Author Topic: Natasha Crawley - should have walked  (Read 2625 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5809477) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by CoolTiger]

Offline Assessor

External Link/Members Only

Just a quick note as a warning. Comms good, parking easy and I'm sure the photos are her. That's the positives.

Now for why I should have walked. This lady is at  least 10 years older than the claimed 28, probably more and the photos are either really well photo-shopped or at least 10 years ago. She's a bit chunkier too. Now, I could have lived with all that at £70 if the service had been good and I guess that's why I didn't walk, I was hoping it would be good. But it was awful, she really rushed me, she was loose, attitude was terrible. Avoid.

Offline HoleyHatrick

External Link/Members Only

Just a quick note as a warning. Comms good, parking easy and I'm sure the photos are her. That's the positives.

Now for why I should have walked. This lady is at  least 10 years older than the claimed 28, probably more and the photos are either really well photo-shopped or at least 10 years ago. She's a bit chunkier too. Now, I could have lived with all that at £70 if the service had been good and I guess that's why I didn't walk, I was hoping it would be good. But it was awful, she really rushed me, she was loose, attitude was terrible. Avoid.

Sorry to hear this OP.

I saw this SP back when she was Sexlover Lola - External Link/Members Only in 2018 & 2019.
Met her 3 times after the first visit where she took the hardest anal pounding I have ever given, the memory of her pushing back and loving it still lives with me, each visit thereafter was a positive for me.

Agree she is probably 10 years older than stated but I still was attracted to her, I haven't seen her for over a year so it is a shame if her standards have slipped from my meetings with her.