External Link/Members OnlyDate of Meeting: November 2020.
Communications: Initial contact by text. Responded quickly and meeting arranged for the following day at the time requested (late morning). Provided postcode straight away, and the specific address by text a few minutes before the meeting.
Location: A modern apartment close to the canal in Chester city centre. Free parking is available at a nearby Waitrose (about 5 mins’ walk) for up to 90 mins. Local pay-and-display parking is expensive. Entry to the apartment building is by intercom and then several floors up by lift. The complex appears very quiet and I didn’t encounter anyone else in or near the building. I think the apartment may be used by more than one SP, but Chloe was alone the day I visited.
Price: £70 for 30 mins.
Appearance: Chloe’s AW photos are heavily photoshopped but not too far off the mark for all that. She has a trim body that belies her age, with smallish (but not tiny) boobs that look and feel near-perfect to me. Her stated age is 49, but I’d estimate she’s four or five years older. Facially she is quite plain - not ugly, but definitely not pretty - I didn’t find her unattractive, but some might be disappointed. She was wearing a black teddy-thingy which she removed at my request, and black stockings.
Attitude: Chloe is a mature woman (my preference) who is friendly and easy to talk to. Although her AW profile dates from 2019 and she only has one previous review on this site, she is clearly an experienced SP with a well-practiced routine (her physical resemblance to the similarly-named Chloe020/AW 4837993 reviewed on this site might not be entirely coincidental). The service was enthusiastically delivered without any obvious clock-watching, and though I had a quick shower on arrival and again before leaving, I didn’t feel rushed at any time.
Service: After showering, an opening massage was offered but I declined. This was only a half-hour booking, so I confined myself to OWO/CIM with some RO and kissing (which is pretty much my hour-long preference anyway). OWO was extremely good - deep, slow, and quite sensual with lots of eye contact - and worth a return visit on that score alone. RO was also good, but was slightly diminished by unnecessary and unconvincing ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’ from Chloe; I know when I’m getting it right and this, for want of time if nothing else, wasn’t one of those occasions. Kissing was open mouth but didn’t feel entirely committed if that makes sense.
Summary: This was a short ‘taster’ (for me) meeting, and I left feeling well satisfied if not totally overwhelmed. If Chloe can ditch the over-acting, I think she could become a useful regular, and will certainly return for a longer booking if we’re ever allowed outdoors again.
Positives: Nice personality; professional attitude; superb OWO.
Negatives: Unnecessary over-acting. Not as glamourous as her photographs (and my pre-fantasising) suggested.
Would I Return? Yes.
