Innocent Angel - Bournemouth

[funseek888]

Innocent Angel (AW InnocentAngel23) is my top GFE.  Very slim (so not for those of you into large boobs), she is great at conversation, as well as the physical side of things.  As I love spending time with her, her current 90 minute offer is ideal for me.  I have seen her at hotels she has booked for the day, one she booked just for our meeting, and a couple of times at my place.  All were super fun.  I also had one meeting with her and Holly (Miss_Holly), which I hope to repeat  in the New Year.  Most recent meeting was just a couple of weeks ago
Her pictures on AW do not really do her justice.

[Goldfinch]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[DrConners]

Just ............................ Wow 

External Link/Members Only

[anon1989]

Angel gets a poor review yesterday then today this pops up. It has a rather funny smell to it if you ask me

[funseek888]

Sorry guys, nothing funny about my smell.

I do report other things on other sites, but hadn't reported on here  much.  So I got a message telling me to report more.  I then reported on my two favourite Bournemouth ladies.

Granted I didn't go into explicit detail, but they both (Angel and Holly) have massive feedback on AW, including field reports, so not sure I could add anything new.   Just confirming that I thought they were both lovely and would happiiy see them both whenever opportunity and finance allow.

Yes, I had seen the less good report on Angel.  I ignored it as i didn't want my report to be seen as a defence of that.......but now you have raised it, I have never had any inkling of unpleasant odours with Angel, and have always got up close and personal.   Can only say what my experience has been,.....and will try to report again next time I see her......but might be a while as advance booking is usually best with Angel, and my limited opportunities don't often come with much notice

(I am hoping that the questioning of the veracity of my report does not mean that this site is flooded with false reports......if that is the case, then its value is somewhat less than it could and should be)

[southcoastpunter]

No funseeker, I don't think this site is flooded with false reports - in fact quite the opposite. However all reports have to be read as a "guide only" in my opinion. All guys are different and like different things - you only have to look at the "best tits" thread on here as an example of what I mean. Most pics put up there, I personally think are much too big and some just plain horrible. But its all personal opinion.

We also have some "keyboard warriors" on here and Dr C is a bit of one (a bit) and likes picking guys up when a review does not meet his expectations of what a review should be but in your case, he does have a point - your review did lack some of the basic details.

And maybe you can understand why Anon1989 questions a short positive review on someone who has just had a negative one from someone who has not historically contributed much. And perhaps Anon doesn't know the Bournemouth area very well and doesn't know that Innocent Angel and Miss Holly are two of this areas (generally) good english young WG's .  Maybe because his record of successes with WG's is not great, (only 6 out of 15 positives) this has clouded his judgement on others. Maybe, but its part of the ethos of this site to question others when it seems fair to question.

Anyway, keep contributing and reviewing - with a little more detail in the future please.

[funseek888]

Thank you Southcoastpunter.   Your positive message is much appreciated.

Has to be said that my experiences are less frequent and less varied than in the early days of Punternet.   But will try to contribute when appropriate.

[anon1989]

5 years a member and 2 recent reviews (very poorly written I should add) of 2 WG's who duo together is as about as suspicious as it get's. I have seen Holly 10+ times & she is an excellent punt. I guess when I compare my punts to the likes of Holly and English Rebecca, most feel sub standard as a comparison. Angel is on the H/L hence the interest in this post. But I apologise if I hit a nerve, look forward to your future contributions. 

[Shortandsensible]

I’ve only seen innocent angel once (river 11 at the time) I really liked her but never got round to seeing her again. I like the way she out where’s she’s working & when I’m her profile  :thumbsup
I remember shooting my load over her lovely arse cheeks. She has a small cute bum!

[houseboot]

5 years a member and 2 recent reviews (very poorly written I should add) of 2 WG's who duo together is as about as suspicious as it get's.

"Maybe some encouragement would be helpful"

Who said that?        You did anon1989 


"Some people must think "whats the fucking point" no wonder 80% of the people on here just loiter"

Who said that?        You did anon1989 


So show some Christmas spirit anon1989 and stop being such a t*t.

[anon1989]

Speaking of keyboard warriors............ Welcome to the thread houseboot These 2 reviews are B/S and you of all people should see that with your relentless monitoring of every comment ever made on every section.  p.s merry xmas

[southcoastpunter]

5 years a member and 2 recent reviews (very poorly written I should add) of 2 WG's who duo together is as about as suspicious as it get's. 

 These 2 reviews are B/S

Am i missing something anon1989? why is the duo "as suspicious as it gets" and why are these two reviews "B/S"? Lacking in detail is one thing but "suspicious" and "B/S" is something very different. I don't know the Op but I am trying to encourage his participation not put him off - which your allegation may do and are perhaps unfair unless you have some evidence to support your comments. If you do, then shouldn't we all know what it is?

[houseboot]

Speaking of keyboard warriors

 

I didn't attack you anon1989 .... simply pointed out the inconsistencies in your posts.

Additionally, why do you consider the OP's review of Holly b/s when he is confirming not only the other 25 Reviews of her here but also the fact you said, " I have seen Holly 10+ times & she is an excellent punt"

He said she was Positive, they said she was Positive, you said she was Positive.  How is that b/s?

Your comments are just bizarre anon1989     

And do you actually know what a keyboard warrior is?   

I, like others here, don't understand your attack on the OP.  Please explain.

You appear to be trying to be the tough guy and failing miserably.

[anon1989]

You may of had a valid point with your comment about inconsistencies, my response would of been totally different but then you end with a pathetic, petty little insult like a 4 year old. Hence "key board warrior"

Keyboard warrior (plural keyboard warriors) (informal, derogatory) A person who behaves aggressively and/or in an inflammatory manner in online text-based discussion media,

Inflammatory(especially of speech or writing) arousing or intended to arouse angry or violent feelings.

For the foreseeable future I will exercise my right to ignore any comments you aim towards me. In fact I think i will just not post anything again and loiter like most members. good day sir 

[anon1989]

Am i missing something anon1989? why is the duo "as suspicious as it gets" and why are these two reviews "B/S"? Lacking in detail is one thing but "suspicious" and "B/S" is something very different. I don't know the Op but I am trying to encourage his participation not put him off - which your allegation may do and are perhaps unfair unless you have some evidence to support your comments. If you do, then shouldn't we all know what it is?

No evidence, I just don't believe these reviews are from a genuine punter. A member for 5 years than the morning after Angel gets her first ever bad review he decides to do his first ever review...of Angel! It's common knowledge a vast majority of SP's are on here. They need to disguise themselves as member's in order to read everything. I realise now though I should of kept this opinion to myself. Or at least worded my comment's better

[HawkG]

I don’t want to join in someone else’s scrap, but I share anon’s suspicion of these. To me, they read like they were written by a woman.

[funseek888]

Didn't mean to kick up such a storm guys.  Lets not get over excited about this. 

Last time I had a shower, I did check, and was definitely sporting male bits not female ones!    I am not sure how one identifies the gender of an author, but HawkG is definitely mistaken on this occasion. 

In terms of the "coincidence" that I write a positive report on Innocent Angel on 17 December, one day after the Neutral review.   My intention was to become more active on this site.  On December 13th (3 days before the Neutral review of Angel), in response to a post on the Tuckton massage shop, i wrote a brief summary of my view of 4 Bournemouth Massage Shops (Tuckton, WeCare, Chana and Dream). That doesn't fit in with the theory that I was Holly, Angel or one of their (female) friends.

Suggest we close the debate on me and focus on what the forum is here for, to help us determine what specific ladies may be worth seeing, and which may be most suitable for our individual tastes.

I don't see a whole host of different escorts these days......although do perhaps see a slightly wider variety of massage providers.  So there is no point in my posting a lot of reviews - there is not much to add to the existing online information (here and AW) on Angel and Holly. and most providers in most of my nearby massage shops are only here for a couple of weeks, and then gone.  It is also often not a great idea to go into great detail on experiences with massage providers, as this can put them at risk either from locals if they have evidence of more than a massage being offered, or even from police or local authorities......who also probably look at this site. But I will try again, when I have information or new experiences that I think might add to the knowledge of the UKP viewers, without putting providers at risk.

Until then, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all (and that includes anon1989 and HawkG :-)  )