VoluptuousVicki82

[rogerr36]

Hi has anyone seen this one? I remember a profile from before from same person. always a concern when a new account gets set up.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[MME]

bare backer and a big unit, face looks familiar to me but can't seem to place where from.

[AgedCases]

I book noone with anger and/or bareback within their profile.

[datwabbit]

I book noone with anger and/or bareback within their profile.

Given she does BB I don't believe she is complaining about this forum. Interesting that she mentions being a mother but doesn't seem to compute the risk to her health.

I agree on both your negatives. BB or not, I don't see the point of using the aw profile to complain about what people say. Does make me think that the meeting will involve paying to listen to moaning as well.

[The Outsider]

Any marketing material that effectively starts with "fuck off and stop annoying me" is going to struggle to get the desired outcome.  Luckily it's no loss on this occasion because of the bareback. 

[tynetunnel]

So many reasons to avoid this one! Let’s start with all the CAPITAL LETTERS! WHY IS SHE SHOUTING?

If she’s unhappy with being messaged at “all hours of the night” spend £20 and buy a cheap phone and a payg sim, and have a ‘work’ phone. Then she can turn it off when she’s not working

Apparently the private gallery is “ONLY 5 Credits”. Except it’s not, it’s 6.00 credits 

If you don't confirm at least 24 hours in advance “YOU WILL BE TAKEN OUT” which seems a bit extreme, nobody wants to be killed for not confirming a booking. 

Oh and then the elephant in the room, besides the WG, is bareback 

Like I have said before, this is the WG’s shop window on the world, the place to really sell herself to you, the aspiring punter. This profile is so dictatorial, so defensive, SO SHOUTY, it could’ve been written by Gerald Ratner himself! 

[bigkstyle]

Definitely one to avoid. Absolutely nothing on her profile is remotely tempting