Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Prossies who insit you book through AdultWork  (Read 7110 times)

Online NIK

It appears there are a number who insist you book through AW. Are there actually many who insist upon this and why?
Is it so they can check a clients feedback or something?
Personally if anyone insisted I book through the bollocks that is AW, or that I had to have a certain amount of feedback before I was allowed to make a booking they could fuck right off!  :mad:

Offline vorian

It appears there are a number who insist you book through AW. Are there actually many who insist upon this and why?
Is it so they can check a clients feedback or something?
Personally if anyone insisted I book through the bollocks that is AW, or that I had to have a certain amount of feedback before I was allowed to make a booking they could fuck right off!  :mad:

I think the feedback check may well be the reason, I am guessing not so much the public feedback which is pointless crap but the hidden notes. I must say once I have seen a prossie once, I rarely place an AW booking for following punts with the same girl and that has not been a problem. Also they probably know that you are more likely to give FB if you have booked through the system.

Does'nt really bother me (I know a lot of punters have an issue with booking this way, and I respect their reasons for that). I do all my research using UKP, make contact and only after everything is agreed do I place the booking.

Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online NIK

I think the feedback check may well be the reason, I am guessing not so much the public feedback which is pointless crap but the hidden notes. I must say once I have seen a prossie once, I rarely place an AW booking for following punts with the same girl and that has not been a problem. Also they probably know that you are more likely to give FB if you have booked through the system.

Does'nt really bother me (I know a lot of punters have an issue with booking this way, and I respect their reasons for that). I do all my research using UKP, make contact and only after everything is agreed do I place the booking.

Well the idea of there being hidden notes which seems to have appeared recently is yet another black mark against AW in my view.

Offline wristjob

I booked a party recently using AW - I figured with the risks and logistics of organising it then it's reasonable to prove you are serious by going through the booking system. Only time I ever have.

I also contacted a girl recently for her phone number, which she said she only gives out when it's confirmed and she uses the booking system to tie it in with her other job bla bla. I asked if she was free the following day, got a reply the day after - forget it, waste of time. If they want to use the booking system good fro them, but my name won't be appearing on it unless I go deaf.


Offline wristjob

Well the idea of there being hidden notes which seems to have appeared recently is yet another black mark against AW in my view.

I see the point - but easily abused but a nutter WG - and thre are a few of those.

Offline mattylondon

It appears there are a number who insist you book through AW. Are there actually many who insist upon this and why?
Is it so they can check a clients feedback or something?
Personally if anyone insisted I book through the bollocks that is AW, or that I had to have a certain amount of feedback before I was allowed to make a booking they could fuck right off!  :mad:
I had one yesterday. E-mail ping pong for a couple of days. Services and rate agreed right at the start but she continued to stall on providing any further details. Contact number and general area. And I have 100% exemplary feedbacks on a few of my profiles.  :cool:

However, when politely pressed for a contact number, she requested a booking through Adultwork. I think you can work out my reply!  :D

I had another two other dumb bitches recetly insist I only book them via Whatsapp or Blackberry?! Wtf!!  :dash:

Tell you what though, reading their feedback shows that there must be many punters out there willing to play their game. I agree with JRC and Smiths, who prefer to go through displayed numbers. I don't have either the time nor inclination to fuck about. I have plenty of other options.

More and more, I've been booking women through other sources rather than Adultwork. Those places being where direct numbers are displayed.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 07:23:19 PM by mattylondon »

Offline smiths

It appears there are a number who insist you book through AW. Are there actually many who insist upon this and why?
Is it so they can check a clients feedback or something?
Personally if anyone insisted I book through the bollocks that is AW, or that I had to have a certain amount of feedback before I was allowed to make a booking they could fuck right off!  :mad:

Absolutely agree, i am the service buyer so will decide to do what suits me NOT the WG. No idea how many WGs insist on booking through A/W but in London i havent had any problems finding WGs who take phone bookings.

As i have posted before this A/W feedback crap gives the WG the whip hand as i see it. Its also a very bad idea for one crucial reason in my view. As punters have posted some are too scared to give a bad WG negative FB in case the WG leaves them negative in revenge potentially putting off future WGs. How on earth does that help punters, what it no doubt does is ensure bad WGs are laughing their heads off at punters stupidity.

However, if a punter punts in a punting desert he might HAVE to have FB to get a punt off A/W so in those areas the WG can dictate as she chooses, just glad i punt in London.

My advice to punters is at least leave FB on here using a different nick to your one on A/W. Personally i dont trust one word of A/W FB unless i know, trust and/or respect the punter leaving it, its a rotten to the core site run by low lifes as i see it. I still use it as a location tool only as its the best there is. ;)

Offline Festisio

It's all well and good saying that you (NIK, JRC, Smiths, MattyLondon) will never punt with a pro$$ie who requires an AW booking, however if you want to see that girl and that is the only way to book, you are simply cutting off your nose to spite your face by not jumping through their (relatively effortless) hoops.

I've seen a number of prossies who only took AW bookings and have been awesome punts that I would have missed out on had I taken such a stubborn approaching to booking.

Let's face it, there AREN'T that many decent prossies anyway, so reducing that pool further is never a good thing.

It's obviously your choice how you punt but I think it's nonsense to discount them on that basis alone.  I have no problem using any communication means that they want in order to secure a booking.

Offline sexy_lacyx

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 29
hope you don't mind my adding too this.  I do on my tours and that is too see they have feed back, as there is more risk involved, so maybe the same reason

Offline smiths

It's all well and good saying that you (NIK, JRC, Smiths, MattyLondon) will never punt with a pro$$ie who requires an AW booking, however if you want to see that girl and that is the only way to book, you are simply cutting off your nose to spite your face by not jumping through their (relatively effortless) hoops.

I've seen a number of prossies who only took AW bookings and have been awesome punts that I would have missed out on had I taken such a stubborn approaching to booking.

Let's face it, there AREN'T that many decent prossies anyway, so reducing that pool further is never a good thing.

It's obviously your choice how you punt but I think it's nonsense to discount them on that basis alone.  I have no problem using any communication means that they want in order to secure a booking.

I am not that desperate to see one particular WG so i dont see it that i am cutting off my nose to spite my face, plenty of other WGs to choose from.

I will continue to punt as suits me, worked perfectly well in the main for over 30 years and no intention on changing it. However, i have no problem in saying i am an old stick in the mud on this.

Offline mattylondon

It's all well and good saying that you (NIK, JRC, Smiths, MattyLondon) will never punt with a pro$$ie who requires an AW booking, however if you want to see that girl and that is the only way to book, you are simply cutting off your nose to spite your face by not jumping through their (relatively effortless) hoops.

I've seen a number of prossies who only took AW bookings and have been awesome punts that I would have missed out on had I taken such a stubborn approaching to booking.

Let's face it, there AREN'T that many decent prossies anyway, so reducing that pool further is never a good thing.

It's obviously your choice how you punt but I think it's nonsense to discount them on that basis alone.  I have no problem using any communication means that they want in order to secure a booking.
You're right. It's my choice and you assume far too much.  :rolleyes:

Where did I say I've never booked a prossie through Adultwork? It's something I choose not to do anymore, so please spare me the lecture about missing out on 'gems'. Been there, done that. I don't jump through hoops to book prostitutes anymore.

As far as I'm concerned, it's enough for me to have exemplary feedback and use the e-mail system. I soon sort out the wheat from the chaff. The prossies who insist on it are simply feedback collectors, in my opinion. It has fuck all to do with safety. Anybody can create a profile anonymously via a proxy server and provide an unregistered sim for their contact details. If they're thick enough to believe they're safer, then they're truly naive.

It's called experience of being fucked over by the Adultwork booking system and prossies in the past. Have you any idea how many options I have in my area? Including those not listed on Adultwork. It's in the 1000s. Fine words if you live in a punting desert. I don't.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 07:39:52 PM by mattylondon »

Offline smiths

Yes at one time I would chase a prossy I wanted to see.
It's amazing how advanced middle age  :D changes your outlook on so many things.
Nowdays I can barely be bothered to punt never mind jump through hoops for an appointment. It's the same with travelling as I've said before. Once upon a time the travelling to the punt was all part of the thrill for me - not anymore

I know next week when I go to London, in the absence of Nicoletta I will almost certainly see my other regular Amy, rather than risk someone new. She is expensive, but 100% reliable, never having let me down in nine years! Also like Nicoletta she is based very near to the areas I usually stay, no travelling into outer London.

I wouldnt even consider travelling from where you live to London for a punt nowadays, so your well advanced on me on that. My absolute maximum travelling distance is a 50 mile round trip, obviously being in London helps with that as i have a lot of choice.

Overall, i have a principle that i wont jump through hoops for a punt, i am the buyer so why should i, its the seller that should be jumping through hoops to get my business as i see it. As i have got older this thinking has hardened greatly. Jumping through hoops to get a punt, thats a no way, i only do that to get a civvy shag. ;)

It will be photo ID and references from other WGs needed next to get a punt, all due to punters stupidity at letting the WG dictate the terms. :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 07:43:42 PM by smiths »

Online NIK

It's all well and good saying that you (NIK, JRC, Smiths, MattyLondon) will never punt with a pro$$ie who requires an AW booking, however if you want to see that girl and that is the only way to book, you are simply cutting off your nose to spite your face by not jumping through their (relatively effortless) hoops.

I've seen a number of prossies who only took AW bookings and have been awesome punts that I would have missed out on had I taken such a stubborn approaching to booking.

Let's face it, there AREN'T that many decent prossies anyway, so reducing that pool further is never a good thing.

It's obviously your choice how you punt but I think it's nonsense to discount them on that basis alone.  I have no problem using any communication means that they want in order to secure a booking.

Yes at one time I would chase a prossy I wanted to see.
It's amazing how advanced middle age  :D changes your outlook on so many things.
Nowdays I can barely be bothered to punt never mind jump through hoops for an appointment. It's the same with travelling as I've said before. Once upon a time the travelling to the punt was all part of the thrill for me - not anymore

I know next week when I go to London, in the absence of Nicoletta I will almost certainly see my other regular Amy, rather than risk someone new. She is expensive, but 100% reliable, never having let me down in nine years! Also like Nicoletta she is based very near to the areas I usually stay, no travelling into outer London. Watch Amy not be available for the first ever time now!

Offline mattylondon

It will be photo ID and references from other WGs needed next to get a punt, all due to punters stupidity at letting the WG dictate the terms. :thumbsdown:
I can see a time when Adultwork start insisting on punters verifying themselves too!

There will always be plenty of idiots and mug punters who will jump through any hoops dictated to them by a prossie, in order to book them. I should know. I used to be one of them!  :blush:

I'll do that for a civvy but for a two a penny prossie? I don't think so. I understand the argument if you live in a punting desert, but not in my area. I don't know the woman, after all. I'm simply judging them by looks, services and any feedback. I don't get that emotionally attached as some punters appear to do.  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 07:51:04 PM by mattylondon »

Online NIK

I wouldnt even consider travelling from where you live to London for a punt nowadays, so your well advanced on me on that. My absolute maximum travelling distance is a 50 mile round trip, obviously being in London helps with that as i have a lot of choice.

Overall, i have a principle that i wont jump through hoops for a punt, i am the buyer so why should i, its the seller that should be jumping through hoops to get my business as i see it. As i have got older this thinking has hardened greatly. Jumping through hoops to get a punt, thats a no way, i only do that to get a civvy shag. ;)

I will be photo ID and references from other WGs needed next to get a punt, all due to punters stupidity at letting the WG dictate the terms. :thumbsdown:

Well I don't go just for the punting. I'm actually on a training course on the Friday. I've also arranged to see a mate on Thursday evening. Sat Afternoon I may meet another friend if he's available or go to the theatre. I also simply enjoy the change of pubs. I've actually become quite friendly with a doorman at one of my regular venues since I first met him last autumn and have had lots of good chats with him in their outside area towards the end of the evening.
I also like walking around different areas on the outskirts of Central London just to see what the are like. One of the few localities I haven't been to is Highgate, been to Hampstead loads, so maybe Highgate is next on my agenda.
So the punting is only part of the experience. Having said that I'd be disappointed if I didn't manage at least one punt.  :cool:

Wish I hadn't bothered with the punting this time.
Everything else has been great apart from that!  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: May 17, 2014, 07:09:10 PM by NIK »

Offline pleasure

It's crazy how different people's experiences differ. If a girl asks me to book through AW I'm usually pleased as punch, because it's one of the few ways I can be pretty sure she's not a time-waster.

Booking by email, text or phone is all very well, but I've had plenty of girls let me down that way. Once I've got an AW booking arranged, I'm pretty confident the meeting's going to go ahead as planned. Maybe it's because they know you can leave them bad feedback if they screw you over. Or maybe it's just if they can work out how to use the booking system in the first place, they generally have the intelligence to be able to remember an appointment. :)

Online NIK

Also I meet Jimmy very occasionally!  :yahoo:

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Some girls are under the impression that by booking through the AW system it means you are a nice guy and wont hurt them in any way.  Just like they assume good feedback means someone is reliable or not a freak.  we all know how flawed that system is.  Some also insist on AW bookings as they want the feedback themselves as it gives them validation of a job well done not realising some men wont leave negative no matter how bad it was

Offline smiths

Well I don't go just for the punting. I'm actually on a training course on the Friday. I've also arranged to see a mate on Thursday evening. Sat Afternoon I may meet another friend if he's available or go to the theatre. I also simply enjoy the change of pubs. I've actually become quite friendly with a doorman at one of my regular venues since I first met him last autumn and have had lots of good chats with him in their outside area towards the end of the evening.
I also like walking around different areas on the outskirts of Central London just to see what the are like. One of the few localities I haven't been to is Highgate, been to Hampstead loads, so maybe Highgate is next on my agenda.
So the punting is only part of the experience. Having said that I'd be disappointed if I didn't manage at least one punt.  :cool:

Thanks, i wasnt aware of that obviously. ;)

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
Some girls are under the impression that by booking through the AW system it means you are a nice guy and wont hurt them in any way.  Just like they assume good feedback means someone is reliable or not a freak.  we all know how flawed that system is.  Some also insist on AW bookings as they want the feedback themselves as it gives them validation of a job well done not realising some men wont leave negative no matter how bad it was

This is my experience too Dani. AW feedback is flawed on both sides, and I say unless it's blinking obvious a person is an axe murderer, then use all your usual screening methods and your common sense. Someone who is going to be a pain will usually show their true colours during the booking procedure, if not then they'd get passed your checks anyway and you are down to your own basic protection methods.

Offline berksboy

  No phone no showing on a wgs AW profile = move on to the next one , job done.There are more wgs out there then i can get to see so sure as hell not fucking about with aw bookings , e mail ect.

You're a bloke perhaps visiting a girl on her own.

Think about it  :diablo:


Offline wristjob

It's all well and good saying that you (NIK, JRC, Smiths, MattyLondon) will never punt with a pro$$ie who requires an AW booking, however if you want to see that girl and that is the only way to book, you are simply cutting off your nose to spite your face by not jumping through their (relatively effortless) hoops.

I've seen a number of prossies who only took AW bookings and have been awesome punts that I would have missed out on had I taken such a stubborn approaching to booking.

Let's face it, there AREN'T that many decent prossies anyway, so reducing that pool further is never a good thing.

It's obviously your choice how you punt but I think it's nonsense to discount them on that basis alone.  I have no problem using any communication means that they want in order to secure a booking.

Well I'm not saying never ever, but I tend to book last minute so that isn't a natural fit to the AW booking system - especially if there's no number til after I have booked.

As for cutting off my nose - so is the girl. I've seen very few girls who insist on this so reduce the number of girls I can see by maybe 3%. They probably reduce the number of clients by 50% or more.

I get why they might do it - as was mentioned on another thread maybe 50% of bookings don't turn up so at least it gives them some comeback anda  way to stop the same person doing it more than once. Generally though the more attitude a girl seems to have the less good the punt is - and this comes across as attitude to me.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
You're a bloke perhaps visiting a girl on her own.

Think about it  :diablo:

As has been said by myself and Strawberry it makes no difference. Feedback on AW is so flawed as so many are too scared to leave negative feedback on both sides so we have no idea that the guy with 8 great feedbacks is actually a nasty bit of work.
A phone call is our first line of defence and much better than feedback that is written with the fear they might get back feedback in return so leave something nice.


Offline wristjob

I can see a time when Adultwork start insisting on punters verifying themselves too!


It's about digital footprint too. My AW ID used to be something that could have been tied to me - when I realised it got changed. Search for an AW username in google and you get to see that user's ID. How clever does booking through AW and leaving/receiving feedback look now?

There will come a time when somebody will hack or leak AW records, or the government will get hold of their data or whatever. Sending mails, buying PGs even - you can still plead you are a timewaster and didn't see them. Having feedback - nail in the coffin.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)