INCREDIBLE JOANNA XX - Northfields

[Diggler fights back!]

External Link/Members Only

Rate - £60 for 30mins at the time, rates have gone up now.

Communication
Arranged on day by phone with ease.

Location
Northfields W5 4UR. Nice flat on top floor, bed is a bit soft and bedding could be improved. A number of girls have worked from this place. I have seen another a few years back here. There are parking restrictions for short periods during the day or there’s some pay and display spots to hand.

Joanna
She is slim and has nice legs and ass. Facially not a looker, i’d score her a 4/10. Complexion not the greatest and bad stained teeth, probably a smoker. Age wise I’d say 37+ and she is being extremely ambitious if she thinks she can pass herself off as 27. Her tits are saggy once they’ve been released. Looking at the pics on the profile you’d think you’re on the way to see a hottie which isn’t the case. Her back is inked up with some sort of passage on it. She speaks good English and says she has lived in Ireland for many years. She is very welcoming and talkative which breaks the ice.

The main event
She opened the door and I felt a bit bummed as I was expecting someone younger and hotter. She was really nice so I thought I’d take a thirty min punt. She didn’t offer a shower but I’d already showered at the gym beforehand. So sorted out money, stripped and went on the bed with her. She started fk which was ok but I could have left it if I’m honest as there wasn’t that wow factor and her teeth aren’t great. Got her out of bra and panties, tits are saggy. Pussy looked ok and ass was decent. She then proceeded to nosh me off which was wet and sloppy, licked and sucked balls too. She went quite deep and not too much teeth, good tongue action. Then I instructed her to rubber up and she did, I proceeded to pound her in CG, RCG, legs pinned up and doggy, her arse looks good whilst she’s taking dick and is by far her best feature. She really got into it and was bouncing for her life when she was on top and was out of breath by the time I eventually popped. Cleaned me up and I didn’t feel rushed, all in all I was prob there for 40mins with a solid 30 of full on shagging.

Conclusion
Nice girl who provides a good service, but she isn’t a looker and I was disappointed by that as I had read a review on here that described her as pretty. I won’t visit again as she isn’t really my type but I can’t fault her service and it’s a good neutral for me. Over and out.





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Joelawerence]

Out of your 19 reviews, you have only One Positive - You seem to be a hard man to please 

[Diggler fights back!]

Out of your 19 reviews, you have only One Positive - You seem to be a hard man to please 

That might be true, but I can only give my honest opinion. I do feel a lot of the time people hand out positives when they read otherwise to me.

[PLeisure]

That might be true, but I can only give my honest opinion. I do feel a lot of the time people hand out positives when they read otherwise to me.

And please continue to do so 
Way too many on here think it’s sufficient to add their Neg comment on someone else’s Pos review, which is little help. They get asked to post an independent review and are suddenly struck mute 
The Neu and Negs are far more valuable.

[Diggler fights back!]

And please continue to do so 
Way too many on here think it’s sufficient to add their Neg comment on someone else’s Pos review, which is little help. They get asked to post an independent review and are suddenly struck mute 
The Neu and Negs are far more valuable.

Thanks for the support, I felt the other guy was being snidey, as I have experienced once before on here. I feel as though this is a site where SP’s are discussed about their performance. It shouldn’t be about judging punters if they are above board and have never displayed shady behaviour. I find there’s too many trolls at times and people who contribute nothing of any value to genuine punters.

[PatMacGroin]

Keep Em Coming Diggler. Reading why one punter was not satisfied with some aspect of the meet is usually more revealing than several positives. Especially when a WG already has all positives from 10 or more previous reviews (not that this WG is one of those).

Readers can take what they want from your review in combination those submitted by other members for the same WG. Also, a scan over your review history will show them that you don't give positives easily.

For what it's worth, checking the only two girls we have both reviewed we seemed to have given similar evaluations. Personally, I also trust your other reviews that I have read. The neutrals don't discourage me completely, just help to set realistic expectations.

[PatMacGroin]

One other thing. Every time I see this profile pop up I get reminded of a WG I reviewed a while back (I walked after being there a short while, mostly because I felt like I was getting messed about): https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190152.0

Only thing that makes me say they must be two different WG's is this photo below (which I must have captured from the gallery on this 5319406 profile before she removed it). It includes a back tattoo, the WG I saw didn't have a tattoo at the time. At least, not one that was showing in her profile photo's back then or that I can remember seeing. Of course the photo could be borrowed, or the tattoo could be recent, or I could be completely off the mark. What do you reckon Diggler?

P.S. At her age it's likely she not completely new on the scene. Does anyone recognise the back tattoo glimpsed in this gallery photo?:

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Diggler fights back!]

One other thing. Every time I see this profile pop up I get reminded of a WG I reviewed a while back (I walked after being there a short while, mostly because I felt like I was getting messed about): https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190152.0

Only thing that makes me say they must be two different WG's is this photo below (which I must have captured from the gallery on this 5319406 profile before she removed it). It includes a back tattoo, the WG I saw didn't have a tattoo at the time. At least, not one that was showing in her profile photo's back then or that I can remember seeing. Of course the photo could be borrowed, or the tattoo could be recent, or I could be completely off the mark. What do you reckon Diggler?

Hey Pat, thanks for the words of encouragement. You caught me awake as I just rolled in so good timing I guess. The pic you posted is 100% the Joanna I saw. I recognised the tatt straight away on her back. It reads like an essay and I remember trying to read it whilst banging her in doggy even though I was bouncing around like I was driving an F1 car because of the dodgy mattress. Her ass looks slightly plumper in your pic so she might have lost a little weight by the time I saw her.

[PatMacGroin]

Hey Pat, thanks for the words of encouragement. You caught me awake as I just rolled in so good timing I guess. The pic you posted is 100% the Joanna I saw. I recognised the tatt straight away on her back. It reads like an essay and I remember trying to read it whilst banging her in doggy even though I was bouncing around like I was driving an F1 car because of the dodgy mattress. Her ass looks slightly plumper in your pic so she might have lost a little weight by the time I saw her.

Do you think she could be the same WG from my old review?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190152.0

It includes several face photos.

[Diggler fights back!]

Do you think she could be the same WG from my old review?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190152.0

It includes several face photos.

I can confirm 100% that it’s not her. I do recognise the girl in those pics though. She worked in that flat by North Acton tube which I’ve seen a few girls in over the years.

[Diggler fights back!]

Joanna has a long thin nose that leans towards one side of her face also.

[PatMacGroin]

I can confirm 100% that it’s not her. I do recognise the girl in those pics though. She worked in that flat by North Acton tube which I’ve seen a few girls in over the years.

Ok. Thanks for confirming.

I wasn't confident it was her, particularly based on the fluent English comments in all the reviews. There was just something about some of the other similarities that kept making me wonder and double check her profile every time I saw it.

[Diggler fights back!]

Glad to help. I actually thought about banging the one you sent pics of but never quite vibed with the profile even though when I read it at the time it had an extensive enjoys list that included anal in an hourly rate if my memory is correct.

[The Film Director]

And please continue to do so 
Way too many on here think it’s sufficient to add their Neg comment on someone else’s Pos review, which is little help. They get asked to post an independent review and are suddenly struck mute 
The Neu and Negs are far more valuable.

+1