Author Topic: MEGHAN_SCOTLAND - Glasgow  (Read 8856 times)


6 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5536174) (5 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]
6 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6120969) (5 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Matrix]

Offline Grimer

External Link/Members Only

Contacted Meghan through aw as texting didn't seem to work. Comms were fine. Booking request sent on aw and was given name of hotel. Door number was given nearer the booking time. Paid parking nearby hotel. Half hour @ £80.

Opening the door and was greeted by Meghan. I was rather disappointed. Profile indicates 26 (and 27). Appears more mid 30s. Thin face with lots of make up. Facially to me, not that attractive. Size 6 seems accurate.

Gave her paperwork and asked for a quick shower. Out the shower and started with some groping and FK. Her FK was nice, slow and sensual with plenty of tongue. She adjusted herself wherever my hand went so I could get a better feel of her which was a good touch. Got her undressed which revealed her petite body and small tits. Sucked on them for a while then OW at my request. Good, slow and rather sloppy too. There are noticeable tattoos on her leg and one that covers her near whole arm (can't remember left/right).

Got her on mish with some more FK then switched to doggy with her adding (I believe) fake moans. Kept going at doggy but couldn't stay hard so stopped for a moment for more FK and fondling. Once I got going, back onto mish but again, couldn't finish so left it at that. Friendly overall, no clockwatching and had a wee chat as I got dressed.

This would have been an easy positive if I had found her attractive. Looks are subjective and all that so could just be me. Everything else was fine and done well. Another neutral to the list...

Offline Vanhobonk

Small tits?Her profile pic in the bath they do not look small,would you say thats not her?

Offline Grimer

I would say that's her aye.

But I would also say that's also effective camera work and how she's cupping her tits upwards for more (lack of better word in the morning) 'volume'.

Offline The Man With No Name

Marks for enthusiasm and engagement alone, relative to the best you've experienced (presumably Bonnie Scotland, going by your reports), if you please?

Also you say "plenty of tongue" but how deep and full on is her FK?

And how would you say her body and tits compare in the flesh to these more revealing pictures of Tiffany? https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211931.msg2166618#msg2166618 / https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211931.msg2166579#msg2166579

Offline Grimer

Marks for enthusiasm and engagement alone, relative to the best you've experienced (presumably Bonnie Scotland, going by your reports), if you please?

Also you say "plenty of tongue" but how deep and full on is her FK?

And how would you say her body and tits compare in the flesh to these more revealing pictures of Tiffany? https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211931.msg2166618#msg2166618 / https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211931.msg2166579#msg2166579

3/5 for both enthusiasm and engagement if you wanted a mark for it. Bonnie would be 4/5 for engagement at the time I saw her.

The FK wasn't deep to the point where I could stab her throat with my tongue, then again I never tried to. I don't really understand what you mean by "full on", her FK was good where we could've been at it for the whole duration of the booking and make you believe it was a passionate winch.

Body and tits appear about the same as Tiffany in my opinion going by those pictures while Meghan is much more tanned. Tiffany definitely seems more appealing though.

Offline The Man With No Name

3/5 for both enthusiasm and engagement if you wanted a mark for it. Bonnie would be 4/5 for engagement at the time I saw her.

The FK wasn't deep to the point where I could stab her throat with my tongue, then again I never tried to. I don't really understand what you mean by "full on", her FK was good where we could've been at it for the whole duration of the booking and make you believe it was a passionate winch.

Body and tits appear about the same as Tiffany in my opinion going by those pictures while Meghan is much more tanned. Tiffany definitely seems more appealing though.

Cheers for this.

On the basis her rates are pretty standard, would you therefore say she's worth taking a gamble on in the hope I might be more enamoured - even if just for the sake of fucking someone new?

This is also taking into account the fact you seem to be quite picky over deciding whom you've actually properly enjoyed fucking - and who you actually award positive ratings to, after what reads like a reasonably positive review with only one or two mild caveats. This is merely an observation though, not a judgement or criticism - you're well within your rights to have high standards of punting enjoyment in return for your hard-earned. And if anything, being overly critical is far preferable and more reliable than the gushing, fluffy shite we see far more of on here.

So going by your rating and the nature of your review on Meghan, while I'm guessing you wouldn't be rushing back to bang her again particularly soon (in normal circumstances), I take it you don't overly regret spending 80 quid on her either?


Offline Grimer

Hard to say... I definitely wouldn't have regret it had I found her more attractive, which isn't her fault anyway. Clatty's review however, he found her good looking. She might appeal to you, I really don't know.

Looks aside though, she did everything else all well and fine. So aye, go for it.

Reading back, you're right. It does sound like a positive.

Offline The Man With No Name

Cheers again. May just do, after all this is over.

And while a girl obviously can't help her facial looks in the main, I'd still say you're within your rights to give her a neutral if you simply don't find her terribly attractive (especially in relation to what appear to be relatively representative photos), regardless of her performance - provided you mention all this in the review, as you have. I've given girls of reasonable performance neutral ratings that would've been positive, had I found them hotter than I did.

At the end of the day, it all comes down to how much you enjoyed the punt. And there's only so much you can if you just don't really fancy her. You can often never tell what the body's properly like till you get the full kit off, but whether you'd make the effort to try and fuck her on civvy street in a pub with other attractive options, I find, is usually a good guide.

Offline seeker

Op says her profile says 26 but appears to be mid thirties.
In my book that would be a big fat Negative.
That's almost a decade of a difference
That' would be enough to put me off going  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: March 31, 2020, 11:42:35 pm by seeker »

Offline MajorPayne

Generally I'm not so fussed about age if the service is good quality.  Though I had one punt were her profile stated 35 and she had a 26yo daughter . . . and looked well into her 50's.

Offline David1970

Generally I'm not so fussed about age if the service is good quality.  Though I had one punt were her profile stated 35 and she had a 26yo daughter . . . and looked well into her 50's.

She was 35 and her daughter was 26, I take it she was from Dundee  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline Jamsonite

Back to Meghan I saw her and commented on Clatty’s review my experience was very similar to his.  I found her to be very attractive full on (does anyone remember Little Lady M?)....but there’s no way she is 26!
Banned reason: Undesirable stalker.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline BaronVonProdger

Back to Meghan I saw her and commented on Clatty’s review my experience was very similar to his.  I found her to be very attractive full on (does anyone remember Little Lady M?)....but there’s no way she is 26!

You should do a review as she only has the two. She might be worth paying a visit after this Covid 19 stuff is over.

Offline The Man With No Name

You should do a review as she only has the two. She might be worth paying a visit after this Covid 19 stuff is over.

Indeed, do a review. As a wider point, even if it is just a fag-packet minimal one, it still gets indexed and recorded, thus becoming a quick, easy means for potential punters to check how many reliable reports a girl has - good or bad. It's simply how the site functions effectively as a resource.

And while I appreciate your intention and logic with regard to the similarity of your experiences, because two-line comments riding on the back of other punters' reviews are too easily missed, it effectively contributes fuck-all to the forum - especially in the case of new girls. So even if you feel you would just be carbon-copying Clatty's report, just state that and link it in your own review.

Like I said, this is far less of an issue with girls who've already been extensively reviewed (or even ones that've only clocked up a handful of similar reports), but it's obviously particularity important and useful with regard to new girls with little feedback. Case in point - a page on here with two green lights and one grey (as it would be with your review) would be a fuck-site more useful and determining than the current standing of only one of each - both to many of us and her (since you seem to think she's deserving). Similar to a negative amongst a sea of green, the importance and usefulness specific to any individual positive review, in determining business level from both perspectives, is weighted infinitely more heavily towards the first two or three, then rapidly diminishes from there on due the inevitable snowball effect this has on her reputation - i.e. the few green lights early on in the bag for a decent provider ensure a steady supply of eager punters, many of whom inevitably report the same. This also, just as importantly, often results in the odd negative or neutral which may point out specific drawbacks, not witnessed or perhaps relevant to the other, positive, reviewers, but still important to many prospective punters. In short, none of this would ever happen if the first few members who thoroughly enjoyed their time with a stunning ride-of-the-century, new to the scene, didn't bother their arses to properly report they had.


there’s no way she is 26!

But even if I still haven't convinced you to be arsed yourself, or before you can, at least tell us your impression of an accurate actual age for Meghan here. While I've happily fucked several smoking-hot women in their mid-30s and beyond, I'd argue her specific image and appeal - of being a petite, tanned, glamorous little thing in heels and stockings, that'd be fun to throw about - just doesn't much work past the late-20s age bracket. Well into their 30s, it just becomes a bit awkward mutton-dressed-as-lamb - almost literally :D - at least for me, anyway.

Offline Jamsonite

Banned reason: Undesirable stalker.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Man With No Name


Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Don't think I mentioned anything with regards to her age in my review, having looked at it again... I'll always go with the fact I may be 3-4 years out, as guessing age isn't an exact science...  :unknown:

I've met lassie's outside of punting that have looked younger, and some that have looked older than their actual age...Trying to remember back to the booking itself, I wouldn't have put mid thirties on her, 30 or thereabouts from memory... That's not to say the OP is wrong, that's just my guesstimate, albeit she had alot of make up on...  :unknown:

Offline The Man With No Name

Don't think I mentioned anything with regards to her age in my review, having looked at it again... I'll always go with the fact I may be 3-4 years out, as guessing age isn't an exact science...  :unknown:

I've met lassie's outside of punting that have looked younger, and some that have looked older than their actual age...Trying to remember back to the booking itself, I wouldn't have put mid thirties on her, 30 or thereabouts from memory... That's not to say the OP is wrong, that's just my guesstimate, albeit she had alot of make up on...  :unknown:

And presumably her petite, glamour, lingeried look worked for your perceived age of her?

Somewhere in-between a yuppie/student fuck-bunny and a MILF, perhaps?

Offline Jamsonite

Just about the only Scottish green light just now
Banned reason: Undesirable stalker.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Neverthere

Just about the only Scottish green light just now

Still quite a few green lights so I've noticed, they are certainly making things a lot easier on future bookings from me that's for sure or repeat bookings like this one, just nah chance :thumbsdown:
 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Or this rocket, mind and have a wash
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

Offline Jamsonite

I actually thought she was a really classy girl but clearly not as she is still hooking.
Banned reason: Undesirable stalker.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Man With No Name

Or this rocket, mind and have a wash
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

Aye, hen. Cause dipping his head under the shower is really going to stop Corona-Colin giving you the virus when he's licking your tonsils.

Not that this Herpes-Hermione cares much for hygiene anyway, presuming the reports of her working with coldsore breakouts caked in makeup are anything to go by.

Can believe this one's still at it, actually. I remember seeing her profile fucking years ago - more like a decade actually - and thinking she might be a decent budget punt (at best), aged 30 back then. Funny how she's only aged three years in that time, despite her pictures becoming noticably - and far more representatively - wider.

I actually thought she was a really classy girl but clearly not as she is still hooking.

Not sure where I stand on this, actually. If she is regularly in close contact with others then she's clearly being a selfish cunt. However, if she never is, you can argue it's her punters actively going to see her, potentially spreading the virus and being responsible for doing so. She very well might be acting as a hub for it, but (presuming after her shift, she drives in her own car, to her own house, where she lives on her own, gets all her groceries delivered and stays there till her next shift) she's therefore no more of a virus hotspot in practical terms than a bus or a supermarket.

Either way, she's somewhat inevitably increased her prices in a seller's market. Will be interesting to see how many who've done so will bring them back down when regular trade resumes - though I suspect many won't, having acquired a taste for the extra lolly. In that case, they've priced themselves out of my business. This, to me, being a far more important principal than operating a trade (already at the fringes of the law) in violation of a legally questionable lockdown, imposed by a government woefully unprepared for a pandemic they were well-warned was inevitable - both in the long and short term.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
And presumably her petite, glamour, lingeried look worked for your perceived age of her?

Somewhere in-between a yuppie/student fuck-bunny and a MILF, perhaps?
I'm not too sure what more you want me to add with regards to her... I actually prefer the more natural look in a WG as opposed to being heavily made-up, but then again I'm not all that fussed, Aslong as I find said WG attractive enough, then that's still fine by me... Some may not particularly like that look, some may, and that's all well and good...

Between my review, and my comment above I've done my best to give my experience/opinion... If I'm out with the age then I'll stand corrected, my guess being about 30, but like anyone that punts, it will only be an educated guess on my part same as with the other 2 reviewers, which is totally fine...

I usually do a summary at the bottom of my reviews saying whether I would return or not... In this instance I said I'm not so sure, but was still  a Pos for me as the booking itself I felt warranted it, whereas if I was certain I wouldn't see her again (which I more than likely wouldn't now) then it would have been a neutral...

From what you've said I think you pretty much know the answer as to whether you would see her or not... Its punting, and we all take a "punt" at the end of the day, everyone's perception/experience will be different... Have I seen better than her, very much so, and I think the strength of a "Pos" is usually conveyed by how I put it across in my reviews, especially in the summary... Hope this was of some help...  :hi:
« Last Edit: April 08, 2020, 02:04:32 am by Clattypats »

Offline The Man With No Name

I'm not too sure what more you want me to add with regards to her... I actually prefer the more natural look in a WG as opposed to being heavily made-up, but then again I'm not all that fussed, Aslong as I find said WG attractive enough, then that's still fine by me... Some may not particularly like that look, some may, and that's all well and good...

Between my review, and my comment above I've done my best to give my experience/opinion... If I'm out with the age then I'll stand corrected, my guess being about 30, but like anyone that punts, it will only be an educated guess on my part same as with the other 2 reviewers, which is totally fine...

I usually do a summary at the bottom of my reviews saying whether I would return or not... In this instance I said I'm not so sure, but was still  a Pos for me as the booking itself I felt warranted it, whereas if I was certain I wouldn't see her again (which I more than likely wouldn't now) then it would have been a neutral...

From what you've said I think you pretty much know the answer as to whether you would see her or not... Its punting, and we all take a "punt" at the end of the day, everyone's perception/experience will be different... Have I seen better than her, very much so, and I think the strength of a "Pos" is usually conveyed by how I put it across in my reviews, especially in the summary... Hope this was of some help...  :hi:

The "answer" will depend, more than anything else, on whether her prices go back down.

All I was asking was whether you thought her specific look - which only really appeals to me on younger girls - specifically worked for her, at the age she seems. You've kinda implied it effectively does by stating you found her attractive - though in a rather roundabout way, without answering directly.

30 with a petite-glam look is probably a stretch, but doable. But 35 effectively trying to look 22, I always just find a bit tragic. What I look for in a girl closer to her teens than her 30s, is usually different from what I look for in a MILF. The curves in the right places (real or not) need to grow with a girl's age for me.