Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Secret WG feedback meanings.  (Read 4541 times)

Offline vorian

Notes are the best way to leave feedback yes but only verified members like myself can leave such feedback or even view it and a lot of WGs don't want to verify their profile so best to leave feedback on the profile in which everyone can see.
Also it's even known for WGs to leave "notes" that aren't true so other WGs are put off by it.
I'm sure some WGs don't put an effort in their feedback like some clients don't.
But that's their choice.
I like to be honest and tell it how it is and I'm sure there are many WGs who do the same.

But not all, so the reliability of a system will be flawed unless all treat it the same. Again who are these established girls who do not get verified. How can AW allow these profiles to carry on and still maintain a due diligence defence. I'm not saying you don't treat FB seriously but if others don't how can you trust it when looking at a punter. Of course if it is bad fair enough but if it is all good doesn't mean the punter is not a bad punter.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

go to adultwork, search for female escorts that have logged in during the last 7 days, order by rating, and you will see many with 100s of feedback who are not verified - amongst the first 20 are naughty slut soph, platinum cindy and dee - all of whom have been well reviewed on ukp I believe

Thank you for those examples I will have a look.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

I give up, doubtless you know best  :hi:

As you wish :hi: I do not know best about anything it is simply my opinion, yours is equally valid.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2014, 02:06:30 AM by vorian »
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline xCocoMonroe

But not all, so the reliability of a system will be flawed unless all treat it the same. Again who are these established girls who do not get verified. How can AW allow these profiles to carry on and still maintain a due diligence defence. I'm not saying you don't treat FB seriously but if others don't how can you trust it when looking at a punter. Of course if it is bad fair enough but if it is all good doesn't mean the punter is not a bad punter.
There are plenty established girls.
It's not mandatory to be verified that's probably why adultwork let it happen although any pictures found to be on other websites that are in the free gallery on AW, tend to get closed down quickly.

I don't solely go by feedback I'm just saying it's good to have a look through and see what other WGs have said, and the clients I have had who have had good feedback have been perfectly fine.
Best thing I go by is a woman's instinct lol! It works wonders.
I do agree a lot of people don't take FB seriously though.
But what can you do!
X

Offline vorian

There are plenty established girls.
It's not mandatory to be verified that's probably why adultwork let it happen although any pictures found to be on other websites that are in the free gallery on AW, tend to get closed down quickly.

I don't solely go by feedback I'm just saying it's good to have a look through and see what other WGs have said, and the clients I have had who have had good feedback have been perfectly fine.
Best thing I go by is a woman's instinct lol! It works wonders.
I do agree a lot of people don't take FB seriously though.
But what can you do!
X

I think you are spot on the best defence you can have is going with your "Spider Sense" and experience. I'm sure it will serve most girls well. It does concern me when some newbies put things on their profile must have 5 good FB before I will take a booking,  they are putting faith and their safety in the hands of a flawed system.

May I ask what is the difference between a verified SP and a fully verified SP and what you have to provide to become one or both.  Thank you.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline mattylondon

I have never booked a WG from Adultwork by Email. Therefore I have no feedback (plus' and minus') Sometimes I have a nose at what my Regular WGs write about there clients in there feedback........Always "Nice gentleman", "Wow! friendly guy"......"or blimey what a gargantuan cock" etc.
I wonder if these things have a hidden meaning, Eg. "Lovely gentleman=He came in 2 seconds thank fuck I don't have to do anything but chat for 59 mins 58 seconds now".
Or "Wow! Treat him well ladies"=He's on deaths door, don't get him too excited.
I'm tempted to book this way to see what they would say about me :sarcastic:
Many of these prossies do have 'code' for their AW feedback and if you have a fragile ego, it's probably better you don't know! For the most part, it isn't that complimentary!  :D

Offline smiths

I have never booked a WG from Adultwork by Email. Therefore I have no feedback (plus' and minus') Sometimes I have a nose at what my Regular WGs write about there clients in there feedback........Always "Nice gentleman", "Wow! friendly guy"......"or blimey what a gargantuan cock" etc.
I wonder if these things have a hidden meaning, Eg. "Lovely gentleman=He came in 2 seconds thank fuck I don't have to do anything but chat for 59 mins 58 seconds now".
Or "Wow! Treat him well ladies"=He's on deaths door, don't get him too excited.
I'm tempted to book this way to see what they would say about me :sarcastic:

I dont play this very stupid game, i am the one paying so a WG having feedback on me is irrelevant as i see it. I dont have any or want any and only book WGs with displayed phone numbers.

Does Asda require FB on me to allow me to shop in their stores, does my builder before doing some work for me, of course not, all they want is my money. Why on earth would i allow a WG to give me FB on a site that is rotten to its core like A/W.

He was annoying as fuck and insincere. And those were his best qualities.

will you be meeting him for a drink  :yahoo:

Offline xCocoMonroe

I think you are spot on the best defence you can have is going with your "Spider Sense" and experience. I'm sure it will serve most girls well. It does concern me when some newbies put things on their profile must have 5 good FB before I will take a booking,  they are putting faith and their safety in the hands of a flawed system.

May I ask what is the difference between a verified SP and a fully verified SP and what you have to provide to become one or both.  Thank you.
A fully verified SP like myself is someone who has uploaded a verification photo, and uploaded ID to prove who they are. This means they are able to leave and read notes for anyone on AW.

A verified SP is someone who has uploaded just a verification photo and no ID. They won't be able to view or write notes, same for non verified SPs
X

Offline vorian

A fully verified SP like myself is someone who has uploaded a verification photo, and uploaded ID to prove who they are. This means they are able to leave and read notes for anyone on AW.

A verified SP is someone who has uploaded just a verification photo and no ID. They won't be able to view or write notes, same for non verified SPs
X

Thanks for the answer makes more sense now, so only fully verified SP's have been aged checked. I thought AW was concerned about underage issues which is why the movies and public gallery rules were changing. Does that mean at some point all SP will have to provide ID or lose their profiles. I know at some point, SS will have to age verify before they can purchase movies and PG's.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Many of these prossies do have 'code' for their AW feedback and if you have a fragile ego, it's probably better you don't know! For the most part, it isn't that complimentary!  :D

There is but its more of a read between the lines and not a code,   None of it is anything horrible as if it was then I would hope the girl would say.

Nice guy, pleasant would see again means just what it says.  If there is nothing even slightly flattering about the client but it was all positive then it means he was probably one of those who did not speak or move for the whole booking and just laid there as if dead.
Nothing bad but lets the next one know that he is safe to see
However what does piss me off is when a guy has loads of positive feedback but dozens of red notes saying very dangerous, this guy attacked me, guy stalked me and attacked me.  Why the fuck leave positive?  I am now banned from the notes section so have only the feedback to rely on (my fault for helping people on here oops) so I don't. I expect everyone to ring me so I can get a feel for them myself and ignore any feedback now
If prossies leave such fake feedback I can only assume many punters do to for fear of getting a negative.  Get rid of feedback for punters all together as it would make it a much more honest system.  We don't need feedback on clients as I take lots of bookings from my website and I don't get to see feedback on them and use my gut instead which tends to work better

Offline Jvosta

Hurts my ego comparing my feedback with other punters.

Feedback for Tom dick and Abdul : "fucktastic time, knows how to please"
Feedback for me: "nice time thanks Hun "

.... :cry:

Offline xCocoMonroe

Thanks for the answer makes more sense now, so only fully verified SP's have been aged checked. I thought AW was concerned about underage issues which is why the movies and public gallery rules were changing. Does that mean at some point all SP will have to provide ID or lose their profiles. I know at some point, SS will have to age verify before they can purchase movies and PG's.
I'm not sure if all SPs will have to age verify themselves but I'm assuming that's how it will be in the near future.
It's not a bad thing in my opinion.
I haven't heard that SS will have to age verify that's news to me but we will see!
X

Offline vorian

I'm not sure if all SPs will have to age verify themselves but I'm assuming that's how it will be in the near future.
It's not a bad thing in my opinion.
I haven't heard that SS will have to age verify that's news to me but we will see!
X

They will if they wish to purchase PG or movies but no one knows for sure how this will work yet.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Uoti2

Wow = (nothing)
Fun = (nothing)
Genuine = (nothing)
Had a great time = (nothing)
Had an amazing time = (nothing)
Had a fantastic time = (nothing)
Lovely = easily pleased, thank god he doesn't realise what the other bastards make me do for the same money
Lovely lovely = can't believe how little I had to do to keep him happy
Clean = wasn't actually covered head to toe in excrement
Polite = not too drunk
Respectful = didn't beat me up, thank fuck
Always a pleasure = boring but safe
Gentleman = paid without my having to ask
Nice guy = scary and possibly evil
Handsome = (nothing)
Enjoyed sucking your cock = (nothing)
Come back soon = (nothing)
Would definitely see again = (nothing)
May see again = can you imagine how vile this fucker was if I didn't even write "would definitely see again"?
One of the best guys I have seen = I hate this job so I don't care if I upset my other punters
Best guy I have ever seen = I hate this job so much that with this FB I have just effectively told all my other punters to fuck off

Offline broksonic

I do check their feedback before I see them , and if it is hidden I definitely won't book
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Offline dilettante

One I've had:
Quote
Very nice man indeed whom I enjoyed getting to know.
... means "A total mug who thinks I give a sh1t about him and is prepared to waste valuable fucking time trying to strike up an acquaintance with me."

... I did see exactly the same FB left for another punter by the same girl - being forrin, she must have copied it from somewhere else on AW.

Offline dilettante

I do check their feedback before I see them , and if it is hidden I definitely won't book
No, the OP is asking about FB that WGs have left for us punters, not hiding their own FB.

Oh dear I was respectful nice gent on one of mine

I guess she had right then

I didnt beat the shit out of her and i paid straight away the evil bit well......
« Last Edit: April 06, 2014, 04:50:13 PM by cockneybstrd »

Offline Daffodil

There is but its more of a read between the lines and not a code,   None of it is anything horrible as if it was then I would hope the girl would say.

Nice guy, pleasant would see again means just what it says.  If there is nothing even slightly flattering about the client but it was all positive then it means he was probably one of those who did not speak or move for the whole booking and just laid there as if dead.
Nothing bad but lets the next one know that he is safe to see
However what does piss me off is when a guy has loads of positive feedback but dozens of red notes saying very dangerous, this guy attacked me, guy stalked me and attacked me.  Why the fuck leave positive?  I am now banned from the notes section so have only the feedback to rely on (my fault for helping people on here oops) so I don't. I expect everyone to ring me so I can get a feel for them myself and ignore any feedback now
If prossies leave such fake feedback I can only assume many punters do to for fear of getting a negative.  Get rid of feedback for punters all together as it would make it a much more honest system.  We don't need feedback on clients as I take lots of bookings from my website and I don't get to see feedback on them and use my gut instead which tends to work better

You've spouted this nonsense before.

Just like most punters do not use Internet forum, neither do prossies. There is no way to make a universal language known and, if there was, us punters would know about it. You and a few others on saafe or wherever might have a 'code', but it means nothing outside of your circle.

The thought that there is some sort of 'prossie code' is ridiculous  :hi:

Offline vorian

You've spouted this nonsense before.

Just like most punters do not use Internet forum, neither do prossies. There is no way to make a universal language known and, if there was, us punters would know about it. You and a few others on saafe or wherever might have a 'code', but it means nothing outside of your circle.

The thought that there is some sort of 'prossie code' is ridiculous  :hi:

Thats the point I was making, unless everyone knew and used this so called code, it is worthless as a way of communicating. Any punters FB that is the same/similar to others is down to a lack of imagination on the part of the prossie. Nothing more sinister.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Daffodil

Thats the point I was making, unless everyone knew and used this so called code, it is worthless as a way of communicating. Any punters FB that is the same/similar to others is down to a lack of imagination on the part of the prossie. Nothing more sinister.

Exactly.

The "prossie code" is complete bollocks outside of a very small circle.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
That is why I said there is not a code but it is more of read between the lines on some of the feedback left...  For instance girl A always leaves really gushy feedback such as super sexy, so horny and skilled and is mine all mine or other such rubbish but for one client just put clean and on time, we can read that she did not like him for some reason
or girl B always leaves fairly normal feedback such as pleasant guy, good sense of humour or some such guff and for one client leaves so energetic, don't know where he gets all his energy from if I see him again I would need tons of redbull. then it would probably mean shagged me non stop from start to finish   It is not a code. It is common sense of reading between the lines. 
when I used to used feedback I always checked out what the girl said about the guy and then checked what she had put for other clients so I could get an idea about how truthful she was and if I should believe the feedback or not.

I have never said there is a code.  It would be stupid to think there was as noone would bloody well know it.  What I said was you can often read between the lines

Offline Gordo987

"Distinguished, mature gentleman" = Stupid bald headed old twat who needed help to find my fanny without his glasses?  :)
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

"Distinguished, mature gentleman" = Stupid bald headed old twat who needed help to find my fanny without his glasses?  :)

Been there; but not had that said about me, although it could well have been!

Many of mine have had comments about how much fun it was to be with me! :wacko:  I don't want it to be fun :mad:; I want it to be sexy!! :cool:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)