Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Johanna XxX - South Kensington, Scarlett Johansson look-alike  (Read 20379 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5527828) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by johnny34]
9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5379285) (7 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by PatMacGroin]
9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6687214) (7 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline pgma1



External Link/Members Only

I have seen Johanna a few times in the past via divaescort where she's listed as "Uma". Her adultwork profile has been knocking about a while, and i'd never really been able to reach her via it until this evening. Searching on here when i got back from the meet i noticed there was a post about a possible bait and switch but its definitely Johanna as depicted in the pics in the profile i met tonight.

My booking with her was for half an hour. In terms of the action, there was kissing and OWO, and i managed to get through two positions before finishing. She's in a spacious apartment in South Kensington which is literally 3 minutes from the station and quite convenient for me to reach from where i'm based so I suspect therefore i will be paying her more visits in the near future  :P Why? She's probably the most attractive SP i'v been with and if you look at my previous reviews that's saying a lot. She bears a quite striking resemblance to Scarlett Johansson facially, but she's sexier because she has a body that's built from sin. Gym toned stomach and thighs with a fantastically proportioned ass which i found myself staring and grabbing at a few times! The experience with her is very much GFE - she's a sweetheart and holds good conversation in english that flows like its with a friend you haven't seen in a while. So quite the combination of qualities.


Offline PatMacGroin

Thanks for the review, although I think you have been a member long enough to know a dew more details would make this much more useful. E.g.:
- How long was the visit, and how much did you pay?
- Were there any extra charges mentioned. (For the FK, OWO received. or CIM even if you didn't take her up on it?)

Got to wonder why she has already reprofiled on AW. Her previous profile was only a few months old: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Maybe some of the previous reviews and comments have hurt her business, so she thinks will give her a fresh start.  :unknown:

Personally it's the Scarlett Johansson comments in your title that caught my attention. I didn't see a resemblance in her old profile photo's. I can see what you are getting in a couple of these new shots. Although she looks a bit more like a Johansson that's a serious power weight lifter.

P.S. Cutting it fine on the 6 month rule with your last review of this WG posted in July. I don't believe Admin and the Mods treat it differently, just because she's using a different name and a new AW profile.
 

Offline pgma1

Wasn't aware she had re-profiled, I just thought she had changed her photos. She does look a bit different compared to the first time I saw her, curvier and perhaps might have had some work done so the update in photos would be  warranted. I have to say the first time I saw her I didn't see the Johansson comparison either- perhaps it was my having seen JoJo Rabbit and Marriage Story recently that brought the similarity into focus combined with aforementioned changes in appearance from when I first saw her.

I also wasn't aware of the 6 month rule, but that's noted. I do tend to get a bit excited after particularly good punts- which I categorise this as for her stunning looks combined with the GFE aspect- and eager to share and review. I have mentioned that I saw her for half an hour; I paid the price as advertised on her profile. There were no extras demanded for any service I partook in which as mentioned was the kissing and the OWO (I'm always quite vanilla)

Offline Bornslippy

Graffiti everywhere, daft looking lips, really not my type at all. Shame that this seems the norm nowadays. They all look the same....Going to have a generation of 30/40 year olds desperate to cling onto their looks when the reality is they will look like freaky fat chavs

Offline Limauk18

She doesnt have rimming recieving on her services, big no no for me as I like to eat girl butt and that butt looks delicious.

Offline sensualencounter

Thanks for the review, although I think you have been a member long enough to know a dew more details would make this much more useful. E.g.:
- How long was the visit, and how much did you pay?
- Were there any extra charges mentioned. (For the FK, OWO received. or CIM even if you didn't take her up on it?)

Got to wonder why she has already reprofiled on AW. Her previous profile was only a few months old: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Maybe some of the previous reviews and comments have hurt her business, so she thinks will give her a fresh start.  :unknown:

Personally it's the Scarlett Johansson comments in your title that caught my attention. I didn't see a resemblance in her old profile photo's. I can see what you are getting in a couple of these new shots. Although she looks a bit more like a Johansson that's a serious power weight lifter.

P.S. Cutting it fine on the 6 month rule with your last review of this WG posted in July. I don't believe Admin and the Mods treat it differently, just because she's using a different name and a new AW profile.

The six month rule is the latest you can review after a meet, NOT that you can only review the same escort after six months have passed. The rules say you can re-review an escort but make sure it’s not touting. Is this touting? Not sure.

As for the Scarlet Johansson resemblance, I see nothing similar whatsoever. A blown up porn star look with loads of tatts and no obvious facial resemblance at all. Each to their own though. One man’s sex doll is another’s Scarlet. :wacko:

Offline Fuzzyduck

The six month rule is the latest you can review after a meet, NOT that you can only review the same escort after six months have passed. The rules say you can re-review an escort but make sure it’s not touting. Is this touting? Not sure.

As for the Scarlet Johansson resemblance, I see nothing similar whatsoever. A blown up porn star look with loads of tatts and no obvious facial resemblance at all. Each to their own though. One man’s sex doll is another’s Scarlet. :wacko:

Personally I don't see the need to post 2 positive reviews within 6 months. Unnecessary promotion IMO or an soft way to up their review numbers. If a punter has some new information to share or just want to bleat about a punt then they can always append their original review. Of course if there has been a change of rating then a new review is not only warranted but very much appreciated.

I see why some punters might get cuntstruck and effuse gushingly in their reviews but, as you suggest, each to their own.

Offline Superjames0824

It is a pity that she increased her rate cause when I saw her in November through Diva. Her rate was 200 per hour. She was worthwhile at that point. Considering that her price goes soar, it will certainly hinder punters to see her. By the way, she has done tits, nose and lips job but I feel that only tits job earn the credit.

Offline pepsicolaboy

I see this latest aw profile you linking to is relatively new, possibly created at the same time the B&S profile I went for.

I was B&S by a profile carrying her pictures early Dec as well, when it was showing as the Romford area, Review:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=268520.0

"Summary:

Bait & Switch using pictures of Uma, although more natural pics than the ones on Divas, perhaps she had a genuine aw profile at one point or photos on another agency website  :unknown:

External Link/Members Only

Profile (now offline)
External Link/Members Only

Profile name: ByancaBaby 22yo

Phone: 07438217626"


Whether the SP I was B&S too is connected to Uma/Johanna or simply stole her photos I cant say.

Be aware

 :hi:
« Last Edit: January 16, 2020, 01:00:01 pm by pepsicolaboy »

Offline king tarzan

Graffiti everywhere, daft looking lips, really not my type at all. Shame that this seems the norm nowadays. They all look the same....Going to have a generation of 30/40 year olds desperate to cling onto their looks when the reality is they will look like freaky fat chavs

Otherwise would of been warm gulab jaman and vanilla ice cream for me 🥊👅👅👅😋😋😋😋
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline ollielon

definitely got some work done since last profile or photoshop

Offline Shadow314

Looks like breasts have been done.  Were natural when I saw her last year.
Some older pics here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=261422.0

On the Scarlett comparison didn't really think that, though below does have some similarity

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Bornslippy

yeah it's a female and blonde. end of similarities

Offline Warm-Hands

I would definitely go for anyone that looks like Scarlett Johanssen but she looks like a blow up doll that has been pumped up too hard. A miss for me.

Offline tantraman

... She bears a quite striking resemblance to Scarlett Johansson facially ...

Yes, I can see that, and thus have appended in our regional Look-a-likes thread ...

I reckon pgma1 might be on to something here ...

Johanna XxX - South Kensington, Scarlett Johansson look-alike

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

:drinks:

Offline The Film Director

Looks like breasts have been done.  Were natural when I saw her last year.
Some older pics here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=261422.0

On the Scarlett comparison didn't really think that, though below does have some similarity

Hidden Image/Members Only

I assume that's a camera effect on the hands .... otherwise  :scare: :scare:

Offline rdbnrnr

Really tempted to see her. Phoned and told me DFK is extra £50 but OWO is included in the 1 hour rate. In two minds whether to go and see her.

Offline Bornslippy

DFK extra £50??? Fill your boots....I certainly won't be bothering

Offline PatMacGroin

The six month rule is the latest you can review after a meet, NOT that you can only review the same escort after six months have passed. The rules say you can re-review an escort but make sure it’s not touting. Is this touting? Not sure.

As for the Scarlet Johansson resemblance, I see nothing similar whatsoever. A blown up porn star look with loads of tatts and no obvious facial resemblance at all. Each to their own though. One man’s sex doll is another’s Scarlet. :wacko:

I got that six month rule a bit mixed up. But still, doesn't it smell like touting to post two reviews in a row for the same WG even if they are months appart?  :unknown:

Although, there's obviously alot of interest in this WG. With strong feelings for and against.

I could definitely be tempted to cough up £200 for a WG that genuinely looked like Scarlett Johansson. But not for one that looks a bit like in her a couple of photo's... when they're taken in the right lighting... and if you squint a bit. But looks nothing like her in the many other photo's floating about. Especially as she is clearly an YMMV inconsistent provider that apparently asks extra charges for some punters, but not all.

Offline sensualencounter

I got that six month rule a bit mixed up. But still, doesn't it smell like touting to post two reviews in a row for the same WG even if they are months appart?  :unknown:

Although, there's obviously alot of interest in this WG. With strong feelings for and against.

I could definitely be tempted to cough up £200 for a WG that genuinely looked like Scarlett Johansson. But not for one that looks a bit like in her a couple of photo's... when they're taken in the right lighting... and if you squint a bit. But looks nothing like her in the many other photo's floating about. Especially as she is clearly an YMMV inconsistent provider that apparently asks extra charges for some punters, but not all.
Completely agree

Offline rdbnrnr

She's now classed herself as a "Luxury Companion" and now charges £1000 per hour  :wackogirl:

Offline mace-window

She's now classed herself as a "Luxury Companion" and now charges £1000 per hour  :wackogirl:

I know. Either she increased the price not have anymore customers due to the lockdown or she really lost her mind to think she is worth that much. 

Offline king tarzan

She's now classed herself as a "Luxury Companion" and now charges £1000 per hour  :wackogirl:

different woman
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Film Director

Whoever she is, she's lost the plot.  :wackogirl:

Offline kim88

I know. Either she increased the price not have anymore customers due to the lockdown or she really lost her mind to think she is worth that much.

I think it's the latter :crazy:

« Last Edit: June 29, 2020, 05:55:28 pm by kim88 »

Offline PatMacGroin

« Last Edit: June 29, 2020, 09:57:44 pm by PatMacGroin »

Offline king tarzan

The woman in the current profile pictures is the same woman as January. Just look at all the tattoo's.

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

looked different to me..maybe i am wrong  :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline dondraper

saw £1000 an hour and now i don’t find her attractive at all

Online NightKid

looked different to me..maybe i am wrong  :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Obviously you were wrong.  :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


Offline mace-window

She is back with new profile .. at least i think this is her ..

External Link/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Well this bitch don't see Black guys so she off my list. But hi, maybe that's "Luxury Companion" experience. To let the other white western civvie men know that you only suck white dick. 

P.S. I wonder what are the health and security risk that average Black punter have? Especially health risk with us brothers?
« Last Edit: December 22, 2020, 10:08:51 pm by mace-window »

Offline popmopcop

Well this bitch don't see Black guys so she off my list. But hi, maybe that's "Luxury Companion" experience. To let the other white western civvie men know that you only suck white dick. 

P.S. I wonder what are the health and security risk that average Black punter have? Especially health risk with us brothers?

She don't see Romanian guys either.

About "security and health risks" it is not a very good place to talk about it on the internet. I see many horrible arguments and many people get hurt and many trolls start provocation.

Better not invite this talk

Offline Shadow314

Back to a more sensible (though still high) £200 p/h.  The luxury companion gig must have not taken off.

Offline mace-window

She don't see Romanian guys either.

About "security and health risks" it is not a very good place to talk about it on the internet. I see many horrible arguments and many people get hurt and many trolls start provocation.

Better not invite this talk

The reason she don't see Romanians is because she don't want to be known as an escort in her circle (which likely contain mostly Romanian commuinity). That and likely she want to marry/date Romanian man and don't want her being an escort be know to him future sucker husband.

As for this is not a good place to talk about this topic. So when is it good place to talk about this issue when non-whiites see this BS excuses "I don't see X because of reasons" countless times?  This is place were punters can talk about punter issues freely. Unless UKP has a policy/role were race should not be discussed, I see no problem talking about this topic.

Yet a certain group of WG's think it is ok to have the same BS script for their NBA policy instead of being honest and saying "you don't like blacks" with no excuses or buts of "but am not a racist".  Even though these WG's will suck ugly non-black guy dick (can of tells you were they place blacks).

And the people who provide the horrible arguments are people defending this shit. And they are the ones who get hurt when truth is that 99% of black punters are not the type of black guy you see in rap video nor they are violet aggressive sex pests or in this case have "health risks" which I think is code word saying most blacks have STD. Which is ridiculous as she is in a line of work were sexual heath is very important to both punters and WG's regardless of race, gender or class.

Just my 2 cents as the WG's sudden policy change of "I am not racist but I don't see X" is BS. And real truth is she had one black client and had refused to see him. And importantly nothing bad happened at the meet. And now have to set that NBA policy with a BS excuses of having "to many bad experiences" instead as being honest about not liking black guys. But let be honest here if she said that, she would face backlash and WG's like her hate backlash on herself. But it's ok for her to say that most blacks are have a health and security risk.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2020, 11:32:48 pm by mace-window »

Offline g284

As for this is not a good place to talk about this topic. So when is it good place to talk about this issue when non-whiites see this BS excuses "I don't see X because of reasons" countless times?  This is place were punters can talk about punter issues freely. Unless UKP has a policy/role were race should not be discussed, I see no problem talking about this topic.

There's already one topic over here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=254589.0
« Last Edit: December 22, 2020, 11:46:04 pm by g284 »
Banned reason: Demanding threads be deleted by PM despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline mace-window

There's already one topic over here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=254589.0

Fair enough. But anyways won't go on about this topic in this thread.

Offline unus669

The reason she don't see Romanians is because she don't want to be known as an escort in her circle (which likely contain mostly Romanian commuinity). That and likely she want to marry/date Romanian man and don't want her being an escort be know to him future sucker husband.

As for this is not a good place to talk about this topic. So when is it good place to talk about this issue when non-whiites see this BS excuses "I don't see X because of reasons" countless times?  This is place were punters can talk about punter issues freely. Unless UKP has a policy/role were race should not be discussed, I see no problem talking about this topic.

Yet a certain group of WG's think it is ok to have the same BS script for their NBA policy instead of being honest and saying "you don't like blacks" with no excuses or buts of "but am not a racist".  Even though these WG's will suck ugly non-black guy dick (can of tells you were they place blacks).

And the people who provide the horrible arguments are people defending this shit. And they are the ones who get hurt when truth is that 99% of black punters are not the type of black guy you see in rap video nor they are violet aggressive sex pests or in this case have "health risks" which I think is code word saying most blacks have STD. Which is ridiculous as she is in a line of work were sexual heath is very important to both punters and WG's regardless of race, gender or class.

Just my 2 cents as the WG's sudden policy change of "I am not racist but I don't see X" is BS. And real truth is she had one black client and had refused to see him. And importantly nothing bad happened at the meet. And now have to set that NBA policy with a BS excuses of having "to many bad experiences" instead as being honest about not liking black guys. But let be honest here if she said that, she would face backlash and WG's like her hate backlash on herself. But it's ok for her to say that most blacks are have a health and security risk.

Well said :thumbsup:

Some of the NBA dross is so discriminatory, makes me chuckle when it’s defended, whatever the alleged good reason for it is.

Offline Meursault

Thanks OP. I vaguely see it however I wouldn't be very happy if I was Scarlett Johansson

Offline mace-window

Well said :thumbsup:

Some of the NBA dross is so discriminatory, makes me chuckle when it’s defended, whatever the alleged good reason for it is.

Thanks unus669  :thumbsup:. I am not going to be quite on NBA policies with BS excuses. Again I am not against all NBA policies as I rather have those certain type of WG's to have such polices rather than me turning up on the door and being refused by this racist WG due to my skin color. What is not ok is painting a large brush on all/most black or non-whites punters as dangerous thugs or aggressive sex pests with BS excesses like "having to many bad experiences" or in this case "valuing her health and security risks" in regards of black guys to not have any guilt over that decision. When the truth is most black punters aren't like that especially outside of London. I have to say, can these WG's think of something new instead of using the same old script  :D?

And I think us punters should not feel like this is ok to defend such things when someone points this BS NBA policy. End of the day own up to your racism rather than painting a large brush on a group of punters as bad people.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2020, 09:57:45 pm by mace-window »

Offline Link7

Scarlett Johansson would be gutted!  :sarcastic:

Standard looking european girl you would see in a window in Amsterdam. Bit trashy, might regret later. 15 minutes tops.

Wouldn't waste tears if she won't see you, for any reason. Not a rare find.

Offline Crackanut

I've seen her before and reviewed her. I think I left her a negative review at the time because service wasn't upto standards. The scarlett Johannsen comparison is a funny one as she seems to be the only one making it. If you close both eyes and look at her having never seen Johannsen before you might see a slight resembles.

Having said that, bending her over and fucking her in doggy with the most absolutely amazing ass and tight gym body is a moment that has been laser etched in to my memory and is one of a handful of great memories I remember from punting so that's got to be worth something.

Weirdly, I'd probably go back once it's safe and the pandemic is behind us just to have a go on that amazing body.


Offline Shadow314


Offline ollielon

Why close it...more fun to peel it off  :D

nice one  :D if i see her, definitely will be asking for that suit !

Offline Zen calm

Awesome body. I can't wait for this lockdown to be over but I know it's gonna be a while before it is and it's driving me crazy :dash: :dash:

Offline webpunter

Hope she got the spellin right  :sarcastic:

She's now classed herself as a "Luxuary Companion" and now charges £1000 per hour  :wackogirl:

Offline Tom.Punter

Well....Hope she delivers good quality. A plastic rom, full of tattoo at 200/ph.

Offline Joe Exotic

Awesome body. I can't wait for this lockdown to be over but I know it's gonna be a while before it is and it's driving me crazy :dash: :dash:

Anyone seen recently? Latest pics/vids look a bit slimmer. Ass less curvy.

Petition to re-open gyms safely for WGs.
Banned reason: Posting on 2 accounts
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Joe Exotic

Banned reason: Posting on 2 accounts
Banned by: daviemac