Author Topic: Petite Priyanka 20/ Nepalese - Wood green/ Bounds Green/ North London  (Read 17882 times)


6 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6092033) (4 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by puntingpumping1920]

Offline Brad2020

External Link/Members Only
Phone number: 07934420522
30 mins: £70 (plus OWO, I think it was £20 IIRC)

Location
Just off the Green Lanes end of Truro Road, so I'd say closer to Wood Green than Bounds Green. Flat is not far down an alleyway, all very lit so I didn't get the feeling it was dangerous or anything. Entrance to the building was a a bit grubby and run down, although to be fair I've seen flats and hallways on council estates in much worse condition. The room itself was OK enough. Not huge but not messy etc. There was a massage table which I considered laying on, but I wondered when the last time it had been cleaned was and decided against it. The bed wasn't made and there was a scrunched up towel on the pillow, I asked her to get a new one and she said that was a fresh towel, it just hadn't been folded. There is a large rug hung on the wall, which I've noticed is in the background of another WGs pictures on AW (Petite Ingrid) so I'm assuming it's the same location.

Comms
Her comms were good and laid back. No long reply times etc. Not overwhelming either, like I've found some WGs to be e.g. telling you to go away if you don't reply within a very short time etc. When I got there and text her she told me she was running late and would be 30 mins! This was OK as I'd driven so just sat in the car, but it was a long time to wait admittedly, and it was really cold even with the engine running. When I was trying to find the building she asked me to phone her so she could explain, which was very helpful.

Personality
She was very friendly and chatty. Also very apologetic for being late. I'd asked her to wear leggings and she wasn't, she said she'd gotten me confused with someone else. No biggie, she put on stockings and heels instead, which she looked great in. As said, very chatty, told me she'd only just moved there and was a student. She was actually very helpful, I accidentally gave her £30 extra and she was totally fine with leaving the room and bringing it back to me. I can imagine some others would give you a 'tough luck, it's been put away now' sort of response. I didn't ask her age, she does look young although I'd say she came across as more mature/ grownup/ forthcoming than most 20-year-olds-certainly not a bad thing. But this may have just been her background, I've noticed lots of young Asian women come across as more grown-up than European women of the same age.

Looks
Very short, I'd say 5 foot or under; I'm quite tall so anyone under 5'5 looks short to me, but she was indeed very small. Small breasts, essentially nonexistent and it seemed very prepubescent to me so not very appealing. She doesn't really show her breasts in her pictures so I wasn't expecting them to just not 'be there', so be warned. But very nice skin tone and smooth skin. She had a pretty large scar on the top of her thigh if I remember that's where it was. I can't remember what she said it was from but I was assured it was nothing shady or from poor hygiene etc. She had a nice bum. Quite small but shapely all the same, soft and didn't feel fake like I've found on some Brazilian escorts. It looked great in doggy. Nice legs and small feet which looked great in heels. Pretty face and short hair which really suited her, very sexy I thought. She wasn't wearing makeup but I didn't feel she particularly needed it, she's very pretty without it, although I can imagine she'd looked very good indeed with maybe some light makeup, foundation, eye makeup, lipstick etc.

Services

So I'd enquired about A-Levels and she said she'd have to see 'me' first. I usually don't see girls that say this as it's usually a no, but I've never been with an escort of asian background, and she looked hot, so yeah. Anyway she did say no. I'm quite large, and she was even smaller than I thought she'd be, so this was understandable. We chatted for a few minutes which I think made me a little more comfortable (not that I was uncomfortable for any reason, so to speak, it just helped me settle). I laid on the bed while she got her stockings and heels on. I'd paid extra for OWO, I think it was £20. She was OK at this, but her mouth was a little too tight. Not because I'm trying to say I'm hung like a horse, but more because I think she was just sucking a little hard. I got the feeling she wasn't very experienced and didn't much feel like directing her, but she may have taken some direction well, who knows. Not much hand action either, it wasn't very 'fluid' if you get what I mean... (Excuse the pun). No teeth scraping at least though. It was as OK as an OK blowjob can be; sort of like a not amazing pizza or chocolate bar, it's still pizza or chocolate at the end of the day, you know? Certainly not the worst though.

She tried to get a condom but I asked her to do oral for longer and she was OK with this. About 5 minutes later I put a condom on, I can't remember if she did or I did though. We did missionary first. She's pretty tight but used lube so it wasn't far too tight. It was good but I got the feeling that she's quite small 'inside' e.g. not much depth. Indeed she did ask me to go slow for a few minutes but eventually warmed up and seemed to be enjoying it. Laying over her with my head over her shoulder I remember she smelled very nice, which I liked. I asked if I could go down on her but she declined, as I think she said she was tired and wouldn't orgasm. I know from doing this before though that some WGs expect men to be pretty average at it or too rough. I'm pretty good at giving oral and am confident I could've made her cum, but it was late at night and she said she was very tired, so I didn't push her on the subject. We then did doggystyle, which again she seemed to enjoy although couldn't take all of me very much, a few times very slowly but any faster and she said it was too much. This was very enjoyable though as she's got a nice bum, nice legs which looked great in stockings and heels and I really got off on that, if bums and legs are your thing... I went for about 10 minutes, she then told me it was getting close to 30 minutes so I went for it, and came very hard inside her, very deep and may have leaned into/ onto her quite a lot, as I tend to do when orgasming in that position. She didn't complain or anything but seemed pretty flustered and a bit worn out when she stood up. It was very late so perfectly understandable. She wetwiped me clean and didn't mind me taking a few more to clean my hands etc.

Conclusion: She was very polite throughout and saw me out, checked to make sure I had everything etc. I left satisfied with the 30 mins I'd paid for. I think I'd pay extra for a facial or CIM as I'm getting a bit bored of just finishing inside a condom, with nothing to 'show' for my efforts. I don't think I'd go back for an hour though, realy just based on her average BJ technique and hesitation about me going down on her.  That being said, writing this review has made me feel like seeing her again  :rolleyes:



Offline Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,045
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Thanks for a great detailed review, much appreciated  :hi:

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
I think this is a managed student set up, the Angelina who had a negative review recently was at same N22 address and another girl is there, Angelina was moved to Barnet area after last review. Where she worked before.

I only worked this out as they all seem to be students, the pricing is exactly the same for each and @N22 always appears on profiles when they are at this address. I also had Angelina as a possible if I came into London that way and noticed the @N22 appearing on search lists for the area.

Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Wozel

OP can I ask when this took place ? The only reason why I ask is that I’ve tried contacting her and got zero joy

Offline bidulemachin

Thank you, that's an amazing review!

Really tempted, but something about her masculine traits is putting me off a little bit. Is it just the pictures that do that or am I paranoid?

Offline Brad2020

OP can I ask when this took place ? The only reason why I ask is that I’ve tried contacting her and got zero joy

It was between Xmas and NYE.

Offline Brad2020

Thank you, that's an amazing review!

Really tempted, but something about her masculine traits is putting me off a little bit. Is it just the pictures that do that or am I paranoid?

I mean other than the prepubescent teenage boy's chest I didn't get any masculine vibes from her pictures or in person. Go and have a look haha.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I think this is a managed student set up, the Angelina who had a negative review recently was at same N22 address and another girl is there, Angelina was moved to Barnet area after last review. Where she worked before.

I only worked this out as they all seem to be students, the pricing is exactly the same for each and @N22 always appears on profiles when they are at this address. I also had Angelina as a possible if I came into London that way and noticed the @N22 appearing on search lists for the area.

If you mean Angelina London she has been alternating between N22 and N3 for at least a year, it was her I punted with in Finchley Central, N3 and as I was leaving spotted Lucy Mayer which was before she had an A/W profile up. The WGs pimp from the N3 brothel anyway usually states student at the top of the WGs profiles. Veronica XO worked very briefly at the N3 brothel last summer. Prices in N3 are usually £130-140 an hour.

According to a punters review on Lucy the pimp at N3 was charging too much so she left and set up firstly in Islington at £170 an hour up from the £140 an hour I paid her in Feb-Mar just before the first lockdown. The N22 and N3 brothels are definitely linked but I don't know the N22 one from personal experience.


Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
If you mean Angelina London she has been alternating between N22 and N3 for at least a year, it was her I punted with in Finchley Central, N3 and as I was leaving spotted Lucy Mayer which was before she had an A/W profile up. The WGs pimp from the N3 brothel anyway usually states student at the top of the WGs profiles. Veronica XO worked very briefly at the N3 brothel last summer. Prices in N3 are usually £130-140 an hour.

According to a punters review on Lucy the pimp at N3 was charging too much so she left and set up firstly in Islington at £170 an hour up from the £140 an hour I paid her in Feb-Mar just before the first lockdown. The N22 and N3 brothels are definitely linked but I don't know the N22 one from personal experience.

That is the one, something had me wanting to see her but finding the reviews here I changed my mind, I have not visited either address but worked out none were independent from the similar pricing and the @ N22 which appeared on several profiles.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
That is the one, something had me wanting to see her but finding the reviews here I changed my mind, I have not visited either address but worked out none were independent from the similar pricing and the @ N22 which appeared on several profiles.

Very few EE WGs or indeed foreign WGs from anywhere who come here are likely to be really Independent. How could a WG from say Poland possibly afford to rent a premises in London, or supply the required references. So they choose to work for a pimp instead. The brothel network in North London as that's the area I know best is vast as I posted on my Brothels In North London thread last year on the London regional board. Normally Poles stick with Poles and Hungarians with Hungarians in the same brothels etc, these brothels in N3 and N22 have a mixture of nationalities unusually.

Offline HERTSBLUE

The girls have somewhere to work no rent or bills just lose some of there earning not many won't work from home.

Offline HERTSBLUE

The girls have somewhere to work no rent or bills just lose some of there earning not many won't to work from home.

Offline HERTSBLUE


Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17


That question has actually piqued my interest and am awaiting the reply. :D
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline webpunter

She's FAF
And i deffo haven't ticked off Nepal on my [fairly extensive] world map of countries 'visited'
HL is +1
Wonder if she takes it up the Khyber ?

Offline Jonestown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,730
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 52
Wonder if she takes it up the Khyber ?

Only if your cock is somewhat smaller than the OP's.

Offline Wozel

Does she charge extra for As, can’t see anything on the AW profile

Offline Midnight_Peeler

OP can I ask when this took place ? The only reason why I ask is that I’ve tried contacting her and got zero joy

Also messaged her twice and got no reply in the past couple days. Haven't tried calling yet

Offline webpunter

A rhetorical geographical type question
Twas but jestin

I didn't bother reading through most of the review
It was like a Mills & Boon novel in parts
Mixed in with commentary about the venue which came across as if from Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen
Then it was chilly in his car whilst waiting in his car for 1/2 hour with the engine on.  Oh bless
Moving on accidentally giving the burd 30 xtra & then wanting it back.  Time to grow some & think bollox don't do that again
It gets better:
" I'm pretty good at giving oral and am confident I could've made her cum, but it was late at night and she said she was very tired "
Which actually means that she was as bored with the OP as i was reading the review

Fair do's to the OP for posting the 1st review for a burd from Nepal that i've seen on here
A fittie too
Other than this its like luvved up drivel  :sarcastic:

Only if your cock is somewhat smaller than the OP's.

Offline tantraman

Top review, OP :hi:

I'd already tentatively HL'd this gal, simply for the Nepalese novelty, but your report has for sure run her near the top of my list for when I get back in action.

Reading the location has reminded me of another South Asian student WG that I'd ticked off in N22 ...

Aria 23 (TOFTT: OW, Penetration) in N22 (Wood Green)

... and this makes me think that they must be connected via the same pimp :unknown:

Offline Jonestown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,730
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 52

Fair do's to the OP for posting the 1st review for a burd from Nepal that i've seen on here


Afraid not, he was beaten to that by Northlondonduke:-

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=294588.msg3072341#msg3072341

Offline Brad2020

A rhetorical geographical type question
Twas but jestin

I didn't bother reading through most of the review
It was like a Mills & Boon novel in parts
Mixed in with commentary about the venue which came across as if from Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen
Then it was chilly in his car whilst waiting in his car for 1/2 hour with the engine on.  Oh bless
Moving on accidentally giving the burd 30 xtra & then wanting it back.  Time to grow some & think bollox don't do that again
It gets better:
" I'm pretty good at giving oral and am confident I could've made her cum, but it was late at night and she said she was very tired "
Which actually means that she was as bored with the OP as i was reading the review

Fair do's to the OP for posting the 1st review for a burd from Nepal that i've seen on here
A fittie too
Other than this its like luvved up drivel  :sarcastic:

Sorry my reviews aren't concisely listed shorthand bullet points like your own. She may very well let you and 'littleWP' do anal with her, if he is indeed little, and if you don't racially abuse her first by referring to her using some kind of white trash neanderthal-like derogatory term for an Asian person, as you already did in one of your other reviews. Saying that, it will run you up to the £120 at least, which is apparently a bit on the 'expensive side of things' for you sadly, so you may want to rethink that... :dash:

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
Top review, OP :hi:

I'd already tentatively HL'd this gal, simply for the Nepalese novelty, but your report has for sure run her near the top of my list for when I get back in action.

Reading the location has reminded me of another South Asian student WG that I'd ticked off in N22 ...

Aria 23 (TOFTT: OW, Penetration) in N22 (Wood Green)

... and this makes me think that they must be connected via the same pimp :unknown:


Def a managed set up, using the student line, Smiths thinks in 2 brothel flats in N22 and N3. The negative review seems to have pushed Anglina London into a break, no idea why but still on my mind, maybe with a shared shower first.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Wozel


Def a managed set up, using the student line, Smiths thinks in 2 brothel flats in N22 and N3. The negative review seems to have pushed Anglina London into a break, no idea why but still on my mind, maybe with a shared shower first.

Shared shower because of the stinky pussy ?

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
Shared shower because of the stinky pussy ?


Yes lol, 3 negatives is very off putting but strangely still on my mind.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Wozel


Yes lol, 3 negatives is very off putting but strangely still on my mind.

Good luck but once a smelly pussy ...... always a smelly pussy

Online rebelscum

Sorry my reviews aren't concisely listed shorthand bullet points like your own. She may very well let you and 'littleWP' do anal with her, if he is indeed little, and if you don't racially abuse her first by referring to her using some kind of white trash neanderthal-like derogatory term for an Asian person, as you already did in one of your other reviews. Saying that, it will run you up to the £120 at least, which is apparently a bit on the 'expensive side of things' for you sadly, so you may want to rethink that... :dash:

Maybe he shouldn't see her Brad, you're on record here as saying while writing this review, you wanted to see her again.  However, elsewhere on this site, you said you had just posted this review to another forum user, but you wouldn't want to go back to see her.  So you maybe need to do some rethinking yourself?  I assume you don't care though, as £120 is apparently a nothing amount to you. 
« Last Edit: January 30, 2021, 02:39:27 pm by rebelscum »

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Thanks for the review @Brad2020

To me your review provides sufficient detail to allow others to make a decision and that is what good reviews are all about.

However forum members rarely like reading from a poster how good a fuck they are, punter good looks, great at giving oral et al. It rubs peeps up the wrong way and distracts the reader from what is otherwise a comprehensive review.

Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Brad2020

Maybe he shouldn't see her Brad, you're on record here as saying while writing this review, you wanted to see her again.  However, elsewhere on this site, you said you had just posted this review to another forum user, but you wouldn't want to go back to see her.  So you maybe need to do some rethinking yourself?  I assume you don't care though, as £120 is apparently a nothing amount to you.

I actually said I don't think I'd go back to see her first, then after giving it quite a lot of thought when reviewing it sort of made me feel like fucking a nice small bird again, maybe giving her a few hints at sucking cock. I never said £120 is a nothing amount, but let's be honest in the grand scheme of escort prices, £120 is not 'expensive'.

Offline Brad2020

Thanks for the review @Brad2020

To me your review provides sufficient detail to allow others to make a decision and that is what good reviews are all about.

However forum members rarely like reading from a poster how good a fuck they are, punter good looks, great at giving oral et al. It rubs peeps up the wrong way and distracts the reader from what is otherwise a comprehensive review.

Fair enough mate. I never actually said I was a good fuck though, nor did I say I was good looking  :lol: I just said I'm good at giving oral which tbh I was well aware of before punting. It's actually one thing which I use to make up for not lasting very long. I would've thought it's worth bearing in mind that some of us actually get off on maybe the WG getting something out of it too, not just getting our end away, and that a WG who will outwardly say no to that when it's included on their likes list is one punters of this inclination might want to avoid.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Fair enough mate. I never actually said I was a good fuck though, nor did I say I was good looking  :lol: I just said I'm good at giving oral which tbh I was well aware of before punting. It's actually one thing which I use to make up for not lasting very long. I would've thought it's worth bearing in mind that some of us actually get off on maybe the WG getting something out of it too, not just getting our end away, and that a WG who will outwardly say no to that when it's included on their likes list is one punters of this inclination might want to avoid.

I was just giving you other examples alongside your oral statement. I personally like your review and have HL as a result for when I get back on the saddle so to speak. Hopefully she is still around. As she is so petite I have no idea how I will get on but that’s all part of the fun.

Keep the reviews coming bro I see no need to change your overall style of reviewing.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline webpunter

UKP'ers review styles are various.  There is no set format.  Variety is the spice of life.  Yours is fine.  Plenty of [useful] detail.  Just a bit on the Mills & Boon scale  :rose: type thing.  Presuming that your review is not your last me thinks you will adapt.  Think of it like a learning curve.  It's the same for everyone on here.  Overall a pukka review, especially when popping your cherry

You've done some research on my reviews.  I am flattered.  As for littleWP  :)  CBA to read through my reviews dating back the best part of 6 years to work out what you are referring to.  It is worth noting that the world is changing as to what is acceptable & is not, particularly on the latter.  And UKP is no different.  So what i may or may not have written should be viewed in this context.  Commentary on here is entirely different from what happens with whichever burd it is, unless a punter is a complete bell-end.  As for what i've coughed for up ranges from 65 [45 + 20] to over a bag of sand [albeit the latter was a rare event].  So a ton twenty is in the median & i've commented that one massage burd @ a ton fifty looked good for a one-off type booking.  As for what is good VFM or expensive is in the eye of the beholder 

Sorry my reviews aren't concisely listed shorthand bullet points like your own. She may very well let you and 'littleWP' do anal with her, if he is indeed little, and if you don't racially abuse her first by referring to her using some kind of white trash neanderthal-like derogatory term for an Asian person, as you already did in one of your other reviews. Saying that, it will run you up to the £120 at least, which is apparently a bit on the 'expensive side of things' for you sadly, so you may want to rethink that... :dash:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
UKP'ers review styles are various.  There is no set format.  Variety is the spice of life.  Yours is fine.  Plenty of [useful] detail.  Just a bit on the Mills & Boon scale  :rose: type thing.  Presuming that your review is not your last me thinks you will adapt.  Think of it like a learning curve.  It's the same for everyone on here.  Overall a pukka review, especially when popping your cherry

You've done some research on my reviews.  I am flattered.  As for littleWP  :)  CBA to read through my reviews dating back the best part of 6 years to work out what you are referring to.  It is worth noting that the world is changing as to what is acceptable & is not, particularly on the latter.  And UKP is no different.  So what i may or may not have written should be viewed in this context.  Commentary on here is entirely different from what happens with whichever burd it is, unless a punter is a complete bell-end.  As for what i've coughed for up ranges from 65 [45 + 20] to over a bag of sand [albeit the latter was a rare event].  So a ton twenty is in the median & i've commented that one massage burd @ a ton fifty looked good for a one-off type booking.  As for what is good VFM or expensive is in the eye of the beholder

I do not think we should discourage newbies or insinuate they need to adapt their review style. So long as they are not touting or it is not a fake review then we should take it as read.

It is this very guarded attack why so many newbies join, lurk, refuse to post for fear of not “fitting in” with the seasoned reviewers.

Newbies have much to bring to the forum let us welcome them on board rather than firing off critique simply because it is written in a different style to what many are accustomed to.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2021, 10:10:09 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Shadow314

She sounds great, and excellent first review OP.  Was kissing on offer with her?

Online rebelscum

Fair enough mate. I never actually said I was a good fuck though, nor did I say I was good looking  :lol: I just said I'm good at giving oral which tbh I was well aware of before punting. It's actually one thing which I use to make up for not lasting very long. I would've thought it's worth bearing in mind that some of us actually get off on maybe the WG getting something out of it too, not just getting our end away, and that a WG who will outwardly say no to that when it's included on their likes list is one punters of this inclination might want to avoid.

Posted this 10 mins after you posted your review here. 

Hi mate, my review is below:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=295051.new#new

I'm not sure if it was a post-op type thing; I haven't seen many hugely flat chested girls but I can imagine some do have basically non-existent breasts as they're very skinny etc. But yeah the shit BJ thing was not worth going back for I think. There are plenty of other 'small' WGs that do give good BJs and have some evidence of breasts around that area

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Posted this 10 mins after you posted your review here. 

Hi mate, my review is below:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=295051.new#new

I'm not sure if it was a post-op type thing; I haven't seen many hugely flat chested girls but I can imagine some do have basically non-existent breasts as they're very skinny etc. But yeah the shit BJ thing was not worth going back for I think. There are plenty of other 'small' WGs that do give good BJs and have some evidence of breasts around that area

I can’t see/find your review?
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline webpunter

+1, my comment was on the basis that ukp'ers naturally tend to adapt how they do a review
After popping their cherry
Its not a requirement, IMO more what naturally happens

I concur with your outlook as to what newbies can bring to UKP
At least the 'old guard' of 1st class cunts who dominated off topic are now largely gorne
It was like the earth being hit by a meteorite & the dinosaurs were wiped out 
They were merciless when it comes to newbies
My comment was more on the basis that the review was a bit luvved up, Mills & boon etc
And my subsequent post balanced things up 
I am all for reading stuff likes reviews coming from a different perspective / written in a different style 

I do not think we should discourage newbies or insinuate they need to adapt their review style. So long as they are not touting or it is not a fake review then we should take it as read.

It is this very guarded attack why so many newbies join, lurk, refuse to post for fear of not “fitting in” with the seasoned reviewers.

Newbies have much to bring to the forum let us welcome them on board rather than firing off critique simply because it is written in a different style to what many are accustomed to.