewing a WG?

Offline workinallweek

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,560
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 33

 Ive seen her 3 times  after radio silence on the first booking .

  1st was good  second was really very good   3rd visit was a two hour cut to one hour (as she messed up bookings ) and she seemed very edgy as if she didnt want to be there ...
Banned reason: Offering glowing positive reviews for free bookings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline marion70

Ive seen her 3 times  after radio silence on the first booking .

  1st was good  second was really very good   3rd visit was a two hour cut to one hour (as she messed up bookings ) and she seemed very edgy as if she didnt want to be there ...

  Looks like you were impressed with her and repeat visited. Certainly I got that edgy impression as well on our meet, but she always put the effort in to please and that is what matters. Haven't been able to book again for some reason but yeah she is a stunning lady who should really be a professional model in my opinion !!!

Offline marion70

Ive seen her 3 times  after radio silence on the first booking .

  1st was good  second was really very good   3rd visit was a two hour cut to one hour (as she messed up bookings ) and she seemed very edgy as if she didnt want to be there ...

 Can we have a review pls mate ? Would be interesting to read the different encounters.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Wow the cynicism is strong on this forum! Parking was free as I went at 8pm in the evening and every word of that review is the truth. Isn’t putting a picture up part of the rules of reviewing a WG?

Initiation process
Everyone gets the nuts Kung Fu kicked at the beginning
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline workinallweek

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,560
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Can we have a review pls mate ? Would be interesting to read the different encounters.

i will get round to it  but like to cover my digital tracks
Banned reason: Offering glowing positive reviews for free bookings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Welshpunter

Wow the cynicism is strong on this forum! Parking was free as I went at 8pm in the evening and every word of that review is the truth. Isn’t putting a picture up part of the rules of reviewing a WG?

I’m with you with this one mate. Plenty of free parking if you know the area. Closed down pub car parks are good right now. I also think there was anything wrong with the post... but what do I know... I’m also a recently new contributor

Offline Igor

Saw her recently, she has changed venue to Riverside Ice rink general area, exposed location on a main road, several cheap or one free car park nearby. Now sporting a trimmed pu##y which I personally love. Still good attitude and service but I sense a little 'conveyor belt' in operation.

Offline pepsicolaboy

Saw her recently, she has changed venue to Riverside Ice rink general area, exposed location on a main road, several cheap or one free car park nearby. Now sporting a trimmed pu##y which I personally love. Still good attitude and service but I sense a little 'conveyor belt' in operation.

I seen her twice and the first time was better and she was more engaged (it was 1 hour on first appointment, second 30 mins), and yes she maybe subject to a conveyor belt operation - she never seemed tired though.

As the second time engagement slipped, less swayed to go back.

 :hi:

Offline marion70


 Can you write a review guys please  :unknown: ? Might explain the situation better.

Offline marion70


 Definitely her popularity has soared due to this site and it's only fair that we hear the other side as well  :crazy: :dance:

Offline Calexor10

I seen her twice and the first time was better and she was more engaged (it was 1 hour on first appointment, second 30 mins), and yes she maybe subject to a conveyor belt operation - she never seemed tired though.

As the second time engagement slipped, less swayed to go back.

 :hi:

If too cheap they are conveyor belts

If too expensive 9/10 complain.

Can we have it both ways?