Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Milf Eva Beaconsfield  (Read 8126 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5649026) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline Big adventure

Saw this lady yesterday, for the past two years I have either been too broke to punt or been deceived, ripped off or rushed usually all three. It's become so bad I have been vanilla dating for the first time in years but the absence of good sex had a devastating effect on my confidence. Money was saved during lockdown and a plan was formed to find a lady who looked like my vanilla girlfriend and buy myself a much needed confidence boost.
Eva is certainly not cheap nor local to me but her profile  intrigued me enough to buy her Private AW Gallery, once I had seen her face and body pictures as well as noticing how kinky some of them were in comparison to her sparse sensibly worded profile I knew she was worth contacting. Of course after a chain of horrific punts I sensibly looked for her on UKM and felt pleased I could TOFTT.
I use Public transport and Eva is a £10 taxi from Beaconsfield Station it's not something one could walk to but a very secluded, well appointed and secure premises. She has only recently moved there and everything is spotless and new. We sorted everything in a few texts on the day Eva made me feel comfortable straight away and offered me a drink and shower- even taking the time to show me how the shower worked. If anybody thinks this is a fluffy AW style review ask yourselves how often that has happened during a punt. Eva looked beautiful in an outfit I had not seen before in her pictures, there was no rushing we simply small talked and I got to begin touching her amazing breasts. She told me more about herself and her extensive toy collection, something she is very passionate about. Eva talks about Eva very well she is very intelligent, unguarded with a proper dirty imagination and a real love of sex in all it's manifestations. Soon the talking got dirtier and she climbed on top giving me an amazing view of her breasts, unlike a lot of ladies with piercings she encourages you to have a good play and obviously gets off on having her tits fondled and admired. I am in my fifties and take a little time but Eva was more than patient guiding my hand to feel her long, soft curtains. Eva was getting very wet as I gently rubbed her clit and was soon riding me hard her slim figure and quality mattress combining to allow maximum bounce with minimum squeak and clank. I'm crap at that position and after a brief, unexpected and very sexy snog we switched to doggie and poor Eva got to earn really earn her money as those nifty new circular sildenafil began to take full effect. Even after a long hard pounding Eva was eager to please turning her head to make eye contact and encouraging me to feel her huge tits. It was time for a break and Eva proved a great listener and conversationalist. With almost every escort i have seen it would be about time to start pulling the socks on and saying goodbyes but Eva was having none of that and was soon oiling her tits up and playing with a Hitachi wand to great effect, it would have been rude to not join in and soon I was fucking Eva in her posh bum and groping her oiled tits to a resounding climax. Somehow it gets a bit blurry at this point but Eva proves herself in the non clockwatcher  hall of fame by getting a third load from my by now permahard cock and rubbing it in her oiled and juicy pierced tits. Then it's more chat and a shower, E :coolgirl:va noticing I got a cab to her kindly phones me one and it's a smooth ride to London, it's amazing how three or four bad punts can destroy your sexual ID but it only takes one good one to fill it again.  :coolgirl: :yahoo:https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=5649026


1 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline The_Don

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

    
+447546224839

Quote
"A" Levels (at discretion)
CIM (at discretion)
Dinner Dates
Massage
Oral without (at discretion)
Penetration (Protected)
Pussy Pumping
Toys

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline The_Don

« Last Edit: August 07, 2020, 06:47:05 am by The_Don »

Offline tobyk1

Nice review thanks! Was OWO & CIM on offer?
Banned reason: Posting on 2 accounts
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Big adventure

No idea sorry didn't ask, there's a difference between occasional mouth to genital contact to erotically heighten a situation and a full on balls to the wall nosh fest;love the former can't imagine having to wrap my lips round a huge schlong for a full hour though so as always be specific with any requests. The best thing about my visit was she was open to everything I asked and friendly with it. Like every cliche came true at once "It was like we were old friends within moments of meeting"

Offline advent2016

There's something wrong with this report other than the readability. Is it "Hello, Eva" or something else?

I'll give the OP the benefit of the doubt, though I too would like too know if she offers OWO, CIM and Snowball.

Offline tobyk1

No idea sorry didn't ask, there's a difference between occasional mouth to genital contact to erotically heighten a situation and a full on balls to the wall nosh fest;love the former can't imagine having to wrap my lips round a huge schlong for a full hour though so as always be specific with any requests. The best thing about my visit was she was open to everything I asked and friendly with it. Like every cliche came true at once "It was like we were old friends within moments of meeting"

Lol. Interesting response
Banned reason: Posting on 2 accounts
Banned by: daviemac

Offline contentguy

There's something wrong with this report other than the readability. Is it "Hello, Eva" or something else?

I'll give the OP the benefit of the doubt, though I too would like too know if she offers OWO, CIM and Snowball.

Agree, with the "Hello Eva", though strange that the profile's been here since 2016 and comments on a couple of SPs.
My "Hello Eva" radar was reinforced by "his" comment above: "...can't imagine having to wrap my lips round a huge schlong for a full hour though so as always be specific with any requests. "

As a straight bloke, I wouldn't want to think about doing that - not sure why "he" would, unless he has varied tastes.
And the "always be specific with any requests" is in the voice of an SP.

And that wasn't the question, it was "CIM and OWO", who mentioned anything that about...  I don't want to think about it.

But it doesn't matter, she's way too old for my tastes and at £200 an hour, delusional too.

Sorry Eva.

Guy
« Last Edit: August 07, 2020, 10:49:06 am by contentguy »

Offline DrConners

As a straight bloke, I wouldn't want to think about doing that - not sure why "he" would, unless he has varied tastes.
And the "always be specific with any requests" is in the voice of an SP.

But it doesn't matter, she's way too old for my tastes and at £200 an hour, delusional too.

Sorry Eva.

Guy

The terminology he (?) has chosen to use is female orientated - No bloke speaks like this  :dash: Unless he got her to proof read it first  :sarcastic:

If anybody thinks this is a fluffy AW style review ask yourselves how often that has happened during a punt.

It is.

Quote
Eva looked beautiful in an outfit I had not seen before in her pictures, there was no rushing we simply small talked and I got to begin touching her amazing breasts.

Quote
Eva talks about Eva very well she is very intelligent,

guiding my hand to feel her long, soft curtains.

I was fucking Eva in her posh bum and groping her oiled tits to a resounding climax.

Long, soft curtains  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: AND A POSH BUM  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: :lol:

Cheers for the review OP.

I'll give this skinny old granny with too much filler in her lips a pass thanks  :hi:

Oh - You are allowed to use paragraphs when writing reviews you know.

Offline Wadebridge

14 times in post #1
Hidden Image/Members Only
Actually it's 15 times if you count the E  :coolgirl:  va in line 42.
@The_Don, and your point is?
I don't think there's any reason to arouse suspicion.  The OP has posts from a couple of years ago, so it hardly seems likely that it's Eva in disguise.
Saw this lady yesterday, for the past two years I have either been too broke to punt or been deceived, ripped off or rushed usually all three ...
Money was saved during lockdown and a plan was formed to find a lady who looked like my vanilla girlfriend and buy myself a much needed confidence boost.
Eva is certainly not cheap nor local to me but her profile ...
I am in my fifties and take a little time but Eva was more than patient ...
we switched to doggie and poor Eva got to earn really earn her money as those nifty new circular sildenafil began to take full effect. Even after a long hard pounding ...
With almost every escort i have seen it would be about time to start pulling the socks on and saying goodbyes but Eva was having none of that and was soon oiling her tits up and playing with a Hitachi wand to great effect ...
it would have been rude to not join in and soon I was fucking Eva in her posh bum and groping her oiled tits to a resounding climax. Somehow it gets a bit blurry at this point but Eva proves herself in the non clockwatcher  hall of fame by getting a third load from my by now permahard cock and rubbing it in her oiled and juicy pierced tits...
Then it's more chat and a shower ...
Although the OP's review might come across as a bit fluffy in places I can't personally see any reason why it should've got The_Don's 'spidey senses' tingling.
She wouldn't be my cup of tea personally but ...
1. He states that she looked remarkably like a former or current girlfriend so that's the reason he singled her out.
2. He makes the point that it's justified sometimes travelling a long distance to see the right WG and if you're confident you'll get money's worth out of a punt. I've travelled a long way beyond reasonable to a punt before myself and I was not disappointed.
3. She was not a clock watcher and made him cum 3 times. That's not bad for a man in his fifties and, although the price tag seems a tad on the expensive side, the OP seemed to be fully sated and more than satisfied, so his punt, his money, his choice.
@BigAdventure, a minor point of advice fella.
Make use of the 'Preview' button to proof read your reviews or posts before submitting them. That way you'd have seen that the AW link didn't work, because there was no space between the previous yahoo emoji.
Then you could've corrected your post before posting and it mightn't have prompted Clouseau here, and other dimwit detectives like "James Japp" @Contentguy, to stick their misguided oar in.  :hi:
Banned reason: Posting on politics again despite previous 7 day ban.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline contentguy

detectives like "James Japp" @Contentguy, to stick their misguided oar in.  :hi:

You might not agree with me, that's your prerogative (look it up if you need to).

You're playing milk monitor again. I've suggested to you before (after you reviewed a well known barebacker and got upset when it was politely pointed out), you'd be happier on MumsN*t.

You say the post isn't from Eva.  Then you seem to have a change of heart, realise it's a woman and totally mansplain a load of drivel instructions to her.   :D

Guy  :hi:






Offline CheeseBoard

@BigAdventure

You mentioned you were too broke to punt and you saved money during lockdown (fair play).  You also provide good info that her place is a £10 taxi ride from Beaconsfield Station.  You go on to say you use public transport, but then say you got a 'cab' back to London...

How much was the taxi fare?  Its a good 45 mins in a car so considering you have been broke id have thought you'd have been more careful about the additional punting cost of travel.

I also think its written by or under guidance of the SP.  If she was as elegant and articulate as the SP says, her profile wouldn't be so sparse...

Offline brian1123

Pretty sure this lady used to be "Michelle" from Beaconsfield. She used to have a website and I saw her once in 2012.

Offline Wadebridge

You might not agree with me, that's your prerogative (look it up if you need to).
Sarcastic c*nt.  :cry:
You're playing milk monitor again. I've suggested to you before (after you reviewed a well known barebacker and got upset when it was politely pointed out), you'd be happier on MumsN*t.
Well if I were you I wouldn't bother 'suggesting' anything else to me. As if! I mean as though you misguidedly believe your big ego and inflated 'Billy Big Bollox' opinion of yourself might possibly have any influence on me, or my punting habits.
You're just an inconsequential,  hypocritical little worm.
You say the post isn't from Eva.  Then you seem to have a change of heart, realise it's a woman and totally mansplain a load of drivel instructions to her.   :D
Correct!
WTF are you going on about! I did not change my opinion, or have a 'change of heart'. I was simply pointing out that since the OP had historical posts from a couple of years ago it is unlikely that 'Eva' is the OP. It's silly that she would've registered on the forum two years ago and waited until now to write a review about herself.
Then I was mildly admonishing Clouseau (@The_Don) for readily jumping to dodgy conclusions, whilst at the same time flagging up your paranoid post jumping on the bandwagon.
If you fancy yourself as a dimwit detective @Contentguy, I'd politely suggest that you don't give up the day job.
Banned reason: Posting on politics again despite previous 7 day ban.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Charlie Chalk

Sarcastic c*nt. 
You're just an inconsequential,  hypocritical little worm.

Polite reminder about Site Rule 23:

23 Abuse towards other members
Discord must be kept civil. Excessive abuse/swearing is not acceptable. "You're acting like a twat" is not excessive, however, "you're a fucking inbred cunt" is excessive and is not acceptable. Bullying will result in a ban. Abuse to the Mod or Admin Team will result in a ban.

You might be sailing a bit close to the wind.

Offline Big adventure

I am grateful for Wadebridge's defense. I have been punting fairly constantly since the 1980s but about five years ago had to stop working due to a medical condition and have felt the full brunt of government Austerity measures since. Just to keep a roof over my head I have had to give up all of my previous habits and vices which at times resembled the more colourful sections of an Irvine Welsh book.
An old friend became my gf this year and I decided that I needed to build my confidence back again, it had been a long time since I used to make a point of fucking every girl twice at Lady Marmalades parties or that Gentlemans Party where I was the only punter there and had to satisfy three porn stars for four hours, believe me i lived the life but now I live a different one.
In 35 years I had only a handful of disappointing experiences I always checked for reviews and studied pictures carefully so it was a expensive shock to have my first two attempts one in march and one in june be complete disasters. Fortunately I picked well with the last dregs of my lockdown savings- I won't be punting again until christmas time sadly. Eva was a breath of fresh air after the first two, her profile is fairly new and I wanted to at least say something positive here because finding the quality of service and sexual openness I did seems very rare in her age group these days.

Offline Big adventure

@cheeseboard-sorry I was trying to avoid over explaining but that was a confusing bit-i got a cab back to the station and stepped straight on a nice empty train back to London.

Offline DrConners

Sarcastic c*nt. Well if I were you I wouldn't bother 'suggesting' anything else to me. As if! I mean as though you misguidedly believe your big ego and inflated 'Billy Big Bollox' opinion of yourself might possibly have any influence on me, or my punting habits.
You're just an inconsequential,  hypocritical little worm. Correct!
WTF are you going on about! I did not change my opinion, or have a 'change of heart'. I was simply pointing out that since the OP had historical posts from a couple of years ago it is unlikely that 'Eva' is the OP. It's silly that she would've registered on the forum two years ago and waited until now to write a review about herself.
Then I was mildly admonishing Clouseau (@The_Don) for readily jumping to dodgy conclusions, whilst at the same time flagging up your paranoid post jumping on the bandwagon.
If you fancy yourself as a dimwit detective @Contentguy, I'd politely suggest that you don't give up the day job.

Crikey George - Calm down  :D

Listen mate, he wasn't the only one to be concerned about the terminology used by the OP to describe her 'lady parts'.

I mean, you and me are talking about a girl I'm shagging (as blokes do) instead of telling you about how much she likes having her tits played with & how hard she likes to be fucked, or how tight or loose her pussy is I tell you she has "Long soft curtains & a posh bum too."

I wouldn't be surprised if you did a double take  :sarcastic: Do you know what I mean.

You have already been reminded of the rules, I'm not UKP police either - Just remember we are all on the same team mate  :hi:

As you can see the OP has now posted a reasonable explanation as to his review wording - It still sounds like something a female proof read first IMO.

Offline contentguy

Sarcastic c*nt.  :cry:Well if I were you I wouldn't bother 'suggesting' anything else to me. As if! I mean as though you misguidedly believe your big ego and inflated 'Billy Big Bollox' opinion of yourself might possibly have any influence on me, or my punting habits.
You're just an inconsequential,  hypocritical little worm. Correct!
WTF are you going on about! I did not change my opinion, or have a 'change of heart'. I was simply pointing out that since the OP had historical posts from a couple of years ago it is unlikely that 'Eva' is the OP. It's silly that she would've registered on the forum two years ago and waited until now to write a review about herself.
Then I was mildly admonishing Clouseau (@The_Don) for readily jumping to dodgy conclusions, whilst at the same time flagging up your paranoid post jumping on the bandwagon.
If you fancy yourself as a dimwit detective @Contentguy, I'd politely suggest that you don't give up the day job.

As vociferous as your post is, it’s not even accurate.

It wasn’t The_Don that first pointed out that the review looks like it was written by Eva, it was Advent2016. 
The_Don just pointed out that there are 14 instances of “Eva” in the review. 

I quoted Advent’s post, suggesting that it read as if it was written by a woman (it does). 
I also said it’s strange that the OP’s profile has been here since 2016 and that they had commented on other SPs. 
You then use that as “evidence” to point out how inaccurate my post is, which is just bonkers.

I wonder why you haven’t found it necessary to “mildly admonish” Advent or the good Doc. 

It seems you were having a bad day yesterday, I hope today is better for you.  Though, I do wonder why you decided to get all vitriolic over my post.  The only time I recall encountering you on here before is when you saw a known barebacker and you got a bit upset when it was pointed out to you.  I think you may have EAS for Sarah Bareback of Bracknell.

Anyway, let’s put it behind us, you’ve been admonished by respected members on here for breaking the forum rules.  I forgive you, but do try to realise that this is a discussion forum.  If you disagree with me, that doesn’t give you the entitlement to spew bilious vitriol at me.

Regards

Guy

PS: I hope that makes sense, and to show no hard feelings: External Link/Members Only

Offline Wadebridge

And that wasn't the question, it was "CIM and OWO", who mentioned anything that about...  I don't want to think about it.
But it doesn't matter, she's way too old for my tastes and at £200 an hour, delusional too.
Sorry Eva.
Guy
So, by your own admission, you've absolutely no interest in this WG. Neither her age, nor her prices do anything for you. Yet still you feel the need to open your cakehole and post a belittling response to the OP. To me at least, that comes across as the actions of an arsehole with an unhealthy desire to deliberately post antagonistic bait. Which, tbh, is the behaviour I've noticed in several of your posts lately over these last months.
For example, you point out that the OP has written a fluffy review, yet several of your own reviews come across as very fluffy indeed.
As vociferous as your post is, it’s not even accurate.
It wasn’t The_Don that first pointed out that the review looks like it was written by Eva, it was Advent2016. 
The_Don just pointed out that there are 14 instances of “Eva” in the review. 
Errr, excuse me, but it was.
It was @The_Don who said "Eva Eva Eva Eva Eva talks about Eva Eva Eva Eva Eva Eva".
I wonder why you haven’t found it necessary to “mildly admonish” Advent or the good Doc. 
I wonder if I'm the only one on this forum that found your phrase "The Good Doc" a little bit nauseating.  :vomit: :vomit:
I notice that Dr. Conners was the first member to come to your defence. It's almost as if you and @Dr. Conners now consider yourselves the new irresistible antagonistic 'double act'; the scourge and saviours of every fluffy or 'fake' post; since one half of @Finn5555 and @James999 retired after deciding their wooden act and partnership wasn't filling the concert halls any longer.
No offence taken. Have a good day.
 :hi:
Banned reason: Posting on politics again despite previous 7 day ban.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline DrConners

That's quite a vivid imagination you have.  :sarcastic:

Georgy Boy, I don't know what your problem is, I don't care - But you have a few issues by the sounds of it.

And by 'a few' I mean - Lots  :hi:

Offline advent2016

All I suggested was there might be something awry with the report and generate some discussion.

My understanding for the raison d'être of the forum is to share information and hopefully improve our punting experience by sharing reports  and by asking questions.



Offline contentguy

@ Wadebridge
I didn’t say the OP’s review was fluffy.  I thought it was written by a woman, as did others.  You said it was fluffy, did you forget that? : “Although the OP's review might come across as a bit fluffy in places”.

You have a strange attitude.  You’ve called me: “misguided”, “inconsequential”, “james japp”, “Billy Big Bollox”, “hypocritical little worm”, “paranoid “, “dimwit detective”, not to forget “Sarcastic c*nt”,  “arsehole “, and made reference to my “Cakehole”. 
And you say that I’m antagonistic!   :D

And it seems you’re being abusive towards me because I’ve posted on a forum about an SP I’m not going to see.  Though you said she wasn’t to your taste either when you posted “She wouldn't be my cup of tea personally but ...”.  How is your commenting in here different to my commenting? 

Anyway, there’s no mileage in arguing with stupid so I’ll leave you to rant in here.

Guy


Offline silk51

I must admit, the original review comes across as a bit fluffy, especially as this is your first one....
It would have helped if you had also added your recent bad punts you mentioned prior to this review!

Offline Wadebridge

But it doesn't matter, she's way too old for my tastes and at £200 an hour, delusional too.
Sorry Eva.
Guy
"And you say that I'm antagonistic". Well maybe a little bit. Definitely guilty of baiting of the OP there to provoke a reaction, I'd proffer.
@ Wadebridge
You have a strange attitude.  You've called me: "misguided", "inconsequential", "james japp", "Billy Big Bollox", "hypocritical little worm", "paranoid ", "dimwit detective", not to forget "Sarcastic c*nt",  "arsehole ", and made reference to my "Cakehole".  
Guy
Well, you're no detective, but granted some of these harsh words probably weren't fully justified and for that I feel I ought to apologize. I possibly overreacted a touch, which I can put, rather lamely, down to me perhaps feeling a bit grumpy on the day.
"I didn't say the OP's review was fluffy, I thought it was written by a woman."
'I thought it was written by a woman' = 'I thought it was fluffy'. It's the same thing in most people's minds.
We've all written ‘fluffy' reviews before, I know I have. Most of us have. You have, as in this one of Larissa Naughty of Farnborough, where you even offered an apology in case you'd been ‘too fluffy'.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=170219.0
But this is the best bit … https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=170219.msg1813852#msg1813852
Well, ive only done 3 reviews now.
And responded to a number of requests for info.
Thx for the snyde comment.  I don't think I'll bother again.
But thats 3 more than you.  Do you plan to say anything positive before you hit 13000 posts?
Guy
When the boot's on the other foot, it seems you're liable to get a bit upset and go into a sulk for the rest of the day.  :cry:
So initially from being the proverbial 'shrinking wallflower', when first you were posting, you've since had a few more punts and posts under your belt, and now seem to be dishing out the sandpaper treatment yourself to every fledgling post.
So I think perhaps my use of the term "Billy Big Bollox" rather nailed it.
It's been demonstrated that you dislike criticism of your own reviews @Contentguy, so perhaps time to eat a bit of humble pie, eh fella.
Anyway, I'm sorry for using overly harsh words towards you, which I'll admit was probably an overreaction based on my mood.
Having said that though, I won't be joining you and @DrConners anytime soon for a quaff down at his ‘imaginary' pub for a spot of ‘alpha male' bonding.
I mean, you and me are talking about a girl I'm shagging (as blokes do) instead of telling you about how much she likes having her tits played with & how hard she likes to be fucked, or how tight or loose her pussy is I tell you she has "Long soft curtains & a posh bum too."
Jee-zus! Perhaps he likes to join up with likeminded "Billy Braggart" bankers or traders from the City, who'd be prepared to lend a pissed-up, semi-interested ear to this kind of inane, drunken babbling.
Cheers and good health.  :drinks:
Tatty-bye  :hi:
Wade

Banned reason: Posting on politics again despite previous 7 day ban.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Celtic 69

Hi all,
Seriously thinking about paying a visit to milf eva as I haven't ticked a milf off my to do list yet!

OP review seemed a bit fluffy with some questions raised if indeed if it was a genuine review?

Does anyone on here have any good intel on her?

Thanks in advance.

Offline jeanphillipe

Hi all,
Seriously thinking about paying a visit to milf eva as I haven't ticked a milf off my to do list yet!

OP review seemed a bit fluffy with some questions raised if indeed if it was a genuine review?

Does anyone on here have any good intel on her?

Thanks in advance.

IMO this is more of a GILF experience then a MILF experience but each to our own.

Offline RAJEC


Offline lamboman

She properly fucked me around when trying to make a booking late last year so I didn't,I'm not fully convinced by the OPs review either.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2022, 09:58:28 am by lamboman »
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Celtic 69

Lamboman,
Completely agree. I've tried to contact her via txt & got mixed responses. Once she gave me a day to visit her but I couldn't make it because of work, tried to arrange something with her & she doesn't bother to reply?
Obviously she probably has her own life & maybe only does appointments part time?
But there's one picture on her AW profile that really makes me curious?? So I might persevere & see where it goes as she lists anal as part of her service and I would definitely like to give a decent looking milf a good smashing in their back door to tick it off my to do list!

Anyone on here that's met milf eva, your feedback would be grateful. If not if I do get to meet her I'll post a review.

Thanks all.