Author Topic: NaughtyAimy Manchester  (Read 6578 times)


75 review(s) for NaughtyAimyxxxx (72 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by OakTree]
83 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 8217549) (81 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline mikhail

I don't think any introduction is needed to this SP.  I saw her for half hour at end of November 2019.

Comms carried out by text a couple of days beforehand.  Confirmed on the day when she send over her postcode for her place in North Manchester.  Easy enough to find. Flat was clean and tidy.

A mature lady who advertises as 48yrs old with a banging body of someone in her 30s and facially quite young too.

After a quick freshen up she literally jumped on me. She really isn't for the faint hearted.  Was kind of dragged to the bed by her putting my cock in her mouth which preceded a very sloppy BJ.  I wanted to stave off the inevitable to make myself last a bit longer.  Pulled her off my cock and flipped her round to return the favour.  After some tongue with fingers and thumbs helping I swapped her back round to finish off in her mouth as her BJ felt that nice.  Finished with a tasty lip smacking conclusion for Aimy  :D

After finishing, had a brief chat about life in general.  It was all a bit of a blur and it may sound like it was rushed but I actually had a very generous half hour and would definitely return.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline OakTree


A mature lady who advertises as 48yrs old with a banging body of someone in her 30s and facially quite young too.


Did she tell you how old she actually is?

Offline McSwell

Did she tell you how old she actually is?

If he enjoyed his time with her its irrelevant.

Offline mikhail

Did she tell you how old she actually is?

She did.  Well she told me an age and I'm not too fussed if it was true or not.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 12:08:28 am by mikhail »

Offline OakTree

If he enjoyed his time with her its irrelevant.

Of course it's relevant. If she's advertising at 48 and she's mid to late fifties then that's info punters can take on board. That's the whole point of reviews. I'm baffled why the OP kept that back.

Offline mikhail

Of course it's relevant. If she's advertising at 48 and she's mid to late fifties then that's info punters can take on board. That's the whole point of reviews. I'm baffled why the OP kept that back.

If an SP looks the age they are advertised or even better/younger what difference does it make other than the fact of actually knowing?  If her appearance was much older than advertised I would have mentioned it.

Without checking, I assume you've asked this question on every review  posted where the OP hasn't posted the SP's true age/looks?

Offline McSwell

Of course it's relevant. If she's advertising at 48 and she's mid to late fifties then that's info punters can take on board. That's the whole point of reviews. I'm baffled why the OP kept that back.

The point is he enjoyed his time with her, his enjoyment doesn't alter because of her age.

All girls advertise less than their real age so any punter knows to advertise a few years on.

It's part of the game.

Offline OakTree

If an SP looks the age they are advertised or even better/younger what difference does it make other than the fact of actually knowing?  If her appearance was much older than advertised I would have mentioned it.

Without checking, I assume you've asked this question on every review  posted where the OP hasn't posted the SP's true age/looks?

No I haven't. It's just you was a little cryptic when you said she advertises her age as 48. I guessed then you were aware of her real age but chose not to disclose it.

I saw her myself years ago so I know how old she is.

As for wether it matters or not we know her real age, that's the whole point of reviews. It may not matter to some and in her case probably most but it's certainly something many would bare in mind if they were going to book her.

Offline OakTree

The point is he enjoyed his time with her, his enjoyment doesn't alter because of her age.

All girls advertise less than their real age so any punter knows to advertise a few years on.

It's part of the game.

I know it's part of the game but if you see a girl and she tells you her real age why wouldn't you put that in the review. You'd put any other discrepancy to what’s advertised and whats actually real.
For example. She says her tits are natural but I can tell you now they're false.

She says she's a non smoker but reeked like an ashtray.

She says she does OWO but it was with condom

She says she's 48 but told me she's 55

By the way I'm not attributing all those claims to the girl reviewed. It's purely for example purposes.

Offline mikhail

No I haven't. It's just you was a little cryptic when you said she advertises her age as 48. I guessed then you were aware of her real age but chose not to disclose it.

I saw her myself years ago so I know how old she is.

As for wether it matters or not we know her real age, that's the whole point of reviews. It may not matter to some and in her case probably most but it's certainly something many would bare in mind if they were going to book her.

I'd have to disagree.  Unless it was blatantly obvious that they looked much older I don't think the age thing should matter unless someone has a fetish for only seeing someone they know the true age of or Mr Droopy No Bonner comes along and ruins the fun, in that case well caveat emptor.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on this then as I'm not looking to get into an argument and it's too late in the evening.  :drinks:

Good night.

Offline McSwell

We never know any girls real age.  We read what Adultwork says then take it with a pinch of salt.

Age isn't a measure of ability, the more significant fact is that since she went Independent 5 yrs ago she has more positive reports on this board than any other girl base in the North West.


Offline lewisjones23

usual bollocks line about having a great body of a woman in her 30’s  :wacko:

if id booked and paid to see a woman in her 30’s and she had that body then i wouldnt be happy

for her age she looks ok but can we please stop the shite about her body, although it was a variation of the usual nonsense of something like “ a body of a woman half her age “

Offline chrishornx


I saw her myself years ago so I know how old she is.



if we are being pedantic you don't actually know her age - all you know is what she told you which may, or may not be true.

Offline lewisjones23

if we are being pedantic you don't actually know her age - all you know is what she told you which may, or may not be true.

it is well established that she is mid 50’s

Offline Numberone


Offline chrishornx

it is well established that she is mid 50’s

nobody is disputing  that she is over 50, are they?  Read what I said

Offline lewisjones23

nobody is disputing  that she is over 50, are they?  Read what I said

what have I disputed?

Offline chrishornx

what have I disputed?

Again I suggest you read what I said - I never said you were disputing anything

 I simply said nobody was disputing she was over 50 but her actual age is unknown

what point were you making??

Offline lewisjones23

Again I suggest you read what I said - I never said you were disputing anything

 I simply said nobody was disputing she was over 50 but her actual age is unknown

what point were you making??

what point are you making?

you say to read what you said but I’m struggling to see where abouts you think I am disputing what you have said  :unknown:

Offline OakTree

if we are being pedantic you don't actually know her age - all you know is what she told you which may, or may not be true.

Well it was a lot older than she advertised. Adding on how long ago I saw, her I make her 55. If she was lying about her age to me  then she’s even older.

But that’s not my point. I couldn’t care less how old she is. What I can’t understand is the reluctance of punters to mention what she tells them when it comes to her age.

Offline chrishornx

what point are you making?

you say to read what you said but I’m struggling to see where abouts you think I am disputing what you have said  :unknown:

Ok -the point I was making is that nobody knows for certain what age she is to which you responded saying it is a well known fact that she is in her mid 50's - again I ask what point were you making I have explained my point so only fair you explain yours
I don't think you are disputing anything and I never said I thought that you were so am puzzled why you asked me.  I clearly said nobody disputed she was mid 50's to which you replied asking 'what have I disputed'?

Where did I say you had disputed anything? If you are struggling to see whereabouts I think you are disputing what I have said then why ask the question ?

Offline chrishornx

Well it was a lot older than she advertised. Adding on how long ago I saw, her I make her 55. If she was lying about her age to me  then she’s even older.

But that’s not my point. I couldn’t care less how old she is. What I can’t understand is the reluctance of punters to mention what she tells them when it comes to her age.

so we have 4 possibly 5 different ages for her on this thread alone. When did you last see her?
« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 02:53:59 pm by chrishornx »

Offline lewisjones23

Ok -the point I was making is that nobody knows for certain what age she is to which you responded saying it is a well known fact that she is in her mid 50's - again I ask what point were you making I have explained my point so only fair you explain yours
I don't think you are disputing anything and I never said I thought that you were so am puzzled why you asked me.  I clearly said nobody disputed she was mid 50's to which you replied asking 'what have I disputed'?

Where did I say you had disputed anything? If you are struggling to see whereabouts I think you are disputing what I have said then why ask the question ?

it was you that mentioned disputing first  :unknown:

Offline chrishornx

it was you that mentioned disputing first  :unknown:

Stop deflecting the question. Yes you are correct I said nobody was disputing that she is over 50 - and we aren't, are we ?

but where did I say that you had disputed anything?

Offline lewisjones23

Stop deflecting the question. Yes you are correct I said nobody was disputing that she is over 50 - and we aren't, are we ?

but where did I say that you had disputed anything?

The way you responded implied it, the “ are they? “ part

I made a statement that it is established she is mid 50’s and you came back with that about disputing it  :hi:

I know it is hard to see others not sing the praises of your escort of the decade but it is simple facts, she is mid 50’s

« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 03:07:11 pm by lewisjones23 »

Offline chrishornx

The way you responded implied it, the “ are they? “ part

I made a statement that it is established she is mid 50’s and you came back with that about disputing it  :hi:

I know it is hard to see others not sing the praises of your escort of the decade but it is simple facts, she is mid 50’s

for christ's sake I know she is mid 50's that doesn't bother me. I was  merely asking a question not making an inference you really need to wind your neck in and stop being so sensitive

Offline lewisjones23

for christ's sake I know she is mid 50's that doesn't bother me. I was  merely asking a question not making an inference you really need to wind your neck in and stop being so sensitive

you were the one who got all antsy about it  :music:

Offline chrishornx

you were the one who got all antsy about it  :music:

where?

you are like a school kid ...'you said Dispute first',  'you got antsy first' 

Offline Moby Dick

I believe she is younger than 55, not that it matters.
Outperforms most 30years olds.

Offline chrishornx

I believe she is younger than 55, not that it matters.
Outperforms most 30years olds.

careful someone will jump all over you for comparing her to a 30 years old

Offline lewisjones23

where?

you are like a school kid ...'you said Dispute first',  'you got antsy first'

what are you like? “ wind your neck in “  :lol:

Offline chrishornx


Offline Moby Dick

it is well established that she is mid 50’s
By whom?

 :unknown:

Early fifties would be more accurate.

Edit: Not that it matters  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 05:11:36 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline McSwell

By whom?

 :unknown:

Early fifties would be more accurate.

Edit: Not that it matters  :sarcastic:

You are correct on both points.


Offline chrishornx


Offline chrishornx


Offline lewisjones23

By whom?

 :unknown:

Early fifties would be more accurate.

Edit: Not that it matters  :sarcastic:

well by her telling multiple different punters to start with  :hi:

Offline chrishornx

Well it was a lot older than she advertised. Adding on how long ago I saw, her I make her 55. If she was lying about her age to me  then she’s even older.

But that’s not my point. I couldn’t care less how old she is. What I can’t understand is the reluctance of punters to mention what she tells them when it comes to her age.

when did she say she was 55?

Offline OakTree

when did she say she was 55?

She didn't. I saw her four or so years ago and I'm sure she told me then she was 51 or 52.

Offline chrishornx

She didn't. I saw her four or so years ago and I'm sure she told me then she was 51 or 52.

my mistake I thought you said 'she told me she's 55'

Offline lewisjones23

my mistake I thought you said 'she told me she's 55'

need to read what people say more instead of getting yourself all worked up and confused about your escort of the decade  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic:

Offline chrishornx

need to read what people say more instead of getting yourself all worked up and confused about your escort of the decade  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic:

what are you suggesting ...i made a mistake?

Offline lewisjones23

what are you suggesting ...i made a mistake?

no, I don’t have to,  you already established that you did

thought that’d be obvious  :unknown:

Offline chrishornx

no, I don’t have to,  you already established that you did

thought that’d be obvious  :unknown:

my response was rather tongue in cheek actually

check response 8 on this thread where it states 'She says she's 48 but told me she's 55'

I read exactly what people were saying, it is you the needs to check properly

Offline lewisjones23

my response was rather tongue in cheek actually

check response 8 on this thread where it states 'She says she's 48 but told me she's 55'

I read exactly what people were saying, it is you the needs to check properly

why ask the question then if you’d already read the post?

Offline chrishornx

why ask the question then if you’d already read the post?

what question?


Offline lewisjones23


Offline chrishornx

“ when did she say she was 55? “

because he said he hadn't seen her for a few years yet said she said she was 55

now following that logic it would mean she was more like 59 !

that is why I asked 'when' she said it

Offline OakTree

my response was rather tongue in cheek actually

check response 8 on this thread where it states 'She says she's 48 but told me she's 55'

I read exactly what people were saying, it is you the needs to check properly

That wasn't me stating anything, it was an example of advertising versus reality. That said it would tally with what she told me.

Who cares anyway how old she is. I just cant understand why if the girl tells you her real age then why not add that into the review.

I saw Sexy madison a while back and she claims on her AW she's forty something but she told me she's mid fifties. I put that in my review.

Offline lewisjones23

That wasn't me stating anything, it was an example of advertising versus reality. That said it would tally with what she told me.

Who cares anyway how old she is. I just cant understand why if the girl tells you her real age then why not add that into the review.

I saw Sexy madison a while back and she claims on her AW she's forty something but she told me she's mid fifties. I put that in my review.

dont get any brownie points off the WG for doing that though  :hi: