Naughty Natt - Chancery Lane - just about positive

[aj12345]

Time and location: decent flat near Chancery Lane tube station. Easy to find. Booked an hour, reduced to 30mins. Paid £120 upfront, refunded £40.

The girl: didn't do it for me. Really friendly person and pleasant to look at but I didn't fancy her. Tall, which is nice, but a bit big for me.

The meet: she did nothing wrong. Great dfk and owo to cim. Gets all huggy and licks around your neck, ears and body.  Everything  was delivered well but after the first pop, I knew I wasn't feeling it enough to continue. Shame I didn't fancy her. She gave me 40 quid back. Pleasant chat and I left.

My experience was very neutral but she did nothing wrong so I'll give her a positive as others will enjoy. I think some of the reviews have rated her looks way too high. She's very average and plain and I think that's my biggest disappointment in that I was expecting her to be a lot more attractive.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[LLPunting]

Thanks for the candid review 

Props to her for the refund, presuming there was no bitterness or difficulty in getting it for the early termination.

[whoya.kiddin]

Agree - big unit and the service is a bit chilly.

[aj12345]

Thanks for the candid review 

Props to her for the refund, presuming there was no bitterness or difficulty in getting it for the early termination.

No bitterness. She was totally fine by it. I apologised, twice in fact, and she said it was no problem at all.

[Decadent Hobby]

Agree - big unit and the service is a bit chilly.

I found her to be really welcoming and giggly. Maybe an off day?

[whoya.kiddin]

I found her to be really welcoming and giggly. Maybe an off day?

Maybe.  I have noticed that any criticism of this SP generally gets a reaction.  Given my experience, which was very ordinary, together with the large number of reprofiles this leads me to think she keeps the marketing cranked up.  There was some murkey stuff about the veracity of her photos a couple of years back.  I weigh her reviews accordingly.

[Shadow314]

Maybe.  I have noticed that any criticism of this SP generally gets a reaction.  Given my experience, which was very ordinary, together with the large number of reprofiles this leads me to think she keeps the marketing cranked up.  There was some murkey stuff about the veracity of her photos a couple of years back.  I weigh her reviews accordingly.

On photos the ones I've posted here will be representative of her https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=281275.0  Not so sure if all the others floating around are of her.
I've always met the welcoming giggly Natt, but guess YMMV.

[Fully Sated]

On photos the ones I've posted here will be representative of her https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=281275.0 

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[smiths]

On photos the ones I've posted here will be representative of her https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=281275.0  Not so sure if all the others floating around are of her.
I've always met the welcoming giggly Natt, but guess YMMV.

The 1 where she is wearing a black bra and knickers with black cuffs on her wrists is the best pic of the Natt I met earlier this year facially that is. I said at the time or shortly afterwards that some of her pics may not be of her, close but not her. She was a bit bigger body wise than that pic though, and that was just before the first national lockdown so a long time ago now.