Author Topic: Vee_Easy in Chatham.  (Read 6942 times)


5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 4889766) (5 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline signy

Vee_Easy seen in Chatham. £200 for 1 hour incall.

External Link/Members Only  or External Link/Members Only

Booking and comms. Usual emails and texts. No issues.

Location. A small house in a residential neighbourhood in Chatham. Plenty of parking and easy to find. Straight upstairs and used the shower which was a bit weak, but usable and clean. Bedroom was similarly fine for purpose. 

Appearance. Vee is clearly the woman on her profile, which although it doesn’t have clear face photos leaves little hidden. She was smaller than I expected, but I think that was me misreading her profile as 5’3”, size 8, 32B is accurate. Pretty and bubbly.

Services. I will give a brief description, but anyone interested should read Vee’s blog; the encounters she describes are a true reflection of her services. Short roleplay to start, but this was soon forgotten and on to the action. Hand spanking, which didn’t even start to stretch Vee’s limits, real face fucking in multiple positions, firm fingering of cunt and arse, periodic kissing, rimming both ways, oral on her, protected sex and anal (the latter of which she asked for). Basically, anything I wanted with few limits.     

Overall. Vee is a genuine sub, as far as I could tell, and really seems to enjoy what she does. We chatted afterwards and whilst I was exhausted, Vee was all relaxed and had a “that was easy” attitude that suggested that I could have gone a lot further; I think I will see her again to find out. Another rather expensive punt, but if this is the experience anyone wants, then Vee delivers in spades, which to my mind is better than risking a cheaper alternative and being disappointed. Obviously, recommended.

P.S. Just noticed NoLuck's review, amazing how often a little reviewed WG suddenly gets two in a row.



Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
P.S. Just noticed NoLuck's review, amazing how often a little reviewed WG suddenly gets two in a row.

At least your review contained some actual useful information regarding her being sub ect.

His was fucking useless.

Cheers, not at those prices - Just me, but something about her profile screams 'go have a wash'

Thanks for the review  :hi:

Offline pewpewpew

something about her profile screams 'go have a wash'
Meaning what exactly? Nothing stands out to me that would suggest that she's a skank

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Meaning what exactly? Nothing stands out to me that would suggest that she's a skank

No need to get upset pew  :sarcastic:


I don't think the idea of posting pictures of you having unprotected anal sex with your boyfriend (ex or not) is a particularly good idea either.

Yes I know it happens between consensual partners but it's still the riskiest form of intercourse.  :thumbsdown:


Hidden Image/Members Only

See my point - I'm not overly squeamish - Just an opinion.

Offline workinallweek

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,560
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 33

 been trying to book her but doesnt seem to read e mails  and i lost her bloody number   :dash:
Banned reason: Offering glowing positive reviews for free bookings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fu-Qin Boi-Ling

been trying to book her but doesnt seem to read e mails  and i lost her bloody number   :dash:


Same here mate, looks like if you got her number you have a better chance of making contact.

I sent an email one month ago and she still hasnt opened it to read



Offline masons

Never understood why she blurs her face but if you click on movies her face is shown on the thumbnails

Offline Dorsetpunter

She also shows her face on her twitter profile.  :rolleyes:


Offline rockstar

I would love to see her wearing that black outfit on her profile pic ;)

Offline hockogrockle

At £200 per hour in a dump like Chatham, I don't exactly think I'll be rushing to see her. In fact, it rather explains the lack of reviews.

Offline hockogrockle

And who wrote that ridiculously o.t.t. blog? It reads like pornographic Mills and Boon. I suspect it's lifted from somewhere else. Probably an American source, to judge by the use of "gotten" instead of "got".