Gymfitbex aka englishrebecca121- Bristol

[jDguy]

I previously saw Rebecca  in 2017 in her London tour. This time I was heading to SW on a business trip. On my way back to London I had the opportunity to visit Rebecca.



Comms: by AW in advance and txt confrmation. 1 hour booking.

Location : central Bristol in her apartment .

appearance/Meeting: I was curious to look at her enhanced breast. But wasn't disappointed, boobs are perfectly matched with her body and looks more of natural. Drink showers offered.

Service wise she delivered owo, cim, fk DFK, 69 sex with great enthusiasm. 

Positive:
Excellent hygiene, no clock watching,  we ran over by 20 mins or so.


Negative: none


in summary _
A solid English SP who provides a top notch service.

Would I recommend : yes

Would I return : I will keep an eye on her tour.

using External Link/Members Only or               External Link/Members Only

[konky dong]

Another +ve review confirming what a solid performer bex is, thanks. Though I see her AW now states she is slowing down in three months , any word on what that's about?

I better get me skates on to get to see her soon........ Hang on is this just a ruse  to drum up more trade    Or am I just being cynical

[Charlie Chalk]

I’d always take anything Bex says with a couple of packets of Saxa.

[threechilliman]

I’d always take anything Bex says with a couple of packets of Saxa.

Indeed. Usual BS from her. Her lack of discretion needs highlighting as well. Personally I wouldn't go anywhere near her.

[Fuzzyduck]

Another +ve review confirming what a solid performer bex is, thanks. Though I see her AW now states she is slowing down in three months , any word on what that's about?

I better get me skates on to get to see her soon........ Hang on is this just a ruse  to drum up more trade  Or am I just being cynical

No, but I think you're being unnecessarily melodramatic. My advice would be to get some new skates. You've been talking about seeing Bex for over 4 years now.

[millbush]

Indeed. Usual BS from her. Her lack of discretion needs highlighting as well. Personally I wouldn't go anywhere near her.

In what way is she indiscreet?

[cotton]

Rebecca sounds great but tbh id be avoid seeing a hooker who advertises they have 4th stage kidney failure , my heart goes out to her and all that but its just not what i want to know about someone im considering as a hooker.

[sonyvaio]

In what way is she indiscreet?

There's a current thread over on UKE about how she outed another SP (by accident allegedly), the SP went to the bother of creating a brand new profile, which was then outed within hours by Bex.

[Fuzzyduck]

There's a current thread over on UKE about how she outed another SP (by accident allegedly), the SP went to the bother of creating a brand new profile, which was then outed within hours by Bex.

On interesting. I wasn't aware of that. I don't really frequent UKE but one glance at the SW board there and I picked the thread straight away. Right where's my popcorn.

[millbush]

There's a current thread over on UKE about how she outed another SP (by accident allegedly), the SP went to the bother of creating a brand new profile, which was then outed within hours by Bex.

Thanks i do not read UKE.

[threechilliman]

On interesting. I wasn't aware of that. I don't really frequent UKE but one glance at the SW board there and I picked the thread straight away. Right where's my popcorn.

I would say 'Coming right up' but this is UKP not UKE. Tis a good read though, glass of wine worthy.

[cotton]

I havnt seen the UKE topic and know nothing about it but id assume rebeccas mistake was borne out of thoughtlessness and lack of understanding rather than anything malicious.

[Fuzzyduck]

I havnt seen the UKE topic and know nothing about it but id assume rebeccas mistake was borne out of thoughtlessness and lack of understanding rather than anything malicious.

Perhaps you should read it before making any assumptions. I'm only part way through and the backlash from punters and other SPs is significant. It might be unjustified but there's usually no smoke without fire.

[cotton]

Perhaps you should read it before making any assumptions. I'm only part way through and the backlash from punters and other SPs is significant. It might be unjustified but there's usually no smoke without fire.

I find UKE to nauseating , im happy with my assumption and giving the benefit of the doubt but will be happy to hear your judgement after youve heard the whole story. Was it borne out of thoughtlessness and lack of understanding or maliciousness.

[sensualencounter]

I find UKE to nauseating , im happy with my assumption and giving the benefit of the doubt but will be happy to hear your judgement after youve heard the whole story. Was it borne out of thoughtlessness and lack of understanding or maliciousness.

Pure spite and malice. She even admitted what she’d done. And then compounded it by “accidentally” posting the wg’s new profile on the uke thread, hence outing her again.

How anyone can accidentally copy and paste a wg’s adultwork link is beyond me.

But I’m sure the WK’s will be rallying to the cause.

Oh and she’s been talking about other wg’s and punters with punters. Honestly, how anyone would risk seeing her and spewing out all that “fuck and go” bullshit is beyond me. She is very malicious and sinister.

Anyone that wishes to bury their heads in the sand and ignore all this with “I don’t read uke” or “I’m sure it wasn’t malicious” are bigger fools and deserve all what you might get. You have been warned.

[threechilliman]

Pure spite and malice. She even admitted what she’d done. And then compounded it by “accidentally” posting the wg’s new profile on the uke thread, hence outing her again.

How anyone can accidentally copy and paste a wg’s adultwork link is beyond me.

But I’m sure the WK’s will be rallying to the cause.

Oh and she’s been talking about other wg’s and punters with punters. Honestly, how anyone would risk seeing her and spewing out all that “fuck and go” bullshit is beyond me. She is very malicious and sinister.

Anyone that wishes to bury their heads in the sand and ignore all this with “I don’t read uke” or “I’m sure it wasn’t malicious” are bigger fools and deserve all what you might get. You have been warned.

I'd agree with that lot. Visit her at your peril.....

[cotton]

Pure spite and malice. She even admitted what she’d done. And then compounded it by “accidentally” posting the wg’s new profile on the uke thread, hence outing her again.

How anyone can accidentally copy and paste a wg’s adultwork link is beyond me.

But I’m sure the WK’s will be rallying to the cause.

Oh and she’s been talking about other wg’s and punters with punters. Honestly, how anyone would risk seeing her and spewing out all that “fuck and go” bullshit is beyond me. She is very malicious and sinister.

Anyone that wishes to bury their heads in the sand and ignore all this with “I don’t read uke” or “I’m sure it wasn’t malicious” are bigger fools and deserve all what you might get. You have been warned.

Fair enough but where are you quoting “I’m sure it wasn’t malicious” from ?

[Fuzzyduck]

I find UKE to nauseating , im happy with my assumption and giving the benefit of the doubt but will be happy to hear your judgement after youve heard the whole story. Was it borne out of thoughtlessness and lack of understanding or maliciousness.

- If you think the sun shines out of Bex's ass then you will believe it's a misunderstanding and that the other SP is trying to smear her name.
- If you think she's a malicious shit-stirrer then it will just compound what you already believe. I've not seen much of this crossing over to UKP myself, though someone's comments on a recent thread about Rosie makes a lot more sense now
- If you try to have an open mind you'll make the effort to find out for yourself and come to your own conclusion.

There's a backstory on SAAFE that I've not looked at but the UKP thread is pretty damning and many SPs and punters conclude she acted deliberately, and have said it's a theme that she can be malicious towards other SPs. No-one whatsoever has tried to defend her actions. FWIW I believe the other SP in the drama is a little unhinged herself, but I do believe that GFB was bang out of order and it isn't one-off behaviour.

The main takeaway for punters thinking about seeing her is to be cautious and don't share too much personal information with her.

I'm interested to see what the WK brigade think of it.

[Fuzzyduck]

Fair enough but where are you quoting “I’m sure it wasn’t malicious” from ?

You can quibble about the difference between being sure and assuming but you were being paraphrased, fairly IMO

I havnt seen the UKE topic and know nothing about it but id assume rebeccas mistake was borne out of thoughtlessness and lack of understanding rather than anything malicious.

[cotton]

- If you think the sun shines out of Bex's ass then you will believe it's a misunderstanding and that the other SP is trying to smear her name.
- If you think she's a malicious shit-stirrer then it will just compound what you already believe. I've not seen much of this crossing over to UKP myself, though someone's comments on a recent thread about Rosie makes a lot more sense now
- If you try to have an open mind you'll make the effort to find out for yourself and come to your own conclusion.

There's a backstory on SAAFE that I've not looked at but the UKP thread is pretty damning and many SPs and punters conclude she acted deliberately, and have said it's a theme that she can be malicious towards other SPs. No-one whatsoever has tried to defend her actions. FWIW I believe the other SP in the drama is a little unhinged herself, but I do believe that GFB was bang out of order and it isn't one-off behaviour.

The main takeaway for punters thinking about seeing her is to be cautious and don't share too much personal information with her.

I'm interested to see what the WK brigade think of it.

Ive an open mind , my inclination is to give rebeca the benefit of the doubt that it was stupidity rather than deliberately malicious , but i could be wrong , i have no idea. I know rebecca can be caustic to other sps on UKP but if they deserve it its fine. In this instance , since i have no deseire to check UKE or saafe myself i am happy to accept your judgement.
Which seems to be that rebecca is a bit of a cunt to other sps but possibly youl be ok if your a punter 

[cotton]

You can quibble about the difference between being sure and assuming but you were being paraphrased, fairly IMO

No totally unfair . massive difference between saying "assume something" and being "sure" of something.

[Fuzzyduck]

Ive an open mind , my inclination is to give rebeca the benefit of the doubt that it was stupidity rather than deliberately malicious , but i could be wrong , i have no idea. I know rebecca can be caustic to other sps on UKP but if they deserve it its fine. In this instance , since i have no deseire to check UKE or saafe myself i am happy to accept your judgement.
Which seems to be that rebecca is a bit of a cunt to other sps but possibly youl be ok if your a punter 

I made no judgement. It was just my opinion. I encourage others to form their own.

[Fuzzyduck]

No totally unfair . massive difference between saying "assume something" and being "sure" of something.

Normally I'd totally agree, which is why I pointed it out. However, even if sensualencounter had written "Anyone that wishes to bury their heads in the sand and ignore all this with “I don’t read uke” or “I assume it wasn’t malicious” are bigger fools and deserve all what you might get", it would have made little difference in the context of his message: choosing ignorance is no defence.

[cotton]

Normally I'd totally agree, which is why I pointed it out. However, even if sensualencounter had written "Anyone that wishes to bury their heads in the sand and ignore all this with “I don’t read uke” or “I assume it wasn’t malicious” are bigger fools and deserve all what you might get", it would have made little difference in the context of his message: choosing ignorance is no defence.

Point of quotation marks is that it is a verbatim repeat of the exact words used , not a paraphrasing.

[cotton]

I made no judgement. It was just my opinion. I encourage others to form their own.

Ok well sounds like a lot of unhinged ho bickering , UKE and saafe type BS , "many SPs and punters conclude she acted deliberately, and have said it's a theme that she can be malicious towards other SPs"
Ok noted she can be a cunt to other sps.
But in the interest of even handiness her feedback on UKP +73 is pretty good.

[Fuzzyduck]

Point of quotation marks is that it is a verbatim repeat of the exact words used , not a paraphrasing.

I know you're right, you know you're right, and sensualencounter knows you're right. You miss the fucking point.

[cotton]

I know you're right, you know you're right, and sensualencounter knows you're right. You miss the fucking point.

Ok well maybe sensualencounter can make his point without misrepresenting me by the improper use of quotation marks.

[Fuzzyduck]

Ok well sounds like a lot of unhinged ho bickering , UKE and saafe type BS , "many SPs and punters conclude she acted deliberately, and have said it's a theme that she can be malicious towards other SPs"
Ok noted she can be a cunt to other sps.
But in the interest of even handiness her feedback on UKP +73 is pretty good.

No-one is debating whether she's a good punt or not. Lots of good feedback that I would agree with from personal experience. The point though is this is the latest drama in a litany of manipulative and unpleasant behaviour that is deeply ingrained. A lot of punters choose to ignore this side of her, presumably for a simple punting life.

[Fuzzyduck]

Ok well maybe sensualencounter can make his point without misrepresenting me by the improper use of quotation marks.

I see why you chose to be ignorant if all you care about is the use of some quotation marks. FFS.

[sensualencounter]

Ok well maybe sensualencounter can make his point without misrepresenting me by the improper use of quotation marks.

Jesus Christ mate, talk about deflection. I put quotation marks as it was what I fully expect a fluffy fan boy to say, or should I call them speech marks? Wasn’t quoting you per se but the more you keep on trying the feign ignorance and coming up with “It all seems a load of nonsense between wgs and it doesn’t affect punters” (that’s not a verbatim quote before you deflect again), the more you look like EXACTLY the type of WK I was describing.

Ignorance is no excuse. When you’ve been given where to find the evidence and you decide not to read it and just go with somebody’s summary, it makes you look stupid and deliberately in denial. As has been mentioned, do your research and make up your own mind. But I assure you, I’ve decided she IS a risk to punters as well as wgs.

[cotton]

Jesus Christ mate, talk about deflection. I put quotation marks as it was what I fully expect a fluffy fan boy to say, or should I call them speech marks? Wasn’t quoting you per se but the more you keep on trying the feign ignorance and coming up with “It all seems a load of nonsense between wgs and it doesn’t affect punters” (that’s not a verbatim quote before you deflect again), the more you look like EXACTLY the type of WK I was describing.

Ignorance is no excuse. When you’ve been given where to find the evidence and you decide not to read it and just go with somebody’s summary, it makes you look stupid and deliberately in denial. As has been mentioned, do your research and make up your own mind. But I assure you, I’ve decided she IS a risk to punters as well as wgs.

As Fuzzy says shes a good punt with + 73 feedback on UKP ,   i cant be bothered to read UKE or saafe because its all a load of mindless BS , just cos you tell me to read it dosnt mean i have to. If youve got some insightful information to impart from your research say what it is because so far youve said nothing except youve made your mind up but your mind was made up before this anyway.

[threechilliman]

As Fuzzy says shes a good punt with + 73 feedback on UKP ,   i cant be bothered to read UKE or saafe because its all a load of mindless BS , just cos you tell me to read it dosnt mean i have to. If youve got some insightful information to impart from your research say what it is because so far youve said nothing except youve made your mind up but your mind was made up before this anyway.

Controversial SP's with a lot of reviews makes me wonder whether they request reviews. Wouldn't be the first time.....

[Kev40ish]

Controversial SP's with a lot of reviews makes me wonder whether they request reviews. Wouldn't be the first time.....

You seem to have quite a bit of disrespect for the 73 reviewers, many of whom who have many other reviews under their belt.. are you suggesting they are weak willed and under her thumb..

[millbush]

As Fuzzy says shes a good punt with + 73 feedback on UKP ,   i cant be bothered to read UKE or saafe because its all a load of mindless BS , just cos you tell me to read it dosnt mean i have to. If youve got some insightful information to impart from your research say what it is because so far youve said nothing except youve made your mind up but your mind was made up before this anyway.

Good summary I concur.

[sensualencounter]

As Fuzzy says shes a good punt with + 73 feedback on UKP ,   i cant be bothered to read UKE or saafe because its all a load of mindless BS , just cos you tell me to read it dosnt mean i have to. If youve got some insightful information to impart from your research say what it is because so far youve said nothing except youve made your mind up but your mind was made up before this anyway.

I’ve told you earlier what I’ve found, she’s outed another wg twice, putting her safety at risk. She’s talked about other wgs and punters with other punters. And she’s also tried contacting new wgs to weasel up to them to control them to scare them off. She’s slagged off many of her duo partners.

But like I said, you make up your own mind. Don’t just take my word for it. But you won’t, as you’re in denial. It’s easier for you to just say uke is shit rather than use your own brain and objectively make up your own mind.

[sensualencounter]

Good summary I concur.

And have you bothered to look at any of the evidence? Wouldn’t think so as you’re a massive WK of her.

As predicted, we’ve got two of you saddled up, protecting the fair maiden. There will be plenty more coming to her rescue.

Interesting she hasn’t come on this thread to deny it. She’s like lightening on others. Does that tell you anything or have you got a fluffy explanation for that too?

[millbush]

And have you bothered to look at any of the evidence? Wouldn’t think so as you’re a massive WK of her.

As predicted, we’ve got two of you saddled up, protecting the fair maiden. There will be plenty more coming to her rescue.

Interesting she hasn’t come on this thread to deny it. She’s like lightening on others. Does that tell you anything or have you got a fluffy explanation for that too?

I read it all except the SAAFE thread if it's still online,agreed doesn't look good on the face of it.
I'm in no position to speculate however and my only dealing with Rebecca was faultless and I had a great time,she's no threat to me and your fluffy/white knight bollocks is predictable, rather childish and I couldn't give a shit what you think anyway.

[threechilliman]

You seem to have quite a bit of disrespect for the 73 reviewers, many of whom who have many other reviews under their belt.. are you suggesting they are weak willed and under her thumb..

It's not disrespect but old Bex is very manipulative. 82 reviews, 73 green but 9 that are not green - that kind of mix and the volume of reviews raises suspicion with me now due to an experience I had with a girl in Sherwood a few years ago with a similar history. An under-whelming punt is what I got and mirrored the not so glowing reviews.

You interpret how you wish, but I'll do it my way thanks.

[Charlie Chalk]

I read it all except the SAAFE thread if it's still online,agreed doesn't look good on the face of it.
I'm in no position to speculate however and my only dealing with Rebecca was faultless and I had a great time,she's no threat to me and your fluffy/white knight bollocks is predictable, rather childish and I couldn't give a shit what you think anyway.

You couldn’t give a shit but here you are, defending yourself anyway against an opinion you don’t give a shit about.

What appears to be beyond any doubt is:

1) Rebecca outed another WG
2) Rebecca then outed the same WG shortly after she had changed her online ID’s

Aside from all the rest of the shitstorm, those are the facts backed up by what has been posted and can be seen on UKE. As for motives, either it was accidental or deliberate. If she’s done it once then I’d have been prepared to believe it was accidental but to do it twice? Especially as Rebecca has been around for a while and isn’t naive ? Nah, sorry but I doubt it. She’s either stupid and careless or deceptively clever and vindictive. Given all the other drama and hullabaloo which seems to surround her, and given the various things she has said in the past which have been proven to be lies or at least exceptionally doubtful, then I’d be very, very wary of having anything to do with her. She may not have had any of these issues with an SS yet (just other SP’s so far as we know) but if she does have a questionable nature then she’s a Danger Punt in my eyes.

So despite her 70-odd positives on here (which TBF shows that she does know how to provide a good service) I’d not consider booking her. Others may come to a different conclusion which is their prerogative but don’t ignore the evidence as this opens you up (quite rightly) to accusations of WK-ing.

[BobAJobMan]

Ive an open mind , my inclination is to give rebeca the benefit of the doubt that it was stupidity rather than deliberately malicious , but i could be wrong , i have no idea. I know rebecca can be caustic to other sps on UKP but if they deserve it its fine. In this instance , since i have no deseire to check UKE or saafe myself i am happy to accept your judgement.
Which seems to be that rebecca is a bit of a cunt to other sps but possibly youl be ok if your a punter 

You don't 'accidentally' ferret out a new AW profile and then 'accidentally' post it on UKE.

[sensualencounter]

You don't 'accidentally' ferret out a new AW profile and then 'accidentally' post it on UKE.

+1000 that to me is really sinister and malicious. The profile had barely been up and she found it and posted it. She’s either constantly stalking and / or her minions are reporting back to her. THATS why she’s a risk to punters as well as wgs.

I would laugh my head off if a few of these WKs on here came a cropper with her.

[Kev40ish]

I would laugh my head off if a few of these WKs on here came a cropper with her.

It might happen, who knows....

What I find more amusing is, since I have been a member on here for the last 6 or 7 years, there have been warnings on every review that is made on her.

I find it a bit sad that people feel the constant need to remind everyone of the risks of seeing her, but nothing has ever materialised.

There are some people on here that seem to like to gossip more than fishwives, predicting doom on anyone who may want to see her.

But that’s just my view, what do I know, you may be right but nothing has happened, so let’s wait and see.

I for one wouldn’t be laughing my head off, like a cunt, at someone’s misfortune, if something did happen, but maybe I’m just a nice person..

[cotton]

I’ve told you earlier what I’ve found, she’s outed another wg twice, putting her safety at risk. She’s talked about other wgs and punters with other punters. And she’s also tried contacting new wgs to weasel up to them to control them to scare them off. She’s slagged off many of her duo partners.

But like I said, you make up your own mind. Don’t just take my word for it. But you won’t, as you’re in denial. It’s easier for you to just say uke is shit rather than use your own brain and objectively make up your own mind.

Ok she supposedly outed another WG , but we dont know if she did it through thoughtlessness and lack of understanding rather than anything malicious do we ? or do we ?
And fgs stop the WK crap , it just makes you look like a lame prick , im entitled to disagree with you if i want or at least keep an open mind. Just cos i dont join in your vindictive drum banging dosnt make me a WK , nor anyone else who dosnt agree with you.

I would laugh my head off if a few of these WKs on here came a cropper with her.

If anything your relentless vindictive pursuit of Rebecca actually makes me more inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt because what the hell is wrong with you 

[Charlie Chalk]

Ok she supposedly outed another WG , but we dont know if she did it through thoughtlessness and lack of understanding rather than anything malicious do we ? or do we ?

Firstly, there is no “supposedly” about it. If you read the thread in question she actually admits doing it. Twice. The outing (twice) is therefore a matter of fact, not conjecture. You need to know the facts before you post, otherwise you immediately ook like a WK who wants to ignore them.

As I posted above, what is open to question are her motives. If you believe this to be a mistake, then you  have to believe that an experienced WG who is and has been (for some time) a frequent user of forums, somehow managed to link another WG’s details on one forum to her details on another. Once would be difficult enough to believe, but twice? That would be a monumental foul up from someone who usually knows exactly what she is doing when she posts.

As I said, people can decide for themselves whether she has been careless and stupid or clever and vindictive. Based on the fact she is an experienced WG, an experienced forum member across multiple forums and, when called out about what she had done, didn’t say “oh I’m so sorry, I never meant to do that, I’m an idiot” (as would be natural if you found you had inadvertently done something as serious as outing someone) then I find it difficult to believe she didn’t do this on purpose.

[millbush]

You couldn’t give a shit but here you are, defending yourself anyway against an opinion you don’t give a shit about.

What appears to be beyond any doubt is:

1) Rebecca outed another WG
2) Rebecca then outed the same WG shortly after she had changed her online ID’s

Aside from all the rest of the shitstorm, those are the facts backed up by what has been posted and can be seen on UKE. As for motives, either it was accidental or deliberate. If she’s done it once then I’d have been prepared to believe it was accidental but to do it twice? Especially as Rebecca has been around for a while and isn’t naive ? Nah, sorry but I doubt it. She’s either stupid and careless or deceptively clever and vindictive. Given all the other drama and hullabaloo which seems to surround her, and given the various things she has said in the past which have been proven to be lies or at least exceptionally doubtful, then I’d be very, very wary of having anything to do with her. She may not have had any of these issues with an SS yet (just other SP’s so far as we know) but if she does have a questionable nature then she’s a Danger Punt in my eyes.

So despite her 70-odd positives on here (which TBF shows that she does know how to provide a good service) I’d not consider booking her. Others may come to a different conclusion which is their prerogative but don’t ignore the evidence as this opens you up (quite rightly) to accusations of WK-ing.

You don't seem to read posts properly or perhaps rather prefer twisting them to your clear agenda.
Indeed I don't give a shit what you say(doubt many do) I'm not defending myself either just giving my opinion.
I've said it doesn't look good for her on that UKE thread but that doesn't affect me in any way.
If Bex winds you up so much it might be best you ignore any posts regarding her.

[dubs]

What appears to be beyond any doubt is:

1) Rebecca outed another WG
2) Rebecca then outed the same WG shortly after she had changed her online ID’s

When you say "outed", do you mean ER posted the WG's real name, or sent her AW links to her family/friends/neighbours?  That's what "outed" means in my punting dictionary.

[Charlie Chalk]

You don't seem to read posts properly or perhaps rather prefer twisting them to your clear agenda.
Indeed I don't give a shit what you say(doubt many do) I'm not defending myself either just giving my opinion.
I've said it doesn't look good for her on that UKE thread but that doesn't affect me in any way.
If Bex winds you up so much it might be best you ignore any posts regarding her.

You’re starting to come across as a bit of a twat. I don’t have a “clear agenda” other than confirming the facts (as opposed to any hearsay) on here so that others, who may not have access to UKE, can make up the own minds. I have said this in multiple posts on this thread. Unless you are WK-ing Rebecca then I fail to see why you would have a problem with that.

I don’t have a dog in this fight. I don’t know who the other WG is and I’ve never met Rebecca. I’m just commenting on an issue which may have escaped the notice of other members and which may be useful to help them MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS (look, I’ve said it again). I’ll continue to do so with or without your permission, Mr Wannabe Mod.

[Charlie Chalk]

When you say "outed", do you mean ER posted the WG's real name, or sent her AW links to her family/friends/neighbours?  That's what "outed" means in my punting dictionary.

Not “outed” in that context so good chance to clarify and to be fair to Rebecca (regardless of whether she deserves it) if anyone else has drawn the same conclusion. Some of the posts have been removed, but what seems clear is that she linked another WG’s SAAFE account to her UKE account which therefore links back to her AW. A link between SAAFE and her AW is therefore established which is not a good thing. The WG created new accounts and Rebecca then linked (via another post) the new accounts to the old. Either spectacularly stupid or nasty - everyone can draw their own conclusions.

[dubs]

Not “outed” in that context so good chance to clarify and to be fair to Rebecca (regardless of whether she deserves it) if anyone else has drawn the same conclusion. Some of the posts have been removed, but what seems clear is that she linked another WG’s SAAFE account to her UKE account which therefore links back to her AW. A link between SAAFE and her AW is therefore established which is not a good thing. The WG created new accounts and Rebecca then linked (via another post) the new accounts to the old. Either spectacularly stupid or nasty - everyone can draw their own conclusions.

Pffff. storm in a teacup then.  Linking saafe usernames happens all the time here e.g. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=257379.msg2627693#msg2627693

And linking new AW profiles to old also happens very frequently here, and is very useful for punters.

I guess the WG identified may not have liked it from another WG, but I can't see why ER is being so vilified for something that happens here all the time.

[cotton]

Not “outed” in that context so good chance to clarify and to be fair to Rebecca (regardless of whether she deserves it) if anyone else has drawn the same conclusion. Some of the posts have been removed, but what seems clear is that she linked another WG’s SAAFE account to her UKE account which therefore links back to her AW. A link between SAAFE and her AW is therefore established which is not a good thing. The WG created new accounts and Rebecca then linked (via another post) the new accounts to the old. Either spectacularly stupid or nasty - everyone can draw their own conclusions.

Thanks for the extra info. So its unestablished wether this was just a collosal accidental fuck up by rebecca or malevolent.
Personally i dont put it beyond credibility for hookers to be either incredibly stupid or malevolent so on the info provided its impossible to call.
Do you know if Rebecca had any apparent motivation to do this for malicious reasons ?
Or as dubs says its all just a storm in a tea cup.