Author Topic: Lizzie  (Read 15611 times)


35 review(s) for Lizzie xox (32 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,775
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
It’s not you clatty your cool as fuck mate 🤙🏻 I’m not wanting to name people as I think that’s negative but I notice the same dude on most posts just being a general stick in the mud.

Utterly pointless bringing it up if you won't name and give any examples. 

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
This reads to me like Lizzie and Kendra/Sophia are the same girl which I'm pretty sure is not the case??

...correct, not the case. 2 different girls. :hi:

Offline mills_and_bhuna

 :drinks:
...correct, not the case. 2 different girls. :hi:
Thanks for the reply.
Thought I was losing my marbles :drinks:

Offline OGS20

I accept that my body and how I look wasnt to his liking and that’s fine but to call me repulsive and a paper bag job is malicious and it’s never a reasonable excuse to attack someone.

I really don’t want any drama or hassle, I just want it all to stop.

First things first, I agree I don't want drama or hassle either and I also want it to stop. Unfortunately forum members bring it up from time to time, perhaps not appreciating how toxic the thread was. Repulsive was a poor choice of wording from me and for that I do apologise. I didn't foresee you taking it so badly but I will watch my exaggerations. (As an aside for my fellow punters, my comments about the SP in this thread's hygiene were not exaggerated). I found you unattractive. I am not a malicious person. I had trouble with you due to this review, not due to tricking you into seeing me which never happened.

In OGS20’s case, I refused to meet him countless times not only because of my own issues with him but I had been given the heads up by others about him and I know a girl who actually retired because of him, he’s not a nice person.

We all know the girl who retired, who I sent a message of sincere apology to. It was a mistake on my part and it was seen to be relatively benign at the time. The issue was I was a little too specific about the location but I only said it was across the river from a famous landmark. In the interest of full disclosure it was perhaps also an issue that I described her tattoo in a little too much detail. The review is still up for anyone that wants to see.

These were all common things to note in a review and no-one thought it would be an issue. I have done many reviews since then and I have been consciously careful not to include anything potentially identifiable.

So we all know her, who else gave you the "heads up"? I dispute this.

I wasn’t terrified of him, I was trying to dodge his very awkward moves - he was like a clumsy virgin and his whole vibe was  off from the second he walked in the door.

Assuming we didn't gel and it was my fault for being "awkward", that's not a very good way to treat a customer.

Probably because he hated me before he even got here given he’d been told to fuck off a dozen times and had to trick me into seeing him.

I never hated you then and I don't hate you now. My overriding emotion towards you is one of sympathy. By the way the tone in this post is better than any other post you've produced before, usually on your blog. Of course I dispute the allegation that I tried to see her and was told no several times before.

And can I please remind you, this person backtracked and admitted on here that he was malicious in the things he said about me the second he realised he wasn’t as anonymous as he thought he was.

Anonymity allows some people behave terribly and he’s a perfect example of that.

If I blackmailed you and threatened to out you as a WG you'd probably have a similar response. Anonymity in this case is a prerequisite that we owe one another. Don't forget you're anonymous too, although admittedly it's a little bit different as I don't have a publicly facing persona aside from a throwaway name on a forum.

He now takes back that apology because he claims that I don’t have the footage that I said I do.

And how would he know that exactly?

Your original claim was that you had footage of me to leak, you worded it slyly to insinuate that you had the footage in your possession. It later transpired, on your blog, after you realised that wasn't something other customers would be comfortable with, that these were building CCTV cameras. I figured you wouldn't go to the hassle as it's been long enough now and it would be detrimental to both of us if the footage even exists.

This job can be very rewarding but also very dark at times so it shouldn’t be so surprising that sometimes the dark times are difficult to deal with for some of us.

I think we all sympathise with that. My only issue is you either confuse me with someone else trying to book you, who sounds like a right annoying piece of shit, or Clatty and Courtney have put you up to this for whatever reason. Either way, do we really need to care? Do you genuinely have an issue with me aside from my gratuitously worded review? I have no issue with you.

And as for Clatty and Courtney being my bitches, it’s been a good 18+ months since I seen Courtney and literal years since I seen Clatty so  :rolleyes:

Yet you know their forum names, and you appear a mere day after you're referenced deep in a thread which at the outset doesn't concern you. On a newly created account. Unless you login you can't even browse the forum boards. Which means you couldn't have seen it yourself, and certainly couldn't have read through until page 2 to find the mention of you. And you popped up just a day later, and barely a day after Clatty and Courtney pop up? This was after an email correspondence you had with admin as well? That must've taken some time. An interesting string of events. This reflects badly on Clatty and Courtney, they're weirdos and you should dissociate from them.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 10:22:09 am by OGS20 »
Banned reason: Shit stirring walloper.
Banned by: Ali Katt

Offline Name Not Found

« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 10:45:20 am by Name Not Found »

Offline ScottishS

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 68
  • Likes: 0
  •  
First things first, I agree I don't want drama or hassle either and I also want it to stop. Unfortunately forum members bring it up from time to time, perhaps not appreciating how toxic the thread was. Repulsive was a poor choice of wording from me and for that I do apologise. I didn't foresee you taking it so badly but I will watch my exaggerations. (As an aside for my fellow punters, my comments about the SP in this thread's hygiene were not exaggerated). I found you unattractive. I am not a malicious person. I had trouble with you due to this review, not due to tricking you into seeing me which never happened.

We all know the girl who retired, who I sent a message of sincere apology to. It was a mistake on my part and it was seen to be relatively benign at the time. The issue was I was a little too specific about the location but I only said it was across the river from a famous landmark. In the interest of full disclosure it was perhaps also an issue that I described her tattoo in a little too much detail. The review is still up for anyone that wants to see.

These were all common things to note in a review and no-one thought it would be an issue. I have done many reviews since then and I have been consciously careful not to include anything potentially identifiable.

So we all know her, who else gave you the "heads up"? I dispute this.

Assuming we didn't gel and it was my fault for being "awkward", that's not a very good way to treat a customer.

I never hated you then and I don't hate you now. My overriding emotion towards you is one of sympathy. By the way the tone in this post is better than any other post you've produced before, usually on your blog. Of course I dispute the allegation that I tried to see her and was told no several times before.

If I blackmailed you and threatened to out you as a WG you'd probably have a similar response. Anonymity in this case is a prerequisite that we owe one another. Don't forget you're anonymous too, although admittedly it's a little bit different as I don't have a publicly facing persona aside from a throwaway name on a forum.

Your original claim was that you had footage of me to leak, you worded it slyly to insinuate that you had the footage in your possession. It later transpired, on your blog, after you realised that wasn't something other customers would be comfortable with, that these were building CCTV cameras. I figured you wouldn't go to the hassle as it's been long enough now and it would be detrimental to both of us if the footage even exists.

I think we all sympathise with that. My only issue is you either confuse me with someone else trying to book you, who sounds like a right annoying piece of shit, or Clatty and Courtney have put you up to this for whatever reason. Either way, do we really need to care? Do you genuinely have an issue with me aside from my gratuitously worded review? I have no issue with you.

Yet you know their forum names, and you appear a mere day after you're referenced deep in a thread which at the outset doesn't concern you. On a newly created account. Unless you login you can't even browse the forum boards. Which means you couldn't have seen it yourself, and certainly couldn't have read through until page 2 to find the mention of you. And you popped up just a day later, and barely a day after Clatty and Courtney pop up? This was after an email correspondence you had with admin as well? That must've taken some time. An interesting string of events. This reflects badly on Clatty and Courtney, they're weirdos and you should dissociate from them.

1. YOU ARE SUCH A LIAR. A compulsive liar at that. It’s an illness, seek help.

2. I didn’t find you attractive either hun, like I said at the time that this happened.....you wouldn’t get a sniff of one of my farts for free in a real life situation but you’re entitled to your opinion in that you didn’t find me attractive.

3. I know SOME of their usernames because I was a member of UKE years ago and not only did we interact on there but we met through there too so don’t try to suggest something you’re actually wrong about.

4. For someone who wants it to stop, I suggest you stop lying, learn to take no for an answer and seek help for your issues.



Banned reason: I’ll help you be silent
Banned by: Head1

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,379
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 250

Offline ScottishS

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 68
  • Likes: 0
  •  
P.S what you said about the filming and how I changed it to CCTV is honestly absolute BS lol.

You’re so twisted and manipulative, it’s unreal.

Not the best way to treat my customers? I’m human and you came in with such an off vibe about you so naturally I wasn’t comfortable myself, I’m not a robot.

Your exact description was spoken about between myself and the others, your various phone numbers were shared. At the time, you even admitted that you had various numbers.

Even when you were originally pestering me on your original number the 8th time or something (not the number you tricked me on), I told you at this point that I knew who you were from UKP, your response was that you didn’t even know what UKP was.

Then the time after that, I mentioned UKP again only this  time you said you no longer post on there but when you did, you weren’t one of the nasty ones.

So you clearly forgot the time before that you denied all knowledge of UKP  :wacko:

You’re not a very good liar, you need a good memory when you lie to that extent.

Stop with the backtracking, stop with the lies. You’re as well just stopping speaking (or typing) until you learn to speak honestly.

As for me not being anonymous? I’m not the one who phones clients and books them from multiple phone numbers, it’s the other way around so it’s not the same thing.

It’s funny, you’re a mouse in person (a clumsy big mouse) yet such a billy big baws online, you’re the definition of a troll.

It’s actually a waste of time even arguing with someone who can lie to this degree  :dash:

I’ve said all I can say to you, I hope those who can read between the lines on here see you for what you are.

« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 11:46:12 am by ScottishS »
Banned reason: I’ll help you be silent
Banned by: Head1

Offline ScottishS

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 68
  • Likes: 0
  •  




Hey Don (dunno what happened to the quote there)

I was told to read rule 2 before signing up. I hope I’ve stuck within those rules but admin is free to do as he likes, I only came on here to address this guy and his BS.

He is using this forum to talk shite, I would hope that admin would want this forum to be as authentic as possible.

What he says from this point on has nothing to do with me as long as he doesn’t mention me again.

I will gladly leave now that I’ve said what I need to say in response to him.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 11:42:53 am by ScottishS »
Banned reason: I’ll help you be silent
Banned by: Head1

Offline ScottishS

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 68
  • Likes: 0
  •  
Tried to edit my first response but it’s too late.

Back to you trying to suggest Clatty or Courtney let me know about this thread, reviews are open to the public and always have been but the rest of the forum has been closed.

If I Google UKPUNTING and click on Scotland, it brought me straight to the reviews.

Maybe someone from admin can confirm this.

So please don’t try to deflect or make suggestions that simply aren’t true, you need to get your facts straight like I did before I called you out.

I have a new phone and a new phone number and haven’t even spoken to either of them in a long time.

I don’t have their numbers and unless they’re booking me, they’ve no reason to contact me either.

So am away this time, bye  :coolgirl:
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 12:05:48 pm by ScottishS »
Banned reason: I’ll help you be silent
Banned by: Head1

Offline Cactus

Mon’ tae fuck folks, don’t clog up a review about one girl with back and forth about someone else. Sophia is now commenting on this review in her typically verbose blogging style to retort.

Take it up on the original review in question if it really needs raked over again.

Poor Lizzie is getting dragged into something that’s nowt whatsoever to do with her. Mud sticks, as they say, and given the comments on her hygiene, she might not scrub it off too soon.

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
they're weirdos and you should dissociate from them.

:lol: ...unlike yourself  ...a model citizen who comes across as deceptive, manipulative and malicious. I'm glad to be just a weirdo. :cool:

Apart from us weirdo's (myself and Clatty) there are 3 other long-standing respected members who have tagged you as a liar. What does that tell you? Doesn't look good for you. :bomb:

Clatty and Courtney have put you up to this for whatever reason.

...eh ...no. What utter pish. You are clutching at straws with these silly accusations. She can talk for herself as we can all see. :D :wackogirl:

Yet you know their forum names, and you appear a mere day after you're referenced deep in a thread which at the outset doesn't concern you. On a newly created account. Unless you login you can't even browse the forum boards. Which means you couldn't have seen it yourself, and certainly couldn't have read through until page 2 to find the mention of you. And you popped up just a day later, and barely a day after Clatty and Courtney pop up? This was after an email correspondence you had with admin as well? That must've taken some time. An interesting string of events. This reflects badly on Clatty and Courtney, they're weirdos and you should dissociate from them.

:dash: ....try thinking outside the box a bit. Some WGs will very likely talk to other WGs, share info, gossip etc. ...some have UKP logins, some don't.

I'll confirm I was on UKE a few years back, Naughty&NiceEva and Gabriella knew who I was also, it wasn't a big secret.

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Mon’ tae fuck folks, don’t clog up a review about one girl with back and forth about someone else. Sophia is now commenting on this review in her typically verbose blogging style to retort.

Take it up on the original review in question if it really needs raked over again.

Poor Lizzie is getting dragged into something that’s nowt whatsoever to do with her. Mud sticks, as they say, and given the comments on her hygiene, she might not scrub it off too soon.

...I agree, good shout. :hi: It's just causing a lot of confusion tagged on here. This should be on her own thread.

Offline ScottishS

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 68
  • Likes: 0
  •  
Mon’ tae fuck folks, don’t clog up a review about one girl with back and forth about someone else. Sophia is now commenting on this review in her typically verbose blogging style to retort.

Take it up on the original review in question if it really needs raked over again.

Poor Lizzie is getting dragged into something that’s nowt whatsoever to do with her. Mud sticks, as they say, and given the comments on her hygiene, she might not scrub it off too soon.

Totally agree, this has nothing to do with Lizzie.

But I got dragged into Lizzies review which was nothing to do with me either so swings and roundabouts  :wackogirl:

Convo now taken over to the original thread....

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=269994.50
Banned reason: I’ll help you be silent
Banned by: Head1

Offline willie loman

previously on uk punting,,,,,,, i enjoy a spat as much as the next man, but this thread has been like reading a who dunnit while drunk, any chance of someone posting a brief account of what its all about.

Offline HumphryB

previously on uk punting,,,,,,, i enjoy a spat as much as the next man, but this thread has been like reading a who dunnit while drunk, any chance of someone posting a brief account of what its all about.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=269994.0

This review


Specifically this comment by OGS20 in that thread.


"Clearly I'm in the minority on this forum but I don't see how anyone can find her attractive. I met her about 3 months ago and found her to be almost repulsive... and she had absolutely no shape to her body whatsoever either so not even a paper bag job. Wouldn't have done her for free... Didn't provide a good service either, was completely on edge as if she was terrified of my every move, it's a wonder I managed to finish that day.

In fact the reason I finished and the only positive in a sea of shite was that she was really, really tight."
« Last Edit: February 06, 2021, 12:24:40 pm by HumphryB »

Offline willie loman

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=269994.0

This review


Specifically this comment by OGS20 in that thread.


"Clearly I'm in the minority on this forum but I don't see how anyone can find her attractive. I met her about 3 months ago and found her to be almost repulsive... and she had absolutely no shape to her body whatsoever either so not even a paper bag job. Wouldn't have done her for free... Didn't provide a good service either, was completely on edge as if she was terrified of my every move, it's a wonder I managed to finish that day.

In fact the reason I finished and the only positive in a sea of shite was that she was really, really tight."

thanks.