« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Freya at diva (DFK/CIF/OWO/DT/Penetration) - Warwick Road  (Read 4648 times)

Offline Snowenne

« on: October 15, 2020, 03:33:42 pm »
External Link/Members Only

Big thanks to Bonapati for this one.

Easy comms by diva booked a day in advance.This happened a 3rd week of September.Warwick road flat i think quite few of us have been there Met Mikel and Sunnu in the second flat and Freya was in the first one.

£350+£50 for 90minutes +CIF

Freya is much more prettier and petite and wholesome in real life, pictures dont show her truly, i Requsted a black Jeans and white shirt with heels which she had, was looking hot as fuck i couldnt stop feeling and squeezing her ass while Dfking her, i have a boner now just thinking about it it was that good,sorted the paper work and off for  shower, came back she had all cloths still on i was only with underwear some more DFK and turning her around like im about to fuck her standing doggy with a cloths on, she was very happy about it, picking her up around and finally onto bed for some pussy/ass licking she was making the right noises she was getting wet aswell into some 69 and soon i started with CG on top i give her time just like i always do she made some comments and asked me is it alright if i speak on russian i said no problem ofc, its like she knew what was about to happen, i position myself from below with her squating and pounding from below like my life is depending on it, she doesnt move and take it like a champ, just like Woofie35 and mikel which for me at first was at big surprise for such a petite girl, more mish legs on shoulders no problem takes it all in no restrictions, just screaming from time to time DA DA DA DA, decided to try and pick her up and pound her like theres no tomorrow she takes it aswell screaming big time, into the bed for some BJ and we later relocated on the floor on her knees i tried to squeze my CIF for free but as i made the comment she said but you know its extra i said no problem and she was fine with it, i was shooting a 3 days load on her face it was so much she was making comment it was so much, and smiling had to help her get wipes :) left the money on the table after, had some chit chat about her that might come back in November, and that she tried to go to Australia but it was very hard to get a visa for girls there.

I know shes gone now but if she comes back if you havent seen her, you must.  :drinks:

Offline Fully Sated

« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2020, 03:56:51 pm »

Offline Dashing

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,613
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2020, 03:57:52 pm »
Quote from: Snowenne on October 15, 2020, 03:33:42 pm
... might come back in November,...

I know shes gone now but if she comes back if you havent seen her, you must.

Cross-references for Freya @ Diva, in case she returns and links are re-activated:

= Franka @ Admiral (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Barracuda (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Babylon (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Top Secret (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Hot Collection (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Angels of London (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ City Butterflies (External Link/Members Only)
= Tequila @ PalaceVIP (External Link/Members Only)

To help UKP key-word searches find relevant reviews/intel.

Offline newbie83

« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2020, 04:09:30 pm »
Quote from: Dashing on October 15, 2020, 03:57:52 pm
Cross-references for Freya @ Diva, in case she returns and links are re-activated:

= Franka @ Admiral (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Barracuda (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Babylon (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Top Secret (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Hot Collection (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ Angels of London (External Link/Members Only)
= Freya @ City Butterflies (External Link/Members Only)
= Tequila @ PalaceVIP (External Link/Members Only)

To help UKP key-word searches find relevant reviews/intel.

She looks like one to avoid actually:
External Link/Members Only

Has anyone used Palace VIP before?

Offline Goldfinch

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,344
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 26
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2020, 04:13:04 pm »

Offline bonapati

« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2020, 05:25:39 pm »
Quote from: newbie83 on October 15, 2020, 04:09:30 pm
She looks like one to avoid actually:
External Link/Members Only

Has anyone used Palace VIP before?

Have you seen her... bet you have not. let alone avoid her.

I will be seeing her again and you or that agency aren’t going to stop me - maybe you have a connection to this agency.... that we have heard little or nothing about expect for a negative review around the time you joined?

P.S. 7 years, 1 review... you should cover your face in shame and through your keyboard in the bin!
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 05:41:11 pm by bonapati »

Offline PatMacGroin

« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2020, 01:47:34 am »
Quote from: newbie83 on October 15, 2020, 04:09:30 pm
She looks like one to avoid actually:
External Link/Members Only

Has anyone used Palace VIP before?

I've not seen this WG, but there's something very odd about that.

Why would an agency want to advertise their arguments with one of their escorts? Even if she is no longer on their books? Makes it seem more like vindictive, snide behaviour by someone at the agency that has a personal grudge against her.

It certainly doesn't seem like professional behaviour and would only make me more wary of using that Agency.

Offline hermanmunster

« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2020, 09:00:06 am »
Quote from: newbie83 on October 15, 2020, 04:09:30 pm
She looks like one to avoid actually:
External Link/Members Only

Has anyone used Palace VIP before?

I am slightly puzzled by this - she was fantastic when I met her.  My first thought when I looked at the palacevip link was : is that really her, 6 years ago?  But then why would the agency allow photos of her to be attached to those comments (unless they had a hidden and very vindictive agenda).  So I am guessing that it must be Freya when she was naive and not fully understanding of what was expected of her as an escort.  I can only say that she must have changed and other reviewers seem to support this as well.  So this will not affect my decision making if I wish to see her again.  Palacevip have not covered themselves in glory here - for me it is just unnecessary to post all those screenshots, and their own messages can only have fuelled the disagreement.  Diva have probably got it right in having a "not recommended for other agencies" page.

If palacevip are stating that she was 35-40 in 2014 she is 41-46 now which I cannot believe.  And lastly, a very big question - why have they got Freya on their site as a girl currently working if they had that experience of her 6 years ago??
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 09:15:50 am by hermanmunster »

Offline bonapati

« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2020, 09:05:30 am »
I doubt those photos are 6 years ago. The fist time I saw her she said it was her first time in London. I have seen her several times after  - no complains whatsoever. Top drawer.

Offline hermanmunster

« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2020, 09:17:51 am »
I'm not sure if I am being blind, but do we know if the lady from the review 6 years ago (Krista) is the same Tequila now (or Freya at Diva)? 

I.e. those screenshots could be very recent?  Please excuse me if I am missing something.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 09:20:44 am by hermanmunster »

Offline massagepuntingfan

« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2020, 09:41:26 am »
Quote from: newbie83 on October 15, 2020, 04:09:30 pm
She looks like one to avoid actually:
External Link/Members Only

Has anyone used Palace VIP before?

Thats a pretty extraordinary link. I'm assuming the agency banned her and the implication is she barebacks punters, slags off the agency and girls to punters and is 35-40 years old. The lady I saw could barely speak English, uses condoms, was late 20's/early 30's in age, of a sunny disposition throughout and quite simply a top notch fuck. I'm not white knighting merely expressing my surprise at this link which is the opposite of my experience.

Offline bonapati

« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2020, 10:10:47 am »
Well she hasn't made it to this hall of fame (External Link/Members Only) yet... until then we should all keep an open mind and not be too judgemental. Hit the "Read more" link for a better insight.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 10:12:37 am by bonapati »

Offline hermanmunster

« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2020, 10:24:28 am »
Quote from: bonapati on October 16, 2020, 10:10:47 am
Well she hasn't made it to this hall of fame (External Link/Members Only) yet... until then we should all keep an open mind and not be too judgemental. Hit the "Read more" link for a better insight.

I "Read more" and there is one glaring omission - not paying agency fees. I would imagine that is the easiest way to get on the "not recommended" list.

Offline Dashing

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,613
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2020, 10:49:59 am »
Quote from: hermanmunster on October 16, 2020, 09:17:51 am
I'm not sure if I am being blind, but do we know if the lady from the review 6 years ago (Krista) is the same Tequila now (or Freya at Diva)? 

I.e. those screenshots could be very recent?  Please excuse me if I am missing something.

The 'Krista' in the review from 6 years ago has no connection. Goldfinch's Reply #4 link was in answer to the question whether anyone has used PalaceVIP.

Who appear to like airing their dirty laundry in public, with all their 'Suspended' profiles mixed in among their galleries. Unlike Diva who, you and Bonapati point out, tuck theirs away in a discrete section (and draw a polite veil over reasons for suspension). Separate section is more user-friendly if your audience is other agencies.

Offline hermanmunster

« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2020, 11:00:37 am »
Quote from: Dashing on October 16, 2020, 10:49:59 am
The 'Krista' in the review from 6 years ago has no connection. Goldfinch's Reply #4 link was in answer to the question whether anyone has used PalaceVIP.

Who appear to like airing their dirty laundry in public, with all their 'Suspended' profiles mixed in among their galleries. Unlike Diva who, you and Bonapati point out, tuck theirs away in a discrete section (and draw a polite veil over reasons for suspension). Separate section is more user-friendly if your audience is other agencies.

Thanks, I should have read the replies more carefully.

Interestingly the palacevip website is now "down" - I wonder if they have read this thread and are removing critical posts about their escorts?  It's live again now. 

If you read the thread on palcevip, Freya has had an overnight for £1,700, the agency take commission of £510, Freya has £700 leaving £490 for the Russian "manager" (i.e. middleman).  Interesting.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 11:19:14 am by hermanmunster »

Offline bonapati

« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2020, 11:27:53 am »
Quote from: hermanmunster on October 16, 2020, 10:24:28 am
I "Read more" and there is one glaring omission - not paying agency fees. I would imagine that is the easiest way to get on the "not recommended" list.

That's a no brainer but also providing crap service would not put a good agency in good light - that's the difference in one that has a cusotmer service strategy and on that just has a website. I am sure SPs also have prefered agencies they want to be listed with based on type of clientele, length of time requested etc.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 11:30:47 am by bonapati »

Offline Dashing

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,613
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
« Reply #16 on: October 16, 2020, 12:15:45 pm »

Offline stuart.

« Reply #17 on: October 16, 2020, 12:18:36 pm »
When Freya in London again, I will be going back for sure.   

Offline bonapati

« Reply #18 on: October 16, 2020, 12:23:51 pm »
Quote from: stuart. on October 16, 2020, 12:18:36 pm
When Freya in London again, I will be going back for sure.
I will be there before you Stu' :)

Offline stuart.

« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2020, 12:41:06 pm »
Quote from: bonapati on October 16, 2020, 12:23:51 pm
I will be there before you Stu' :)

haha I hope so, I wouldn't want to be the guy after me, could still be cum in her hair  :lol:

Offline g284

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 349
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 7
« Reply #20 on: October 16, 2020, 02:43:15 pm »
Quote from: PatMacGroin on October 16, 2020, 01:47:34 am
Why would an agency want to advertise their arguments with one of their escorts? Even if she is no longer on their books? Makes it seem more like vindictive, snide behaviour by someone at the agency that has a personal grudge against her.

It certainly doesn't seem like professional behaviour and would only make me more wary of using that Agency.

It's not a grudge against her, palacevip have a number of WG with warning comments added to their profiles. Seems they prefer to air dirty laundry out in public instead of taking the diva route of just not recommending the girls.
Banned reason: Demanding threads be deleted by PM despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline bonapati

« Reply #21 on: October 16, 2020, 05:19:51 pm »
Quote from: g284 on October 16, 2020, 02:43:15 pm
It's not a grudge against her, palacevip have a number of WG with warning comments added to their profiles. Seems they prefer to air dirty laundry out in public instead of taking the diva route of just not recommending the girls.

Listing SPs on a website does not equal a brand strategy or a mission statement.. reason why not many of use use VIp Palace.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »