Brief Interview before Booking with SheSomeGirl

[FreshBreath]

External Link/Members Only

I once tried to get a booking with a WG (link provided above) via AW and she asked me to describe myself and what I'd like in the booking. In reply I described my age, physical appearance etc and also my likes in the booking (no special requirements, just normal sex with owo and dfk at her discretion) which she said was not enough information for her to give me a booking.

I'm wondering if its normal for a WG to expect more than the basic information from a punter or may be she had a bad experience with someone and was making sure not to see that person.

P.S: I have never seen her in my life and whoever she was trying to avoid was not me.

[Clattypats]

External Link/Members Only

I once tried to get a booking with a WG (link provided above) via AW and she asked me to describe myself and what I'd like in the booking. In reply I described my age, physical appearance etc and also my likes in the booking (no special requirements, just normal sex with owo and dfk at her discretion) which she said was not enough information for her to give me a booking.

I'm wondering if its normal for a WG to expect more than the basic information from a punter or may be she had a bad experience with someone and was making sure not to see that person.

P.S: I have never seen her in my life and whoever she was trying to avoid was not me.

Don't think I've ever been asked in comms to describe my physical appearance...

Think I've been asked once for my age, to which I gave a "dinghy" age (not a mile off but not exact) ... Not for any other reason than its none of their business... Aslong as I'm above their lower age limit and below their upper age limit if its even stated on their profile then that should be enough...

I'll also give a brief outline of what services I'm after and if all good and satisfactory with the WG then hopefully a booking will be made...

[Subboy1980]

External Link/Members Only

I once tried to get a booking with a WG (link provided above) via AW and she asked me to describe myself and what I'd like in the booking. In reply I described my age, physical appearance etc and also my likes in the booking (no special requirements, just normal sex with owo and dfk at her discretion) which she said was not enough information for her to give me a booking.

I'm wondering if its normal for a WG to expect more than the basic information from a punter or may be she had a bad experience with someone and was making sure not to see that person.

P.S: I have never seen her in my life and whoever she was trying to avoid was not me.

Its happened to me over the years.  Some wgs want to speak to you over the phone first before a meet.  I suppose each wg has their own ways of checking a client out first before deciding to accept a booking.  More likely for their safety. 

Now the way things are with covid19, I think a lot of wgs will be struggling financially, however, not all of them.  Maybe they should reavaluate their choosy techniques to gain more clients.

[FreshBreath]

Don't think I've ever been asked in comms to describe my physical appearance...

Think I've been asked once for my age, to which I gave a "dinghy" age (not a mile off but not exact) ... Not for any other reason than its none of their business... Aslong as I'm above their lower age limit and below their upper age limit if its even stated on their profile then that should be enough...

I'll also give a brief outline of what services I'm after and if all good and satisfactory with the WG then hopefully a booking will be made...

I told her its very unusual she had an interview type process in place for bookings to which she replied she wanted to make sure a person was not a creep or dangerous to her since she could not let anyone in her place (for sex) until she got all the information to her satisfaction from them (not sure how she can identify a dangerous punter).
 
I am pretty sure either she had a bad experience with someone and or she was interested to know more about her punters.

[Clattypats]

I told her its very unusual she had an interview type process in place for bookings to which she replied she wanted to make sure a person was not a creep or dangerous to her since she could not let anyone in her place (for sex) until she got all the information to her satisfaction from them (not sure how she can identify a dangerous punter).
 
I am pretty sure either she had a bad experience with someone and or she was interested to know more about her punters.

WGs certainly have different vetting procedures and I understand why they have them, for their own safety and if it makes them more comfortable accepting a booking then that's a good thing...

Description by text I doubt they could glean much from, and whilst phone call could be a better indicator of how someone comes across through the way they speak and tone its obviously still not fool proof...

Farquar from lemmington Spa could come across really polite on the phone, turn up, and be a total prick... Wee Johnny fae Easterhoose might sound like a Ned but be brand new in person, who knows...

One thing I will add, some WGs may request a call before booking though if they've had previous issues with a punter(stalking etc) as they may recognise the voice... Not saying that's the case with the WG in this thread, just in general...

[FreshBreath]

WGs certainly have different vetting procedures and I understand why they have them, for their own safety and if it makes them more comfortable accepting a booking then that's a good thing...

Description by text I doubt they could glean much from, and whilst phone call could be a better indicator of how someone comes across through the way they speak and tone its obviously still not fool proof...

Farquar from lemmington Spa could come across really polite on the phone, turn up, and be a total prick... Wee Johnny fae Easterhoose might sound like a Ned but be brand new in person, who knows...

One thing I will add, some WGs may request a call before booking though if they've had previous issues with a punter(stalking etc) as they may recognise the voice... Not saying that's the case with the WG in this thread, just in general...

I understand and WGs have every right to make sure about their safety and to pick and choose their punter as well, but they do not need detailed information about punters. Punters' age, appearance, likes etc are sufficient information to make or refuse bookings. I just got annoyed since I felt she refused to meet because she confused me with the person she wanted to avoid for some reason.

[Moby Dick]

Did you ask what else was needed?
Maybe she meant date, time and duration?

[FreshBreath]

Did you ask what else was needed?
Maybe she meant date, time and duration?

I gave her date, time and duration of meet in my very first message. She wanted to know more about me - I do not know what else she wanted to know. I offered her a phone call (gave her my mobile number and time to call me) as she refused to share her number with me, but she reached to the conclusion I was the person she did not want to see.

Some (unprofessional and chancer) WGs out there might want to know more about their punters to blackmail them (I am not saying SheSomeGirl was like that since I never met her), that's why I started this topic.

[Neverthere]

I've certainly had the twenty/forty ping pong messages through AW when I tried to book a girl before, would have been so much easier and quicker with a call.
She was a bit reluctant to meet as I had no FB on AW, old account timed out so new profile didn't show alias etc so she couldn't check me out.
If she had phoned easy to sort but she was very part time and better to keep a distance until she felt safe, which she told me later.
Got booking, great time and seen her a couple of times, so each SP has there thing I suppose.

[Moby Dick]

I gave her date, time and duration of meet in my very first message. She wanted to know more about me - I do not know what else she wanted to know.

Should’ve asked her.

Sounds like a timewaster.
Probably doesn’t want/need the booking, being extra cautious, sticking to regulars.
Or something about you, that she to a dislike to but handled it like this rather than admitting a dislike.
Did you tell her your occupation?
Age/weight/size limits?
Anything you asked for that she doesn’t do, or anything on your AW profile/feedback.
Skin colour?
Who knows?
if they create hurdles I just find a different WG.

[FreshBreath]

Should’ve asked her.

Sounds like a timewaster.
Probably doesn’t want/need the booking, being extra cautious, sticking to regulars.
Or something about you, that she to a dislike to but handled it like this rather than admitting a dislike.
Did you tell her your occupation?
Age/weight/size limits?
Anything you asked for that she doesn’t do, or anything on your AW profile/feedback.
Skin colour?
Who knows?
if they create hurdles I just find a different WG.

I just told her my age, physical appearance, built type and likes for the meet. She had every right to refuse but she should not assume someone a creep or dangerous when she never met them ever just because they were not willing to provide information (to be discreet and careful) that may expose their true identity.

[Dpr180]

External Link/Members Only

I once tried to get a booking with a WG (link provided above) via AW and she asked me to describe myself and what I'd like in the booking. In reply I described my age, physical appearance etc and also my likes in the booking (no special requirements, just normal sex with owo and dfk at her discretion) which she said was not enough information for her to give me a booking.

I'm wondering if its normal for a WG to expect more than the basic information from a punter or may be she had a bad experience with someone and was making sure not to see that person.

P.S: I have never seen her in my life and whoever she was trying to avoid was not me.

You're not missing too much,

 seen her a couple of times,  first time was good,  my last time, <ever>,  was just a drag,  she's got a chip on her shoulder,  service wasn't actually too bad, but she moans not stop about other guys and is a conspiracy theorists,  I was slowly trying to edge towards the stairs and the front door last time , all the while she was trying to keep me there for longer talking about the absolute biggest load of drivel you've ever heard in your life,   

Plus bedroom is under street level with no fresh air,  so has a bit if a funky smell

[Marvlus69]

Plus bedroom is under street level with no fresh air,  so has a bit if a funky smell

You sure that’s not her.... she is massive, a lot bigger than pics suggest.. and her breath definitely stank.

[jambo1874]

Plus bedroom is under street level with no fresh air,  so has a bit if a funky smell

You sure that’s not her.... she is massive, a lot bigger than pics suggest.. and her breath definitely stank.

Agreed. Her Twitter feed is full of ramblings and ‘woe is me’ content.

First time I seen her a few years back she was alright. One of the best BJs ive had. Was equally good last time but she’d put on more weight and there was defo a halitosis issue going on from the outset and a stale smell all round

[FreshBreath]

Agreed. Her Twitter feed is full of ramblings and ‘woe is me’ content.

First time I seen her a few years back she was alright. One of the best BJs ive had. Was equally good last time but she’d put on more weight and there was defo a halitosis issue going on from the outset and a stale smell all round

Glad I never got a booking. She got almost everything that put me off!

[Name Not Found]

Agreed. Her Twitter feed is full of ramblings and ‘woe is me’ content.

I would put it a little more kindly and suggest that it looks to me, from her Twitter, that she has mental health problems (I'm no shrink, and I'm not attempting a diagnosis, but it's difficult to conclude she's very well, or happy, from her tweets).  For her sake, as well as mine, I'll not be visiting her, with or without an interview.

[Jayf]

The blow and go for 30 quid looked alright. Not worth an interview though

[OGS20]

There's a general rule of thumb, the harder it is to make the booking the less satisfactory it will be. That's the way it goes more often than not.

[Forthports]

Just had a look at the Twitter feed, if the interview doesn’t put you off then the rhetoric on there will.

[Jayf]

Just had a look at the Twitter feed, if the interview doesn’t put you off then the rhetoric on there will.

Do you have a link to her twitter? 

[Name Not Found]

Do you have a link to her twitter?

Search for "SheSomeGirl"

[Casey69]

Vetting is one thing.
Asking a lot of personal questions would have me thinking about phishing/blackmail.
I doubt I’d jump through too many hoops to see this one.
Probably wouldn’t even cross the road.

[Anon1874]

Vetting is one thing.
Asking a lot of personal questions would have me thinking about phishing/blackmail.
I doubt I’d jump through too many hoops to see this one.
Probably wouldn’t even cross the road.

[mills_and_bhuna]

I saw her a couple of years ago and I doubt she has changed that much.
I didn't get the third degree but I did tell her I was late 50s as I always do just in case they have any issues.
She was bigger than I usually find attractive and I don't think I'd return for that reason.
As said above there is a bit of a smell in the flat which is a basement with a ground level entrance.
I'm fairly sure she wouldn't be a scammer though and she is a nice enough person if a little bit full on with her opinions.
I'm guessing she's maybe being more cautious with her acceptance of bookings bearing in mind that it's a lockdown and she is possibly putting her tenancy at risk if there are complaints from neighbours about visitors.

[nike]

What is the point of quoting someone else and then adding no comments, yourself?
This is the second time I've seen this, recently, from relatively new posters.

[mattmugwump]

What is the point of quoting someone else and then adding no comments, yourself?
This is the second time I've seen this, recently, from relatively new posters.

I've noticed it too... always with "last edit" under it so maybe it's them learning you can't delete a comment once made but you can wipe it out with an edit?

[Name Not Found]

What is the point of quoting someone else and then adding no comments, yourself?

I assume it's just newbie error. Not everyone is a master of technology 

[Rookie67]

While WGs have every right to vet customers, there's also a limit to what information they are entitled to - We're entitled to protect ourselves as well and as the OP pointed out there are some less than scrupulous WG's who might think they can use the info against you.
I always prefer WG's that want a phone call for bookings - easier than confusing ping pong texts that take forever to get to the point, with a phone call both sides can get their questions out of the way quickly - in the end, both parties can decide to go ahead (or not) with the booking. I've had a couple that looked amazing on their profile but had a stinking attitude on the phone so I changed my mind, but fair point Clatty  - Farquar might be a prick and Wee Johnny is sound so that could be unfair, the reviews on this forum help everyone with weeding out the waste of time WG's from our perspective.

In the end though OP - halitosis is a walk out the door for me so sounds like you doged one.

[FreshBreath]

While WGs have every right to vet customers, there's also a limit to what information they are entitled to - We're entitled to protect ourselves as well and as the OP pointed out there are some less than scrupulous WG's who might think they can use the info against you.
I always prefer WG's that want a phone call for bookings - easier than confusing ping pong texts that take forever to get to the point, with a phone call both sides can get their questions out of the way quickly - in the end, both parties can decide to go ahead (or not) with the booking. I've had a couple that looked amazing on their profile but had a stinking attitude on the phone so I changed my mind, but fair point Clatty  - Farquar might be a prick and Wee Johnny is sound so that could be unfair, the reviews on this forum help everyone with weeding out the waste of time WG's from our perspective.

In the end though OP - halitosis is a walk out the door for me so sounds like you doged one.

It was back in August/September 2020 after the lockdown got lifted (when I tried to book her). After reading comments and views of the old valuable users I do feel I got lucky and did not get the booking.

Thank you guys! 

[Deadpool]

An interview to pay to fuck that thing??   

Got to admire the high regard she holds herself in i suppose

[Name Not Found]

...that thing?? 

If she encounters people with your demeaning attitude towards women, I can actually understand why she might want to interview them first.

[Endevour117]

I met this lady a couple times about 4 years ago ( I wasn’t a member of UKP) and she was a really lovely lassie , she is English and had a place in Albert Street, Leith. I found her very sexy and her size was between 14/16 and a very comfortable visit , very clean and very sexy with a great smile and a lovely big bum .
She was a horny we whore and could do things with your cock with her hands that I have never experienced before . I am sorry she seems to have let her self go because she was worth every penny which was £100 for the hour .   

[TommyMoundfrigger]

she is English

Are you sure? 

[mills_and_bhuna]

Are you sure? 

she is definitely English and still speaks with an English accent so I'm sure she did most of her school years down there.

[Endevour117]

Definitely English and came up to Scotland when she started working as a whore .

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Her profile says Scottish Female.

I can't recall her having an English accent. 🤔

[jambo1874]

Her profile says Scottish Female.

I can't recall her having an English accent. 🤔

Me neither. Im sure shes scottish but lived down south for a while before coming back. Relatively certain shes from northern scotland

[misterunique]

I've  checked her profile a few times and been tempted to go for the punt, I don't mind a bit extra meat on the bones. Judging by her social media posts and what others have said I think I'll give her the swerve

[Dman88]

I would put it a little more kindly and suggest that it looks to me, from her Twitter, that she has mental health problems (I'm no shrink, and I'm not attempting a diagnosis, but it's difficult to conclude she's very well, or happy, from her tweets).  For her sake, as well as mine, I'll not be visiting her, with or without an interview.

Just had a look at her Twitter. Shouldn’t someone let her know that coming across as a neurotic loudmouth is actually very off putting and can’t be good for business    

[Casey69]

She’s had a rant about this thread on Twitter.
Based on her other Tweets and pics, I think you dodged a bullet. 

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Ok. To show balance, I have seen her a few times and the fact that I returned more than once must mean I enjoyed it.
Yes, she's opinionated, but so am I. Just not with WGs.
Whatever problems she has, if any, are not mine.
She advertises and delivers.
I would suggest that the 'interview' is due to current restrictions and nothing more. Her choice. Your decision.
Changed times.

[embrame]

I seen this girl about 3 years ago, Was quite difficult to book, think id tried umpteen times, long gaps between texts. Location at time in trinity area main door and really stank of weed and lights off on entering, she was pretty kinds big n squarish but i thought what the hell. I was in a group on kik who did reviews on escorts/massage etc and she ended up in the group and huge arguments started with others who had been.

[Jock D]

Out of curiosity, based on what's been said in this thread...I had a wee swatch at her twitter there. I don't use the platform...so not sure if I get restricted access?

All I can say is, I was a bit disappointed...didn't really live up to the hype imo