Author Topic: Indian_Cinnamon - Isha - Uxbridge  (Read 6558 times)


16 review(s) for Indian_Cinnamon (13 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Kev40ish]

Offline Bangman

External Link/Members Only
07709399819
I Saw Isha a few weeks ago
Comnunications....  Ive had to wait a day for a reply, and almost thought she is unavailable, but luckily she replied and i made a apoointment today. 

The girl, she is average looking, a 5/6 out of 10. She is slim, size 6ish. nice slim body in her mid 20s.
The meet.... she greeted me with a lovely smile, very welcoming, great hair, friendly and dressed to impress. 

We chatted for a bit, she is chatty  soon i undressed her and started to kiss her body, There was kissing, not dfk though which is a shame, we moved to a 69 position and I gave her a good rimming. I love her blowjob technique she does, i felt her teeth, it felt brilliant. this was owo. 
I started to get hard, she then put a condom on and we started sex cowgirl, I must say, she is quite tight and I almost struggled to put it in, but eventually I did and penetrated her for a  few mins till i cummed.
throughout, she had a positive attitude but I felt a little rushed. She kept talking during the sex which I found annoying and I nearly lost my erection a few times and had to imagine I'm having sex with Margot robbie.

After a while we had another round of sex. Again I struggled to do her doggy as my dick wasn't erected hard enough and I coudnt insert in, at one point I thought, either I'm too big (I'm not fat, I'm slim) or she is too tight, but eventually I managed to penetrate in mish position and cummed. After cleaning me, She then started to direct me out, I looked looked time and there was 10 mims left, so I decided to leave. I prefer to have a full hour.
If u like it rough then she is not for you, she likes to go easy. Maybe I wasn't in the best form, could be all that talking turned me off a bit at some points and I found her to be average looking.

Overall. A average punt.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Thanks for the review @Bangman

I am a bit baffled by this review tbh.

Re her looks she has loads of face pics on this forum and on her profile so what was you expecting ? If she looks like the girl in the pics then that’s it. Why book then complain about her looks.

Most guys, me included, like a mega tight Fanny. Insofar as rough/PSE or gentle this comes out in every review including her last one posted so again what was you expecting.

She is on my HL but way down mainly because not sure she is worth 200 of my hard earned with no CIM and precisely for the things you described i.e can she handle a dick/sustained fuck. That said I like an Indian so will probably get round to her ... one day.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Bangman


Offline Pupil2021

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 103
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Nice one Bangman, my initial thought after looking at the pics was "yum!", but after reading her AW profile and your review this seems like a a lot of hard work (and cash) for relatively average returns.
Banned reason: Idiot who doesn't know when to stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Harry Thomas

Hi Bangman,

I'm quite baffled by your review of Isha.

I've personally found her simply stunning! Ofcourse again, I have no idea what your idea of beauty is?
Facially/Figure-wise/Personality-wise  she is easily on par with some of the best SPs around.

Please take no offence in my comment. I just believe in promoting good service providers on this platform.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Hi Bangman,

I'm quite baffled by your review of Isha.

I've personally found her simply stunning! Ofcourse again, I have no idea what your idea of beauty is?
Facially/Figure-wise/Personality-wise  she is easily on par with some of the best SPs around.

Please take no offence in my comment. I just believe in promoting good service providers on this platform.

We all know looks are subjective but as we can see her face pic I personally think you’re stretching it a bit far as up there with the best SPs. Body type I am a fan, based on her reviews re her personality I am fan too hence she is on my HL and has been for a bloody long time; gathering dust :D

I think for me it’s gonna be one of those where I am in the location would not mind eating some pussy and she happens to be free when I text.

Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline sunnyj

I am a bit baffled by this review tbh.

Re her looks she has loads of face pics on this forum and on her profile so what was you expecting ? If she looks like the girl in the pics then that’s it. Why book then complain about her looks.

Most guys, me included, like a mega tight Fanny. Insofar as rough/PSE or gentle this comes out in every review including her last one posted so again what was you expecting.
OP's review and his rating. WG who looks like her profile and providing similar service like her other reviews can be rated differently by OP as long as the review is genuine and have enough details in it.

Offline sunnyj

I just believe in promoting good service providers on this platform.
Reviews are written to help other punters with information and not to impact or boost WGs business.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
OP's review and his rating. WG who looks like her profile and providing similar service like her other reviews can be rated differently by OP as long as the review is genuine and have enough details in it.

Totally get that and I am in no way challenging the rating OP has given. I am just wondering why OP booked her in the first place when he could clearly see her face pic and not one review posted to date has said anything but she is a gentle vanilla GFE nothing more nothing less. It reads to me as if OP was expecting something different.

Strange!
« Last Edit: January 11, 2021, 11:36:05 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline sunnyj

Totally get that and I am in no way challenging the rating OP has given. I am just wondering why OP booked her in the first place when he could clearly see her face pic and not one review posted to date has said anything but she is a gentle vanilla GFE nothing more nothing less. It reads to me as if OP was expecting something different.

Strange!
:thumbsup:
Regarding the expectation only OP can answer it.

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,237
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 130
Her pics to me show she is extremely average.

My thoughts are similar to Jerk's if in person she's not a looker then it's a reflection of her pics lol. (Unless he thinks her pics look good and in person she's worse? Which seems staggering to me)

Don't wanna sound too harsh cos it's not my style but she looks like a drag queen. She wouldn't suddenly become good looking in person.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2021, 01:22:46 am by JonasG »

Offline Harry Thomas

JonasG: Very so harsh indeed.
Look forward to reading reviews from JerkChicken and Sunnyj, if they ever get round to meeting Isha.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
:thumbsup:
Regarding the expectation only OP can answer it.

The salient points of the review ... OP has already answered it.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
JonasG: Very so harsh indeed.
Look forward to reading reviews from JerkChicken and Sunnyj, if they ever get round to meeting Isha.

Personally I think I will have a good time and come out of the meet a happy punter as she ticks a number of boxes for me.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline RockyBaboa69

Wow man, Bangman. I just arrived at this page after reading OPs today's review on Georgeous Georgia X

Personally finding it fascinating how the OP rates/finds the Georgeous Georgia "good-looking" but not the Indian Cinnamon

Georgeous Georgia - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=295537.0
Indian Cinnamon - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=274137.0

Most certainly shows that "We all have different tastes" and that, "Beauty lies in the eyes of the Beholder".

Offline Bangman

Let me clarify, there's obviously some mis understanding, perhaps my fault for not going into details in my review.
So, firstly, I fancied a indian. In my opinion, she looked pretty and well fit in her photos, but when I saw her she was OKish. I.e. above average looking. Thats it. I've never said she was ugly.
She turned the lights off, I had to see her face in the dark which is annoying. When I have sex, I like eye contact  I stare at the girls face, boobs and arse to keep me erected.
I didn't have a terrible time, but I didn't have a amazing time. Only 2 or 3 times in my life I struggled to get a erection and this was one of them.

Maybe I set my standards too high. I expected more raunchy sex then vanilla for that price. Maybe, cos I fucked so many pretty indian wgs in India (Mumbai and Delhi), great price and great service. My standards are a little high when in UK with British Indians.

Looks are subjective I agree


Offline SpaceRaiderDave


Maybe I set my standards too high.

I think at £200/hr it wouldn't be unreasonable to have highish expectations.

Yes on the profile there are face photos but we all know photos can make the girl look much better than reality.
Banned reason: Previously banned member TinMan69
Banned by: 90125

Offline Harry Thomas

I think at £200/hr it wouldn't be unreasonable to have highish expectations.

SpaceRaiderDave: Totally agree on that and Isha precisely delivered as advertised on her profile.

Important point for all to note is: The price £200 an hour includes not just SPs face - but also the right body - the right attitude - good quality of incall accommodation - precise delivery of advertised services.



Offline SpaceRaiderDave


Important point for all to note is: The price £200 an hour includes not just SPs face - but also the right body - the right attitude - good quality of incall accommodation - precise delivery of advertised services.

So true. Personally I rate delivery of advertised services highest, followed by body shape/size then attitude/personality then face then venue.
Banned reason: Previously banned member TinMan69
Banned by: 90125

Offline Bangman

Fair point. I personally feel she is not worth that price. £150 per hour is understandable. I'm looking at my history bookings on adultwork. I paid less to fuck a few other indian wgs over the years. There's indian Nahdia (heathrow) who I really miss, pretty girl, good service and good price. Even the other nadia near the hoover building off the a40, although not the prettiest, but excellent vfm and great raunchy sex.


So once again, I can see a few ops being defensive to indian cinnamon and questioning my review. Just to clarify I Did NOT give neutral because of looks. She is not ugly and she is a nice girl and can understand why has been a positive for many. Just the sex was not great, maybe it was a bad day for me, not 100% sure, I admit I wasn't on form.
I forgot to add, when we talked, I mentioned she has great reviews, she did try to convince me to give her a positive review?


Offline RockyBaboa69

Fair point.

From my experiences and few others on here - she is a kind woman and is content enough.

Certainly NOT the type of woman that asks OPs to give her positives.
Be helpful to read- https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=284021.msg2955017#msg2955017

 :hi:
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 10:49:46 am by RockyBaboa69 »

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
I think the biggest issue for me regarding OP’s review is this.

OP does not say with any clarity if she looked like her pics despite it being dark/lights off. I mean OP are you saying for the entirety of your punt you are unable to confirm either way if she looks like her pics; are they current, flattering or edited ? I mean she has around c10 pics of her face posted on this forum alone if not more.

Raunchy services - every review posted to date says she is a gentle GFE fuck nothing more nothing less.

As a punter I like all flavours and all types of experiences. If I was to book this one I would not expect a PSE or even close. What I would expect is her to look like her pics, size 8, small breasts, intelligent pre-post punt convo, good hygiene and a gentle fuck. I would not expect her to be able to handle Dick or take a pounding and I would go easy on her :D

Sorry OP, to me it sounds like you simply did not do your homework and simply booked her because she was Indain hence the neutral rating and disappointment.

I do agree on the price thing though but it is what it is. Indian girls for all the reasons we have discussed extensively on this forum don’t come cheap. Very rare now to find one sub 150 queensheads/per hour.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 11:28:16 am by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,237
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 130

Offline RockyBaboa69

 :drinks: Jonas, some Old photos man. The woman has, like all of us, EVOLVED through the years.
I am sure we all have our own fair share of grim pictures, along with the good pictures.

Offline anujok

She replied on whatsapp after almost a week and said she isn't accepting any bookings. She was offerring cam show last week and she seems to have stopped that too.

Hope to see her once she starts accepting bookings.


Offline anujok

Thanks for the real/ recent pics..

Her pic on AW seems too old or modified. Isn't worth the hype in general. As someone said 'Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder', but in my eyes and being from the same clan she isn't a beauty for me..!!!

Not on my hot list anymore.

Thanks

Offline RockyBaboa69

Thanks for the real/ recent pics..

Harsh Bangman! That is ONE old odd picture! The pictures on her profile are the most recent.

And Anuj, it is probably worth checking her out on webcam first, like I did back in the day. :thumbsup:

If Webcamming with Isha is not an option that is possible for you, she has over 35 pictures OF HER FACE from all the angles on her private gallery too. Period.

« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 04:18:30 pm by RockyBaboa69 »

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,237
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 130
Stop fanboying over her. If some people don't think she's fit, then so be it. (Her current pics aren't good to me either imo)

You don't need to try and prove people otherwise cos you're into her.

People aren't gonna start buying PGs when deciding to see a WG. Nearly all punters judge by the pics available and if they don't like them they move on in their browsing.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 08:31:12 pm by JonasG »

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,237
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 130

Offline RockyBaboa69


Her current pics aren't good to me either imo

People aren't gonna start buying PGs when deciding to see a WG. Nearly all punters judge by the pics available


Oh OK mate! No worries absolutely. I'm just happy to help anytime!  :drinks:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Oh OK mate! No worries absolutely. I'm just happy to help anytime!  :drinks:

Quit whilst you’re ahead  :D
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish