Charli Pristine (Birmingham)

[Starmen1000]

External Link/Members Only    External Link/Members Only+

This review is from back end of 2019

Quite a few messages to arrange 30 min @£100  (I know) appointment which I can only explain I thought I was going to be in for an absolute treat at that price.

Anyway turned up in nice (ish) north b’ham residential area and parked up once she’d given me the house number which is an end terraced house.

she must rent the back room for her ‘business’ as when you get to the house you go down the side entrance and go in the back door straight into her bedroom with en suite.

She is my type petite, pale and has to be said really good looking English girl hence the price, but on this occasion she had very bad body odour, which matched the sweaty smell in the room also.

As soon as I walked in she didn’t stop moaning, mainly about punters not turning up for appointments.

I took a shower hoping she’d be in a better mood for when I came back....


Nope still moaning! expecting me to get hard and hurry up, never felt so rushed!

So as I said she was fit so at this stage I was just hoping the sex would be amazing and she’d at least stop talking for the action ...

Nope! I had her legs on my shoulders and was licking her pussy frantically going slightly lower to get the point of my tongue in her arse every now and then which I was enjoying as decided she was never going to stop moaning  which she did after a good while of me going down on her

This action carried on until I got the tongue ache ! I was now hard and she was very wet so I removed her bra to reveal a nice pair of tits but as I went in for a suck on her nips it was then I got the whiff of her pits!

I’m too polite tbh and said nothing as I was hard I just thought get her onto her front and smash her from behind which I did first off in doggy then I lay her flat on the bed and banged her as hard as I could until I came all over her pale arse cheeks. (Obvs after removing condom)


That was about 20 mins tops including shower time and tbh I couldn’t get out of there quick enough.

Maybe I got her on a bad day I don’t know but couldn’t see many reviews on her so I won’t be paying another £100 to find out

[Littlefoot]

Thanks for the warning starmen1000. Sorry to hear you had a shite time. With only one positive review out of 4, sounds like one to avoid, especially so at the stated rates. Just for the record; another review describes her as a dress size 10 - 12 with a big arse. And another states she’s curvy. But the other review agrees with your assessment of her being petite. Profile states 5’ 2” and a dress size 8. I would think that’s fairly petite. In your opinion would you say those published stats are accurate? 

[Gizmoles]

Thanks for the review. Can you please tell us all when at the end of last year did this meet take place?

[oldmanking]

Thanks for the review. Can you please tell us all when at the end of last year did this meet take place?

is that even in any way relevant this far on? 

tbh, i get frustrated at reviews this long after the deed took place.  a lot of girls' attitudes change from week to week, let alone months on! 

[tesla]

Thanks for the review. Can you please tell us all when at the end of last year did this meet take place?

have you considered contributing something useful to this forum?

[Beamer]

have you considered contributing something useful to this forum?

+1

[Gizmoles]

That’s ok. Me being a lurker is the least interesting thing on this post. This escort that wrote this fake review (yes that’s right, this isn’t a punter review) isn’t going to reply. You should all think why that account has been active for a year and hasn’t posted or reviewed in that time. Then the first review is a negative that’s written supposedly 5 months later but cant say when the meet had taken place. You know why that is? Because it didn’t take place. The only way I can be proved wrong is for her to answer. Which I am looking forward to. Or she can not answer and then that will also be an answer so win win either way. Could’ve come up with something better than sweaty armpits and moaning about clients like that’s ridiculous. She has stated that there was quite a few messages back and forth so she should be able to give the date and even the time this alleged meets took place... or better yet, who wants to see the proof of these messages. I know I do. Even I’m laughing at that joke of a ‘review’. If anyone feels the need to pm me you’re more than welcome. Y’all have a nice day now.

[vindici]

That’s ok. Me being a lurker is the least interesting thing on this post. This escort that wrote this fake review (yes that’s right, this isn’t a punter review) isn’t going to reply. You should all think why that account has been active for a year and hasn’t posted or reviewed in that time. Then the first review is a negative that’s written supposedly 5 months later but cant say when the meet had taken place. You know why that is? Because it didn’t take place. The only way I can be proved wrong is for her to answer. Which I am looking forward to. Or she can not answer and then that will also be an answer so win win either way. Could’ve come up with something better than sweaty armpits and moaning about clients like that’s ridiculous. She has stated that there was quite a few messages back and forth so she should be able to give the date and even the time this alleged meets took place... or better yet, who wants to see the proof of these messages. I know I do. Even I’m laughing at that joke of a ‘review’. If anyone feels the need to pm me you’re more than welcome. Y’all have a nice day now.

The escort being reviewed doesn't exactly have stellar form, this would be the second negative, with a neutral already on the books.

Are you sure you're not an escort, Gizmoles? Looking at your review count, you're for damn sure not a punter.

[Gizmoles]

The escort being reviewed doesn't exactly have stellar form, this would be the second negative, with a neutral already on the books.

Are you sure you're not an escort, Gizmoles? Looking at your review count, you're for damn sure not a punter.

like I said. Who I am doesn’t matter. Let’s just wait for the reply. Like I already said you’re welcome to pm me.

[tesla]

Who I am doesn’t matter.

yes it does, because you have no posting history on this site you have no credibility

[Littlefoot]

like I said. Who I am doesn’t matter. Let’s just wait for the reply. Like I already said you’re welcome to pm me.

Who are you? Charli by any chance?

[Beamer]

like I said. Who I am doesn’t matter. Let’s just wait for the reply. Like I already said you’re welcome to pm me.

Hello Charli !
It's so obvious that you are not a punter.

[daviemac]

That’s ok. Me being a lurker is the least interesting thing on this post. This escort that wrote this fake review (yes that’s right, this isn’t a punter review) isn’t going to reply. You should all think why that account has been active for a year and hasn’t posted or reviewed in that time. Then the first review is a negative that’s written supposedly 5 months later but cant say when the meet had taken place. You know why that is? Because it didn’t take place. The only way I can be proved wrong is for her to answer. Which I am looking forward to. Or she can not answer and then that will also be an answer so win win either way. Could’ve come up with something better than sweaty armpits and moaning about clients like that’s ridiculous. She has stated that there was quite a few messages back and forth so she should be able to give the date and even the time this alleged meets took place... or better yet, who wants to see the proof of these messages. I know I do. Even I’m laughing at that joke of a ‘review’. If anyone feels the need to pm me you’re more than welcome. Y’all have a nice day now.

How you know the meeting didn't take place is the only thing that needs to be proved, exactly when it was has nothing to do with you, nor is it a requirement to post copies of messages.

In any case you have no room to talk, you have not posted any reviews, or anything useful to the site for that matter, since you joined.

 

like I said. Who I am doesn’t matter. Let’s just wait for the reply. Like I already said you’re welcome to pm me.

Yes it does, you need to explain yourself and quickly. I will also PM you and I do expect a reply.

[Starmen1000]

Blimey ....

I’ve been on here a while and was conscious I had no reviews as ive only ever met with highly reviewed girls (mainly FBSM) yes the chocolate offer (turn right once through the door) and the mirror in the corner of the room to get a flash of the panties from an African goddess.

If charli has read this review and is upset by it then I think that’s the whole point of this website tbh.

I was as honest without being nasty and I’ve changed my mind and at some point I am going to revisit.

From what I can see the only thing I’ll change is my next review will be sooner after the date. For that I can only apologise.

[Littlefoot]

I was as honest without being nasty and I’ve changed my mind and at some point I am going to revisit.

I can’t understand you leaving a negative review, then saying you will revisit. 

[Starmen1000]

Maybe I will maybe I won’t it was just an impulse type tbh don’t over think it 👍

[Littlefoot]

Maybe I will maybe I won’t it was just an impulse type tbh don’t over think it 👍

Can only speak for myself, if I met a girl and there were negative elements involved in the punt making it an overall negative experience there is no way I would return! There’s plenty of other WGs out there, especially so at the advertised rates. I just hope we don’t get to read another negative review from you on the same WG in a few months. It just sends out the wrong vibe, to post a negative then a few days later say you’re considering going back for seconds. 

[Starmen1000]

I get your point and I’d be saying the same no doubt .

Like I said it was an impulse type

I get your point completely.

[pbrown355]

There have been occasions, not many admittedly, when I've had a bad punt but wanted to return. Probably haven't actually returned very often but the desire has still been there. Usually a smoking hot body with poor attitude. I would go back with a different attitude, ie p & d rather than hopes of an all encompassing service.

[Littlefoot]

I see the prats been banned. Looking at the banning reason and reading between the lines I’m guessing daviemac received an incriminating pm. 

Thanks for whoever reported it and thanks for daviemac for the banning. 

We don’t need useless idiots like that on here. 

[tesla]

I see the prats been banned. Looking at the banning reason and reading between the lines I’m guessing daviemac received an incriminating pm. 

nice to see the mods on the case, well done

[Beamer]

I see the prats been banned. Looking at the banning reason and reading between the lines I’m guessing daviemac received an incriminating pm. 

Thanks for whoever reported it and thanks for daviemac for the banning. 

We don’t need useless idiots like that on here. 

Agreed.
Why would a punter get that involved?
EAS syndrome?

[Littlefoot]

Agreed.
Why would a punter get that involved?
EAS syndrome?

Sounds like it, there’s probably a few of them out there.