jesus all the comments are full of fluffies, and were all vile keyboard warriors 
I know. How do these escorts and fliffies know that most of us are ugly,vile creatures, trolls, assholes (well some of us are), sad pathetic pieces of cheapskates who don't have a mind of their own and are a bunch of bald, toothless, overweight men with terrible personal hygiene - P.S. Miss Nera Skye, UKP is a escort review site which helps punters to see which escort best suits them and avoid bad ones that are rip offs as well a place were we can express our opinions. Besides it not like some of us have 11% body fat and exercises regular (or used to do).
By the way KingLouie, some of the punters here are in sexless marriages and only way to have some normality and not get destroyed in the divorce courts is to fuck a escort in secret. The responses are just telling and funny. I mean River Sky comment is interesting. I mean maybe some of the UKP clients are socially/sexually awkward clients but really a guy expressing that he don't find one practically WG attractive don't tell me he is one of those clients. Besides River Sky does not mind getting paid by some of "socially/sexually awkward" UKP clients who have reviewed her with all encounters being a big positive of all of the UKP reviews. Same goes to Devon Breeze who said "I’d rather put hot pokers in my eyes than meet with anyone who uses that site". Well her 12 reviews from UKP punters say otherwise with most giving her positive reviews.
But Goddness Sx comment just says it all - "It should be mandatory those freaks have to have a photograph of themselves next to the comments they leave so we can see what we are working with?". I don't know, I don't think most men don't want to be doxxed for obvious reasons that most WG's don't want their escorting job being exposed. To me the hardcore projections are coming from the responses from that twitter post. Not from one guy opinion on a WG. And no, just because one guy don't like one WG does not mean most UKP members hates most women or WG's.
I will agree, Tesla comment is a bit harsh, but people like Hayley Hazard should know that the bald look or having tons of tattoos is not in vogue with most straight non-liberal men apart from few others like myself who still find Hayley Harzard attractive. Yeah it may hurt your feelings but you are in a field that someone looks (as well as sex performance) plays a big factor on weather or not someone sees you or not as the alternative/goth/emo look will be polarizing with most people. And it's review sites like UKP that helps decide if people see you or not which most of Hayley Hazard reviews have been positives
. If I was Hayley Hazard I would just ignored that one comment and focused on many positive comments on this thread. But strangely she focused on that one negative comment from Tesla and screen shoot it on twitter. If there is any projection, it is coming mostly from the escorts/pornstars and fliffies but more importantly it is coming from Hayley Hazard herself which tells me she aren't comfortable in her looks and shows me that she is very insecure on her looks.
