Latina SophieSophie- Heathrow- an actual beauty

[sasuke9801]

First review on a UK sp so be patient with me.


The original plan was to see Arabian Kitten but her comms are HORRIBLE. So I decided to visit Sophie instead, cause I fancied the way she looked.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Comms

I asked her a few questions and I opted for an hour with fk and owo extras so that was £190. Her comms were pretty good, replies came after 5/6 minutes at most.


Location


The meet was around Heathrow in her 1 bedroom flat, which was very clean itself but the building itself seemed a-bit run down.


The meet

Services: owo, LFK, RO, spanking, protected penetration

So she told me to call her when I arrived then gave me her flat number, I hadn't even knocked on her door and the door opened so Im guessing she didn't want any noise. She gave the classic hide around the door move aswell but once we got out the dark hallway and I could actually see her, my jaw dropped. I found her very very attractive, with an amazing body, tall, smooth with pierced nipples, she looked amazing and pretty much exactly like her photos. But here is where stuff started going abit average.

I went to the bathroom to wash my hands and when I came back, I took my clothes off and she went on to use like 6 wipes on my dick, which was already clean by the way as I had showered right before I came but oh well. The owo was lack lustre as she only took half the tip to the full tip in without any real suction but the way she looks at you during it is enough to really get me going. I then asked if I could RO, to which she agreed but she said only licking which took a lot of the fun out of it but she had an amazing looking pussy and asshole and tasted very very good, I should have asked if rimming was allowed but I doubt it to be honest. After a couple minutes I suggested we start so she rubbers me up and we go on to recycling through positions. This was okay but she kept putting her hand the on base of my dick or putting her hand on my chest/stomach to stop me going to full length as she said it was sore. Her perky, and very well done nipples were also lick only which again, took alot of fun out of it as I really wanted to suck on them.

Only position I could really get into was doggy as her voice really came out and I could go quite deep, could feel that I was close so I pulled of the condom and had her suck me till I came (although she did wipe it with like 3 wipes beforehand which was annoying). I finished on her chest as she said cim and facial is not allowed at all when I messaged her beforehand.


She ended up giving me a small massage and talking about random stuff before I initiated a 2nd round, which she got into alot more (owo was still weak) but I could tell she knew I liked the look of her snatch and arsehole because she spread her cheeks and looked at me when I was nailing her but unfortunately the 2nd shot wasnt coming so we left it at that. She didn't complain and really tried though so I can't fault her commitment there.


Final thoughts

I shouldn't of went for the owo because it wasnt that great, but I enjoyed the LFK (she said she didnt do DFK) although you can tell her lips were done as they felt slightly weird.
The hand on cock/ chest was really annoying but she agreed to any position I wanted to put her in without complaining or rolling her eyes, so attitude wasnt a problem at all.
The whole meeting felt abit weird as I am used to the sp taking a bit more action but I had to completely lead her and it felt very impersonal like the moment I came, there was no cuddle or relaxing, it was straight away "do you want a massage" which ended by being quite a shit massage anyway. and also I dont really appreciate having my dick wet wiped every 20 seconds like 5 times. I think the main place I went wrong in, is that it should have been half an hour instead of an hour because her as a 30 minute meet would probably be better

Also on text, I requested an outfit but she wasn't wearing it which was a shame but again she looked good regardless so I wasnt too fussed.

I was borderline between positive and neutral but as she was so attractive and tried to get a second shot out of me that I gave her the positive.


Would I return: maybe for 30 mins but as im new to punting, I think I want to see what else is on offer elsewhere


Sorry about the long read and if I jumped about abit. If anyone has any suggestions for girls I should see next who are attractive/good looking and willing to really get to business then let me know pls

[sasuke9801]

also forgot to say the meet happened yesterday

[kuck]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[kuck]

Post-op?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=67631.msg2521339#msg2521339

[Jardent6]

Post-op?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=67631.msg2521339#msg2521339

And thats exactly why I don't punt girls with fake tits especially from the South americas region .

[golden bull]

Lol😆😆😆😆😆😆😂😂😂....

I didn’t want to say anything but look at the hands on some of those pics...... defo give away mans hands.

Especially the veiny ones.

[Jerk Chicken]

S/he looks a mess 

[sasuke9801]

I saw people say she might be a post op but everything seemed fine to me to be honest, her face seems a lot more angular in photos and is a lot more feminine in person, but everyone can have their own opinion

[foobarbaz]

Ended up on this thread while I was on the search of a post-op (because reasons) and once more I can’t resist the urge to say that judging whether a woman is a post-op based on hands, jaw lines, and so forth is a really bad method. There are many reasons why a biological woman can end up having androgynous features. The real give away is the actual fake pussy, that’s what you really have to watch out for and If you can’t tell a part a real one from a fake one, well, then you didn’t really pay enough attention all this time. Emmydray, in my reviews is a good example, everyone alluding she was a post-op while she is instead 100% the real deal. For the skeptics, I have been also with post-ops and you can definitely experience the difference.

Sure, you can tell me better be safe than sorry, I’ll give you that, but at the same time you can miss out on great opportunities that way. So the question is really for the OP, did her peach looked legit? Did she get wet? Often post-op applies lube pre punt to fake it, but if you lick them you’ll know for sure... there you have it. Again I apologies but I dislike poor stereotypes.

[Stealthmode]

Ended up on this thread while I was on the search of a post-op (because reasons) and once more I can’t resist the urge to say that judging whether a woman is a post-op based on hands, jaw lines, and so forth is a really bad method. There are many reasons why a biological woman can end up having androgynous features. The real give away is the actual fake pussy, that’s what you really have to watch out for and If you can’t tell a part a real one from a fake one, well, then you didn’t really pay enough attention all this time. Emmydray, in my reviews is a good example, everyone alluding she was a post-op while she is instead 100% the real deal. For the skeptics, I have been also with post-ops and you can definitely experience the difference.

Sure, you can tell me better be safe than sorry, I’ll give you that, but at the same time you can miss out on great opportunities that way. So the question is really for the OP, did her peach looked legit? Did she get wet? Often post-op applies lube pre punt to fake it, but if you lick them you’ll know for sure... there you have it. Again I apologies but I dislike poor stereotypes.

All well and good for someone who doesn’t mind fucking guys, but for the rest of us, it is better to be safe than sorry.

Your ‘fool proof method’ would mean you’ve already touch/licked/sucked/fucked the ‘fake’ pussy. I think it would be a bit to late to protest then.

[golden bull]

Sure it’s difficult to be 100% certain whether a she is a he but when more than one sign suggests it I’ll keep well away.
A lot of the time you have to get pretty close to examine the lady which is near impossible from pictures.

But what I can do visually is:
1) look at hands.
2) look at face... angular and masculine high eyebrows are give aways...... this lady if you imagine without hair looks like a bloke.
3) look at body..... a female usually have a hour glass figure whereas a man usually have a v shape.
Also note the shoulder to hip ratio.... shoulders broader than hip is a giveaway.

Non visual apart from checking the pussy you can check the voice...a falsetto voice is a sign.
Also there’s an elbow test but it’s only about 90% accurate.

Imo she ticked all my visual boxes as a trans and will not risk finding out as it’s not my thing but it’s ok if you’re ok with it.

[kuck]

There ought to be an instant dna sex test. Feed in a strand of hair and it flashes pink or blue.

[Stealthmode]

There ought to be an instant dna sex test. Feed in a strand of hair and it flashes pink or blue.

i would drop money on that kit in a heartbeat

[foobarbaz]

All well and good for someone who doesn’t mind fucking guys, but for the rest of us, it is better to be safe than sorry.

Your ‘fool proof method’ would mean you’ve already touch/licked/sucked/fucked the ‘fake’ pussy. I think it would be a bit to late to protest then.

Absolutely, I said the same, better be safe then sorry, my only point was that it's unfair to judge a book by his cover because the cover can be very misleasing, simply that.

[foobarbaz]

Imo she ticked all my visual boxes as a trans and will not risk finding out as it’s not my thing but it’s ok if you’re ok with it.

I do understand where you are coming from and I used to be the same... then I let it go. Each on their own of course which is the secret of personal life enjoyment. For instance this one https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=270267.0 had all the sign and she was labelled as post-op on here, I ended up toftt and she turned out to be one of the best fuck I had

She was raised in Portugal which for many can be already ring an alarm for association with Brazil somehow but she is actually Russian which is where the slender figure and sharp features are coming from.

On this specific one the OP is the only one who can rule out one or the other.

[foobarbaz]

i would drop money on that kit in a heartbeat

I'd love one of those for STDs, that worries me more

[Stealthmode]

Absolutely, I said the same, better be safe then sorry, my only point was that it's unfair to judge a book by his cover because the cover can be very misleasing, simply that.

For those who dont want to fuck a man, they will lose more sleep worring about someone who,  post punt may turn out to be a post op, rather than missing out on a good opportunity with a 100% female.

At least that how I feel. There is 1000s of options on AW alone. Why risk it with someone you have doubts about. Just because your ok with shagging dudes, you can be nonchalant about it. For the reat of us, it will hunt us forever most likely.


You seem more concerned about promoting those you fucked who turned out, in your opinion, to be female. I would has why do you keep risking punting with those with doubts, but the answer is, you are comfortable either way.

[Bornslippy]

it seems that when it comes to Brazilian girls there are many that are debatable post op. I no longer include Brazilian girls (if thats what they actually are) in my searches, as any slight doubt in my mind would stop me raising to the occasion.
sorry. men ain't my thing at all

[winkywanky]

Ended up on this thread while I was on the search of a post-op (because reasons) and once more I can’t resist the urge to say that judging whether a woman is a post-op based on hands, jaw lines, and so forth is a really bad method. There are many reasons why a biological woman can end up having androgynous features. The real give away is the actual fake pussy, that’s what you really have to watch out for and If you can’t tell a part a real one from a fake one, well, then you didn’t really pay enough attention all this time. Emmydray, in my reviews is a good example, everyone alluding she was a post-op while she is instead 100% the real deal. For the skeptics, I have been also with post-ops and you can definitely experience the difference.

Sure, you can tell me better be safe than sorry, I’ll give you that, but at the same time you can miss out on great opportunities that way. So the question is really for the OP, did her peach looked legit? Did she get wet? Often post-op applies lube pre punt to fake it, but if you lick them you’ll know for sure... there you have it. Again I apologies but I dislike poor stereotypes.

Personally, I enjoy seeing Trans girls as well as Cisgirls. Subsequently there isn't the absolute dread for me, of seeing someone who's had a sex change. But let me say, I do understand that dread for someone who simply doesn't want to see someone who was born as a guy, and for a post-op WG to advertise as female is totally wrong. It's deception, pure and simple, and always totally unjustified.

Having said that, the level of laziness - or even ignorance - displayed here on the basis of some very dubious gender profiling - that's what it is - is almost laughable.

The person in this profile has what might be considered a masculine face. For sure. But to then go on to add a list of other stuff to simply fit in with a first impression, is just plain wrong.

Fake tits and from South America: try finding a South American WG that hasn't got fake tits.

'Veiny hands'?  Skinny people got veiny hands. Even girls sometimes. Her hands aren't that big, they're long and slender.

And the comments about some guys not caring about fucking other guys? For starters, to simply call a post-op a guy is pretty unfair...they're so keen to be a woman they have their cock and balls cut off. Seems a tad harsh? They're Trans girls (either pre or post-op). Not that it matters a flying fuck (and I don't really give a shit), but whether or not someone who likes fucking Trans girls as well as Cisgirls is technically bisexual is a moot point.

Previous reviewers have commented on her 'naturally wet pussy', and have gone down on her. All have fucked her.

However good a surgeon is, someone would have noticed something amiss if this was a post-op girl.

From what I can see the girl has a face not unlike Polly Harvey. Perhaps not the 'prettiest', striking and masculine. But she's a woman, born as a woman. Similarly, some guys are 'pretty boys', go figure.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[foobarbaz]

Hey WW thanks a lot for chipping in, you perfectly and flawlessly summarised what I was trying to convey myself, simply the words didn't came out as eloquently as yours.

[winkywanky]

I only got O Level at English?   

[foobarbaz]

I only got O Level at English?   

Possibly, certainly I don't, I'm a bloody damn foreigner

[winkywanky]

Possibly, certainly I don't, I'm a bloody damn foreigner

I have to say, your English is better than most of the natives on here 

[Stealthmode]

Personally, I enjoy seeing Trans girls as well as Cisgirls. Subsequently there isn't the absolute dread for me, of seeing someone who's had a sex change. But let me say, I do understand that dread for someone who simply doesn't want to see someone who was born as a guy, and for a post-op WG to advertise as female is totally wrong. It's deception, pure and simple, and always totally unjustified.

Having said that, the level of laziness - or even ignorance - displayed here on the basis of some very dubious gender profiling - that's what it is - is almost laughable.

The person in this profile has what might be considered a masculine face. For sure. But to then go on to add a list of other stuff to simply fit in with a first impression, is just plain wrong.

Fake tits and from South America: try finding a South American WG that hasn't got fake tits.

'Veiny hands'?  Skinny people got veiny hands. Even girls sometimes. Her hands aren't that big, they're long and slender.

And the comments about some guys not caring about fucking other guys? For starters, to simply call a post-op a guy is pretty unfair...they're so keen to be a woman they have their cock and balls cut off. Seems a tad harsh? They're Trans girls (either pre or post-op). Not that it matters a flying fuck (and I don't really give a shit), but whether or not someone who likes fucking Trans girls as well as Cisgirls is technically bisexual is a moot point.

Previous reviewers have commented on her 'naturally wet pussy', and have gone down on her. All have fucked her.

However good a surgeon is, someone would have noticed something amiss if this was a post-op girl.

From what I can see the girl has a face not unlike Polly Harvey. Perhaps not the 'prettiest', striking and masculine. But she's a woman, born as a woman. Similarly, some guys are 'pretty boys', go figure.

Hidden Image/Members Only

I see them as men, hence why I dont partake. You see them as female, Trans, T-Girl, whatever you want to call them. You are more than free to fuck who ever you choose to, and this site has made great strides in seperating those who do. Which is appreciated. 

But, not all of us feel the same. So any seed of doubt will be off putting, will that mean I miss out on those who are 100% female and been misgendered, yes.  But the peace of mind is worth it. you are right about those being deceptive, but unfortunately that is rife. If it wasnt, then we wouldn’t even need to have this discussion, as I would simple filter them out in my search.

I was simply pointing out the flawed suggestion licking/exploring the ‘pussy’ first before you past judgement. That ridiculous.

[foobarbaz]

I have to say, your English is better than most of the natives on here 

Thank you sir

[winkywanky]

I see them as men, hence why I dont partake. You see them as female, Trans, T-Girl, whatever you want to call them. You are more than free to fuck who ever you choose to, and this site has made great strides in seperating those who do. Which is approciated.

But, not all of us feel the same. So any seed of doubt will be off putting, will that mean I miss out on those who are 100% female and been misgendered, yes.  But the peace of mind is worth it. you are right about those being deceptive, but unfortunately that is rife. If it wasnt, then we wouldn’t even need to have this discussion, as I would simple filter them out in my search.

That's fair enough.

But do you not agree that all the above gender profilng in this thread is potentially misleading bollocks?

Bollocks, which will fuck up her business unjustifiably and unnecessarily?

[Stealthmode]

That's fair enough.

But do you not agree that all the above gender profilng in this thread is potentially misleading bollocks?

Bollocks, which will fuck up her business unjustifiably and unnecessarily?

Yes. I’ve had it on one of my reviews. But i totally understand, once its been pointed out, its very heard to unsee it and push past it.

[winkywanky]

 

[arrow0404]

I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder

[winkywanky]

That's always true, and never more so than in the world of Punting.

But casually casting aspersions about a WG's gender willy-nilly (pun fully intended), is little better than starting a baseless rumour that they do bareback or are harbouring an STI.

[kuck]

I was considering seeing them, and after this review I was sure. Then I searched the AW number on here...
I'd not have a problem if she had a dick at some point in her life if I didn't know about it, or found out after the act. I've figured out later at least once, and that hasn't bothered me much. Those were my rookie days and I remember the sensation of brushing against her shaved face and not having a thought in my head 

Don't think I'd willingly walk in with doubt in my mind. So @WW, you're right this discussion does cost her business, sadly.

[Gambitman92]

Lol😆😆😆😆😆😆😂😂😂....

I didn’t want to say anything but look at the hands on some of those pics...... defo give away mans hands.

Especially the veiny ones.

Veins/being vascular are to do with genetics and also how lean you are, not if you're born male or female. If you went to the gym or were lean then you'd know that.

All well and good for someone who doesn’t mind fucking guys, but for the rest of us, it is better to be safe than sorry.

Your ‘fool proof method’ would mean you’ve already touch/licked/sucked/fucked the ‘fake’ pussy. I think it would be a bit to late to protest then.

Big difference between being safe and being paranoid. She looks 100% like a woman, born female.

People can see who they like but the amount of women here being labelled as trans is really stupid and they're based on nothing.

[winkywanky]

I was considering seeing them, and after this review I was sure. Then I searched the AW number on here...
I'd not have a problem if she had a dick at some point in her life if I didn't know about it, or found out after the act. I've figured out later at least once, and that hasn't bothered me much. Those were my rookie days and I remember the sensation of brushing against her shaved face and not having a thought in my head 

Don't think I'd willingly walk in with doubt in my mind. So @WW, you're right this discussion does cost her business, sadly.

What I find amazing is the gormless, ill-informed comments about her fake tits and hands. They're meaningless. Several guys have seen her and fucked her, and some have gone down on her. Unless I missed something none of them made any adverse comments.

[Stealthmode]

Veins/being vascular are to do with genetics and also how lean you are, not if you're born male or female. If you went to the gym or were lean then you'd know that.


Big difference between being safe and being paranoid. She looks 100% like a woman, born female.

People can see who they like but the amount of women here being labelled as trans is really stupid and they're based on nothing.

Can you say, with what has been brought up, that this is a female 100%?

Paranoid would mean I wouldnt see anyone with surgery or south american (I’ve seen plenty from SA and enhanced) . Incidentally I never said this particular WG was Trans or not. What irked me whas how nonchalant about a potential TS some guys on here were being. One suggested you should examine the pussy FIRST, then make your mind up. Can you imagine telling a WG you are going to do that  first.

How I interpret it is that some guys want validation that what they chose to fuck is fine. Trans or not.

[foobarbaz]

That's not what I suggested, what I did say is inferring a woman is a post-op trans simply based on her look rather than her surgical vaginal is rather superficial and, as it was mentioned by other, quite detrimental to the business of the working girl who doesn't deserve to be called out and labelled without proper evidence.

[Stealthmode]

That's not what I suggested, what I did say is inferring a woman is a post-op trans simply based on her look rather than her surgical vaginal is rather superficial and, as it was mentioned by other, quite detrimental to the business of the working girl who doesn't deserve to be called out and labelled without proper evidence.

is this a punter’s forum or are we trying to increase the WG bank balance.

Unless we kindly ask her if we can have a poke and feel, then unfortunately we only have pictures to go by, my bias will alway be to the punter. Now being malicious is another matter, but there is a fine line. Too many of the TS’s lie unfortunately and rely on no one calling them out.

So what is your preference, punters unknowingly parting with their hard earn cash with someone who tricked them, or the WG loses out on a few potential clients because of it.

I personally dont think she looks TS, i didnt get that vibe, but if someone has a suspicion, then they should be free to air that with the caveat that its just a suspicion. Obviously someone who has seen her words will hold more weight. Then I can make a more informed decision.

[foobarbaz]

is this a punter’s forum or are we trying to increase the WG bank balance.

Unless we kindly ask her if we can have a poke and feel, then unfortunately we only have pictures to go by, my bias will alway be to the punter. Now being malicious is another matter, but there is a fine line. Too many of the TS’s lie unfortunately and rely on no one calling them out.

So what is your preference, punters unknowingly parting with their hard earn cash with someone who tricked them, or the WG loses out on a few potential clients because of it.

I personally dont think she looks TS, i didnt get that vibe, but if someone has a suspicion, then they should be free to air that with the caveat that its just a suspicion. Obviously someone who has seen her words will hold more weight. Then I can make a more informed decision.

I do care about the punters of course, otherwise I wouldn't bother to write reviews, I was simply rectifying your statement because it wasn't reflecting what I wrote.

It's definitely a punting forum that, for as long as I've been here has been based on solid, factual and reliable first hand experience of the many active punters who are contributing all the time, rather than a far fetched "Oh she has veiny hands she is a bloke". Yet, it wasn't a case that I repeated twice it should be the OP place to kindly clarify based on their personal experience that will then add to the one of the others as WW highlighted already too. I'm not arguing on the fact people shouldn't stay on the side of caution when in doubt, but personally I would have preferred to see a direct question to the punter rather than three post inferring the she was a man, just that, I think it's a fair ask in order to keep the quality of the forum high. My personal opinion of course.

So to answer your question, I'd rather give credit where credit is due and have a punters make a properly informed decision not based on a mere speculations.

By the way, thanks for the healthy debate.

[Prince]

Best way is to put them on their side and do a deep rectal digital examination for a prostate gland.

 

P

[Stealthmode]

I do care about the punters of course, otherwise I wouldn't bother to write reviews, I was simply rectifying your statement because it wasn't reflecting what I wrote.

It's definitely a punting forum that, for as long as I've been here has been based on solid, factual and reliable first hand experience of the many active punters who are contributing all the time, rather than a far fetched "Oh she has veiny hands she is a bloke". Yet, it wasn't a case that I repeated twice it should be the OP place to kindly clarify based on their personal experience that will then add to the one of the others as WW highlighted already too. I'm not arguing on the fact people shouldn't stay on the side of caution when in doubt, but personally I would have preferred to see a direct question to the punter rather than three post inferring the she was a man, just that, I think it's a fair ask in order to keep the quality of the forum high. My personal opinion of course.

So to answer your question, I'd rather give credit where credit is due and have a punters make a properly informed decision not based on a mere speculations.

By the way, thanks for the healthy debate.

We are all adults and as grown ups we should be able to decide if we want to go with what someone who has actually seen the WG has assessed or someone going just by the pictures. Sometimes they are valid accusations others times they will be wild and off the mark. Ultimately its up to each individual to make his mind up. Hands, structure, height, these are all things I look for. More often than not we’ll probably be wrong and it was our minds playing tricks, but reverting to my initial comment, its better to be safe than sorry.

Peter Purves (he is missed) is a perfect example, he was gutted he was duped and everyone reasured him, but you can tell it effected him. Those are the cases I dont like reading about. For those who are not trouble by it, then its a learn and not a big deal.

either way, it don’t necessarily agree with a witch hunt with little to no proof, but we live in an age where pictures are easily fabricated, you soon start doubting what you see.

[foobarbaz]

Agreed

[RegionalAndy]

This review has turned into something! I have seen and reviewed Sophie. I’ve slept with many women in my years, if she is in fact a he I really give it to her/him. I analysed her body and got no TS vibes. This isn’t my portion one bit but consequently the most experienced can still be duped. However like some have stated if one feels happy with their experience they’re happy. Women come in all shapes and sizes and this person is no different. Her service is enjoyable and she cake across as a great provider to me. Even if she does come out or irrefutable evidence shows she once was a he. It is what it is (which is a disgusting liar that shouldn’t be deceiving clients) but we live and learn.

[foobarbaz]

This review has turned into something! I have seen and reviewed Sophie. I’ve slept with many women in my years, if she is in fact a he I really give it to her/him. I analysed her body and got no TS vibes. This isn’t my portion one bit but consequently the most experienced can still be duped. However like some have stated if one feels happy with their experience they’re happy. Women come in all shapes and sizes and this person is no different. Her service is enjoyable and she cake across as a great provider to me. Even if she does come out or irrefutable evidence shows she once was a he. It is what it is (which is a disgusting liar that shouldn’t be deceiving clients) but we live and learn.

Thanks a lot for reporting your experience and shed some light on the matter, appreciated.

[JonasG]

Even with you paying extra for FK it still being LFK is a joke.

This seems more like a neutral to me.

[sunnyj]

I saw people say she might be a post op but everything seemed fine to me to be honest, her face seems a lot more angular in photos and is a lot more feminine in person, but everyone can have their own opinion

Thanks OP for the clarification. 

I do understand where you are coming from and I used to be the same... then I let it go. Each on their own of course which is the secret of personal life enjoyment. For instance this one https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=270267.0 had all the sign and she was labelled as post-op on here, I ended up toftt and she turned out to be one of the best fuck I had

She was raised in Portugal which for many can be already ring an alarm for association with Brazil somehow but she is actually Russian which is where the slender figure and sharp features are coming from.

On this specific one the OP is the only one who can rule out one or the other.

+1

Personally, I enjoy seeing Trans girls as well as Cisgirls. Subsequently there isn't the absolute dread for me, of seeing someone who's had a sex change. But let me say, I do understand that dread for someone who simply doesn't want to see someone who was born as a guy, and for a post-op WG to advertise as female is totally wrong. It's deception, pure and simple, and always totally unjustified.

Having said that, the level of laziness - or even ignorance - displayed here on the basis of some very dubious gender profiling - that's what it is - is almost laughable.

The person in this profile has what might be considered a masculine face. For sure. But to then go on to add a list of other stuff to simply fit in with a first impression, is just plain wrong.

Fake tits and from South America: try finding a South American WG that hasn't got fake tits.

'Veiny hands'?  Skinny people got veiny hands. Even girls sometimes. Her hands aren't that big, they're long and slender.

And the comments about some guys not caring about fucking other guys? For starters, to simply call a post-op a guy is pretty unfair...they're so keen to be a woman they have their cock and balls cut off. Seems a tad harsh? They're Trans girls (either pre or post-op). Not that it matters a flying fuck (and I don't really give a shit), but whether or not someone who likes fucking Trans girls as well as Cisgirls is technically bisexual is a moot point.

Previous reviewers have commented on her 'naturally wet pussy', and have gone down on her. All have fucked her.

However good a surgeon is, someone would have noticed something amiss if this was a post-op girl.

From what I can see the girl has a face not unlike Polly Harvey. Perhaps not the 'prettiest', striking and masculine. But she's a woman, born as a woman. Similarly, some guys are 'pretty boys', go figure.

Hidden Image/Members Only

+1
I don't punt Tans girls (pre-op or post-op), I don't call Trans girl a guy or refer her as "him" and I do fully agree that a post-op WG advertising as female is wrong.