MEGHAN_SCOTLAND

[Asian guy]

For the guys on here who sent me a PM meghan has a new profile a got txt lastnite from hr with new profile and new number
Profile is CHLOESTEELE a can’t reply back private to the 2 guys tht messaged me soz

So she also texts punters at night when they aren’t expecting texts? Definitely wouldn’t like her having my number

[seeker]

...really? How do we know you are not just some sick troll pretending to be disabled. 

There is a disabled member in the Scotland section (not sure if he posts anymore) that I feel is genuine, comes across as humble and has a good idea of discretion. Shame the same can’t be said for you.

+1

[J_H]

+1

+ 2.

Very genuine.

[Gordyonwheels]

So she also texts punters at night when they aren’t expecting texts? Definitely wouldn’t like her having my number

  She must think Im important   

[Gordyonwheels]

+1

The accident I had 4 years ago tels me otherwise if I could chose to be normal that’s the way I would be there is nae bs here about my disability 

[Matrix]

She must think Im impotent   

 

[Gordyonwheels]

You’re also a fud.

 

[meghan_scotland]

She must think Im important   

Hello there,
I was really reluctant to come on here as I hate forums in general. But I’ve now had 3 people (2 AW girls and 1 man from this site) contact me via AW to advise of what’s going on within this thread.

I just want to clarify a few points as it is beyond belief that someone doesn’t know the meaning of anonymity and discretion. Something which is a two way street.

To “Gordy on Wheels” specifically,
 
1. I did NOT text you advising of a new profile and new phone number. I met you once in October of last year. The majority of our communication was done via email and I’m happy to insert the emails if you wish? You were given my contact number on the day of the meet to allow you to let me know when you had arrived. That was fine. I have NEVER had you saved in my contacts so therefore, wouldn’t have had your number to text you unannounced.
2. I do not save someone’s contact details unless they ask me to and that’s normally once they have met with me on several occasions, you were not one of these people. You won’t be, in this life or the next.
3. The review you have written contains many inaccuracies, very specifically pertaining to your statement  to me that you are paralysed from the waist down, meaning you are unable to have sex whatsoever. The parts where you describe in detail regarding how we had sex are false. I find how you have exaggerated the review absolutely absurd. I was nothing but pleasant to you but it’s clear you are trying to make yourself out to be some sort of Casanova.
4. YOU contacted my new profile asking for a booking, yet again mentioning your disability. The message basically mirrored that of the one in October. I emailed you back stating I was previously Meghan. You asked me why I had changed names. I advised that my profile had been compromised by my private gallery which could impact on my career so therefore it was terminated.
5. Perhaps if I text you unannounced, you can share my number or screen shot with the rest of the forum? That is something I never have done and never will.
6. You refer to my “real” identity beginning with the letter E. This is false. You also refer to my working phone number being attached to a Snapchat account. This is also false. I’m unsure where you are obtaining your information, but it is obviously from the dream world you are living in.

I’m absolutely horrified that I’ve had to join a forum to clarify these points. I’ve always remained professional with clients. I’m not interested in anyone’s personal life and no one should be concerned with mine.

If I’ve said anything that isn’t allowed on here, I do apologise.

Meghan x

[daviemac]

Hello there,
I was really reluctant to come on here as I hate forums in general. But I’ve now had 3 people (2 AW girls and 1 man from this site) contact me via AW to advise of what’s going on within this thread.

I just want to clarify a few points as it is beyond belief that someone doesn’t know the meaning of anonymity and discretion. Something which is a two way street.

To “Gordy on Wheels” specifically, 

If I’ve said anything that isn’t allowed on here, I do apologise.

Meghan x

From what I can see you have posted a reasonable rebuttal of a review posted and, as with any review, members will form their own opinions and act accordingly.

 

[Name Not Found]

....personally being held in any sort of high esteem by anyone on this forum isn’t something I care about

Pretentious? Tu?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Jamsonite]

I have to say I think Gordy has a really bad dose of EAS. I’ve met her and reviewed her and she is a lovely lady a bit older than advertised and like others have commented I don’t exactly buy her career story but she is utterly professional and a really good fuck.

[J_H]

Hello there,
I was really reluctant to come on here as I hate forums in general. But I’ve now had 3 people (2 AW girls and 1 man from this site) contact me via AW to advise of what’s going on within this thread.

I just want to clarify a few points as it is beyond belief that someone doesn’t know the meaning of anonymity and discretion. Something which is a two way street.

To “Gordy on Wheels” specifically,
 
1. I did NOT text you advising of a new profile and new phone number. I met you once in October of last year. The majority of our communication was done via email and I’m happy to insert the emails if you wish? You were given my contact number on the day of the meet to allow you to let me know when you had arrived. That was fine. I have NEVER had you saved in my contacts so therefore, wouldn’t have had your number to text you unannounced.
2. I do not save someone’s contact details unless they ask me to and that’s normally once they have met with me on several occasions, you were not one of these people. You won’t be, in this life or the next.
3. The review you have written contains many inaccuracies, very specifically pertaining to your statement  to me that you are paralysed from the waist down, meaning you are unable to have sex whatsoever. The parts where you describe in detail regarding how we had sex are false. I find how you have exaggerated the review absolutely absurd. I was nothing but pleasant to you but it’s clear you are trying to make yourself out to be some sort of Casanova.
4. YOU contacted my new profile asking for a booking, yet again mentioning your disability. The message basically mirrored that of the one in October. I emailed you back stating I was previously Meghan. You asked me why I had changed names. I advised that my profile had been compromised by my private gallery which could impact on my career so therefore it was terminated.
5. Perhaps if I text you unannounced, you can share my number or screen shot with the rest of the forum? That is something I never have done and never will.
6. You refer to my “real” identity beginning with the letter E. This is false. You also refer to my working phone number being attached to a Snapchat account. This is also false. I’m unsure where you are obtaining your information, but it is obviously from the dream world you are living in.

I’m absolutely horrified that I’ve had to join a forum to clarify these points. I’ve always remained professional with clients. I’m not interested in anyone’s personal life and no one should be concerned with mine.

If I’ve said anything that isn’t allowed on here, I do apologise.

Meghan x

Never doubted the guy was a Walter Mitty from day one.

[Clattypats]

She must think Im important   

Doesn't look like it!... 

[Uncle Buck]

You’re also a fud.

I had him down as a fud but I would upgrade that to a c*nt

[J_H]

I’m disabled not schizophrenic

Got that one wrong as well.

[seeker]

She must think Im important   

Nah Gordy
She knows your a lieing Twat
Can't see you getting another booking 

[Marcus0101]

I did txt her bk lastnight she just said something about someone she knew knows who she is and has got access to her PG taken screen grabs and threatening to out her I’m her professional day career something along those lines so new profile and new phone number crazy people out there 

Aye you ya melt. After reading Meghan's reply i can't see how fantasists like you are allowed to stay on here posting. Seems to have been an influx of them since the start of the year here but i guess that was always going to happen when it's open for new people to join.

[J_H]

There’s a kind a character profile, a cluster of fuckwitted attributes,  which these wankers exhibit and makes them instantly recognisable (not a few have recently joined).
A review which runs counter to the UKP norm: e.g., a harsh negative for a WG who has been otherwise reviewed positively.

A kind of creepy/stalkerish reference  ‘her Twitter/Facebook/Instagram account’.

Posting links to WG’s which begins to suggest EAS (even if it comes out in a nasty way).

An attempt to insinuate ‘inside knowledge’ with references to her extra-curricular interests: ‘she runs a whelk stall in Cleethorpes/farms 30,000 in the Ukraine acres when she’s not escorting.’

Claims to have received services that the dugs in the street know the SP does not do.

Loutish/cuntish behaviour when challenged by other punters on UKP, then disappear liek snaw aff a dyke.

For the record, the original review was put up by Glastudent who also appears to fall into the above category and which, I now believe, was probably not written, or even prompted by, Meghan/Chloe herself .

[David1970]

Aye you ya melt. After reading Meghan's reply i can't see how fantasists like you are allowed to stay on here posting. Seems to have been an influx of them since the start of the year here but i guess that was always going to happen when it's open for new people to join.

Between Gordy and Candyman64 I don’t know who would win Booker Prize for Fiction, a pair of Walter Mitty’s. I would never trust a word either of them said.

[solway]

Looks like a cracking body - especially new photos on chloesteele profile.

[J_H]

Looks like a cracking body - especially new photos on chloesteele profile.

+ 1.

[seeker]

Looks like a cracking body - especially new photos on chloesteele profile.

Has Chloe steel
Got a pair of
Bolt ons 

[Gordyonwheels]

Cheap slut

[Gordyonwheels]

Has Chloe steel
Got a pair of
Bolt ons 

She is a skank

[daviebond]

 Aaaaaand there goes the rattle out of the pram

[Gordyonwheels]

Aaaaaand there goes the rattle out of the pram

Who u talking tae go piss holes in the snow

[Clattypats]

Cheap slut

There's your true colours right there for all to see...

[Gordyonwheels]

Hello there,
I was really reluctant to come on here as I hate forums in general. But I’ve now had 3 people (2 AW girls and 1 man from this site) contact me via AW to advise of what’s going on within this thread.

I just want to clarify a few points as it is beyond belief that someone doesn’t know the meaning of anonymity and discretion. Something which is a two way street.

To “Gordy on Wheels” specifically,
 
1. I did NOT text you advising of a new profile and new phone number. I met you once in October of last year. The majority of our communication was done via email and I’m happy to insert the emails if you wish? You were given my contact number on the day of the meet to allow you to let me know when you had arrived. That was fine. I have NEVER had you saved in my contacts so therefore, wouldn’t have had your number to text you unannounced.
2. I do not save someone’s contact details unless they ask me to and that’s normally once they have met with me on several occasions, you were not one of these people. You won’t be, in this life or the next.
3. The review you have written contains many inaccuracies, very specifically pertaining to your statement  to me that you are paralysed from the waist down, meaning you are unable to have sex whatsoever. The parts where you describe in detail regarding how we had sex are false. I find how you have exaggerated the review absolutely absurd. I was nothing but pleasant to you but it’s clear you are trying to make yourself out to be some sort of Casanova.
4. YOU contacted my new profile asking for a booking, yet again mentioning your disability. The message basically mirrored that of the one in October. I emailed you back stating I was previously Meghan. You asked me why I had changed names. I advised that my profile had been compromised by my private gallery which could impact on my career so therefore it was terminated.
5. Perhaps if I text you unannounced, you can share my number or screen shot with the rest of the forum? That is something I never have done and never will.
6. You refer to my “real” identity beginning with the letter E. This is false. You also refer to my working phone number being attached to a Snapchat account. This is also false. I’m unsure where you are obtaining your information, but it is obviously from the dream world you are living in.

I’m absolutely horrified that I’ve had to join a forum to clarify these points. I’ve always remained professional with clients. I’m not interested in anyone’s personal life and no one should be concerned with mine.

If I’ve said anything that isn’t allowed on here, I do apologise.

Meghan x

  wanker

[Gordyonwheels]

Iam posting nothing on u r demand mongo

[Clattypats]

wanker

You certainly are... 

[daviebond]

Who u talking tae go piss holes in the snow

Well apart from you, I'm talking to intelligent people

[DaVINCI]

There's your true colours right there for all to see...

+1 been called out and the true colours come to the fore.

Never saw the SP myself although looks ok but her having to register to set the record straight, bad patter Gordy 

[ScottishS]

Cheap slut

Hiya, me again 

PERFECT EXAMPLE OF A WACKJOB WITH AN AXE TO GRIND.

Had nothing but great things to say about her till the second he didn’t get his own way.

Now she’s aw the sluts under the sun.

I hope some of you on here start to realise what I’ve been ranting about all along.

Maybe the way I handle things diverts from the point I’m trying to make and has somehow made me look less credible but I promise you, this is the kinda shit I get on the daily hence my attitude sometimes.

[Marcus0101]

There's your true colours right there for all to see...

100%, he's been caught out big time by Meghan and resorted to spamming other other threads about her and chose to go down the route of bad mouthing her as she called him out with his lies. Good riddance to the clown, sad thing is dangerous people like him can still book another girl easily to meet and no doubt he will come back here in another form and spread his lies and tales of fantasy again.

[ScottishS]

100%, he's been caught out big time by Meghan and resorted to spamming other other threads about her and chose to go down the route of bad mouthing her as she called him out with his lies. Good riddance to the clown, sad thing is dangerous people like him can still book another girl easily to meet and no doubt he will come back here in another form and spread his lies and tales of fantasy again.

Well exactly, this one however is in a chair so he’s easily identified. It’s the other ones that are not so easily identified that just keep changing their phone numbers and usernames that you need to watch like a hawk which is very difficult sometimes.

[Clattypats]

100%, he's been caught out big time by Meghan and resorted to spamming other other threads about her and chose to go down the route of bad mouthing her as she called him out with his lies. Good riddance to the clown, sad thing is dangerous people like him can still book another girl easily to meet and no doubt he will come back here in another form and spread his lies and tales of fantasy again.

Aslong as members can eventually see through the charade then it's all good... 

The last thing the forum needs, both WGs and of course punters is a bad precedent to be set, whatwith make believe/fantasy, liars, maliscious types that do no one any favours... Punters want truthful, informative, helpful reviews, likewise with subsequent posts/comments... not spiteful, maliscious , contradictory, deflecting garbage... 

[J_H]

Well exactly, this one however is in a chair so he’s easily identified. It’s the other ones that are not so easily identified that just keep changing their phone numbers and usernames that you need to watch like a hawk which is very difficult sometimes.

I don't doubt any of that; you will see we have a similar problem here on UKP!

[ScottishS]

I don't doubt any of that; you will see we have a similar problem here on UKP!

Aye but none of you have to suck their anonymous ill intentioned dick 

[J_H]

Aye but none of you have to suck their anonymous ill intentioned dick 

How do you know what we get up to!! LOL!

We could save a bit of money doing that!

[Casey69]

3. The review you have written contains many inaccuracies, very specifically pertaining to your statement  to me that you are paralysed from the waist down, meaning you are unable to have sex whatsoever.

Wait, was he also lying about being disabled?
That’s pretty low. 

[meghan_scotland]

Wait, was he also lying about being disabled?
That’s pretty low. 

Just for clarification purposes, he is in a chair, he is paralysed from the waist down BUT he has no movement in his legs at all and is unable to perform. His references referring to how we had “sex”, were utterly false. He made me aware there wouldn’t be sex in his initial e-mail to me.

Most of the booking required me to be his carer. 

[Courtney]

Just for clarification purposes, he is in a chair, he is paralysed from the waist down BUT he has no movement in his legs at all and is unable to perform. His references referring to how we had “sex”, were utterly false. He made me aware there wouldn’t be sex in his initial e-mail to me.

Most of the booking required me to be his carer. 

...so no blow jobs, fingering, toys ..at all?

TBH he seemed fairly humble to begin with, just pitiful how he turned out. ...I shouldn’t laugh but the “wheeling himself in and out her pussy” is possibly the weirdest thing to imagine that I’ve ever read on here.

[meghan_scotland]

...so no blow jobs, fingering, toys ..at all?

TBH he seemed fairly humble to begin with, just pitiful how he turned out. ...I shouldn’t laugh but the “wheeling himself in and out her pussy” is possibly the weirdest thing to imagine that I’ve ever read on here.

I can’t even fathom how that would work 🤣

[ScottishS]

...so no blow jobs, fingering, toys ..at all?

TBH he seemed fairly humble to begin with, just pitiful how he turned out. ...I shouldn’t laugh but the “wheeling himself in and out her pussy” is possibly the weirdest thing to imagine that I’ve ever read on here.

When I read that, I thought wow she must be a real pro to remain professional with someone actual wheeling in and out of her pink thing 

[meghan_scotland]

When I read that, I thought wow she must be a real pro to remain professional with someone actual wheeling in and out of her pink thing 

Sophia, the whole thing had me spitting my drink out. Don’t. 😭
Giving the disabled guy from Family Guy a run for his money.
X

[meghan_scotland]

.

[Matrix]

Sophia, the whole thing had me spitting my drink out. Don’t. 😭
Giving the disabled guy from Family Guy a run for his money.
X

Back on topic.

What's your view on this review?

[meghan_scotland]

Back on topic.

What's your view on this review?

I am aware who the author is. He is inexperienced, although means no harm whatsoever. 

[Matrix]

I am aware who the author is. He is inexperienced, although means no harm whatsoever.

Interesting. Cheers.

The review has harmed his credibility as it reads like it was written for your benefit, not ours.

[meghan_scotland]

Interesting. Cheers.

The review has harmed his credibility as it reads like it was written for your benefit, not ours.

Understandable. The author actually apologised profusely to me for writing this after the apparent backlash. He is however, genuine and harmless. I imagine the review would be very different if he was perhaps older and more experienced with SPs.