Author Topic: Decabrina - Diva - Earls Court  (Read 1127 times)

Offline Alexmck

Girl
External Link/Members Only

Price
£300 (just seen price is double!)

Location
Studio flat in a house in Earls Court.

Comms
Diva messaging. Arranged at v short notice (30 minutes notice), thank you Diva messaging.

Looks/presentation
Older than photos suggest. Good airbrushing on the site. Guessing she is 35 or so. Figure is fair although no longer has the taut body of a 20-something.

Services
Kissing (on occasion DFK) then oral. Shower in small bathroom (requested to remove shoes before going in there). Started with oral - was good and wet with no teeth. Returned the favour. Initial odour disappeared. No fingers. Got increasingly wet but didn't seem interested in coming. Condom on and then missionary. Liked her legs on my shoulders although kept staring at the wall to one side. Room was very warm so switched to cowgirl to let her do some legwork. Went through the motions but seemed to be going through the motions. Didn't seem to be much enjoyment on her side and for some reason, little enjoyment on my side. Switched to a vigorous doggie to finish. Made a lot of noise during doggie but suspect just to hurry me along.

Have put this as neutral as I was horny and I did pop. However, on another day would be a negative. Personally wouldn't return at £300 and definitely not at £600.

Offline stuart.

Thanks for review I was very interested in this one before the price change but sound like you have save me a wasted trip.

Offline Alexmck

Thanks for review I was very interested in this one before the price change but sound like you have save me a wasted trip.

Definitely add 10 years on to the pictures (even the newer ones now on the site).

Maybe I caught her on a bad day but think is one of those where she seemed to think that going through motions was enough (personally, not for me).

Thank you for your reviews. Allowed me to avoid a few potential landmines!

Offline Stanford97

Definitely add 10 years on to the pictures (even the newer ones now on the site).
She must have aged badly from when I saw her as she wasn’t more than 30, I said she was older than her photos but at the time she had photos of herself as a twenty year old. It’s still ridiculous if she isn’t dolling herself up perfectly for the prices expected.

Offline Alexmck

She must have aged badly from when I saw her as she wasn’t more than 30, I said she was older than her photos but at the time she had photos of herself as a twenty year old. It’s still ridiculous if she isn’t dolling herself up perfectly for the prices expected.

Maybe that's why it was 300 before going up - lack of make up!  :D

She was made up but looked much older to me than the photos. Room was quite dark too which added to make up might have made her look older vs the bright sun and lots of make up that were in some of her photos