Author Topic: Duo with new girl. Chloe_blonde_babe and Mia-English-model -Manchester  (Read 4880 times)


4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5435171) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Global_Punter]
1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5846476) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Global_Punter]
4 review(s) for English-Avax (1 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline Brown sauce

The girls
Mia  External Link/Members Only. She has a good range of pics on her profile. Face and body and all expected   Pretty curvy big arse girl.

Chloe -  External Link/Members Only. Skinny blonde slutty looking sexy   Has a few tattoos

Comms was done through Mia as Chloe didn’t have an account at the time quick easy through what’sapp

Location. Deansgate. Really nice apartment as can see from photos opposite a car park

I’ve wanted to see Mia for a while but her prices for her service no owo. No kissing no RO etc seem to steep for not inc basic I like in a booking so I’ve gave it a miss but thought fuck it go for a duo so option was 150 for 30 min double blow job sex with one or £200 sex with both. I originally went with sex with one but couldn’t decide who during booking so went with both

Service.  It’s been a while since I’ve had ow tbh but both was really good at it - I wanted it but rough and was happy to choke me and play with my balls hard. Dirty talk. With certain services off the menu it miss certain things I miss of a threesome but 2 sexy but different girls playing with you still can’t complain

So after oral I though time to get to action Chloe 1st. She got a petite bit firm arse and grip she had on my cock while doing doggy could blew there and wish I just went with one girl. I stopped myself from finishing so could try Mia.  Swap condoms and Mia she got bigger fatter arse what imo really nice too and ended up finish with double hand job

Final verdict - I enjoyed myself and I knew what was on offer before booking so nothing wasn’t unexpected. If def see both again separate and duo but wouldn’t be regular just due to keys things I enjoy being off the menu

Offline Global_Punter



Details courtesy of @Brown sauce


Mia  External Link/Members Only. She has a good range of pics on her profile. Face and body and all expected   Pretty curvy big arse girl.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only


Chloe -  External Link/Members Only. Skinny blonde slutty looking sexy   Has a few tattoos


Hidden Image/Members Only

« Last Edit: August 05, 2020, 09:37:25 pm by Global_Punter »

Offline GorillaWarfare

Glad you had fun but at £200 an hour each is very much prime piss-take pricing, especially for Chloe who is someone with no reviews at all. You can get more for less with other girls.

Offline Brown sauce

100% agree.  Was a f*#k it punt wouldn’t be a regular but i would return

Offline threechilliman

Glad you had fun but at £200 an hour each is very much prime piss-take pricing, especially for Chloe who is someone with no reviews at all. You can get more for less with other girls.

Completely agree. A newbie at 200 notes an hour, you're havin a laugh.

With some of the prices I'm seein' I'm buying shares in Mr Sheen.

Offline Hollywell

As long as you enjoyed, it seems very expensive compared to my experience

Offline Titi

Completely agree. A newbie at 200 notes an hour, you're havin a laugh.

With some of the prices I'm seein' I'm buying shares in Mr Sheen.

I could be wrong but Chloe looks familiar to External Link/Members Only.
« Last Edit: August 06, 2020, 10:35:58 pm by Titi »

Offline scsa


Offline NigelF

I could be wrong but Chloe looks familiar to External Link/Members Only.

Her size doesn't match (she used to be a size 10), her height doesn't match (I'm pretty sure she was at least a little taller) and particularly her breast/cup size doesn't match since this WG is claiming to have B cup naturals whereas Chloe Glamour had at least DD cup fakes. She's also younger (even when Chloe Glamour created her short lived 2nd AW profile she wasn't claiming to be 21). Also I'm pretty sure she now just sees regulars/previous clients on the side/on the down low and doesn't have an AW but of course that could change in the future.

It’s not chloe glamour.

How would you know, you don't even punt. Assuming you do and since you've been a member since January 2014, it's about time you started actually contributing and also following the site rules (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0), pay particular attention to rules 1 and 27:

1 Site ethos / mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews.
The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent. No favoritism, no special treatment, no vested interests and no pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate Board.

27 Lurking / Dormant Accounts
Members that do not contribute Reviews or where their accounts become dormant may have their membership revoked.

Offline Titi

Her size doesn't match (she used to be a size 10), her height doesn't match (I'm pretty sure she was at least a little taller) and particularly her breast/cup size doesn't match since this WG is claiming to have B cup naturals whereas Chloe Glamour had at least DD cup fakes. She's also younger (even when Chloe Glamour created her short lived 2nd AW profile she wasn't claiming to be 21). Also I'm pretty sure she now just sees regulars/previous clients on the side/on the down low and doesn't have an AW but of course that could change in the future.

How would you know, you don't even punt. Assuming you do and since you've been a member since January 2014, it's about time you started actually contributing and also following the site rules (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0), pay particular attention to rules 1 and 27:

1 Site ethos / mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews.
The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent. No favoritism, no special treatment, no vested interests and no pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate Board.

27 Lurking / Dormant Accounts
Members that do not contribute Reviews or where their accounts become dormant may have their membership revoked.


PMed you.

Offline chrishornx

Bit lost on this one...one SP does £130 ohh the other £100 phh yet both together  are £150 ohh

doesn't seem to add up