I have explained that even if punting was fully regulated like Bransons trains a WG couldnt and in a civilised society wouldnt be forced against her will to punt with a guy she doesnt wish to for whatever reason.
So do you agree its right a WG has a choice for whatever reason or do you believe a WG should be forced to punt with ALL punters and have no choice at all?
Shit ...Ill answer it anyway.
I dont believe nor have I ever stated WG's should be forced to punt against their will regardless of the reason.
My post have been consistent in stating WG's are likely to be racist as any other group in society.
Trying to ban it can be done in certain working environments but there's little governments can do about WG's
I gave an example of a disabled guy I wanted to give a job and hope you read that to fully understand my position.
There was nothing I could do about the infrastructure that discriminated against him but I would never support it and excuse it as "their choice"
The lack of negative response and turning a blind eye to these ads indirectly gives the practice acceptance and indirect support.
If negative reviews and comments such as "choice" where correctly labeled as "racist choice" perhaps others would see it for what it really is.
I have seen polls and reviews outing all the deplorable actions of WG's apart from racist.
Hope this helps to explain