Author Topic: Emily Creme Brulee (Aldgate; good value for money but not great)  (Read 8422 times)


103 review(s) for Emily's Creme brulee (99 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline NotThe


External Link/Members Only

£180 for a 1 hour incall.

When: 2020, when it was legal

Where: Aldgate East. A flat a very short walk from the tube.

Looks: face 6.5-8/10. Body 6.5-7/10.
The best way I can describe her is like someone who was probably very hot in her early 20s, but must now be in her 30s, hasn't aged too well and is definitely past her prime. She's slim, smallish boobs. Don't get me wrong: she's in no way bad, just not quite amazing.

Services offered : FK, OWO, massage, the usual positions.

Attitude : kind, welcoming, did her best to put me at ease.

The deed: started with FK and OWO. I didn't find her too attractive facially, and she had no boobs to look at, so I went for two rounds of doggie, with a massage and some chat in between.
She speaks a heavily accented but good English.

The whole experience was a bit meh. I can't really fault Emily for anything, it's not like she was rude or anything, it's that she didn't really rock my boat, so to speak. But this is very subjective - I understand quite a few people on the forum are big fans and I find it easy to believe other people would find hers a very good service. In fact, simply looking at the number of positive reviews she has, it's clear I'm in the minority!

I won't go back. But, as long as you are fine with a WG in her 30s and no boobs, you could do worse than her.

« Last Edit: September 24, 2024, 02:58:37 pm by Head1 »

Offline cotton

I woudnt worry about what other people think , she may have a bunch of fans on the forum and a virtually blemishfree record but that makes it all the more valuable to get a different perspective.  and reading between the lines it sounds like an expensive pump and dump with a ropey looking old bird , which at £180 is not value for money in anyones language and im guessing after the hype surrounding her was a massive disappointment.
 :thumbsup:

Offline HERTSBLUE

Definitely overpriced that's why I've never bothered.

Offline NotThe

Well, I wouldn't say pump and dump. She was welcoming and didn't have any of the bitchy-get-outta-here-already attitude of a conveyor belt p&d.
BUT she was nothing to write home about.

Her friend Michelle Independent, who sometimes used to work from the same flat, was really good, but her profile is gone, she may have retired.

Offline Mr Girth

Been on my hot list for a long time, but have yet to take the plunge at that price.

What size are her breasts? Struggling to understand when you say 'no boobs' but the photo you included and others on her profile suggest a B or maybe C cup?

Offline NotThe

Not a pair of fried eggs like Camille of Allure (based on pictures, not tried) but certainly very small

Offline mightymunce

I don't remember them being small. I was also a bit underwhelmed when I saw her.  I agree that she is someone who was hot in her 20s but now a bit older

Offline NotThe

I typed this review right after the meet, then kept it as a draft on my mobile for a while because I had been locked out of my old UKP account, and have had to wait for new registrations to reopen. I guess we just have different definitions of small  :)
Anyway, even if she had been busty, it would have still been a meh experience for me - but, like I said, I totally get it that quite a few people would like her, especially at her price point.

Online lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
£180 not a good VFM. She was good VFM about 10 years ago iirc it was £100-120.

Offline NotThe

£180 not a good VFM. She was good VFM about 10 years ago iirc it was £100-120.
In theory I agree with you.
In practice, however, in a world in which even in the £300+ range you get a pump and dump with someone who acts like a statue and looks at the ceiling all bored, someone who at least is welcoming, doesn't act like a statue and looks like her pictures is not the worst you could stumble upon.

Offline alabama1

I saw her a couple of years ago, nice girl. I think her being more expensive than the norm for a very vanilla punt gives you the expectation that she must be something special, which she isn't. I think if she lowered her price by about £30, punters expectations wouldn't be so high of her.

Offline Sexpest

Can I ask is it a hotel or apartment she was on my hot list?

Offline NotThe

I saw her in a flat near Aldgate

Offline mightymunce

I saw her a couple of years ago, nice girl. I think her being more expensive than the norm for a very vanilla punt gives you the expectation that she must be something special, which she isn't. I think if she lowered her price by about £30, punters expectations wouldn't be so high of her.

Agree - super vanilla experience. And very expensive for what she offers. No CIM for examplw

Offline cotton

In theory I agree with you.
In practice, however, in a world in which even in the £300+ range you get a pump and dump with someone who acts like a statue and looks at the ceiling all bored, someone who at least is welcoming, doesn't act like a statue and looks like her pictures is not the worst you could stumble upon.
Just because there are bad hookers at higher prices in no way alleviates her being poor value for money , ffs at £80/hr she should be welcoming.  The logic of justifying charging £180 because others charge more is ridiculous and against the interests of punters.
She is overpriced for what she is and not value for money.

Offline LeeVanCleef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 91
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 6
£180 an hour.
Get a 3 sum for that up here in the North West if you know where to go shopping
Banned reason: Ignoring warning not to derail reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline boardyhell

personally i think she beautiful natural boobs ,perfect size,just my type

Offline boardyhell



Offline Handel2020


I didn't find her too attractive facially...
...simply looking at the number of positive reviews she has, it's clear I'm in the minority!


I felt exactly the same and I seen her at around £120, before I was registered on this site and so didn't write a review. In fact your review is pretty much what I would have written.

I was expecting a drop dead gorgeous brunette from the previous reviews. Instead I got a girl next door who was nothing special in my mind. She was super friendly but I never went back either. I got a free sweet on the way out though. That was the only bonus.

Offline cloud

Since August 2022 ? :sarcastic:

External Link/Members Only

She might be logging in, but the profile hasn't been active for a while.

Offline mightymunce

I saw her a couple of years ago, nice girl. I think her being more expensive than the norm for a very vanilla punt gives you the expectation that she must be something special, which she isn't. I think if she lowered her price by about £30, punters expectations wouldn't be so high of her.

+ 1

Offline youngwolf994

Looks like her profile is back up!

Offline Hobbit

I felt exactly the same and I seen her at around £120, before I was registered on this site and so didn't write a review. In fact your review is pretty much what I would have written.

I was expecting a drop dead gorgeous brunette from the previous reviews. Instead I got a girl next door who was nothing special in my mind. She was super friendly but I never went back either. I got a free sweet on the way out though. That was the only bonus.

I reviewed her many years ago. Was excited to see her based on so many good reviews and like you, I expected a model but was disappointed as well. She was average-looking and nothing to write home about. She is very welcoming and a good SP but I never went back.

This is why I don't always believe the hype when it comes to reviews.

Offline tantraman

Looks like her profile is back up!

Good to know, as Emily has forever been on my HL ... but the depressing price increases are a shame :(

Offline Joe_Peshi

I don't understand these price increases for SP's, considering in Emily's case she's getting on a bit, she's definitely no longer the spring chicken she used to be.

Offline SoapyTW

We're gonna need to update the title of this thread if it's gonna be the leading one.

Offline rafathegaffa

Back in my first year of punting like 2016, she used to be f'ing fit. It's been nearly 7 years since then though, so I can imagine she may not be as fit now. Used to be really, really pretty/tight body etc.

Offline Bond

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as they say.

I first met Emily in 2016, and last saw her in January 2020. She was just as attractive in 2020 as she was in 2016.

For me, she is the best purveyor of GFE that I have met in this business.

As soon as I saw that she's back, I've ramped up my preparations for an unaccompanied trip to London early next year.