Amber-Lux. Nottingham outcall. Misleading profile. Disappointed

[Jack Flash]

Catching up on a few reports - See dates under Details

External Link/Members Only

Details:
December 2019. Evening
Oucall. 1 hour. £160

Prelude:
Set up reverse booking asking for slim woman with a pert bum. Amber was one of many who replied but listed her upfront services on her bid – ‘Full gfe dfk ro owo cim a levels’.
Stated size 8 on interview although I now see hidden in her profile it is 10.Plus pos ukp. Picture looked OK and profile promised 'petite' and 'hourglass figure' 

Venue:
Best Western Hotel. Large comfortable room with a couple of handy mirrors

About:
The usual anticipation led to a big let down as she walked in. She has a small pretty face with long blonde hair but below is a dumpy body with obvious big belly and bum showing through her clothes. Boobs quite nice - handful size with firm nipples. Age about late 30s. Not a good start.

The Meeting:
After my initial disappointment had a chat with her then sorted out the paperwork and she got changed in the bathroom. Unfortunately the transformation only emphasised her plumpness. She had on stockings and a sort of stretchy (it had to be!) black latex-type dress that emphasised her 'curves'. Started off kissing at which she did not hold back - a plus point. Both undressed and I kissed down towards her pussy. This was smooth and wet but difficult to get to because of her big thighs and seeming reluctance/inability to part them much. She later told me that she 'doesn't do yoga'. So I managed to get my fingers in and just about got my head in a position to lick her clit although it wasn't easy. She seemed to enjoy this and following my suggestion to use her vibrator she made herself cum. Owo on me was reasonable although she did use her hand a lot and not a lot of mouth but I was in need of a good shag so condom on and we fucked in several positions. Her pussy was tight and wet and I could feel it squeezing my cock as I slowed my strokes. Mish, doggy, spoons all OK but limited by her mobility issue. Asked her to suck my cock and take it deeper into her mouth which she did, a bit. When I was about to come I said I want to come in your mouth (remember she had listed this in her offer) and she took her mouth away completely!  She left after a bit more chatting.

Summary:
Another less than spectacular RB. Wanted a slim lithe girl/woman and got a rather infexible dumpling. This is definitely bordering on a negative. I notice that she has now blocked her ratings and feedback on AW – maybe someone told the truth, warts and all (no I didn’t see any warts).

Cons:
Profile misleading and deceptive -
Profile                        Actual
Petite                         short
Hourglass figure          barrel shaped. No waist, just a big belly.
Young and energetic    Stiff and inflexible

The rest of the profile is also pure fantasy

Pros:
Pretty face. Nice boobs.

Would I return?
No. No. No. 

[MajorPayne]

Looks quite nice in her photos.

[Jack Flash]

YMMV 

[badsin]

Valid neutral, if her description is misleading

[Imp8]

Valid neutral   !!!!!      Solid Negative

[Gplincs]

also hidden feedbacks...

[moomoo1]

Hello, New on here...... Yes i saw her last night 22nd Jan
To be brutally honest i wished I had kept my money, she told me was doing AW stuff for 12 years the photo on AW must be 12 years old, as she hasn’t got an hour glass figure. Fact is she is a little tubby size 10 on the top size 12/14 on the butt (it’s a big butt with thunderous thighs) her waist is floppy and very unattractive. I couldn’t keep hard....she was that bad.
Also has some side teeth missing and kept sniffling you can make you’re own minds on that.
Would i see her again / would I recommend her both definitely no.

All in all don’t bother many more better toned and more attractive on AW.
Plus pint she has nice tits.....that’s all the plus she has.

[geoff 1171]

I recently met Amber, it was actually my best ever punting experience, different strokes..... Had lined up a second meeting (and intended to review afterwards) but she's now deleted her profile. C'est la vie!

[plsnt1]

I had a very sensual meet with Amber last summer. As has been reported great OWO and penetration, also I thought Amber was quite pretty. Amber is carrying a slight amount of additional weight but I thought not too much. The picture on the left is more representative and as I remember Amber. The picture on the right isn't as representative, on that basis the neutral is justified. My last report on this site was a negative because the given age and pictures must have been 25 years out and the given size was again hopelessly out. I suppose we have no recourse to the Trades Description Act! Hence the benefit of this site.

[Jack Flash]

I had a very sensual meet with Amber last summer. As has been reported great OWO and penetration, also I thought Amber was quite pretty. Amber is carrying a slight amount of additional weight but I thought not too much. The picture on the left is more representative and as I remember Amber. The picture on the right isn't as representative, on that basis the neutral is justified. My last report on this site was a negative because the given age and pictures must have been 25 years out and the given size was again hopelessly out. I suppose we have no recourse to the Trades Description Act! Hence the benefit of this site.

I am not sure that the 'Amber' you and Geoff are referring to is the same person.

The Amber I saw only had one picture on her profile - the one of her boobs; and her profile disappeared yesterday.