Author Topic: SEXY@SARAH - Chelsea  (Read 4173 times)


21 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5577592) (18 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
23 review(s) for AMY@BRUNETTE (20 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Stanford97

Excellent GFE. As good as the best photos. Excellent comms.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location:9.5
Cool little flat overlooking the Kings Rd about 5 minutes walk from Sloane Square tube station. Sarah’s looking to move shortly but this place was really pleasant and fresh with en suite bedroom. Minimal furniture so clothes went on the floor.

Appearance:9.5
Perfectly warm and charming throughout and fairly electric in the level of vibrancy offered. Sarah was really welcoming and always seemed merry. Great face, great T&A, very well presented and silky skin. Slight language barrier.

Performance:9.5
Fairly vanilla in places but first rate hip actions and booty shaking that went well with some cool Brazilian music. Lots of kissing from the first moment to the last, I’d call it excellent FK with fairly satisfactory moments of DFK. Just a charming GFE throughout with our arms always around each other and everything passed smoothly from one stage to the next.
Plenty of RO with cool hip movements and charming climatic acting. Very brief OWO followed by OW that was fine but a bit shallow. Cool CG with lots of tit sucking followed by relentless smooth spooning which felt awesome and led to shooting in the bag.
Lengthy pleasant conversation which involved me facetiming with one of Sarah’s relatives while lying naked on the bed. Seamlessly moved to lots more kissing and cuddling, more OW, really cool doggie with awesome booty shaking, sex over the sink basin with more booty shaking and fairly hard banging, sex over the toilet and myself calling time on the action. Charming farewell and very tempted to run back.

£170 for 60 minutes


Offline Animalbeast

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 211
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
Always been tempted but put off by filtered photos, How accurate are pics to real life?
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Stanford97

Always been tempted but put off by filtered photos, How accurate are pics to real life?
I’d say if you look at the gallery photos, the first one with her on all fours is about bang on although her smile looks a bit odd in the photo and she was very cool and relaxed in person. The first and third photos in the gallery called ‘sexy’ were also very accurate.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2020, 09:29:57 pm by Stanford97 »

Offline magnetico

Nice review.
Would she charge extra to skip OW and be 100% OWO?

Online stewpid

Nice review.
Would she charge extra to skip OW and be 100% OWO?

Didn't do OW with me, strange thing that while we were fucking she changed the condom a few times but during each change I got OWO so I wasn't complaining.  :wacko:

Offline Stanford97

Didn't do OW with me, strange thing that while we were fucking she changed the condom a few times but during each change I got OWO so I wasn't complaining.  :wacko:
I hadn’t washed my cock for a while and couldn’t remember if I’d done it thoroughly. My bad perhaps.

Offline Stanford97

« Last Edit: September 28, 2020, 10:11:19 pm by Stanford97 »

Offline Stanford97

Always been tempted but put off by filtered photos, How accurate are pics to real life?
I noticed a video here:
External Link/Members Only


Offline The Night King

Such a fit SP  :wacko: She could suck a golf ball through a hosepipe at a hundred yards  :wackogirl:

Must book a return visit at some point!