xxxJessica Rabbitxxx - Birmingham

[MrKhan]

So I met the lovely Jessica finally the other day after trying to book for a little while (usually booked up but I will now pre book with her)

Her photos are nice but in person a lot better. Her service is beyond, she’s very energetic and very beautiful.

She opened the door in a red lace dress with a pair of killer heels and I was stunned. Big red bouncy hair, glam make up and lovely cute smile. Usually girls I’ve seen in the past never made that much effort to see a client so I was exceptionally pleased. She greeted me and we had a little giggle at the start together which was really nice (new clients would love her as she will put you at ease)

I personally love a GFE experience and I asked for it over the phone, that’s exactly what I received. Very sensual and she is very good at teasing also. I booked 1 hour and she made me cum within the first 15 minutes which was abnormal for me lol. She just knew exactly how to tease and move her body on mine, it’s like she knew exactly how to make me want her... talented lady lol. This was all just from very passionate kissing & a blow job... which I may add, one of the best I’ve had in a while. We lay down any relaxed together, chatted which was nice and she’s just a down to earth woman. She initiated another round abs started kissing me and touching me, which I was shocked about as really she could have maybe got out of it and just lay there and chatted lol.... I was definitely up for another round though and again the build up was a amazing and I cum again for the second time. She gave me a blow job and rode me. The energy and the effort from her is just beyond what I’m used to from escorts previously seen (no bad experiences before but just not anything like this)

I’ll definitely be back regularly and I recommend this lovely lady to everyone. She is new in Birmingham and she’s one of the best I have seen I’ll be honest. She is hard to book sometimes as she is busy but she’s worth the wait. She puts in the effort with every client! She’s open minded to anything also and she’s so genuine and passionate

External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

Is this her?  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only a link is required in a review. Also how much did you pay (If you did).

have a look at this guide for future reference.  External Link/Members Only

[MrKhan]

External Link/Members Only

[MrKhan]

My apologise. I paid £160 for the hour on a special offer deal. Worth the price and more definitely.

[Pablo02]

Quite a vague review
You seem to be praising her a lot rather than giving more details about what she was like whilst having sex with her, what positions did you try, anything she wasn’t happy to do, what was her incall place like

Did you get dfk? Deep throat? CIM?
She has these listed at discretion which is a bit cheeky when your charging £180 a hour.

[MrKhan]

She rode me and gave me a longer blow job, which I was happy with. I don’t actually like any other position so I didn’t try, I explained what I wanted on phone and I got that.

She does OWO included in all bookings. And CIM is a free extra on an hour booking and the other extras she charges are reasonable as they aren’t a standard service anyway... I usually have to pay extra for OWO and that’s something she does include also so I was happy with pricing... most escorts are around 150-200 that I’ve seen before. I prefer to pay slightly more for a more tailored service

[jay121]

will look forward to seeing reviews of the other escorts you have seen

[MrKhan]

Yes DFK happened and deep throat also... I noticed her gag reflex was also very good. She can hold it in her throat also and I’m on the larger side. If you’d like to know anything else just ask, realised now I didn’t put as much detail in.

[MrKhan]

I’ve seen a few others I’ll be reviewing soon also, only just decided to start posting my own reviews, usually I just scan and look at others

[jay121]

She puts in the effort with every client! 

External Link/Members Only

How could you possibly say that or know that?

[MrKhan]

Sorry that was an assumption that she would be like that with every client. Just from the way she spoke and was on the booking with me. This is just my own personal review on her and my own assumption and on what she is like In bookings so if I’ve wrote anything that’s an assumption it’s just based on my own experience

[sky1234]

I have my suspicions about this post, I'm surprised no one else has ....

[pbrown355]

suspicions +1

[Supernose9]

+2

[MrKhan]

suspicions +1

Not entirely sure what is suspicious champ
Lol. I am just reviewing girls I have seen recently to help others out

[slimdude1]

She has a cracking figure, looks fit!

Not to accuse you OP, but this does read as a fluffy review. I'll give you the BOD though since you've posted two other reviews. 

[Pablo02]

She has a cracking figure, looks fit!

Not to accuse you OP, but this does read as a fluffy review. I'll give you the BOD though since you've posted two other reviews. 

All 3 reviews are fluffy as fuck
Not sure if they are to be believed

[KarmaPolice]

Apologies if you're genuine, but I agree this is suspicious.

Popping up, reviewing three girls (with zero feedback on AW or on here), using language which I'd usually associate with adverts rather than reviews.

I don't mean to offend, but that's how it comes across.

[MrKhan]

What on earth does fluffy as fuck mean lol? I am posting to help others, I’ve not had a bad experience just yet but if I did I would post, I have only just started posting, I don’t see what I would gain from giving a review that was untrue lol... believe it or don’t... it does not effect me... people on this site.... 

[MrKhan]

Apologies if you're genuine, but I agree this is suspicious.

Popping up, reviewing three girls (with zero feedback on AW or on here), using language which I'd usually associate with adverts rather than reviews.

I don't mean to offend, but that's how it comes across.

Apologies if I have wrote their reviews wrong lol... I don’t see what I said wrong.... I was just simply putting my experience out there... we are in Covid times you cannot put reviews on their pages which I usually do so I came to here to post

[KarmaPolice]

What on earth does fluffy as fuck mean lol? I am posting to help others, I’ve not had a bad experience just yet but if I did I would post, I have only just started posting, I don’t see what I would gain from giving a review that was untrue lol... believe it or don’t... it does not effect me... people on this site.... 

"Fluffy" refers to the fact that you're exceedingly positive about each girl in your three reviews, in absolutely every aspect.

Let's examine the evidence...

The girls
"She is even better in person." "She was very naturally beautiful!! She did have make up on but not a lot, it was just right." "Her photos are nice but in person a lot better."

The performances
"The energy and the effort from her is just beyond what I’m used to" "She was exceptional" "Probably one of if not the best I have ever had"

The price
Absolutely top dollar per hour for all 3 girls, but apparently "Worth the price and more definitely." AND MORE?? Who says that? Not punters.

The oddness
"Reviewing a few of my favourites I’ve seen recently!!!" - she's new on Adultwork and in town, weird to call her a favourite
"Beautiful and genuine woman, her profile said 18 but she is 19 and said she made an error while writing profile. That wasn’t an issue for me." Great to know that an accidental year's error wasn't a big deal for you.
"we had a little giggle at the start together" - this does not seem like a phrase punters would generally use
"She is hard to book sometimes as she is busy but she’s worth the wait. She puts in the effort with every client! She’s open minded to anything also and she’s so genuine and passionate" - nice little runner, FSH, MOT until September etc etc. Very much like how I would write an advert for myself...

Conclusion

Probably not genuine reviews.

I don't blame you - getting feedback is tricky and especially at the moment, but this isn't going to win any friends.

[MassageMan]

Oh dear, this does not sound good for the OP.

Is it me, or are all the 3 reviews from this OP suspicious ?

Jenifer_lust - "Met Jenifer last week..." [£150]

Busty_Bailey - "So I saw the sexy Bailey some time last week I believe..." [£160]

xxxJessica Rabbitxxx - "So I met the lovely Jessica finally the other day..." [£160]


Just my observations:-

1) I wish I had £470 to spend in ONE WEEK !
2) Saatchi & Saatchi should employ you as their Advertising Director
3) Three very very positive meets on the trot, in the same week, now life is not like that, surely?

[jay121]

I'm glad Mr Khan can keep this girl and the others he reviewed happy, he seems to have picked up quite a few regulars. I for one won't be partaking

[MrKhan]

"Fluffy" refers to the fact that you're exceedingly positive about each girl in your three reviews, in absolutely every aspect.

Let's examine the evidence...

The girls
"She is even better in person." "She was very naturally beautiful!! She did have make up on but not a lot, it was just right." "Her photos are nice but in person a lot better."

The performances
"The energy and the effort from her is just beyond what I’m used to" "She was exceptional" "Probably one of if not the best I have ever had"

The price
Absolutely top dollar per hour for all 3 girls, but apparently "Worth the price and more definitely." AND MORE?? Who says that? Not punters.

The oddness
"Reviewing a few of my favourites I’ve seen recently!!!" - she's new on Adultwork and in town, weird to call her a favourite
"Beautiful and genuine woman, her profile said 18 but she is 19 and said she made an error while writing profile. That wasn’t an issue for me." Great to know that an accidental year's error wasn't a big deal for you.
"we had a little giggle at the start together" - this does not seem like a phrase punters would generally use
"She is hard to book sometimes as she is busy but she’s worth the wait. She puts in the effort with every client! She’s open minded to anything also and she’s so genuine and passionate" - nice little runner, FSH, MOT until September etc etc. Very much like how I would write an advert for myself...

Conclusion

Probably not genuine reviews.

I don't blame you - getting feedback is tricky and especially at the moment, but this isn't going to win any friends.

Ridiculous lol, I put good reviews on for every girl I’ve recently seen as that’s how my experience went. I am not in anyway affiliated or running any of these girls. I don’t know them personally, I just had a good time with them and thought I’d share, any new punter who puts up reviews that are good gets this and that’s probably why people are cautious to write reviews.

CONCLUSION- re read what I put and make sure I pretend I’m unhappy with a girl or people will think I am lying and giving a fake review

[Pablo02]

Is this her?  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only a link is required in a review. Also how much did you pay (If you did).

have a look at this guide for future reference.  External Link/Members Only

Have you read the above!!!!

[MrKhan]

Oh dear, this does not sound good for the OP.

Is it me, or are all the 3 reviews from this OP suspicious ?

Jenifer_lust - "Met Jenifer last week..." [£150]

Busty_Bailey - "So I saw the sexy Bailey some time last week I believe..." [£160]

xxxJessica Rabbitxxx - "So I met the lovely Jessica finally the other day..." [£160]


Just my observations:-

1) I wish I had £470 to spend in ONE WEEK !
2) Saatchi & Saatchi should employ you as their Advertising Director
3) Three very very positive meets on the trot, in the same week, now life is not like that, surely?

1- MY MONEY AND HOW I SPEND DOES NOT CONCERN ANYONE. I have spent a lot more than this on escorts and I don’t see the issue - sorry you cannot do that or don’t want to

2 - Absolutely no clue who they are

3- It was like that for me and has been for most of my meets. I’ve had one neutral experience where there wasn’t much effort made but I’ve never had a bad experience just yet. Perhaps I’m just not as harsh as people on here and I’m easily pleased

WE ARE ALLOWED OUR OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. I am not going to lie and say any of these girls gave me a bad experience because they did not

[jay121]

Unfortunately when reviews read like adverts people will be suspicious and its not as though it has not happened before. The real test will be when someone else actually reviews this or other SPs

[sky1234]

"Fluffy" refers to the fact that you're exceedingly positive about each girl in your three reviews, in absolutely every aspect.

Let's examine the evidence...

The girls
"She is even better in person." "She was very naturally beautiful!! She did have make up on but not a lot, it was just right." "Her photos are nice but in person a lot better."

The performances
"The energy and the effort from her is just beyond what I’m used to" "She was exceptional" "Probably one of if not the best I have ever had"

The price
Absolutely top dollar per hour for all 3 girls, but apparently "Worth the price and more definitely." AND MORE?? Who says that? Not punters.

The oddness
"Reviewing a few of my favourites I’ve seen recently!!!" - she's new on Adultwork and in town, weird to call her a favourite
"Beautiful and genuine woman, her profile said 18 but she is 19 and said she made an error while writing profile. That wasn’t an issue for me." Great to know that an accidental year's error wasn't a big deal for you.
"we had a little giggle at the start together" - this does not seem like a phrase punters would generally use
"She is hard to book sometimes as she is busy but she’s worth the wait. She puts in the effort with every client! She’s open minded to anything also and she’s so genuine and passionate" - nice little runner, FSH, MOT until September etc etc. Very much like how I would write an advert for myself...

Conclusion

Probably not genuine reviews.

I don't blame you - getting feedback is tricky and especially at the moment, but this isn't going to win any friends.

Well said Mr karma police, I'm glad I weren't the only one having suspicions

[pbrown355]

Mr Khan, as one who has/had suspicions about your review I hope I can help. All of the serious punters on here want reviews. Most of us are suspicious of 1st time reviewers. Your reviews read like adverts, which others have pointed out in great detail. IMHO they have been gentler than is often the case. Take note of the criticism/advice, make the reviews a little more informative and less advertorial. Then keep reviewing because we need good reviews, and yours are at the upper end of the financial scale which makes them less common.
But again, choose your language more carefully.

[MrKhan]

Mr Khan, as one who has/had suspicions about your review I hope I can help. All of the serious punters on here want reviews. Most of us are suspicious of 1st time reviewers. Your reviews read like adverts, which others have pointed out in great detail. IMHO they have been gentler than is often the case. Take note of the criticism/advice, make the reviews a little more informative and less advertorial. Then keep reviewing because we need good reviews, and yours are at the upper end of the financial scale which makes them less common.
But again, choose your language more carefully.

I appreciate the advice thank you. Like I said previously I’m a new guy to reviews on this site. Not new to punting though. I didn’t realise my wording was wrong and I was just reviewing my experience with a few different girls i had seen within less than a month. I see girls regular and I shall post more so I’ll take your advice into consideration. I wasn’t being overly nice with the girls, I just was genuinely happy with my experience but after all the comments received on all my review I understand I should maybe add in more detail and be more critical. For me £150/£160 is on the lower grade pay scale so I had no idea this was a higher scale and should be more critical on them. I’ll take note on this for future reviews. I’ll still post as other reviews have helped me so that’s the only reason I did in the first place. Thank you for some genuine help, instead of giving me stick for just being happy with an experience lol... maybe I have just been lucky because i haven’t needed to write anything negative on any of the girls just yet..

Apologies to anyone who didn’t find my review helpful, was just my experience with all the girls. I’ll take it on the chin and be slightly more critical next time 

[Punterperson1971]

I appreciate the advice thank you. Like I said previously I’m a new guy to reviews on this site. Not new to punting though. I didn’t realise my wording was wrong and I was just reviewing my experience with a few different girls i had seen within less than a month. I see girls regular and I shall post more so I’ll take your advice into consideration. I wasn’t being overly nice with the girls, I just was genuinely happy with my experience but after all the comments received on all my review I understand I should maybe add in more detail and be more critical. For me £150/£160 is on the lower grade pay scale so I had no idea this was a higher scale and should be more critical on them. I’ll take note on this for future reviews. I’ll still post as other reviews have helped me so that’s the only reason I did in the first place. Thank you for some genuine help, instead of giving me stick for just being happy with an experience lol... maybe I have just been lucky because i haven’t needed to write anything negative on any of the girls just yet..

Apologies to anyone who didn’t find my review helpful, was just my experience with all the girls. I’ll take it on the chin and be slightly more critical next time 

Respect to you mate for taking the advice well,we all have to start somewhere and it’s best to follow the advice on here it will help.

[JontyR]

Reviewing punters are like SPs. They build a reputation over time and on the basis of their service to the wider punting community.

We'll find out soon enough as more reviews on these SPs comes in. I can see myself possibly pencilling a booking with one of them after the easing of restrictions. When I or others review it will help confirm or deny other experiences.  That's how it works.

[MrKhan]

  Understood it wasn’t just me lol and all new reviewers on here are apparently questioned, I just was unknown to that! Definitely taking it on the chin and I will learn from these comments lol. I’m having another meet next week so I shall do a more critical review of this girl and make sure it’s not “fluffy”

[Punterperson1971]

Understood it wasn’t just me lol and all new reviewers on here are apparently questioned, I just was unknown to that! Definitely taking it on the chin and I will learn from these comments lol. I’m having another meet next week so I shall do a more critical review of this girl and make sure it’s not “fluffy”

Fair play and well done for not kicking off,a lot of newbies don’t take criticism well from others on here and they end up causing trouble and getting banned.

[JontyR]

Call it as you see it mate. I think the most important thing is to be consistent. Also if there is something that you think may be an issue for some then mention it. If it isn't an issue for you then it shouldn't affect your rating.

[Philloveit21]

So if someone has a meet and it’s fluffy can we mot report it as fluffy ?

[j_181]

Suspicions here too, especially as I messaged this WG for an outcall recently and I got the impression that it was a deposit scam account.

Added to that, MrKhan has reviewed 3 WGs in two days and for all three his is the sole review on UKP.

[Brumish]

There are a few sentences you should consider before adding to any reviews. Such as 'she puts in the effort for every client'
You don't know that, unless you are Jessica pretending to be a punter or her pimp.

[MrKhan]

There are a few sentences you should consider before adding to any reviews. Such as 'she puts in the effort for every client'
You don't know that, unless you are Jessica pretending to be a punter or her pimp.

Have no association to Jessica personally, I have already previously said i may have reviewed too “fluffy” I have already said this above if you read up. I worded it on an assumption off my own personal experience.


If anyone wants to add to this please re read previous comments before adding more to this or we are just going in circles lol

[MrKhan]

Suspicions here too, especially as I messaged this WG for an outcall recently and I got the impression that it was a deposit scam account.

Added to that, MrKhan has reviewed 3 WGs in two days and for all three his is the sole review on UKP.

I never needed to pay for a deposit. I had a incall , I can’t comment on outcalls but she’s the same as her photos so I doubt she would scam you but like I said I can’t comment on that process because I don’t do them so I don’t know about that side of things

[Brumish]

Have no association to Jessica personally, I have already previously said i may have reviewed too “fluffy” I have already said this above if you read up. I worded it on an assumption off my own personal experience.


If anyone wants to add to this please re read previous comments before adding more to this or we are just going in circles lol

We are not going in circles. I'm pointing out something that you cannot say for a fact. Irrespective of who or what you review. You simply cannot say she does this to everyone. Unless you are her pimp or you are Jessica herself. It's a silly statement to make.

[MrKhan]

We are not going in circles. I'm pointing out something that you cannot say for a fact. Irrespective of who or what you review. You simply cannot say she does this to everyone. Unless you are her pimp or you are Jessica herself. It's a silly statement to make.

I had already said this above, so hence why you are going in circles mate. These were my first few reviews on new girls I had seen, i previously have stated on my next reviews I will NOT make assumptions about other punters. It was off my own back from my own experience and I have said it and already been told you can’t say these things. I will learn for next reviews like PREVIOUSLY already stated. I’m in no way associated to any of these girls lol, I just had good experiences and thought I’d share to help others out - obviously when i share again, I shall make sure I word it correctly as I’ve realised people on this site need  reviews to be a certain way.

[Brumish]

I had already said this above, so hence why you are going in circles mate. These were my first few reviews on new girls I had seen, i previously have stated on my next reviews I will NOT make assumptions about other punters. It was off my own back from my own experience and I have said it and already been told you can’t say these things. I will learn for next reviews like PREVIOUSLY already stated. I’m in no way associated to any of these girls lol, I just had good experiences and thought I’d share to help others out - obviously when i share again, I shall make sure I word it correctly as I’ve realised people on this site need  reviews to be a certain way.

 

[CoolTiger]

Stop posting emojis to increase your post count.

I have just deleted all your recent ones

[j_181]

I never needed to pay for a deposit. I had a incall , I can’t comment on outcalls but she’s the same as her photos so I doubt she would scam you but like I said I can’t comment on that process because I don’t do them so I don’t know about that side of things

Having done only outcalls for several years, I'd like to think I can spot the deposit scammers a mile off by now. A big red flag is when they agree to absolutely anything, including things not on the like list, if only you will just pay the deposit now, which was the case when I messaged this WG.

I think it is very suspicious that you have reviewed 3 girls all at the same time, and for all 3 yours is the only review on UKP. Really there are two options: A) you saw three girls and coincidentally all three just happened to have not been reviewed on UKP, or B) you are involved in touting, pimping, or some other grift (e.g. private gallery scam, deposit scam).

Couple this with the comments others have made on this thread that your review comes across as having been written by a WG or someone associated with her (which I agree with), somthing does not add up IMHO.

[Direwolf]

I think it is very suspicious that you have reviewed 3 girls all at the same time, and for all 3 yours is the only review on UKP.

Tbf all 3 profiles are quite new on AW so not really surprising they haven't been review here before.