SexyOralqueen64 - Harlow

[oohermrs]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Went to see this SP recently on the strength of winkywanky's review and the handful of positive comments made.

Comms were quick and easy to set up a blow & go session for £35.  Location easy to find and park up.  Logistics were all fine.

Looks - 

Very good OWO session with a CIM + swallow finish.  Technique was, as has been previously commented on, excellent although I lasted twice as long as I usually do.  And yes, she is a nice lady, easy to talk to, and yes she's good VFM etc.  I agree with all the previous comments on here.

However, and it is not a small however, I had to close my eyes throughout the session and pretend I was with someone else.

Did think about walking when she opened the door, but thought I was a fully paid-up member of the "Don't need to look at the mantelpiece when you're poking the fire" brigade.  Obviously, I'm not.  This visit has helped me to realise there are new depths to my shallowness...for me the visual stimulation is an important part of the nature of the experience and that means me watching a decent-looking SP going to work on me.

Clearly not a negative, but the acid test for me is would I return?  No, therefore, it's got to be a neutral from me.   

[winkywanky]

I must confess, it seems a little unfair that despite her excellent blowjob service which you were fully availed of, even though you knew she was 'no looker' from previous reviews, you've marked her down to a Neutral.

It's that old dichotomy though, do we review based on whether we would return, or do we review on quality of service?

It's tricky.

[winkywanky]

PS - did you get her to unleash her massive tits? They're very fulsome and may have made you feel differently    .

[oohermrs]

PS - did you get her to unleash her massive tits? They're very fulsome and may have made you feel differently    .

I agree, that's what got me into the room I the first place.  See?  Told you I was shallow... 

Is the neutral unfair?  Possibly.  Looks are always subjective and normally they don't impact on the experience of the punt for me, but they did here.  What I can't get away from is the fact that if I visit Evy, Chelsea or Carey they have me flopping all over the place in under 10mins, here it was 20mins and that's not normal for me.  I've reviewed the 3 SPs above and given them positives and have returned on numerous occasions, but this visit wasn't up at that kind of level - hence the neutral.

[Sparta Prada]

I must confess, it seems a little unfair that despite her excellent blowjob service which you were fully availed of, even though you knew she was 'no looker' from previous reviews, you've marked her down to a Neutral.

It's that old dichotomy though, do we review based on whether we would return, or do we review on quality of service?

It's tricky.

I have always been someone who rates service above looks. However in order to enjoy the experience you have to have some attraction to the person you have paid. To me the OP has rated this as they see fit, and has even explained the reasons for it.

Nothing to really query here, is there?

[winkywanky]

I agree, that's what got me into the room I the first place.  See?  Told you I was shallow... 

Is the neutral unfair?  Possibly.  Looks are always subjective and normally they don't impact on the experience of the punt for me, but they did here.  What I can't get away from is the fact that if I visit Evy, Chelsea or Carey they have me flopping all over the place in under 10mins, here it was 20mins and that's not normal for me.  I've reviewed the 3 SPs above and given them positives and have returned on numerous occasions, but this visit wasn't up at that kind of level - hence the neutral.

Looking back at your review I can see I pretty well misconstrued your comment about lasting longer than usual as being a desirable thing (in the sense of building and edging). But evidently that's not the case here.

That makes sense in terms of the overall neutral for a BJ-only booking.

But it's not for me to judge your rating  .

[winkywanky]

I have always been someone who rates service above looks. However in order to enjoy the experience you have to have some attraction to the person you have paid. To me the OP has rated this as they see fit, and has even explained the reasons for it.

Nothing to really query here, is there?

Not really query, more discuss.