Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Amberrbabyy - Edgeware Road  (Read 14792 times)


24 review(s) for Amberrbabyy (11 positive, 4 neutral, 9 negative) [Indexed by Belgarion]

Offline Farfetched

Link: External Link/Members Only

Location: A set of private apartments just off the Edgeware Road.

Duration: 30 minutes at 200 pounds. Her profile indicates that this has now gone up to 220.

Comms: Arranged for a meeting the same day in the early afternoon via phone call. Initially she tried to push the meet back 30 minutes, but I said this wasn't possible and she honoured the original booking time.

This girl caught my eye as the opportunity to punt an archetypical bimbo body (she has featured on the cover of Playboy), and someone who has crafted her body, cheeks, tits, ass and all, to a certain standard. For those who want the glamour look, Amber undoubtedly ticks those boxes.

On arrival, I was told to speak to the porter, say the room number I was there to visit, and be let into the lifts. I did this, and the porter didn't ask any questions (though he did see me walk about just over half an hour later so he must have an idea of what is going on). Once outside the room, I knocked on the door. A nosy neighbour peered out at me and asked what I was doing there, and I said I was visiting a friend and they left me alone. When I told Amber this she seemed unconcerned, as she is apparently moving to South Ken in the near future.

Let's just start with the overwhelming positive about the meet which is the girl herself, who is exactly like her profile pictures suggest. She had a plaster on her bumcheek when I saw her due to recent filler injections but otherwise is an unblemished full-lipped, big breasted, slender, tanned, sultry-eyed specimen that you might see haunting the bars of Mayfair and Dubai. Conversationally she is pleasant, not much of a talker, but not rude or distant.

I saw all the hallmarks of this type of instagram girl walking through her apartment (which was very nice); the Selfridges bags tucked in the corner, Gucci trainers she had on the shoerack, bought items from Tokyo and Dubai...

I requested (and received) OWO which was alright, and spent a long time playing around with her turbocharged body. We switched to missionary and things felt a little bit loose but that could have been the amount of lube she applied. She was moaning throughout which was definitely fake and to be honest a bit of a turn off. In fact there was an element of performance to the whole thing and this combined with her body made me thing it was all a bit unreal. Realising these thoughts weren't a productive use of time, I put my cock between her breasts for a titfuck which got me back on track. Ended with her holding her tits as an offering and me standing above her shooting a few strands on her breasts.

Overall I liked meeting her and her pornstar proportions. Biggest negatives are that this was an expensive punt; and that she doesn't offer PSE services but isn't warm enough to be a GFE either. Some of the action felt quite automated but then again she had impressive enough body that I was happy.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2020, 12:02:46 pm by Farfetched »

Offline Belgarion

Complete Link; External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Review reads like a negative to me but your money, your dick and your review
« Last Edit: March 11, 2020, 12:19:42 pm by Belgarion »

Offline Londonpunter30

Fake body that thinks because she has done some modelling she can charge more.

Services list looks limited and relies on looks alone.

Way overpriced

Offline dan123

Had this one my hot list for a while, however the price, especially given the lack of services, has stopped me from seeing her.

OP - was owo agreed beforehand during comms as its not listed on her profile or did you just request it during the punt and she agreed? Do you know if french kissing is also available? Would probably tempt me if these were included

Offline salome

Accessing from Singapore yesterday lol

Offline Bloody foreigner

Sound like a shit punt. I would like to see her, but I’m afraid of her attitude. Maybe one day, but no rush.


Had this one my hot list for a while, however the price, especially given the lack of services, has stopped me from seeing her.

OP - was owo agreed beforehand during comms as its not listed on her profile or did you just request it during the punt and she agreed? Do you know if french kissing is also available? Would probably tempt me if these were included

Didn’t see her yet, but when I contacted her once she confirmed OWO and kissing.

Accessing from Singapore yesterday lol

Her profile always showing different location, but most of the times she is London.

Offline JamesRockford

That’s because she is an elite International model. She uses champagne to rinse her mouth after brushing with a golden toothbrush, and buys only the best trainers from Tokyo, socks from Dubai, Botox from LA, and toilet roll from the corner shop on Edgware Rd.

Offline MrMohican

Blimey! Standards at Playboy have plummeted if she is now a model they would consider cover-worthy.

there's more silicon, botox and filler here than flesh. Am I the only one that finds this fixation with bee stung lips that look like they have been inflated by a bicycle pump really fucking ugly?

Offline JamesRockford

Standards at Playboy have plummeted if she is now a model they would consider cover-worthy.

Who buys Playboy magazine in 2020? People who have a fax machine on their dining table?

Offline Apu

Glad you had a good time.
I saw her while back. She could certainly take a pounding and she did have some good grinding game when I saw her. Very much felt like fucking a Z list pornstar or celeb.
Banned reason: Undesirable perverted fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Stealthmode

Complete Link; External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Review reads like a negative to me but your money, your dick and your review

+1

I had to read again to find where the positives were

Offline peter purves

Is she an Instagram model btw?

Isn't always the way the one you are attracted to is more often than not a poor SP....Punter's Alienation  :dash: :(

Cheers for the review
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline francescototti

Blimey! Standards at Playboy have plummeted if she is now a model they would consider cover-worthy.

there's more silicon, botox and filler here than flesh. Am I the only one that finds this fixation with bee stung lips that look like they have been inflated by a bicycle pump really fucking ugly?

Couldn't agree more  :thumbsup:

Offline webpunter

IMO the kinda burd for a one off session
OK maybe twice
Save all her photos to remind you in the future that 'back in the day' you banged a FAF playboy insta barbie burd  :yahoo:
On VFM always subjective & easy for OP's choice to be slated on here
I reck flown out to Singapore by some mega wealthy rich fucker who wants some fun for a few days / longer
Have her on HL & will make the effort to have a play
She regularly changes her WA pic so ideal to save these on the punting mobile

Offline peter purves

IMO the kinda burd for a one off session
OK maybe twice
Save all her photos to remind you in the future that 'back in the day' you banged a FAF playboy insta barbie burd  :yahoo:
On VFM always subjective & easy for OP's choice to be slated on here
I reck flown out to Singapore by some mega wealthy rich fucker who wants some fun for a few days / longer
Have her on HL & will make the effort to have a play
She regularly changes her WA pic so ideal to save these on the punting mobile

A 'trophy punt' as my learned friend GLM  :hi: might say

Just seen the Instagram and Twitter profiles. A pity that the Instagram pics are cartoon-like in their appearance
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Gambitman92

A 'trophy punt' as my learned friend GLM  :hi: might say

Just seen the Instagram and Twitter profiles. A pity that the Instagram pics are cartoon-like in their appearance

That's more to do with the filters, she's very good looking with a crazy body (imo of course)
Looks less cartoonish and better looking in real life videos
External Link/Members Only
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline justpassingthru

Was really tempted to see her but after reading the review I get the "meh" feeling so she has slipped a few spots on my HL. But glad you had fun tho OP. Maybe if I have a good day at casino I may visit her.

Offline Belgarion

That's more to do with the filters, she's very good looking with a crazy body (imo of course)
Looks less cartoonish and better looking in real life videos
External Link/Members Only

Her lips make her look stupid

Offline Payyourwaymate

Did you read my rags to riches post on her on the WGs can't give it up thread?

 :lol:.

She looked a lot better before the surgery... oh well. Interesting review.

Offline peter purves

Her lips make her look stupid

I am not worried about the lips but the more 'common' as opposed to 'cultured' attitude on display  :dash: :P

Cheers for the youtube link Gambitman92, I can see your point
« Last Edit: March 13, 2020, 11:53:54 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PatMacGroin

She looks pretty good. In a "best artificial beauty money can buy" kind of way. The sort that will unfortunately, be likely to look like some sort of hideous accident victim that scares small children in 10-15 years. But, can anyone actually confirm the playboy cover shown on her profile is real?

I've seen several AW profiles that use fake magazine covers to promote themselves. Playboy, Maxim, Loaded, etc. I think there's a company that will mock them up for a small fee, and it's probably not that hard to do with some semi decent phot shop skills.

I tried to look up Playboy New Zealand to get a list of their cover models, or see confirmation images. Unfortunately, couldn't find an official playboy site that verifies that sort of stuff. I did actually find a site claiming to sell that magazine. Strangely, even though at first glance they look identical, they're not. Anyone up for a game of spot the difference?:

Hidden Image/Members Only   Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: March 14, 2020, 02:00:09 am by PatMacGroin »

Offline Belgarion

+1

I had to read again to find where the positives were

Some punters are happy to shag "stunners" who provide a hopeless service just so they can say they banged "stunners".

I've had my fair share of porn stars and babestation babes over the years. I'll take a girl next door with a good attitude and enthusiastic services over the ice princesses every day.

Offline finn5555

Some punters are happy to shag "stunners" who provide a hopeless service just so they can say they banged "stunners".

I've had my fair share of porn stars and babestation babes over the years. I'll take a girl next door with a good attitude and enthusiastic services over the ice princesses every day.

Exactly that I have a 41 year old milf regular who’s weight fluctuates and isn’t traditionally stunning but pure and utter filth  :hi:

Offline Apu

Why do you guys repeat the same opinion on every review of a girl that costs more than £200?

Do you not get bored?
It's not your review or your experience.
It's not your value for your money, it's the reviewers.

Its like commenting on someone's TripAdvisor review of a Prague Hotel  ( I know a place that is 5* for alot less but you would have to stay at another city to experience it.) it's pointless and useless.

The reviewer wanted to see this bird not some fat Sharon with 2 kids down the high street.
Banned reason: Undesirable perverted fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Payyourwaymate



The reviewer wanted to see this bird not some fat Sharon with 2 kids down the high street.

That line cracked me up  :lol:.

Offline webpunter

Especially when you are lying on top of her  :lol:

Exactly that I have a 41 year old milf regular who’s weight fluctuates and isn’t traditionally stunning but pure and utter filth  :hi:

Offline webpunter

+1
Like comparing 5* to a Premier Inn
Pointless
And yes i stay in PremierI's on a bizzo trip now & again.  Using the £ saved to go punting
When seeing civvy burds i wouldn't do a PremierI, well not unless i wanted to get shot of the burd soon thereafter
As for shazza  :lol:

Why do you guys repeat the same opinion on every review of a girl that costs more than £200?

Do you not get bored?
It's not your review or your experience.
It's not your value for your money, it's the reviewers.

Its like commenting on someone's TripAdvisor review of a Prague Hotel  ( I know a place that is 5* for alot less but you would have to stay at another city to experience it.) it's pointless and useless.

The reviewer wanted to see this bird not some fat Sharon with 2 kids down the high street.

Offline Hansolo69

Playboy really are lowering their standards

Offline Farfetched

Had this one my hot list for a while, however the price, especially given the lack of services, has stopped me from seeing her.

OP - was owo agreed beforehand during comms as its not listed on her profile or did you just request it during the punt and she agreed? Do you know if french kissing is also available? Would probably tempt me if these were included

Yes - OWO agreed beforehand during comms. FK also available.

Offline Farfetched

She looks pretty good. In a "best artificial beauty money can buy" kind of way. The sort that will unfortunately, be likely to look like some sort of hideous accident victim that scares small children in 10-15 years. But, can anyone actually confirm the playboy cover shown on her profile is real?

There are physical copies of the magazine in her apartment.

Offline webpunter

I hope you offered her a score / pony to take one away
Otherwise you will regret this

There are physical copies of the magazine in her apartment.

Edit:  50 sheets - in for a penny in for a pound.  You've wedged up loads so a bit more isn't material in the grand scheme of things
Endless wanking opportunities
Obviously the mag in a suitable folder
Should take you back to the good old days b4 the interweb

Offline peter purves


I tried to look up Playboy New Zealand to get a list of their cover models, or see confirmation images. Unfortunately, couldn't find an official playboy site that verifies that sort of stuff. I did actually find a site claiming to sell that magazine. Strangely, even though at first glance they look identical, they're not. Anyone up for a game of spot the difference?:

Hidden Image/Members Only   Hidden Image/Members Only

Seems genuine

External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: March 15, 2020, 04:18:26 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline golden bull

External Link/Members Only

On palace vip @ extortionate rate!!!
Video available
I’d rather punt a hot Russian @ 1/3 of her agency price anyday

Offline peter purves

External Link/Members Only

On palace vip @ extortionate rate!!!
Video available
I’d rather punt a hot Russian @ 1/3 of her agency price anyday

£6 :scare: :scare:
« Last Edit: March 15, 2020, 05:22:08 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Belgarion

Why do you guys repeat the same opinion on every review of a girl that costs more than £200?

Do you not get bored?
It's not your review or your experience.
It's not your value for your money, it's the reviewers.

Its like commenting on someone's TripAdvisor review of a Prague Hotel  ( I know a place that is 5* for alot less but you would have to stay at another city to experience it.) it's pointless and useless.

The reviewer wanted to see this bird not some fat Sharon with 2 kids down the high street.

Still smarting because people told you a fool and his money are soon parted.

I remember when I was as foolish as you and blew money on pornstars and babe station type.girls.

I found UKP.after one of those dour performances.

I appreciate you may not be able to pull a stunner in civvy world, but do not let your inadequacies cloud your judgement.

 :hi:

Offline Belgarion

Exactly that I have a 41 year old milf regular who’s weight fluctuates and isn’t traditionally stunning but pure and utter filth  :hi:

Spot on. Plenty of Fish has lots of lovely, talented women  :D

Offline Apu

Still smarting because people told you a fool and his money are soon parted.

I remember when I was as foolish as you and blew money on pornstars and babe station type.girls.

I found UKP.after one of those dour performances.

I appreciate you may not be able to pull a stunner in civvy world, but do not let your inadequacies cloud your judgement.

 :hi:

The hypocrisy of this post is hilarious, give your head a wobble.

Your still a fool mate. Your opinion is just bitter written diarrhoea.

Admit it, your not here for the review, just to spout shit and impress your fellow brown nosers. You definitely appreciate UKP, it's the only outlet for your irrelevant opinions.

Anyways well done to the punter, if you have no interest in the WG, keep it to yourself... No ones cares.
Banned reason: Undesirable perverted fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

Offline webpunter

An interesting read
Open the wallet & instantly comes the barrage of abuse
What's wrong with UKP'ers reporting on more extravangant adventures
I wonder why the adverse comments are forthcoming
Dare to swim in the expensive pond & derision is not far away
I've had a few expensive blowout burds along the way
And plenty of 40 + 20 R&T's so i'm not exactly Carlos Vandango of the cigar [& punting] world
Even the average ones are soon forgotten
Reporting like:  place - OK / looks - OK / action - OK   Just about
The expensive ones have thankfully [& no doubt fortioutously] been  :yahoo: & are etched in the memory
IMO punting is like betting - you forget the losses & remember the wins
As long as the wins exceed the losses you are doing fine
With commentary as on this thread it's likely that any UKP'er 'delving deep' to have some fun is unlikely to report on here
Not worth the grief which follows
We all miss out on reporting on what could be described as trophy burds
Playboy FAF insta burds ain't exactly the norm
There is always Shazza from Dagenham @ 50/30 & 70/60 so worry not

Offline PatMacGroin

Seems genuine

External Link/Members Only

Did you notice that the two images I posted were different?

The one on the left was from her profile, the one on the right is the same as the one shown on the link you have provided.

If you take a close look you'll see that most of the text on the two images are different. Generally, all the articles being highlighted are about different subjects. I thought that was weird, why would playboy produce two slightly different covers for the same edition?  :unknown:

I've seen several profiles with faked magazine covers claiming to be playboy bunnies, it's discussed in this review for example: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=246991.msg2525535#msg2525535 Which made me sceptical of the playboy cover thing. Also, I thought playboy magazine was suffering, so they went from monthly to quarterly issues, then went completely digital. Although, that was just a vague recollection which may have been US/UK specific, so unrelated to the NZ version. It was these thoughts, along with the discrepancies between the two versions that have fuelled my scepticism. I don't think I've seen a Playboy magazine in decades, I certainly don't buy them, so I have no idea really, although your link does make it look genuine. :unknown:
« Last Edit: March 16, 2020, 02:51:14 am by PatMacGroin »

Offline Belgarion

The hypocrisy of this post is hilarious, give your head a wobble.

Your still a fool mate. Your opinion is just bitter written diarrhoea.

Admit it, your not here for the review, just to spout shit and impress your fellow brown nosers. You definitely appreciate UKP, it's the only outlet for your irrelevant opinions.

Anyways well done to the punter, if you have no interest in the WG, keep it to yourself... No ones cares.

"You're"

My opinion certainly has an effect on you. My first post was saying it read like a negative but said, his money, his dick and his review. The same thing I told you.

My issue with you is that you think paying 500 quid an hour to shag some Z list porn star is an achievement. It isn't as you can spend less for  a better quality porn star.

I'm not opposed to spending the cash, but it has to be worth it.

I'm here to share my knowledge as you clearly need help.

 :hi:
« Last Edit: March 16, 2020, 07:54:26 am by Belgarion »

Offline Belgarion

An interesting read
Open the wallet & instantly comes the barrage of abuse
What's wrong with UKP'ers reporting on more extravangant adventures
I wonder why the adverse comments are forthcoming
Dare to swim in the expensive pond & derision is not far away
I've had a few expensive blowout burds along the way
And plenty of 40 + 20 R&T's so i'm not exactly Carlos Vandango of the cigar [& punting] world
Even the average ones are soon forgotten
Reporting like:  place - OK / looks - OK / action - OK   Just about
The expensive ones have thankfully [& no doubt fortioutously] been  :yahoo: & are etched in the memory
IMO punting is like betting - you forget the losses & remember the wins
As long as the wins exceed the losses you are doing fine
With commentary as on this thread it's likely that any UKP'er 'delving deep' to have some fun is unlikely to report on here
Not worth the grief which follows
We all miss out on reporting on what could be described as trophy burds
Playboy FAF insta burds ain't exactly the norm
There is always Shazza from Dagenham @ 50/30 & 70/60 so worry not

Nothing wrong with spending the cash, I have no issues with that.

What I have an issue with is the notion that more cash equals a better punt.

That's just bollocks

Offline Bornslippy

second that totally. best 30 mins I have had was with 2 young Brazilian girls for £120. everything included and it like being in my own porno. the OP would have had a heart attack with the level of service and the cheapness

Offline webpunter

Anyone harbouring such a notion [more cash = better punt] needs their head examining
However there is a correlation between spending more & generally finding:
Fitter burds / better attitude / better comms / more services / better punting accomo / reduced chances of CBF set up
This is far from guaranteed & research on here helps eliminates shite punts
With with more expensive shite burds these turn into more expensive shite punts

With AB a different type of Awank burd IMO
If her look appeals [which it does to me] then one to have on HL for a blowout type session

Per reply 13 i posted:
"IMO the kinda burd for a one off session
OK maybe twice"

Nothing wrong with spending the cash, I have no issues with that.

What I have an issue with is the notion that more cash equals a better punt.

That's just bollocks

Offline CODE51

Is she an Instagram model btw?

Isn't always the way the one you are attracted to is more often than not a poor SP....Punter's Alienation  :dash: :(

Cheers for the review
Yh I got her insta

Offline Randyfai


Offline Bornslippy

She will have to. They will all have to. Spending money on whores is a luxury many will be forced to cancel if there is a recession at the end of all this madness