Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: sweet maria london  (Read 17805 times)


25 review(s) for Sweet Maria London (21 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


I have seen her again, and I asked for c.i.m. just to see if she did it, and she doesnt. She explained to me the health risks of it, so I find it very hard to believe she has done bareback at work in the past. I reckon its bullshit. I am very anti bareback, so I did my research. She told me her previous profiles, and she did not offer bareback. I have to wonder why you said this Abdul? I am wondering where the confusion is, as I want to give benefit of the doubt regarding motive here. I am no white knight or any thing fluffy, but it does bother me when wrong info is put out there. I hate fake reviews and I dislike it when wrong info is put out on a WG. If you were unsure, Im glad you aired your concerns, but stating it as fact when it seems to be incorrect is something else.

When non punters look at adultwork, they see a large number of WGs. To punters, we know that the number of real, reliable, accurate, honest ones is low actually. So when I find one that is what I look for and expect, it bothers me that incorrect stuff is put out there about them. If I had not seen her before, I would never have after what you wrote. And that would have meant me missing out.

I dont believe she offered bareback in the past for several reasons. I saw her again, I had a great time, and she is as advertised. It was a GFE, and exactly as I asked for. Good value for money in my book, and shes gorgeous. I also like that she is always minty fresh and does not do the risky things (cim, etc). Very friendly and up front too.

Having seen her a second time, I recommend her again, as much as I did at first.

I think abdul gets confused, he often says this about girls that no longer show it, or indeed maybe never did

I think abdul gets confused, he often says this about girls that no longer show it, or indeed maybe never did

It can be bloody off putting. Im just glad this incorrect info wasnt there before I saw her. Im glad I saw her. It is frustrating when wrong info gets out there, confusing things.

Shes quality though. Id like to hear from Abdul why he said what he did, as I am curious as to the reason now.

Offline rogerc23

She looks right up my street,as for abdul he seems to have seen or know pretty much every escort in greater london but is yet to contribute one new review,seems strange to me....

She looks right up my street,as for abdul he seems to have seen or know pretty much every escort in greater london but is yet to contribute one new review,seems strange to me....

I think he might be out to remove his competition. lol. his profile still cracks me up.


Offline abdul

It can be bloody off putting. Im just glad this incorrect info wasnt there before I saw her. Im glad I saw her. It is frustrating when wrong info gets out there, confusing things.

Shes quality though. Id like to hear from Abdul why he said what he did, as I am curious as to the reason now.

I don't know how long you've searching and punting from AW, but definitely you're not experienced at least than me. I specially take precautions before meeting with any Romanian. So if I see any attractive Romanian then as a first measure I follow that profile for few days if any good response then go for it. So far I met no more than 10 Romanian ladies. and I meet some of them occasionally as they are well reputed so I can rely them. Out of curiousity do you think she will tell you the truth she was doing bareback as you asked her. As you said she is very careful about health risk but she is happy to do OWO :rolleyes: Couldn't it be the scenario that she came across through unprotected services and she had a good lesson in past and decided to practice in safe mode from now on :hi:
Banning reason: Troll

Offline NightKid

I don't know how long you've searching and punting from AW, but definitely you're not experienced at least than me.

Because you saying so makes it true, like the random nada-proof BB claim. Did I get it right?

... take precautions before meeting with any Romanian ... Romanian then as a first measure ... met no more than 10 Romanian ladies.

You don't happen to be a taxi driver also, as per your avatar, do you?  :dash:

As you said she is very careful about health risk but she is happy to do OWO :rolleyes:

Did you know that OWO is the least riskiest sexual act for us punters?  :rolleyes:

She looks right up my street,as for abdul he seems to have seen or know pretty much every escort in greater london but is yet to contribute one new review,seems strange to me....

Seconded. Looking back at his last 200 posts ... everytime he supposedly chips in to "contribute", it seems to be lacking in details that a person who has actually seen the WG in question would mention, with the sole exception of this post: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=27454.msg393348#msg393348. Also, there's this: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28630.msg405301#msg405301 - Anyone who has been using AW for as long as he implies would know that the alert is applied to unverified profiles.

Last but not least, there's this bollock of a thread he's started (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=27765.0) which was challenged by a couple of credible punters and even had a review to support said challenge since: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28779.0. After all that's said and done though, if I'm honest I still can't for the life of me tell what his intentions are. The rival SP remark does seem to hit pretty close to home thus far.

Offline abdul

Because you saying so makes it true, like the random nada-proof BB claim. Did I get it right?

You don't happen to be a taxi driver also, as per your avatar, do you?  :dash:

Did you know that OWO is the least riskiest sexual act for us punters?  :rolleyes:

Seconded. Looking back at his last 200 posts ... everytime he supposedly chips in to "contribute", it seems to be lacking in details that a person who has actually seen the WG in question would mention, with the sole exception of this post: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=27454.msg393348#msg393348. Also, there's this: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28630.msg405301#msg405301 - Anyone who has been using AW for as long as he implies would know that the alert is applied to unverified profiles.

Last but not least, there's this bollock of a thread he's started (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=27765.0) which was challenged by a couple of credible punters and even had a review to support said challenge since: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28779.0. After all that's said and done though, if I'm honest I still can't for the life of me tell what his intentions are. The rival SP remark does seem to hit pretty close to home thus far.

Naito Kizzu I thought you're cool but I'm surprising some of your bollock analoogy :hi:
Banning reason: Troll

Offline NightKid

Naito Kizzu I thought you're cool but I'm surprising some of your bollock analoogy :hi:

It's not an analogy genius, it's a challenge to all your bullshit.

You've shown that you were lying in that thread about certain pornstar escorts, and now you're accusing another SP of a rather major no-no but no one has actually corroborated any of your claims whenever you mention something about someone you've allegedly seen some years ago.

Since you're obviously not here to share, tell me ... what are you actually here for?

Offline akauya

[snip]

... if I'm honest I still can't for the life of me tell what his intentions are
. The rival SP remark does seem to hit pretty close to home thus far.

You're not the only one thinking that NK.

I do think of abdul's statement when I asked about his profile, and he replied that it was a persona. As it is, I think his claims appear to have been disproven. I just wonder why he made them in the first place? It just seems too absurd that he might be the Kaiser Soze of london pimps?

Offline abdul

It's not an analogy genius, it's a challenge to all your bullshit.

You've shown that you were lying in that thread about certain pornstar escorts, and now you're accusing another SP of a rather major no-no but no one has actually corroborated any of your claims whenever you mention something about someone you've allegedly seen some years ago.

Since you're obviously not here to share, tell me ... what are you actually here for?

Now I have to interpret you all the threads you challenged. Firstly you said I lied to pornstar thread, what I mentioned clearly those pornstars and their profiles are NOT FAKE. what I indicated a guy is corresponding with their email enquiries who has at least 14 aliases. And how you will know if a guy is corresponding with email. So my point was to those punters who are emailing them should be aware of it. Secondly in this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28630.msg405301#msg405301 yes I'm aware that unverified and new members are highlighted in a red alert. What I pointed in that thread that is a new member made a concern and questioned about Ludwig's review but looking back at all of Ludwig's post and review I shall say his review of that thread is well accurate and reliable as long as he has been posting since 2012. Finally now about Maria of this thread well I see you are also relatively old member in this forum but definitely not old in AW as like me. The way I keep watching on Aw profiles definitely you don't' of course when it's about the stick under the trouser we guys don't bother to waste time on monitoring profile but we prefer to TOFT mostly. I am sure this new profile of Maria will not last long may be less than a year. :hi:
« Last Edit: May 01, 2014, 03:48:30 PM by abdul »
Banning reason: Troll

Offline NightKid

what I indicated a guy is corresponding with their email enquiries who has at least 14 aliases. And how you will know if a guy is corresponding with email. So my point was to those punters who are emailing them should be aware of it.

That's exactly what 2 notable UKP-ers have claimed you were lying about, as they were in direct correspondence with the girls in question and have actually provided reviews to match.
What have you done to substantiate your claim besides spouting random drivel? Also, I could ask you the same question ... how would you, of all people, know about whatever person who is corresponding with whatever email if you weren't involved with said person in the first place?

Secondly in this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28630.msg405301#msg405301 yes I'm aware that unverified and new members are highlighted in a red alert. What I pointed in that thread that is a new member made a concern and questioned about Ludwig's review but looking back at all of Ludwig's post and review I shall say his review of that thread is well accurate and reliable as long as he has been posting since 2012.

No, it was obvious that the new member was challenging Ludwig because of the alert ... he quoted the alert in his post, for crying out loud. Are you blind in addition to being delusional?  :wacko:

Finally now about Maria of this thread well I see you are also relatively old member in this forum but definitely not old in AW as like me. The way I keep watching on Aw profiles definitely you don't' of course when it's about the stick under the trouser we guys don't bother to waste time on monitoring profile but we prefer to TOFT mostly.

Annd we're back to random delusional ramblings ... yeah sure, whatever you say. Since you're so great at "monitoring" AW, why haven't I seen you posting in this thread again?  :rolleyes:

Also, while we're on the subject of monitoring stuff ... did you know that I used to do it for real when I was active last year, unlike your fraudulent/non-existent bollocks? That's how I could come up with old links so easily, as recently demonstrated in my most recent review here. And that's how I can say fraudsters like you, who don't even keep records of previous punts but still have the audacity to use the word "monitor", are nothing but lying scumbags.

Oh, btw ... there's a very select few UKP-ers who prefer to TOFT so that's the last part of your bullshit debunked. See what I did there?  ;)
Anyway, I've said all that needs to be said so without wishing to derail the thread ... I'll leave it at that. While I'm still not sure what your intentions are for UKP, this little spar of ours has shone some light on what you are, at least, and I'm grateful for that.  :hi:

Offline abdul

That's exactly what 2 notable UKP-ers have claimed you were lying about, as they were in direct correspondence with the girls in question and have actually provided reviews to match.
What have you done to substantiate your claim besides spouting random drivel? Also, I could ask you the same question ... how would you, of all people, know about whatever person who is corresponding with whatever email if you weren't involved with said person in the first place?

No, it was obvious that the new member was challenging Ludwig because of the alert ... he quoted the alert in his post, for crying out loud. Are you blind in addition to being delusional?  :wacko:

Annd we're back to random delusional ramblings ... yeah sure, whatever you say. Since you're so great at "monitoring" AW, why haven't I seen you posting in this thread again?  :rolleyes:

Also, while we're on the subject of monitoring stuff ... did you know that I used to do it for real when I was active last year, unlike your fraudulent/non-existent bollocks? That's how I could come up with old links so easily, as recently demonstrated in my most recent review here. And that's how I can say fraudsters like you, who don't even keep records of previous punts but still have the audacity to use the word "monitor", are nothing but lying scumbags.

Oh, btw ... there's a very select few UKP-ers who prefer to TOFT so that's the last part of your bullshit debunked. See what I did there?  ;)
Anyway, I've said all that needs to be said so without wishing to derail the thread ... I'll leave it at that. While I'm still not sure what your intentions are for UKP, this little spar of ours has shone some light on what you are, at least, and I'm grateful for that.  :hi:

Thanks again for fishy hypocrant :hi:
Banning reason: Troll

abdul, you've been caught talking shit, take it like a man (or, if it is you in your profile pics, a hairless goblin). leave it now and just accept you were either wrong or talking out your bleached sausage gripper on purpose.

Offline Packer

I'm going to ignore everything relating to Abdul's posts, as I just do not understand what he says, and my translator has a day off today. 

So back to the subject in hand...Sweet Maria!

I saw her at the weekend. Oh my....you will not believe how beautiful this woman is. 

Everything Stealthshagger says is true. A few bits to add:

- She has a piercing down there.  A little annoying for me as it seems to get in the way for good RO.
- She is obsessively clean, and you can tell. Sadly though, this meant that after round one, she wouldn't do OWO for round 2 without me having another shower.  This was the only downside for me, given that I used her wet wipes to tidy up after the first pop.
- She is in fact half Romanian, and did indeed spend many years in Spain.  She told me that this was only her 2nd weekend in the UK.
- There are quite a few tats, which don't really do it for me, but wasn't a turn off in a sexual sense.  One of them is of her real name. 
- She really is fun.  As English isn't her strong point, sometimes she would say "what?" in the most endearing way, to something she didn't understand.  We had a laugh about that.

So all in all a good punt bar anything deemed as negative above.

I am pretty certain she wouldn't do CIM, but I wasn't massively bothered that day. Just ask if you plan to see her, she was good on the phone.

I do think of abdul's statement when I asked about his profile, and he replied that it was a persona. As it is, I think his claims appear to have been disproven. I just wonder why he made them in the first place? It just seems too absurd that he might be the Kaiser Soze of london pimps?

Change the word pimp to stalker and add eastern euro pro$$ie's and you might have the answer to what Abdul is

Offline el-fei

I visited her yesterday and yes she is very beautiful,  I was taken a back by it slightly but she provides a very vanilla service. She also dimmed the lights heavily? I think to hide tattoos and the heavy scarring from her breast implants. We chatted and was very open. This Abdul guy is most likely lying sadly. The more I read his posts the more I wonder why he's still hanging around.

Aa beautiful as she is I won't be returning and actually feel my money would've been better spent elsewhere for my tastes.

« Last Edit: May 09, 2014, 05:15:44 PM by el-fei »

Spent half an hour in her company this afternoon - my God she's out of this world. Looks like a Bond girl and shags like a porn star. She genuinely looks like one of those promotional girls that hang around in nightclubs handing out samples. Actually quite disarmingly fit - the kind of girl who wouldn't look twice at you in civvy street. Yes, you. Gorgeous soft skin, every orifice fresh as a daisy.

She's actually quite assertive and forthcoming for a girl in her mid twenties. I think this is a product of having had so much attention from blokes in the past. Because of this, I assumed that her English was better than it is - she is happy to chat and attempt GFE but the conversation is a little one sided. I ended up launching into a monologue about the English Heritage rating system for listing buildings as she was cupping my balls and massaging my fuckstick to life, which was quite amusing in retrospect.

El-fei, yes, she did dim the lights and yes, she does have scars from a boob job, and though her service is vanilla, what she does she does exceptionally well. She knew exactly how to structure the session in order to turn me on. Her french kissing is incredibly erotic - tongue like a hummingbird exploring my mouth, and this was particularly enjoyable (and impressive) when she did so whilst riding me - skilfully maintaining two different rhythms. 

Wasn't sure initially about the tattoos, but I warmed to them - along with seeing Portofino at sunset from a yacht, the sight of her peachy arse and inked back bouncing back and forth on my fun-sized will stay with me for a while.

To reiterate what someone else said, she is fastidious about cleanliness - wet wiped me before owo (and even herself before I went down on her which was nice, if unnecessary) so yes, what Abdul said is a load of old bollocks.

She's around for another year or so - only incalls from her flat just off Hyde Park. I will definitely see her again, scrubbed up next time and with my game face on.
Lovely stuff.

Offline Hazzzy

Guys

I'm a newbie on here. I saw Maria last week (see my review, written today).

I thought she was pretty good and she certainly practiced safe sex with me (except for OWO).

I would certainly recommend.


She's now upper her prices to £90/140 which is rather steep - don't know if she'll bring them down if demand slows....

I went and saw maria again recently, and figured Id write a review again for a few reasons.

Shes a lovely girlfriend experience, and I was glad to see she is still her happy and friendly self. She is welcoming, gorgeous, and immaculately clean and fresh and hygienic. Not to make a too fine a point of it, but some hot days I worry on the way to a punt whether the WG will be fresh and clean and showered for the meeting. happily Maria was fresh and so forth, so no worries there. I know it sounds like I might be being picky or fussy, but it matters alot, especially if you love oral. I happily do reverse oral with her, as she is always fresh and clean. A big deal for me.

She is very beautiful and her personality lends itself to a gfe very well. As always I had a fun time, a good chat, and great sex. You've got to love good owo, and reverse oral with a beautiful and fresh WG on a summer day.  She certainly knows how to use her tongue piercing. There is nothing as useless as a tongue piercing on a WG who doesnt know how to use it. I enjoyed a good deep owo with Maria's piercing, there is certainly something about the way you feel the tongue texture run across your head, and the piercing stroke the head too. She took me very deep with the owo, and didnt use her hands much, which is how an owo should be, I feel. A nice summer day during the world cup, a nice owo with a friendly unrushed happy WG who seems to be very happy to be where she is doing what she does..whats not to like?  We had some good gfe sex, with her doing the work on top of me, grinding slowly as I enjoyed her breasts and holding her lovely bum cheeks. I admit I came pretty fast, the day and the experience making me trigger happy hahaha. Not as fast as holland in front of a spanish goal, but much faster than usual for me.

I had a good, long round two, with owo (after a very thorough wet wipe of my man sausage), and having sex in doggy style with maria is quite something. Her lovely bum shaking with my hands on them and looking at her slide back and forth over my cock...good times indeed.  We ran over by quite some time, which she didnt mention or seem to mind in the slightest.

We still had a good chat after round two, and I joked that she is GFE and what Id want, if I had a girlfriend, would be a girl next door but better looking threesome. She  said that she apparently is going to offer exactly that soon. I assume she is serious as she looked it. She is moving to another flat in the same area (paddington) and she says she has a good looking friend ( I have no idea what she looks like, etc) who will work with her there. My response was, predictably, that I want to be their first threesome. I forgot to get the dates and ask for pictures of her friend etc, as I was keen to hear about Maria's  bisexuality. Obviously, sitting there naked after round two with a gorgeous WG I wanted to hear more about her bisexuality, so forgot to ask to see pics of her mate etc. I dont know what it is about hearing a woman is bisexual, but I like hearing and picturing it. She says she really is and when I asked if she would then perform oral on a woman in a duo, she said of course.  Now that  I want to see :)

all in all, a good time, well spent with a very good WG for a girlfriend experience. The perfect antidote to many of the grumpy individuals on AW. She is also as her pictures, which is always important.

I think it adds alot when a WG is as per her pics, immaculately fresh and clean, happy and in a good mood, good looking etc.

I have seen her a fair few times in total, and always leave happy and glad I went back. Judging by the reviews on here, others find her the same too.

If she is seriously going to offer duos, Ill definitely be going and trying that out. A good gfe duo in central london this summer is right up my street. fingers crossed that she will do duos!

her profile:
https://www.adultwork.com/2449952 or https://www.adultwork.com/Sweet+Maria+London


25 review(s) found for Sweet Maria London linked to in above post (21 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative)

password02

Thanks for the review -  :hi: -
can you confirm if her kissing was light or deep and if she allowed a finger or 2?

Do you know if she has toys to play with as my sessions sometimes end up with the girl wanking with her toy while I come on her tits or CIM.

Thanks in advance

She doesnt do CIM. As for kissing, the limiting factor for how deep seems to be me, as I tend to not kiss too deeply.

As for fingers, I think she really is like if you were with a girlfriend. In other words, when I have given her RO, I have put a finger in and it didnt occur to me to ask or anything.

I can only speak for my experiences, but I know others here have seen her too and reviewed her.

As for toys, I imagine she does have, you should ask. I havent asked personally as Im not really into that or tried it with a wg that I recall  to be honest. Shes very friendly and happy go lucky, so just message her and ask on aw.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)