N a t a l i e Gfe Edinburgh

[Matrix]

External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only

1 hour @ £120

Just scapes a positive due to the lower rate, good head and her performance in 69.

Nice flat in Haymarket and standard comms.  Quoted the vivastreet rate to save £20.  Owo was quoted at £30 but I think there's room for manuvere. 

Exactly as in the untouched photos.  Great body and nice, but fake, tits.

Started off with a little dfk and she went down on her knees and gave me a good bj. 

Returned the favour and then she hopped aboard.  Technique was poor so I just grabbed and pounded her.  Took it without complaint.

Has an annoying habit of saying "ahhh" every few sentences, whilst talking.  English is alright.  Doesn't know what to do with herself between rounds and needs to stop playing with the phone.

Round 2 involved a lot of 69 and she definitely got off through that.  Ended up with a good old fashioned boning, bent over the bed.  Thankfully resisted the urge to tell me to come, like her pal.

Good sex and a very hot girl.  Needs to work a bit harder though and improve her organisational skills.  Worth a tumble at £120 if you like boning hot Brazilians.  Her friend actually has a better body but is a bit looser.

Has potential but could go either way.  Definitely specify exactly what you expect for your time/money.

[Access]

Did she take anal?

[Matrix]

Did she take anal?

I've no interest in buggery.

Have you read her likes list?

Her friend mentions sodomy in her profile.

[The Man With No Name]

Very tempted to drill one of these two now they're through here.

Realise you've given this one a positive and the other a neutral, mainly due to your score saving. But given I might just go for the hour due to their pricing (presuming I probably won't have the chance to make two trips to see both), for the same money, who would you say has the edge overall? Also realise CIM and anal, etc. are likely available as haggled extras so let's just keep things simple on the basis of the standard service at 120/h. I see Sarah was OW but did you get OWO included with Natalie?

There's very little to choose between the pics, though I'd agree Sarah is ahead on face and ass, while Natalie has the tits - I'm actually quite happy with well-done fakes. But are you still of the persuasion that Sarah is better overall in the physical stakes? You also mentioned in your review of Sarah she was much hotter than her AW pics, before finding the Viva links. Would you still go with this analysis - and how does she compare to the ones there that aren't on her AW for example?

Service and attitude-wise, however, how much did you prefer Natalie? Realise her English isn't as good, but that really doesn't bother me if she's a much more engaging fuck. Is she noticeably tighter than Sarah? Also, does Sarah properly DFK the way Natalie does?

Apologies - realise there's a good few questions here, but am only asking thanks to your detailed reviews and the fact you fucked one pretty much right after the other. Just answer what you can, cheers.

Current links for convenience:

Natalie - External Link/Members Only // External Link/Members Only

Sarah  - External Link/Members Only // External Link/Members Only